|
inkblot posted:"Real jobs" don't exist anymore. The true schadenfreude is on the American worker.
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2016 00:19
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 14, 2024 20:44 |
|
|
http://i.imgur.com/FKoQHch.gifv
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2016 02:17
|
|
|
At the risk of being cliche, what was his goal? Obviously not to pick up the snake, or an egg.
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2016 03:22
|
|
|
http://techraptor.net/content/digital-homicides-games-removed-steam So this company called Digital Homicide has a bunch of shovelware games on Steam. They tried (and failed) to sue a guy for $10M who had the audacity to call their garbage games garbage. They then tried to sue 100 random Steam users for $18M, subpoenaing Valve for their identities. Valve then delisted their games for being hostile to Steam users. I wonder if Valve will actually stick to their guns and keep them delisted, unlike basically every other time they've delisted a game on their own initiative, one of which included a dev threatening to kill Gaben. Videogames breed a weird loving culture.
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2016 03:30
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2016 03:41
|
|
|
Mission Accomplished? Unless they were trying to kick each other in the face or something? 
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2016 03:47
|
|
|
Avenging_Mikon posted:At the risk of being cliche, what was his goal? Obviously not to pick up the snake, or an egg. I think he was moving the snake’s body in preparation for removing the eggs. e: Yep, here’s the source. Platystemon has a new favorite as of 04:11 on Sep 17, 2016 |
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2016 03:52
|
|
|
CAPTAIN CAPSLOCK posted:Mission Accomplished? Hasn't anybody told you yet that this is how lesbians have sex?
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2016 05:01
|
|
|
BrianBoitano posted:Imgur stuff http://i.imgur.com/Kt4wejx.mp4 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=571BuZeeQjE Humphreys has a new favorite as of 05:14 on Sep 17, 2016 |
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2016 05:10
|
|
|
GrandpaPants posted:http://techraptor.net/content/digital-homicides-games-removed-steam They've actually upped the amount they're trying to sue Jim Sterling for to $15,000,000. Frankly it could go either way with Valve. While Valve is usually very happy to just roll over when they could potentially make money off a game, AFAIK this is the first time a dev has tried mass-suing their users (to the point of attempting to subpoena Valve) so they might have more of a stake in this.
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2016 05:33
|
|
|
GrandpaPants posted:I wonder if Valve will actually stick to their guns and keep them delisted, unlike basically every other time they've delisted a game on their own initiative, one of which included a dev threatening to kill Gaben. To be fair, Valve only relisted it after the game was sold for a lump sump to another publisher (that death threat guy didn’t work at).
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2016 05:44
|
|
|
GrandpaPants posted:http://techraptor.net/content/digital-homicides-games-removed-steam poo poo man I was just checking out their sweet titles and was waiting for the bundle  the schadenfreude is me. 
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2016 05:56
|
|
|
GrandpaPants posted:subpoenaing Valve for their identities I would bet 18 million dollars that this was the point of that 'lawsuit.' They're the kind of chucklefucks who would try the doxxing thing from time to time. Also 'a bunch of shovelware' really doesn't cover it with DH- they're basically the poster child for developers making GBS threads up the Greenlight service with dozens of half-made default Unity-asset-store games. The fact that they do this despite not having the temperament or PR skills to deal with even one of their games being criticised turns them from 'typical stupid Unity developer' to 'very special case of narcissistic self-destruction.'
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2016 06:21
|
|
|
Extreme scissoring
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2016 20:17
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2016 20:59
|
|
|
 
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2016 22:57
|
|
|
Avenging_Mikon posted:At the risk of being cliche, what was his goal? Obviously not to pick up the snake, or an egg. Probably moving the snake enough to count the number of eggs (a dumb move still, snakes can be very protective parents). Probably got overconfident but tbh no one should be loving with retics alone anyway, even a calm one.
|
|
#
?
Sep 18, 2016 02:05
|
|
|
 
|
|
#
?
Sep 18, 2016 03:03
|
|
|
Garrand posted:As was mentioned it's clearly just a facial mask of some kind and then when the looked at each other their brains spontaneously fell out of their ears and they decided to take make that stupid snapchat post. The thing is, it's not that their brains fell out of their ears, it's that behind closed doors white people think it's super hilarious to pretend to be black. Like, it's a thing - the joke being one's clearly hilarious, overt whiteness. White dads make 'god it feels good to be a gangsta' jokes and giggle gleefully to themselves. These dumb girls were probably sincerely shocked by this backlash, because it seems so clearly in the vein of that line of joking in white culture. If you've only spent time around white people, this kinda thing can be a slap in the face. A well-deserved one, by the way. They need a bit of rear end-kicking coal-raking to thicken their skin and learn what's-what.
|
|
#
?
Sep 18, 2016 03:46
|
|
|
In the video interview the reporter specifically asks why they added that comment and their response was "not that this is a good thing but that word just kind of happens in our friend group... Also we're a big family so that word doesn't offend anyone in our group". Classy.
|
|
#
?
Sep 18, 2016 04:06
|
|
|
Whoever posted all those court cases, like anyone here gives a damned poo poo about any of that... Just laughing my rear end off at them right now.
Drunk Nerds has a new favorite as of 04:41 on Sep 18, 2016 |
|
#
?
Sep 18, 2016 04:39
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Sep 18, 2016 04:44
|
|
|
Drunk Nerds posted:Whoever posted all those court cases, like anyone here gives a damned poo poo about any of that... Just laughing my rear end off at them right now. The effort taken was quite astounding. I wander if one person clicked a link.
|
|
#
?
Sep 18, 2016 05:08
|
|
|
First one's even better if you pretend that the van was going for the guy on the bench. Second one is already perfect because it involves red pandas. 
|
|
#
?
Sep 18, 2016 05:17
|
|
|
https://vine.co/12ab4dc4-32c6-461f-bd26-ac24f6b2a437 That dude's face right before impact  Edit so I don't double post. This doesn't feature any injuries or dumbshit people doing dumbshit things, but god drat you can just hear the mic drop at the end of this. One of the best political ownage videos I have ever seen. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-wqOApBLPio Stupid_Sexy_Flander has a new favorite as of 07:31 on Sep 18, 2016 |
|
#
?
Sep 18, 2016 06:13
|
|
|
Stupid_Sexy_Flander posted:https://vine.co/12ab4dc4-32c6-461f-bd26-ac24f6b2a437 Vine doesn't seem to work, but that is now my favorite non parody political commercial.
|
|
#
?
Sep 18, 2016 08:21
|
|
|
fuck_shit_damn.gif E: Seriously that is the best use of silence I've ever seen in a political ad. Somfin has a new favorite as of 10:28 on Sep 18, 2016 |
|
#
?
Sep 18, 2016 10:26
|
|
|
Gorilla Salad posted:Sister Fails The "Well gently caress me" leg lift at 1:49 was priceless
|
|
#
?
Sep 18, 2016 11:46
|
|
|
Is the political guy in a real warehouse or in front of a green-screen?
|
|
#
?
Sep 18, 2016 13:36
|
|
|
Inspector Gesicht posted:Is the political guy in a real warehouse or in front of a green-screen? Who cares, dude is putting a gun together while blindfolded.
|
|
#
?
Sep 18, 2016 14:04
|
|
|
Okay, now explain why that should make me want him to be a senator.
|
|
#
?
Sep 18, 2016 14:06
|
|
|
I think you'll find he's a man's man.
|
|
#
?
Sep 18, 2016 14:08
|
|
|
Malachite_Dragon posted:Okay, now explain why that should make me want him to be a senator. Because (according to the information in the ad) he wants to implement gun-control legislation, in part due to his professional experience using weapons. "I know what I'm loving talking about when I say we need background checks, guys."
|
|
#
?
Sep 18, 2016 14:10
|
|
|
Malachite_Dragon posted:Okay, now explain why that should make me want him to be a senator. It's a single issue ad: he's explaining why he supports background checks for gun purchases, while also explaining that he supports second amendment rights and demonstrating that he knows guns better than his opponent.
|
|
#
?
Sep 18, 2016 14:11
|
|
|
Then he could subtitle his loving video for deaf peeps like me  i like him already though
|
|
#
?
Sep 18, 2016 14:13
|
|
|
Somfin posted:Because (according to the information in the ad) he wants to implement gun-control legislation, in part due to his professional experience using weapons. "I know what I'm loving talking about when I say we need background checks, guys." It's not clear to me how his military experience informs him about background checks, but this isn't my home turf. (I'm in favour of background checks just intuitively, but I can't connect field-stripping to the validity of his presented position. Ooh-rah nonetheless!)
|
|
#
?
Sep 18, 2016 14:13
|
|
|
What does a military engagement in an active war zone have to do with domestic gun control though? I'm not saying the burn wasn't icy but this smacks of "As a single mother of 3, I know what it takes to balance a budget"
|
|
|
#
?
Sep 18, 2016 14:13
|
|
|
He's deflecting the criticism of his opponent, it's not that complicated. It shows that he wants background checks not because he's anti-gun or doesn't know what guns are all about, but because it's the sane thing to do. How is that confusing?
|
|
#
?
Sep 18, 2016 14:18
|
|
|
It's not confusing it's just a lovely argument. "I served in the military" is not a trump card (this wicked line works on two levels just fyi)
Sulla Faex has a new favorite as of 14:24 on Sep 18, 2016 |
|
|
#
?
Sep 18, 2016 14:20
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 14, 2024 20:44 |
|
|
Sulla-Marius 88 posted:What does a military engagement in an active war zone have to do with domestic gun control though? I'm not saying the burn wasn't icy but this smacks of "As a single mother of 3, I know what it takes to balance a budget" He needs to convince the dummies, not you.
|
|
#
?
Sep 18, 2016 14:22
|
|
