|
catlord posted:I remember enjoying the Spawn movie, but I also remember being disappointed that he only had the cape in a couple scenes. I remember being disappointed that he didn't even has his mask on very much.
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2016 20:03
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 18, 2024 21:02 |
|
|
Lobok posted:I remember being disappointed that he didn't even has his mask on very much. Well they need to show off the movie-star good looks of old hamburgerface. 
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2016 20:15
|
|
|
If they had Michael Jai White reprise his role as Spawn I'd be there day one.
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2016 20:17
|
|
|
I wonder how they sold spawn to Martin sheen to get him to do that movie
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2016 20:19
|
|
|
site posted:I wonder how they sold spawn to Martin sheen to get him to do that movie Secretly replacing him with Joe Estevez.
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2016 20:30
|
|
|
Endless Mike posted:Well they need to show off the movie-star good looks of old hamburgerface. This is how Deadpool should have looked unmasked.
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2016 20:32
|
|
|
site posted:I wonder how they sold spawn to Martin sheen to get him to do that movie I remember reading something about his grandkids being fans of the comics and them convincing him to do it. I figure there was also a truckload of coke involved. catlord posted:I remember enjoying the Spawn movie, but I also remember being disappointed that he only had the cape in a couple scenes. I absolutely love Todd McFarlane's insane, nonsensical capes, and I know it would have blown the budget out to keep it, but why bother if you can't? They probably blew their cgi budget on the few scenes with the cape. I liked the cartoon enough but felt that it sometimes tried too hard to be edgy, just like the comics.
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2016 21:13
|
|
|
teagone posted:I cut a modern trailer together for the Spawn movie. It's a film forever ingrained in my childhood. You're on cinemablend. Do you know someone there or is someone in this thread working there?
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2016 22:03
|
|
|
Sometimes things catch on. It's how viral videos work. It's neat and the best way for things to get exposure.
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2016 22:06
|
|
|
When I met Martin Sheen I told him my favorite movie of his was Spawn and he laughed.
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2016 22:24
|
|
|
So according to behind the scene's stuff for Civil War they replaced every scene with Black Panther in the suit with CG.
|
|
#
?
Sep 20, 2016 00:18
|
|
|
muscles like this? posted:So according to behind the scene's stuff for Civil War they replaced every scene with Black Panther in the suit with CG. They pulled a Bojack Horseman on him.
|
|
#
?
Sep 20, 2016 00:21
|
|
|
muscles like this? posted:So according to behind the scene's stuff for Civil War they replaced every scene with Black Panther in the suit with CG. That's really weird. So Boseman barely had any screen time if you factor that in.
|
|
#
?
Sep 20, 2016 00:21
|
|
|
muscles like this? posted:So according to behind the scene's stuff for Civil War they replaced every scene with Black Panther in the suit with CG. Was it not supposed to be? I thought it was always intended that way like they do with spiderman
|
|
#
?
Sep 20, 2016 00:24
|
|
|
It's not like RDJ is in a plastic Iron Man suit suspended by wires all the time, so I don't get what the big deal is.
|
|
#
?
Sep 20, 2016 00:26
|
|
|
Rhyno posted:That's really weird. So Boseman barely had any screen time if you factor that in. Apparently it was kind of like how they did it for the Robocop reboot where he (and stunt men) wore a version of the suit, they just replaced it in post.
|
|
#
?
Sep 20, 2016 00:27
|
|
|
Wasn't there a directors cut of Spawn that had basically no differences from the normal version?
|
|
#
?
Sep 20, 2016 00:30
|
|
|
Rubiks Pubes posted:Wasn't there a directors cut of Spawn that had basically no differences from the normal version? I assume there was some difference, the theatrical version was PG-13 and the director's cut was R, but what exactly that means I don't know.
|
|
#
?
Sep 20, 2016 00:44
|
|
|
muscles like this? posted:Apparently it was kind of like how they did it for the Robocop reboot where he (and stunt men) wore a version of the suit, they just replaced it in post. Okay that makes way more sense.
|
|
#
?
Sep 20, 2016 00:45
|
|
|
catlord posted:I assume there was some difference, the theatrical version was PG-13 and the director's cut was R, but what exactly that means I don't know. More Clown jokes and Simmons' death was longer.
|
|
#
?
Sep 20, 2016 00:45
|
|
|
catlord posted:I assume there was some difference, the theatrical version was PG-13 and the director's cut was R, but what exactly that means I don't know. It was the 90s so I'd guess a 5 second longer death scene and boobies? ^^^ eh half right
|
|
#
?
Sep 20, 2016 00:46
|
|
|
About 2 minutes longer, actually!
|
|
#
?
Sep 20, 2016 00:53
|
|
|
ButtWolf posted:You're on cinemablend. Do you know someone there or is someone in this thread working there? Nope! I don't know anyone anywhere. I posted my trailer on my twitter though, and tagged the tweet with Todd McFarlane, John Leguizamo, Michael Jai White, and a couple other accounts like Moviepilot, since I write for them occasionally, and also sites like Comicbook.com and SuperHeroHype. I think it was Comicbook.com that was the first site to do a writeup featuring my trailer; then it all just started to snowball I guess. This same kind of viral exposure happened with my Last Starfighter modern trailer too. I worked hard to get the cut done before the Todd McFarlane episode on AMC's Geeking Out talk show this past Sunday. My learning of him being featured on the show is actually what prompted me to set aside some time this past Friday/Saturday to cut a modern trailer together. The relevance of McFarlane on the show probably helped give sites incentive to feature my trailer since he talked about the Spawn reboot (again). [edit] I also sent a tweet to RedLetterMedia with my Spawn trailer asking them to do a re:View of Spawn, haha. Hope they do it/see my trailer 
teagone fucked around with this message at 09:44 on Sep 20, 2016 |
|
#
?
Sep 20, 2016 09:18
|
|
|
Lobok posted:I remember being disappointed that he didn't even has his mask on very much. I felt this way about Amazing Spider-Man which sucked, because the addition of webshooters had all of my friends telling me how this would be better because it was more accurate to the comics.
|
|
#
?
Sep 20, 2016 18:57
|
|
|
THere was a video on my suggested viewing on YT that said "Who should direct the Teen Titans movie?" and showed Burton and Whedon. Because nerds cannot look outside the poo poo they love for any kind of creators.
|
|
#
?
Sep 20, 2016 19:06
|
|
|
twistedmentat posted:THere was a video on my suggested viewing on YT that said "Who should direct the Teen Titans movie?" and showed Burton and Whedon. Because nerds cannot look outside the poo poo they love for any kind of creators. Nerd media is incestuous low effort bullshit.
|
|
#
?
Sep 20, 2016 19:07
|
|
|
twistedmentat posted:THere was a video on my suggested viewing on YT that said "Who should direct the Teen Titans movie?" and showed Burton and Whedon. Because nerds cannot look outside the poo poo they love for any kind of creators. Whedon I'm not surprised by, but Burton? Will Johnny Depp and Helena Bonham Carter be playing Robin and Starfire?  I enjoy most of the Whedon stuff I've seen but I don't think I'll ever understand the level of veneration he seems to get compared to guys like, say, J. J. Abrams or Steven Moffat. The one I'll always remember was when I was in university and we had a class about feminism, and our pre-class task was to choose an image which we felt represented feminism, write a paragraph explaining why and post it on the module worksite, and one of my esteemed classmates put up a photograph of Joss Whedon. I'm not saying he can't be what you picture when someone asks you to think about what feminism is, but it's still a bit 
|
|
#
?
Sep 20, 2016 19:11
|
|
|
It's because of Buffy.
|
|
#
?
Sep 20, 2016 19:17
|
|
|
Electromax posted:It's because of Buffy. You mean Firefly. Nerds loooove Firefly because they think its cool, and not nerdy, but its nerdy at the same time. It's weird.
|
|
#
?
Sep 20, 2016 19:36
|
|
|
I want Fede Alverez's Teen Titans.
|
|
#
?
Sep 20, 2016 19:49
|
|
|
Firefly should never have been canceled so people could realize how mediocre and cliche it is. Instead Fox made a martyr of it, the fools.
|
|
#
?
Sep 20, 2016 19:49
|
|
|
Which forum did you read that on? (Just kidding I know it's this one.)
|
|
#
?
Sep 20, 2016 19:50
|
|
|
Firefly could've been great had it continued and grew organically. And if that happened the first season would've most likely have been "The worst one." I like Serenity better though.
|
|
#
?
Sep 20, 2016 20:06
|
|
|
CelticPredator posted:Firefly could've been great had it continued and grew organically. And if that happened the first season would've most likely have been "The worst one." I fell in love hard with the pilot but every subsequent episode left me in disappointed tears. Really, the hype I could resist, but that pilot was so loving good and couldn't possibly prepare me for the rest of the season being two dimensional bullshit.
|
|
#
?
Sep 20, 2016 20:09
|
|
|
Just when will your prescription for bad opinions expire
|
|
#
?
Sep 20, 2016 20:30
|
|
|
twistedmentat posted:You mean Firefly. Nerds loooove Firefly because they think its cool, and not nerdy, but its nerdy at the same time. It's weird. I guess I was just responding to the 'feminist' part of that post, not veneration more broadly.
|
|
#
?
Sep 20, 2016 20:50
|
|
|
The Train Job was a better pilot episode. Fox was totally right.
|
|
#
?
Sep 20, 2016 21:05
|
|
|
I'm rewatching Civil War and the part where they over explain Spider-Man's goggles bugs me. Was that the result of them working backwards from "we want his eyes to be animated" to "his eyepieces need to be some kind of tech for them to move" to "gadget eyepieces are needed because he needs them to help him focus"?
|
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2016 04:06
|
|
|
What do they say about the goggles? I just remember Tony asking him how he sees out of them or whatever. I think it's mostly to just cover for the fact that Spider-Man's mask, as usually depicted, would be terrible to see out. Making them mechanical kills that bird, with the added bonus of letting his eyes change shape. Or you're right, and it's the other way around. Works for me either way. Going to watch the movie again, so I can see it in action again.
|
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2016 06:08
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 18, 2024 21:02 |
|
|
Lobok posted:I'm rewatching Civil War and the part where they over explain Spider-Man's goggles bugs me. Was that the result of them working backwards from "we want his eyes to be animated" to "his eyepieces need to be some kind of tech for them to move" to "gadget eyepieces are needed because he needs them to help him focus"? It's like two lines of dialogue, maybe three tops.
|
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2016 06:24
|
|