|
H.P. Hovercraft posted:i will vote for every single gun restriction until they repeal the second amendment
|
# ? Sep 20, 2016 06:33 |
|
|
# ? Jun 5, 2024 15:29 |
|
ComradeCosmobot posted:Speaking of which, I recently read that Sunnyvale's no-smoking-in-multi-family-dwellings (apartments, condos, etc.) ordinance is due to take effect on October 1. The ordinance applies equally to all forms of smoking including not only tobacco but also marijuana and e-cigs. sounds like belmont's law?
|
# ? Sep 20, 2016 06:57 |
|
My beef with Prop 63, is how do they plan to enforce that all ammo purchases are in state. You would give law enforcement probable cause to search any car they want coming into California. Love or Hate guns it's a problem. Big K of Justice fucked around with this message at 07:02 on Sep 20, 2016 |
# ? Sep 20, 2016 07:00 |
|
Big K of Justice posted:My beef with Prop 63, is how do they plan to enforce that all ammo purchases are in state. I mean I usually get waved through the ag inspections, but not always
|
# ? Sep 20, 2016 07:09 |
|
The NY Times has an email newsletter, California Today, if anyone is interested: http://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/20/us/california-today-air-pollution-fossil-fuels.html?_r=0
|
# ? Sep 20, 2016 15:54 |
|
A White Guy posted:Exactly. "Won't someone think of the poor cigarette smokers " is a dumb argument. Cigarettes are exceedingly addictive, they make everything smell like poo poo, significantly shorten your lifespan, and have the bonus side effect of giving cancer to everyone who's unfortunate enough to live with a smoker. So, yes, actually punishing people for smoking is fine with me, even if the people who suffer most are those who are the poorest. Cool. Let's tax the mother loving poo poo out of fast food next!
|
# ? Sep 20, 2016 16:51 |
|
If prop 56 did anything but give more money to people who don't need it I'd vote for it.
|
# ? Sep 20, 2016 16:52 |
|
Good lord is 63 dumb, what on earth is it with liberals and gun control legislation that accomplishes nothing. Oh right, pandering to low info morons.coupbrick posted:Cool. Let's tax the mother loving poo poo out of fast food next!
|
# ? Sep 20, 2016 16:56 |
|
coupbrick posted:Cool. Let's tax the mother loving poo poo out of fast food next! Regulating portion size would probably be better since the issues with fast food (soda aside) is quantity, not quality.
|
# ? Sep 20, 2016 16:58 |
|
tsa posted:Good lord is 63 dumb, what on earth is it with liberals and gun control legislation that accomplishes nothing. Oh right, pandering to low info morons. I'm voting for it to spite you.
|
# ? Sep 20, 2016 16:58 |
|
coupbrick posted:Cool. Let's tax the mother loving poo poo out of fast food next! As long as In-N-Out is upgraded to regular restaurant status.
|
# ? Sep 20, 2016 17:05 |
|
Hitlers Gay Secret posted:As long as In-N-Out is upgraded to regular restaurant status. No. That's not how this works. You get to pay another $4 per meal with no added benefit to you. And there will be pictures of fat people, open heart surgeries, lap band procedures, and Burger King bathrooms on the cups and wrappers.
|
# ? Sep 20, 2016 17:18 |
|
tsa posted:Good lord is 63 dumb, what on earth is it with liberals and gun control legislation that accomplishes nothing. Oh right, pandering to low info morons.
|
# ? Sep 20, 2016 17:40 |
|
|
# ? Sep 20, 2016 17:47 |
|
Hitlers Gay Secret posted:As long as In-N-Out is upgraded to regular restaurant status. In-N-Out is overrated
|
# ? Sep 20, 2016 17:48 |
|
the only way you can get them to make their fries even halfway decent is to order them "light well"
|
# ? Sep 20, 2016 17:56 |
|
I like em well done
|
# ? Sep 20, 2016 18:01 |
|
For fast food, Inn-n-out is good, but any local mom n pop burger shop will blow it out of the water.coupbrick posted:Cool. Let's tax the mother loving poo poo out of fast food next!
|
# ? Sep 20, 2016 18:03 |
|
In-n-Out is McDonald's for people who can't get by on 250k a year.
|
# ? Sep 20, 2016 18:04 |
|
i might care more for In-n-Out if every single one in LA county wasnt, without fail, jammed to capacity like the last helicopter out of Saigon from start of business to closing every single day
|
# ? Sep 20, 2016 18:05 |
|
H.P. Hovercraft posted:the only way you can get them to make their fries even halfway decent is to order them "light well" Who is going to In N Out for the fries though, really?
|
# ? Sep 20, 2016 18:19 |
|
fits my needs posted:Who is going to In N Out for the fries though, really? Depends if you count animal-style fries.
|
# ? Sep 20, 2016 18:38 |
|
paranoid randroid posted:i might care more for In-n-Out if every single one in LA county wasnt, without fail, jammed to capacity like the last helicopter out of Saigon from start of business to closing every single day I wish this was less true
|
# ? Sep 20, 2016 18:45 |
|
anyone got any thoughts about the development freeze measure coming up on the ballot in LA? at first blush it sounds massively counterproductive to me.
|
# ? Sep 20, 2016 18:47 |
|
paranoid randroid posted:i might care more for In-n-Out if every single one in LA county wasnt, without fail, jammed to capacity like the last helicopter out of Saigon from start of business to closing every single day One thing nice about their drive thru is a guy with a tablet taking everybody's orders so the line isn't held up by people that can't make up their mind. Having a comparatively simple menu probably helps.
|
# ? Sep 20, 2016 18:52 |
|
SlimGoodbody posted:I wish this was less true This is why you should just go to twoheys instead
|
# ? Sep 20, 2016 19:12 |
|
paranoid randroid posted:anyone got any thoughts about the development freeze measure coming up on the ballot in LA? at first blush it sounds massively counterproductive to me. NIMBYists gonna NIMBY. FYGMers gonna FYGM.
|
# ? Sep 20, 2016 19:16 |
|
Five Guys is better than In-N-Out
|
# ? Sep 20, 2016 19:18 |
|
Sydin posted:Five Guys is better than In-N-Out
|
# ? Sep 20, 2016 19:22 |
|
Sydin posted:Five Guys is better than In-N-Out you know i'm in the mood for in-n-out but i want a larger crappier and more expensive burger and a huge bag of even shittier fries
|
# ? Sep 20, 2016 19:31 |
|
Five Guys is totally better if the metric you're measuring is "is this burger better at not being very good"
|
# ? Sep 20, 2016 19:51 |
|
I enjoy animal style fries but have no illusions that I'm eating a slurry of thousand island dressing, American cheese, grilled onions and the mashed potato remnants of their soggy French fries.
|
# ? Sep 20, 2016 19:58 |
|
Panfilo posted:I enjoy animal style fries but have no illusions that I'm eating a slurry of thousand island dressing, American cheese, grilled onions and the mashed potato remnants of their soggy French fries. It is the tits for sure.
|
# ? Sep 20, 2016 20:16 |
|
Honestly I've always felt In n' Out fries were pretty sub-par on their own; burgers? ok; shakes? pretty good I just go to local places if I want that stuff
|
# ? Sep 20, 2016 20:58 |
|
paranoid randroid posted:i might care more for In-n-Out if every single one in LA county wasnt, without fail, jammed to capacity like the last helicopter out of Saigon from start of business to closing every single day I feel the same way, I mean it's good but gently caress waiting that long for a burger.
|
# ? Sep 20, 2016 22:27 |
|
lancemantis posted:Honestly I've always felt In n' Out fries were pretty sub-par on their own; burgers? ok; shakes? pretty good Their fries dry out in minutes and they are terrible if you don't get animal style.
|
# ? Sep 20, 2016 22:28 |
|
revolther posted:In-n-Out is McDonald's for people who can't get by on 250k a year. lol In-N-Out is cheaper than McDonalds now.
|
# ? Sep 20, 2016 22:51 |
|
H.P. Hovercraft posted:you know i'm in the mood for in-n-out but i want a larger crappier and more expensive burger and a huge bag of even shittier fries See this goon gets it.
|
# ? Sep 20, 2016 23:10 |
|
So, to get this thread off fast food chat, Kamala Harris vs Loretta Sanchez? Both of them strike me as grey sunken cunts, but who's more cuntier? Inform me, fat goons. (USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)
|
# ? Sep 20, 2016 23:38 |
|
|
# ? Jun 5, 2024 15:29 |
|
A White Guy posted:So, to get this thread off fast food chat, Kamala Harris vs Loretta Sanchez? Both of them strike me as grey sunken cunts, but who's more cuntier? Inform me, fat goons. Kamala Harris is actually pretty decent and Loretta Sanchez has said/done some really loving racist poo poo.
|
# ? Sep 20, 2016 23:39 |