Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Morroque
Mar 6, 2013
Being from the general region Moore is also from, I can sort of see where he's coming from. This is an area that has been completely totally screwed by NAFTA and globalization. He was seen to be nominally left-wing mostly due to how the anti-globalization movement was also seen to be a left-wing phenomenon, and also because his earliest work was about labour issues. But anti-globalization is now a thing that Trump has under his policy set, given the new name of "anti-globalism" with a fresh coat of anti-semitic paint. It's entirely possible that all of the rust belt areas he has contact with are either pro-Trump or still anti-Clinton, especially because the labour side of the Democratic Party seems to still be no longer actually there.

That's my guess as to why it probably seems like Trump is doing so well from Moore's vantage.

Morroque fucked around with this message at 00:27 on Sep 28, 2016

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

STAC Goat
Mar 12, 2008

Watching you sleep.

Butt first, let's
check the feeds.

Deptfordx posted:

Just saw this from Fox.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ihO5KootGjY

Even the two men can't help but cringe and look uncomfortably at their shoes when they hear Trump going after her.

This is going to be Kazir Khan all over again. The man just can't stop himself from doubling down, no matter how stupid a fight it is to get into.

Yeah, CNN and MSNBC have been playing this all day. Its so clear the three Fox News people are uncomfortable and saying to themselves "what the gently caress is he doing?" as he just goes on about how fat that lady was and that's why he called her names. Because after all, she's no Mother Theresa.

Donald Trump is a sick, damaged man and no one can get it through to him very basic lessons you teach children.

Goatse James Bond
Mar 28, 2010

If you see me posting please remind me that I have Charlie Work in the reports forum to do instead

HootTheOwl posted:

My parents will never know I'm bi, if only because my marriage to a catholic will estrange them before I can kill them.

I'm reminded of a Reformation-set joke where a boy is caught banging another boy and his parents are enraged because the second guy is a goddamn Protestant. :v:

Tender Bender
Sep 17, 2004

He doesn't seem stable enough to be doing this deliberately but his offensive rants are still a good smokescreen to keep people from talking about his insane ignorance and lack of coherence on every single policy issue. His base just says "yeah he's an rear end in a top hat but he's gonna get things done."

computer parts
Nov 18, 2010

PLEASE CLAP

Tender Bender posted:

He doesn't seem stable enough to be doing this deliberately but his offensive rants are still a good smokescreen to keep people from talking about his insane ignorance and lack of coherence on every single policy issue. His base just says "yeah he's an rear end in a top hat but he's gonna get things done."

Pretty much every news source is saying how he looks incoherent though.

beatlegs
Mar 11, 2001

Tender Bender posted:

He doesn't seem stable enough to be doing this deliberately but his offensive rants are still a good smokescreen to keep people from talking about his insane ignorance and lack of coherence on every single policy issue. His base just says "yeah he's an rear end in a top hat but he's gonna get things done."

"Things" = returning power to white America. They love him because he's an rear end in a top hat.

Mr Ice Cream Glove
Apr 22, 2007

STAC Goat posted:

Yeah, CNN and MSNBC have been playing this all day. Its so clear the three Fox News people are uncomfortable and saying to themselves "what the gently caress is he doing?" as he just goes on about how fat that lady was and that's why he called her names. Because after all, she's no Mother Theresa.

Donald Trump is a sick, damaged man and no one can get it through to him very basic lessons you teach children.

This is one of the most brutal ads so far.

https://twitter.com/hillaryclinton/status/780768433910710272

https://twitter.com/hillary_esp/status/780772666357719040

Chimera-gui
Mar 20, 2014
And of course O'Reilly is flailing and failing to cover for Trump's tax dodging.

Goatman Sacks
Apr 4, 2011

by FactsAreUseless

Chimera-gui posted:

And of course O'Reilly is flailing and failing to cover for Trump's tax dodging.

I like how he thought WCBS being located in Manhattan meant that their online poll skewing in favor of Trump was more meaningful.

Spacedad
Sep 11, 2001

We go play orbital catch around the curvature of the earth, son.
Well the honeymoon's over.

https://www.salon.com/2016/09/27/pepes-post-debate-identity-crisis-4chan-ditches-donald-trump-after-his-presidential-debate-fiasco/

quote:

Pepe’s post-debate identity crisis: Online alt-right turns on Donald Trump after his presidential debate fiasco

Despite finding Donald Trump’s performance unsatisfactory, 4chan and Reddit users, according to various news reports banded together late on Monday night to manipulate an estimated 70 online polls to make it seem as if the Republican presidential nominee had won the first presidential debate at Hofstra University.

As one user correctly noted on message board 4chan, “/pol/ has enough manpower to change the outcome of a poll with 1.3 million votes,” referring to the site’s politics-focused thread.

Another user tried to put a better spin on Trump’s excuse for alleging stiffing contractors (“Maybe he didn’t do a good job and I was unsatisfied with his work”) by offering up: “As an alpha [Trump] has no problem with asserting his will. You beta cucks wouldnt understand because when the waiter brings you the wrong order you are too busy shoe gazing at your cell phones to dispute in front of your step-sons mom.”

“Trump won,” another 4chan user wrote, alluding to the mainstream media: “MSM in denial but the numbers don’t lie.”

By Tuesday morning, however, anonymous 4chan users awoke to a combination of debate hangover and identity crisis. The Daily Beast pinpointed the alt-right’s tidal shift to Trump’s suggestion that the Democratic National Committee hack might have been perpetrated by “someone sitting on their bed that weighs 400 pounds.” In a quick phrase, Trump had insulted the hackers and denizens of the internet. Some users felt the need to pivot.

“If you vote for either candidate,” one 4chan user declared, “you are a traitor cuck who deserves to have their god-given rights taken from them.”

“How does /pol/ feel now that the election is over?” a self-aware 4chan user asked for us. “I suppose you’ll have to go back to your lovely, miserable life now the Drumpf’s campaign has totally derailed.”

“The very reason we’re hearing all this post-debate discussion of biased moderators and microphones not working is spin for the Trump loss,” another 4chan conceded.

Perhaps the most noteworthy admission came from a 4chan user who openly acknowledged the big scary alt-right’s satirical (and inflammatory) edge: “CTR shills still not realising that pol is a board of satire and our only mission is to meme the retarded manchild to the white house for the lulz.”

So now we know.

For me now it's just a question of if this will be the beginning of the end for the alt-rights 'rise' this election cycle. They rode on the back of trump in all this. Abandoning their only real avenue into mainstream attention - outside of incidents of large-scale organized harassment of their political enemies - seems like the quickest way possible to be pushed back to the fringes where they really should have stayed in the first place.

Funny, it took them this long to figure out that Trump is an incompetent shithead who won't be able to stand up to Hillary.

Dapper_Swindler
Feb 14, 2012

Im glad my instant dislike in you has been validated again and again.

Spacedad posted:

Well the honeymoon's over.

https://www.salon.com/2016/09/27/pepes-post-debate-identity-crisis-4chan-ditches-donald-trump-after-his-presidential-debate-fiasco/


For me now it's just a question of if this will be the beginning of the end for the alt-rights 'rise' this election cycle. They rode on the back of trump in all this. Abandoning their only real avenue into mainstream attention - outside of incidents of large-scale organized harassment of their political enemies - seems like the quickest way possible to be pushed back to the fringes where they really should have stayed in the first place.

Funny, it took them this long to figure out that Trump is an incompetent shithead who won't be able to stand up to Hillary.

I have never been a big fan of salon(old salon is cool, new salon is loving awful) but this is decent article and they might be right. I think the alt-right saw trump gently caress up and gently caress up bad, all he did was flail about and act like a child, he proved himself to be "poo poo" so now they will probaly move on to someone else at least for now. I think a decent amount though will support him still at least for image sake.

PhazonLink
Jul 17, 2010

quote:

a self-aware

Nope. That's a satire article. Terrible parts of the internet aren't introspective.

BornAPoorBlkChild
Sep 24, 2012

Spacedad posted:

For me now it's just a question of if this will be the beginning of the end for the alt-rights 'rise' this election cycle.

I do not want this to be the end of the Alt-Right's rise

I want Racial Realism to hit the mainstream

I want White Nationalism to hit the mainstream.

I want Men's Rights Activism/Men Going Their Own Way to hit the mainstream.

I want all types of toxic poo poo to the hit the mainstream.

I want to wake up morning, and see Steve Sailer, Peter Brimelow, John Debyshire, Taki Theodoracopulos, and Jared Taylor on my TV screen

I want the world to see them. To learn from them as an example.

I'm sick of this poo poo.

BornAPoorBlkChild fucked around with this message at 03:39 on Sep 28, 2016

Mr Ice Cream Glove
Apr 22, 2007

https://twitter.com/deadspin/status/780736705716453380

BornAPoorBlkChild
Sep 24, 2012

stormfront doesnt count because its considered a joke even in Alt-Right circles

Rick_Hunter
Jan 5, 2004

My guys are still fighting the hard fight!
(weapons, shields and drones are still online!)
At least they realize that every month is white history month.

beatlegs
Mar 11, 2001

Race Realists posted:

I do not want this to be the end of the Alt-Right's rise

I want Racial Realism to hit the mainstream

I want White Nationalism to hit the mainstream.

I want Men's Rights Activism/Men Going Their Own Way to hit the mainstream.

I want all types of toxic poo poo to the hit the mainstream.

I want to wake up morning, and see Steve Sailer, Peter Brimelow, John Debyshire, Taki Theodoracopulos, and Jared Taylor on my TV screen

I want the world to see them. To learn from them as an example.

I'm sick of this poo poo.

Have Americans learned anything from the awfulness of Trump? He has the support of 40% of voters over a year into the campaign. Terrible people will always exist as long as they are provided a self-legitimizing bubble to live in.

computer parts
Nov 18, 2010

PLEASE CLAP

beatlegs posted:

Have Americans learned anything from the awfulness of Trump? He has the support of 40% of voters over a year into the campaign.

So a historically low amount.

A Fancy 400 lbs
Jul 24, 2008

computer parts posted:

So a historically low amount.

The fact that 40% is historically low is the problem.

computer parts
Nov 18, 2010

PLEASE CLAP

A Fancy 400 lbs posted:

The fact that 40% is historically low is the problem.

Not really, especially since it's not like these are all "keeping our powder dry" prepper types.

computer parts fucked around with this message at 04:16 on Sep 28, 2016

Night10194
Feb 13, 2012

We'll start,
like many good things,
with a bear.

If he actually ends the election with only 40% of the vote it will be a massive landslide and we can all dance in joy.

BornAPoorBlkChild
Sep 24, 2012
https://twitter.com/TIME/status/780907391932108800

MizPiz
May 29, 2013

by Athanatos

Spacedad posted:

Well the honeymoon's over.

https://www.salon.com/2016/09/27/pepes-post-debate-identity-crisis-4chan-ditches-donald-trump-after-his-presidential-debate-fiasco/


For me now it's just a question of if this will be the beginning of the end for the alt-rights 'rise' this election cycle. They rode on the back of trump in all this. Abandoning their only real avenue into mainstream attention - outside of incidents of large-scale organized harassment of their political enemies - seems like the quickest way possible to be pushed back to the fringes where they really should have stayed in the first place.

Funny, it took them this long to figure out that Trump is an incompetent shithead who won't be able to stand up to Hillary.

You're right, this will be the last we'll ever see of them.

Race Realists posted:

I do not want this to be the end of the Alt-Right's rise

I want Racial Realism to hit the mainstream

I want White Nationalism to hit the mainstream.

I want Men's Rights Activism/Men Going Their Own Way to hit the mainstream.

I want all types of toxic poo poo to the hit the mainstream.

I want to wake up morning, and see Steve Sailer, Peter Brimelow, John Debyshire, Taki Theodoracopulos, and Jared Taylor on my TV screen

I want the world to see them. To learn from them as an example.

I'm sick of this poo poo.

I'm down.

Ivan Shitskin
Nov 29, 2002

I flipped around right wing radio while driving today. Michael Savage was freaking out about the moderator the whole time, calling him "Lester Dolt" and a card-carrying member of the "Democrat Islamist Machine."

He also went on for a long time about trigger words. About how Lester Dolt and Hillary were both strategically using trigger words in order to trigger Trump and set him off, so it totally wasn't Trump's fault.

The fallout from the debate has been loving hilarious all day. :allears:

Night10194
Feb 13, 2012

We'll start,
like many good things,
with a bear.

Kenzie posted:

I flipped around right wing radio while driving today. Michael Savage was freaking out about the moderator the whole time, calling him "Lester Dolt" and a card-carrying member of the "Democrat Islamist Machine."

He also went on for a long time about trigger words. About how Lester Dolt and Hillary were both strategically using trigger words in order to trigger Trump and set him off, so it totally wasn't Trump's fault.

The fallout from the debate has been loving hilarious all day. :allears:

The way they're all bitching is the surest sign he got creamed.

kik2dagroin
Mar 23, 2007

Use the anger. Use it.
I only caught the first hour of Limbaugh, but he was in full damage control mode pretty much the entire show from the look of his front page.

quote:

RUSH: Trump got beat up for this last night, for having the sniffles. He didn't have the sniffles last night. Because I am a highly trained broadcast specialist who understands the technology here. That's how Trump was breathing. They have positioned the mic -- I don't know -- not charging anything here, but his mic was positioned in such a way that you were able to hear him inhale.

He was breathing through his nose because it's more polite to do that than to open your mouth wide and then breathe. And you can hear when people do that, too. If you listen to radio -- a broadcast professional knows when to breathe and how to breathe and you can hear it. It's like stage spit. Do you know what stage spit is? Stage spit is the sign of a highly professional live performer.
I first bore witness to this, interestingly enough, when I was attending the Super Bowl in San Diego.
...
Trump last night was breathing through his nose which of course is gonna sound like a sniffle. (interruption) Yes, I did stage spit all the time in the Rush to Excellence tour. You have to know how to do that. You have to be able to, shall we say, project the saliva. You can't sit there and swallow all night in the middle of a performance. Sinatra was stage spitting, too. It's not glaring. I mean, it's not actually spitting. The saliva comes out of your mouth as you're singing.

And it's the same thing with what Trump was doing last night inhaling. He was inhaling through his nose and you could just hearing it like you can hear it when I do it there. (interruption) What did Howard Dean say? Hm-hm. Are you kidding? Are you kidding? Howard Dean speculated that Trump might be blowing coke? You ever wonder why you didn't hear Hillary breathe? What are you gonna say, 'cause she's a reptile and doesn't breathe through her mouth? What are you gonna say? No, no, no. You didn't hear her breathe, did you? Wonder why. Wonder why.

...
But my only point, he does not have a cold. Howard Dean said he's doing cocaine. This is ridiculous. This was just how he chose to breathe rather than through his mouth. And I know it was distracting to some. It was not distracting to me because again, as a broadcast and communications specialist, you have to breathe. You can't do that without breathing. Now, you didn't hear Hillary breathe. And we think she does. We're not sure.
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2016/09/27/trump_s_debate_performance_will_only_improve_and_he_wasn_t_sniffling

quote:

RUSH: Okay, folks, let's just get straight to it. For people watching this debate last night through the usual prism, through the standard inside-the-Beltway, insider establishment elite circles, if you watched the debate with that as your life experience, with that defining your expectations and that defining your analysis and commentary, Hillary Clinton won this debate in a knockout. If that's how you watch these things.

And that's how the Drive-Bys see it. That's how party officials see it. That's how elected officials see it. That is how people inside the Beltway in the business of politics saw the debate last night overall. At the end of the night, most people don't want to say it, but Hillary Clinton won in a knockout. The Drive-Bys all think so, and so do many others.
Why? Well, because, Hillary was a perfect insider Washington politician.

She spoke in robotic devotion to the meaningless political prattling, going on and on about her plan for this and her plan for that, and this plan over here. And all of the experts who've looked at her plan and say it's the best plan, and all the experts that have looked at his plan and say it's the worst plan. And then we got the obligatory takedown of trickle-down economics for about the gazillionth time in 30 years. We got the obligatory takedown of the rich aren't paying their fair share for I don't know how many umpteenth million times Democrat politicians have been preaching that in the last 30 years.

It was boring. It was robotic. It was almost, especially the first 20 minutes, Hillary Clinton was blindsided, she didn't know what had hit her, maybe the first 30 minutes. She looked out of it. She looked rattled. She looked like she wasn't prepared for the way Trump was behaving and what Trump had to say. She was totally programmed. She was programmed to wait for openings either provided by Trump or provided by Lester Holt. She was waiting for memorized zingers to be implemented and used.

She was exactly what people are fed up with. In terms of the insider nature of Washington politics, the professional politician aspect of Washington politics, insincere, say it because it sounds good. Don't say who you really are, by all means, don't announce what you're really for, never get into any specifics. All you do is try to character assassinate your opponent using the assistance of the moderator. We knew all of this going in. The question is, is that how people, voters, saw this last night?
...
And I can't described for you the overwhelming pessimism that I was greeted with last night by Trump supporters who thought, "Oh, my..." They were so hepped up, they were so jazzed, they were so ready, and then they said they ended up being so disappointed. And I think people are continuing to make what apparently is an unavoidable mistake. You cannot look at this debate as you would look at Romney versus Obama, or Bush versus Kerry, or Bush versus Gore, or Hillary versus Bernie, or Hillary versus Obama. Trump changes all of that.

Here you have 30 years in public life.

By the way, I was very honored last night that Trump used my point a couple of times, that she's been in public life 30 years, and what is there to show for it? She has been complaining and whining about the same things for 30 years. The rich are not paying their fair share, trickle-down economics doesn't work, you name it. This woman's been complaining about it for 30 years and promising to fix it for 30 years, and here we are 30 years later and it's like just like it is her first day in public life before she's announcing what she's gonna do.
...
Well, he's not a 30-year career politician. He doesn't have a 30-year career political record. He doesn't have a 30-year experience of running for office and being in debates or any of that. And yet he's being judged the same way they would judge Hillary Clinton or anybody else who's been in that business for 30 years.

And they're making a very grave tactical error doing so because that's how they conclude that Trump got snookered. They conclude that Trump was embarrassingly defeated last night and it may have been the beginning of the end. And they couldn't be more wrong. And they're gonna be shocked and stunned more than likely when they find out the next series of polls come out that this did not hurt Trump and, in fact, did not stop his momentum.
...
That's not what happened. Well, it may be what happened; it's not how it was seen. I don't expect to be listened to on this. But what the Drive-Bys and the people that create these narratives don't understand is Trump... When they see Trump on defense, when they see Trump in a defensive posture, his supporters see Trump attacking. His supporters see Trump defending in ways the Republican Party hasn't in a long time. They see Trump standing up for them. They see Trump standing up for himself.

They see Trump standing up against Hillary and throwing it right back at her. It may look like he's defensive to these inside-the-politics Beltway pros, but to Trump supporters he's on the attack. The first 20, 30 minutes of this debate last night she literally looked blindsided. First 20, 30 minutes, it's key. The whole debate matters, too, but the first 20, 30 minutes are key. She was blindsided. She looked totally deer-in-the-headlight eyes frequently.

She looked unprepared. She was speaking in robotic ways. Trump was criticizing her and attacking her in ways the Republican Party hasn't gone after a Democrat, particularly the Clintons, ever. And the reason there is frustration aimed at Trump today is because people wished he would have continued doing so throughout the entire debate. As I say, two or three hanging curveballs.
...
I'm watching CNN today. This is classic. This is a classic illustration of the type of inside-the-Beltway analysis these people give that's totally missing the point in relating to people that watched the debate last night. I don't know who it was, doesn't matter who it was, it could have happened on any network. I know it was CNN but it could have happened anywhere. They were discussing how Trump blew it when Lester Holt went to the topic of race.

So I guess to myself, "Well, what are they gonna say as evidence that Trump blew it?" And here it was. Somebody on CNN said, "When the first question, when you are asked the first question about race problems in America, the last thing you say," as though this is the stupidest thing Trump did all night, "the last thing you say is 'law and order.' And then to the compound that mistake by talking about stop-and-frisk," and then they went on to talk about how out of touch Trump is and that that is the evidence of it. And that he's a bonehead idiot, over-his-head, unqualified, has no idea what he's doing, is a total embarrassment to people, 'cause the last thing you should ever say when you are asked about race relations is law and order? Why, doesn't Trump know how insulting that is?

And that, to me, is as good an example I could find of the disconnect that exists in Washington, inside the Beltway and the rest of the country. From Charlotte to Baltimore to Ferguson to Dallas to Tulsa to Fort Hood, wherever you want to go where there is civil unrest, if you don't think the people in these towns are fed up and want a little law and order and want somebody talking instead of coddling the bad guys, instead of making excuses for the bad, instead of politically correct telling us that we must stop our criticism and we must understand the rage.

People are fed up with it. Law and order doesn't seem to be a focus for the Democrat Party.
The Democrat Party seems to be focused and aiming at law. The Democrat Party seems to be on the side of disorder. The Democrat Party seems to be compassionate, understanding, and tolerant of the people who are provoking law and order.

So for Trump to see all of these race riots and these protests as a law-and-order issue just happens to be bull's-eye for I don't know how many millions of Americans. But what they meant at CNN, anybody else who said this, the last thing you're supposed to when the subject race comes up is talking about law and order.

What they think Trump should have done is taken the opportunity to convey to people that he realizes police departments are out of control, and he should have made the effort to do whatever it took to pander to African-Americans because he's gonna need some of them to win. He's gonna need to take some of them away from Hillary, so instead of actually honestly answering this and dealing with it as he sees it as an issue, he should have pandered like everybody else inside the establishment does every day.
...
I'll tell you something else. You talk about Trump missing low-hanging fruit. So did Hillary last night. Now, the Drive-Bys cannot possibly conceive of this. But what has been Hillary's number one thing, issue, subject of her ads that she's been running for a hundred million dollars? I don't know how many millions, but it's just been substantial. Her ads are attacking Trump on what basis, what premise? That he's unsuitable, right?
...
She had to demonstrate that Donald Trump doesn't deserve to be the Republican nominee. She had to demonstrate that Donald Trump has not earned and doesn't deserve to even be going toe-to-toe with her on that stage, and she doesn't do that. There's not a single person when this was over that said Trump didn't belong. There's not a single person, not even in the Drive-Bys. Look, read or listen to all of them. There may be some outlier saying it, but I'm telling you: She didn't, and the Democrats are not making a big deal of it.

They are not saying Trump demonstrated that he had no business in this business. Because he went toe-to-toe with her. He owned the first 30 minutes of the debate. He had the best of her for the first 30 minutes and he held his own throughout the rest of it. He demonstrated to every one of his supporters and even detractors that he had every bit the business being on that stage that she does.
Her primary attack item blew up in her face last night, and the Drive-Bys are not gonna see this. They're not capable of seeing it. She is St. Hillary.

She is Queen Hillary on the way to being coronated. The continual smug, self-satisfied smirk that she had on her face for the last 45 minutes? That's when she thought, "This guy's making a fool of himself. I'm winning this." Major blunder. The two main things that I think ordinary people saw, are Trump demonstrated his earned position as a major party nominee; he had every business, every right being up there. And a lot of people were applauding what he was saying up there last night. And Hillary? She came off exactly as many people see her: A witch with a capital B.
...
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2016/09/27/trump_changes_it_all_you_can_t_see_this_debate_through_the_traditional_prism

KiteAuraan
Aug 5, 2014

JER GEDDA FERDA RADDA ARA!


A man who tripled down on an unconstitutional gun control measure that targets minorities, who suggested that China should invade North Korea and that Japan and South Korea, our two allies right next to that mess, should pay up or die, who said NATO should pay up for Russian-up, who lied constantly about his past, does not in anyway deserve to be the nominee of a major party. I wonder how much oxy I have to do to be as stupid as Limbaugh's audience that buys this poo poo. Limbaugh himself of course does not believe his own horseshit.

Dr. Killjoy
Oct 9, 2012

:thunk::mason::brainworms::tinfoil::thunkher:

Kenzie posted:

I flipped around right wing radio while driving today. Michael Savage was freaking out about the moderator the whole time, calling him "Lester Dolt" and a card-carrying member of the "Democrat Islamist Machine."

He also went on for a long time about trigger words. About how Lester Dolt and Hillary were both strategically using trigger words in order to trigger Donald "Laziness is a trait in blacks" Trump and set him off, so it totally wasn't Donald "Laziness is a trait in blacks" Trump's fault.
Looks like the next debate could use some trigger warnings.

corn in the bible
Jun 5, 2004

Oh no oh god it's all true!
it's ok that trump goes crazy and irrational when you say mean things to him since no world leader is ever rude to the president

woke wedding drone
Jun 1, 2003

by exmarx
Fun Shoe

BiggerBoat posted:

Trump was talking about cops randomly stopping US citizens and disarming them

This is so easy to flip on him I don't know why she hasn't done it:

"Donald, are YOU ok with the police stopping YOU and patting YOU down?"

He either has to say yes which will make the gun nuts flip out, or he has to say no and intimate the truth, that it's not for people who look like him.

boner confessor
Apr 25, 2013

by R. Guyovich

Dapper_Swindler posted:

I have never been a big fan of salon(old salon is cool, new salon is loving awful) but this is decent article and they might be right. I think the alt-right saw trump gently caress up and gently caress up bad, all he did was flail about and act like a child, he proved himself to be "poo poo" so now they will probaly move on to someone else at least for now. I think a decent amount though will support him still at least for image sake.

i dont even think the alt-right is even rising. this is just the flipside of articles that whine about how millenials don't do anything. well, sometimes they hang out on message boards and self-radicalize

Die Sexmonster!
Nov 30, 2005

boner confessor posted:

i dont even think the alt-right is even rising. this is just the flipside of articles that whine about how millenials don't do anything. well, sometimes they hang out on message boards and self-radicalize

Does that really happen?

full communism now

ErIog
Jul 11, 2001

:nsacloud:
Not FNC, but a local Fox affiliate.

https://twitter.com/Amir_Hali/status/780477865838063616

Spacedad
Sep 11, 2001

We go play orbital catch around the curvature of the earth, son.
^^^

'Why don't you shut up because ARE TROOPS' is one of the most pernicious and awful aspects of US nationalism.

Race Realists posted:

I do not want this to be the end of the Alt-Right's rise

I want Racial Realism to hit the mainstream

I want White Nationalism to hit the mainstream.

I want Men's Rights Activism/Men Going Their Own Way to hit the mainstream.

I want all types of toxic poo poo to the hit the mainstream.

I want to wake up morning, and see Steve Sailer, Peter Brimelow, John Debyshire, Taki Theodoracopulos, and Jared Taylor on my TV screen

I want the world to see them. To learn from them as an example.

I'm sick of this poo poo.

I'm sick of hate crime violence escalating every time they poke their heads into the mainstream due to the all the hate they stir up.

I'm all for exposing their heinousness so people know exactly how full of poo poo they are, but not on THEIR terms, as it has been this election cycle.

It's the difference between making people aware of how dangerous & vile hate groups are, vs giving hate groups a platform.

It is true though that hate groups have been swept under the carpet a great deal over the past several years. (Thanks in no small part to republican obstructionism and their tendency to flirt with white nationalists.) If anything, this election cycle demonstrated the need for more education about hate groups, and that a lot needs to be done to curb their recruitment and propagandizing.

boner confessor posted:

i dont even think the alt-right is even rising. this is just the flipside of articles that whine about how millenials don't do anything. well, sometimes they hang out on message boards and self-radicalize

Maybe. But they're still able to harm people. Whether they are an actual political force seems to be overblown to a degree. But then, hate groups in the real world are able to harm people all the time without being significant political forces either.

Spacedad fucked around with this message at 10:53 on Sep 28, 2016

CortezFantastic
Aug 10, 2003

I SEE DEMONS

Quanell X is like a super hero whose power is not smashing old whites to bits. The guy's argument immediately came down to the kid's parents being losers and that they weren't born in America like him?

Vargatron
Apr 19, 2008

MRAZZLE DAZZLE


Is there a thread discussing the rise of the alt-right on 4chan and Reddit? I used to be pretty active on 4chan back around 2006, but I don't remember it being so politically volatile or extreme right wing. Maybe it was because I was 17 and didn't really give a poo poo about politics, but the rise of the alt-right seems really strange to me given what 4chan was.

4chan used to be cat memes and anime gifs. Is the alt-right the final conclusion of those beginnings?

AVeryLargeRadish
Aug 19, 2011

I LITERALLY DON'T KNOW HOW TO NOT BE A WEIRD SEXUAL CREEP ABOUT PREPUBESCENT ANIME GIRLS, READ ALL ABOUT IT HERE!!!

Vargatron posted:

Is there a thread discussing the rise of the alt-right on 4chan and Reddit? I used to be pretty active on 4chan back around 2006, but I don't remember it being so politically volatile or extreme right wing. Maybe it was because I was 17 and didn't really give a poo poo about politics, but the rise of the alt-right seems really strange to me given what 4chan was.

4chan used to be cat memes and anime gifs. Is the alt-right the final conclusion of those beginnings?

IMO it's because you can't get banned there, racist shitheads across the internet get banned for their views and guess where they end up congregating? In the places where they won't get banned, either extreme right wing places like stormfront, sub reddits made for racists like themselves or in someplace where getting banned is an impossibility, i.e. 4chan.

Fried Watermelon
Dec 29, 2008


Most people who go to 4chan grow up and stop taking it seriously after they mature a bit.

Every year there is a subsection who never grows up and needs to double down in how mature and sophisticated they are. The only reason they have having troubles is because of other people(blacks) you see. Year after year this grows until you get the festering mass we have today.

Vargatron
Apr 19, 2008

MRAZZLE DAZZLE


AVeryLargeRadish posted:

IMO it's because you can't get banned there, racist shitheads across the internet get banned for their views and guess where they end up congregating? In the places where they won't get banned, either extreme right wing places like stormfront, sub reddits made for racists like themselves or in someplace where getting banned is an impossibility, i.e. 4chan.

IIRC you can get banned, but it's only for stuff like child pornography and snuff films. Everything else is unmoderated.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

AVeryLargeRadish
Aug 19, 2011

I LITERALLY DON'T KNOW HOW TO NOT BE A WEIRD SEXUAL CREEP ABOUT PREPUBESCENT ANIME GIRLS, READ ALL ABOUT IT HERE!!!

Vargatron posted:

IIRC you can get banned, but it's only for stuff like child pornography and snuff films. Everything else is unmoderated.

Yeah, that's what I meant, you can't get banned for being a racist shithead so hey, tons of racist shitheads who knew???

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply