|
Volcott posted:If you want creepy anime bullshit buy a Vita. That's the entire reason it exists. Vita's dead though so steam store is picking up the slack.
|
# ? Oct 1, 2016 18:13 |
|
|
# ? May 20, 2024 06:33 |
|
Mel Mudkiper posted:I just remembered that time they tried to spin people upset about video games featuring the sexual objectification of children by calling them "neo-puritans" Dang if only this applied to Penn State University coaches as well, but can't tarnish that record, no sir!
|
# ? Oct 1, 2016 18:13 |
|
havenwaters posted:Vita's dead though so steam store is picking up the slack. Persona 4 Platinum coming to Steam Q4 2017.
|
# ? Oct 1, 2016 18:14 |
|
SunAndSpring posted:I have no idea how these guys think that American translators and editors getting rid of content that sexualizes minors to avoid scandal and/or a higher ESRB rating is equivalent to fascist-style censorship. Well if you're very reductionist--and after all it's easy to be very reductionist--then it's censorship, and censorship is supposed to be Bad, so therefore this is bad. It's not hard to see it from either perspective. Is it?
|
# ? Oct 1, 2016 18:14 |
|
fits my needs posted:Dang if only this applied to Penn State University coaches as well, but can't tarnish that record, no sir! The people who still support Joe after all that insanity are literal trash people.
|
# ? Oct 1, 2016 18:16 |
|
I've been reading Carville and Matalin's "Alls Fair" and it's loving great Carville is a loving fox
|
# ? Oct 1, 2016 18:16 |
|
fits my needs posted:Wait doesn't this guy have some weird rumors swirling around him about how he was hooking up with underage girls when he was in Russia? Is that valid? lol It's not really a "rumor". Mark Ames wrote a bunch of articles back in the Exile days about his and Tabbi exploits in Russia.
|
# ? Oct 1, 2016 18:17 |
|
People for some reason don't get that Bayonetta is drag, mocking the concepts of femininity and masculinity.
|
# ? Oct 1, 2016 18:18 |
|
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...m=.f672bba6088cquote:In the class recorded for “Do Not Resist,” Grossman at one point tells his students that the sex they have after they kill another human being will be the best sex of their lives. The room chuckles. But he’s clearly serious. “Both partners are very invested in some very intense sex,” he says. “There’s not a whole lot of perks that come with this job. You find one, relax and enjoy it.”
|
# ? Oct 1, 2016 18:19 |
|
Mel Mudkiper posted:Also every horror and suspense film ever. I had to stop watching police procedurals when I realized all of them are about uncritically celebrating the intersection of eroticism and violence The Taint has the protagonist shooting dicks off with a .44 magnum. So it's got that on other movies.
|
# ? Oct 1, 2016 18:20 |
|
Pirate Radar posted:Well if you're very reductionist--and after all it's easy to be very reductionist--then it's censorship, and censorship is supposed to be Bad, so therefore this is bad. It's not hard to see it from either perspective. This is by far the most annoying pervasive opinion on Reddit. Like I don't think anybody really noticed but I posted an article in the last thread about an rear end in a top hat who dressed up in a gorilla suit and passed out bananas tied with nooses to members of a Black Lives Matter rally and got arrested for it. Reddit's hot take? "Doesn't he have first amendment rights? " edit: In case anyone's interested in the article. lozzle fucked around with this message at 18:26 on Oct 1, 2016 |
# ? Oct 1, 2016 18:21 |
|
Endorph posted:On the other hand, that guy is acknowledging that women like and enjoy sex. That's pretty progressive for the republican party. nah he's just telling his followers to lay off the marital rape for a lil bit
|
# ? Oct 1, 2016 18:24 |
|
Pirate Radar posted:Well if you're very reductionist--and after all it's easy to be very reductionist--then it's censorship, and censorship is supposed to be Bad, so therefore this is bad. It's not hard to see it from either perspective. It absolutely is censorship, but all censorship isn't bad. "Censorship", like "tolerance" or "discrimination" have taken on these sorts of intrinsic good and bad qualities where people seem to have collectively forgotten that it's not the act, but the reason for the act that is good or bad. This is why we see people twisting themselves into pretzels trying to justify being intolerant of bigots as not "really" intolerance or this as not "really" censorship. There are things that deserve censoring (at least the voluntary kind) there are things that deserve discriminating against, there are things that should not be tolerated.
|
# ? Oct 1, 2016 18:25 |
|
canepazzo posted:This is definitely the best timeline. The entire Draper piece is worth a read. I used to think Trump would become a useful idiot for the GOP and just staff his WH with Republican policy flacks, but Hannity as CoS would... not be that.
|
# ? Oct 1, 2016 18:26 |
|
Antti posted:The entire Draper piece is worth a read. If you thought that Trump would fill his cabinet with anything but his cronies, I don't know what to tell you other than you're dumb.
|
# ? Oct 1, 2016 18:30 |
|
Jarmak posted:It absolutely is censorship, but all censorship isn't bad. Yeah, people focus a lot on performance instead of outcomes and that's how you get this attitude of "censorship therefore bad!" that leads to people pitching a fit about something that's not super consequential for them (like toning down VG sexuality).
|
# ? Oct 1, 2016 18:30 |
|
drilldo squirt posted:The people who still support Joe after all that insanity are literal trash people. I immediately read this as Joementum and was like, his predictions before the Repub primary weren't that bad
|
# ? Oct 1, 2016 18:31 |
|
iospace posted:If you thought that Trump would fill his cabinet with anything but his cronies, I don't know what to tell you other than you're dumb. In all fairness to Antti, it is conceivable that Trump is so dumb that he could be manipulated by the Republican establishment to do pretty much whatever they want.
|
# ? Oct 1, 2016 18:32 |
|
I only read the last 5 pages so far so sorrry if I missed this being posted but it's a decent quick sum-up of everything that's bit Trump in the rear end this past week. He goes through them one at a time https://twitter.com/JuddLegum/status/782236867232096260
|
# ? Oct 1, 2016 18:32 |
|
Antti posted:The entire Draper piece is worth a read. Considering his own campaign managers can only keep him 'restrained' for like a month at a time at best I don't know why anyone would assume the GOP would be able to control him. That's why the possibility of his winning is dangerous: He's an erratic and volatile man who likes denigrating and hurting others and displays of strength, whose qualification for 'are you any good' is 'how nice of things do you say about me'.
|
# ? Oct 1, 2016 18:32 |
|
iospace posted:If you thought that Trump would fill his cabinet with anything but his cronies, I don't know what to tell you other than you're dumb. The Senate still needs to confirm them. I definitely didn't expect Doctor Bornstein to become Secretary of Health and Human Services. I thought the machine would take advantage of his ineptitude and inexperience and "help" him populate the cabinet, just like he was obviously given a list of names he had never heard of to tweet as his SCOTUS picks. Campaigning is fun. Running an administration isn't.
|
# ? Oct 1, 2016 18:33 |
|
iospace posted:If you thought that Trump would fill his cabinet with anything but his cronies, I don't know what to tell you other than you're dumb. There was a time when we imagined the elites would be able to muzzle, or at least distract, and control Trump. Basically controlling everything in quiet while Bozo the Clown distracted everyone from the group's plans by collectively humiliating the nation. We were obviously wrong in hindsight. Very wrong. But, hey, hindsight is 20/20
|
# ? Oct 1, 2016 18:33 |
|
Inferior Third Season posted:Everyone's opinions are always equally valid, guys. So, shut up. You guys are being really unfair to this article, or just not reading the whole thing, or... I don't know what, exactly. Taibbi is absolutely right that the current state of the media exists because it's what people want. quote:So media consumers are reduced to blaming the closeness of the race on a species they've practically made extinct with their choices over the years: investigative reporters. Like, there's a whole thread in this forum right now discussing this exact issue. Journalism is dying because you can't fund a polished and flashy 24/7 news network on investigative journalism. You can't even fund a lovely online news magazine with it. The problem isn't that journalists aren't doing their jobs, it's that the job they're being paid to do isn't real journalism.
|
# ? Oct 1, 2016 18:34 |
|
Antti posted:I definitely didn't expect Doctor Bornstein to become Secretary of Health and Human Services. Well of course not. He's gonna be Surgeon General, dummy.
|
# ? Oct 1, 2016 18:35 |
|
Paradoxish posted:You guys are being really unfair to this article, or just not reading the whole thing, or... I don't know what, exactly. "The people complaining about "false balance" usually seem confident in having discovered the truth of things for themselves, despite the media's supposed incompetence. They're quite sure of whom to vote for and why. Their complaints are really about the impact that "false balance" coverage might have on other, lesser humans, with weaker minds than theirs. Which is not just snobbish, but laughably snobbish. So, shut up." Yeah no this poo poo is dumb and the author of it is dumb.
|
# ? Oct 1, 2016 18:38 |
https://twitter.com/mitchellvii/status/782272019442401280 He's not real. Can't be.
|
|
# ? Oct 1, 2016 18:39 |
|
Wow, a lot of that gear is pretty awesome looking. Are we going to see some of this stuff coming up at police auctions eventually or will it be destroyed? I don't think they would just destroy a potential revenue stream right? I mean, they sell squad cars.
|
# ? Oct 1, 2016 18:41 |
|
canepazzo posted:https://twitter.com/mitchellvii/status/782272019442401280 He is.
|
# ? Oct 1, 2016 18:41 |
|
Jarmak posted:It absolutely is censorship, but all censorship isn't bad. that said video game censorship is not what this thread is about so let's talk about that cop who thinks killing a man made sex better for him.
|
# ? Oct 1, 2016 18:41 |
|
canepazzo posted:https://twitter.com/mitchellvii/status/782272019442401280 Daily reminder that Donald is older than Hillary
|
# ? Oct 1, 2016 18:41 |
|
canepazzo posted:https://twitter.com/mitchellvii/status/782272019442401280 That's kind of a letdown from the insane hidden projector tweets from yesterday.
|
# ? Oct 1, 2016 18:42 |
|
lozzle posted:In all fairness to Antti, it is conceivable that Trump is so dumb that he could be manipulated by the Republican establishment to do pretty much whatever they want. Despite all evidence to the contrary, except his tax plan becoming more in line with what the GOP wants. Antti posted:The Senate still needs to confirm them. I definitely didn't expect Doctor Bornstein to become Secretary of Health and Human Services. I thought the machine would take advantage of his ineptitude and inexperience and "help" him populate the cabinet, just like he was obviously given a list of names he had never heard of to tweet as his SCOTUS picks. That is true, but a large part of his "mystique" is the fact that he's supposedly surrounded himself in his business with the "best and brightest". I've had people tell me that to my face, and he (if he somehow gets elected) is going to shove his picks through above whatever the GOP wants. Aesop Poprock posted:I only read the last 5 pages so far so sorrry if I missed this being posted but it's a decent quick sum-up of everything that's bit Trump in the rear end this past week. He goes through them one at a time
|
# ? Oct 1, 2016 18:43 |
|
lozzle posted:"The people complaining about "false balance" usually seem confident in having discovered the truth of things for themselves, despite the media's supposed incompetence. They're quite sure of whom to vote for and why. Their complaints are really about the impact that "false balance" coverage might have on other, lesser humans, with weaker minds than theirs. Which is not just snobbish, but laughably snobbish. So, shut up." You saw that Taibbi literally calls Donald Trump "one of the dumbest people on the planet" two paragraphs below that quote, right? He's not making a truth-is-in-the-middle argument. The snippet you're quoting is talking about the motivations of people who complain about false balance, not the merits of it.
|
# ? Oct 1, 2016 18:44 |
|
Taibbi owns. I haven't read the article yet but so far what's been posted is pretty uncontroversial and quite correct.
|
# ? Oct 1, 2016 18:44 |
|
canepazzo posted:https://twitter.com/mitchellvii/status/782272019442401280 https://twitter.com/AspanKyn/status/782274918071140352
|
# ? Oct 1, 2016 18:45 |
|
Paradoxish posted:You saw that Taibbi literally calls Donald Trump "one of the dumbest people on the planet" two paragraphs below that quote, right? He's not making a truth-is-in-the-middle argument. The snippet you're quoting is talking about the motivations of people who complain about false balance, not the merits of it. Well uh it they have merit then maybe their motivation is actually that it's loving true.
|
# ? Oct 1, 2016 18:45 |
|
I recommend adding Frontline's new 2hr episode "The Choice 2016" to the OP. Has a bunch of information I haven't heard anywhere else, great content. full stream here: http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/film/the-choice-2016/
|
# ? Oct 1, 2016 18:46 |
smg77 posted:That's kind of a letdown from the insane hidden projector tweets from yesterday. He's also reassuring his followers that the only reason she's leading in any polls is that they're skewed at D+9
|
|
# ? Oct 1, 2016 18:47 |
|
lozzle posted:Well uh it they have merit then maybe their motivation is actually that it's loving true. Holy poo poo, dude. The point is that Taibbi isn't arguing in favor of false balance. In fact, the entire article is a condemnation of it. What he's (correctly) arguing against is the blame that's placed on journalists. They are doing their jobs. Their job is to create content that makes money for the company that employs them. If you don't like that, then find a way to get people to actually pay for investigative journalism.
|
# ? Oct 1, 2016 18:49 |
|
|
# ? May 20, 2024 06:33 |
|
well i think the media consensus is snobbish, and booj, and, uh, sheepleish? yeah take that Matt "trash can" Tabbi, you loving, two story ivory tower dickbag, yeah.
|
# ? Oct 1, 2016 18:52 |