I guess NSFW? posted:

So we've been with eachother for 6 years. Our sex life is just as good as when it started, I just wanted to try out some kinkier stuff so I suggested roleplaying. Kevin (husband) was somewhat open to the idea, but also thought it was a bit ridiculous. This is something I've always wanted to try, sort of like a fetish. So we got a few costumes, a Cop outfit and a Spy trenchcoat for him, and a nurse and cheerleader outfit for me. All of our roleplaying revolves around one person being in character, and the other interacting with them.

But he takes his roles as a joke! He goes intentionally extreme with the roles. I know he thinks it's a bit ridiculous, and I know he has more fun when he does this, but I want a real roleplay!

For example, when he dressed up as the Cop, he was supposed to do a stop and frisk, arrest me, etc, but in a sexy way. But instead, he kicks open the door, screams "HANDS UP THIS IS A RAID" and basically tackles me to the bed (this is OKAY it's NOT ABUSE we have rough dom/sub sex all the time), handcuffs me, literally reads me my Miranda Rights, leaves me there and rummages through the drawers throwing stuff everywhere, pulls out a little baggy of weed and goes apeshit like a cop might. I play a long, try to get him to 'let me go' if I can do sexual favours for him. Then we have some rough sex with handcuffs and everything. The actual sex was good but he kept speaking into his fake radio calling for backup, when I was on top he would shout OFFICER DOWN OFFICER DOWN.

With the Spy outfit he would come in and check me for wires and do the whole Pink Panther thing where he says "It is lovely weather we are having" while sneaking to the drapes and then beating the drapes up. I was envisioning a more James Bond-eqsue seduction.

Like, I like the sex, it's good, but I wanted a more porn-like experience. And it was kinda funny but not what I thought. And I KNOW that he thinks roleplay is ridiculous, and that he is trying to have fun with it but I feel like he doesn't know what I want. And I don't hate him for it, he's a big fuckin goofball in or out of our roles, but I want to have MY experience. How can I tell him this?

Samizdata posted:

Right now, I am running a BOGO special. And ask us about our spacial FAMILY RATE!

(Customer's choice - Katana or Desert Eagle .50 on all hits.)

Also, for our discerning customers, we have the "Over-Elaborate Ironic Death Trap Club".

WrenP-Complete posted:

How much was that silkroad one for? Or was that two fake ones?

Tunicate posted:

Two fake ones - one a scammer, the other the cops

ibntumart posted:

ibntumart posted:

walrusman posted:

This guy was browsing the web deep web MARIANAS WEB (fuckin' lol, I bet he thinks that's some kind of super-cagey shibboleth that will ensure only the highest-IQ individuals understand the story)

ibntumart posted:

ibntumart posted:

Mr.Kattykat posted:

How can I email you the photos of tidy rooms when there's no Wi-fi? Dad, how is this remotely possible? Did you think this through? Dad, why are you taking a photo of this while chuckling? Dad, stop

MizPiz posted:

I've been really disappointed with professional killing recently. It just seems like most hitman lost that creative spark (if they even had it) and only do it make money. I get that people have to eat, but they should be doing it because it's what they love to do.

Tunicate posted:

Zulily Zoetrope posted:

Does "porn" in the context of deep/dark web poo poo ever refer to anything other than child/rape porn? It seems a weird thing to brag about.

chitoryu12 posted:

dirksteadfast posted:

I like how hard drug trade is on the same level as banned books. At least in America, banned books is mostly "had a witch/gay person 40 years ago and no one bothered to remove it from the list".

Choco1980 posted:

Libraries like to make a big deal out of "banned books week!" each year, when the "banned" books just mean in pretty much literally every case that some elementary school decided they didn't want it on school grounds, because it would hurt delicate little Timmy's eyes. Though he would have no problem going across town to a book store and buying it himself.

OIF posted:

1. Looking for Alaska, by John Green
Reasons: Offensive language, sexually explicit, and unsuited for age group.

2. Fifty Shades of Grey, by E. L. James
Reasons: Sexually explicit, unsuited to age group, and other (“poorly written,” “concerns that a group of teenagers will want to try it”).

3. I Am Jazz, by Jessica Herthel and Jazz Jennings
Reasons: Inaccurate, homosexuality, sex education, religious viewpoint, and unsuited for age group.

4. Beyond Magenta: Transgender Teens Speak Out, by Susan Kuklin
Reasons: Anti-family, offensive language, homosexuality, sex education, political viewpoint, religious viewpoint, unsuited for age group, and other (“wants to remove from collection to ward off complaints”).

5. The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time, by Mark Haddon
Reasons: Offensive language, religious viewpoint, unsuited for age group, and other (“profanity and atheism”).

6. The Holy Bible
Reasons: Religious viewpoint.

7. Fun Home, by Alison Bechdel
Reasons: Violence and other (“graphic images”).

8. Habibi, by Craig Thompson
Reasons: Nudity, sexually explicit, and unsuited for age group.

9. Nasreen’s Secret School: A True Story from Afghanistan, by Jeanette Winter
Reasons: Religious viewpoint, unsuited to age group, and violence.

10. Two Boys Kissing, by David Levithan
Reasons: Homosexuality and other (“condones public displays of affection”).

chitoryu12 posted:

dirksteadfast posted:

I like how hard drug trade is on the same level as banned books. At least in America, banned books is mostly "had a witch/gay person 40 years ago and no one bothered to remove it from the list".

Furia posted:

The Marianas web is a myth. It's supposed to be even deeper than the dark web, but that doesn't make any loving sense because why would you even need to go "deeper"? When you consider it in terms of openness and anonymity you are pretty much there with a curated .onion link so who would even bother?

Furia posted:

Actually wait a minute: what's the difference between assassination boxes and assassination networks?

Christ, the more I look at that picture the stupider it becomes

chitoryu12 posted:

Not as funny as "Peeing on a baby" being on the same level as "How to find the lost city of Atlantis" in terms of hiding from society.


The theory goes (at least the most reasonable one) is that the deepest of the deep is closed shell systems, where they're hooked up on a local network and completely cut off from the Internet so the only way to access them is to get a physical connection. Of course, this brings up the question of "Why are we assuming it's part of the Internet if it's not connected to the Internet?"

Jonas Albrecht posted:

The Marianas Web is real, but it's just pictures of translucent, oddly colored octopuses.

chitoryu12 posted:

I do think a neat story idea is CAIMEO, the supposed artificial intelligence supercomputer that you can find on the closed shell deep web.

goose willis posted:

How are Mengele's "successes" distinct from WW2 "successes"

Also what the gently caress is a "success" in this context

Non Serviam posted:

Hypothesis: we can really gently caress up this pair of Gipsy twins..

Results : we totally could.

Signed, Mengele.


Beyond that, it's just Wolfenstein fan fiction.

Pththya-lyi posted:

Some of the time it doesn't even mean that! The "banned books" complied by the ALA's Office for Intellectual Freedom are actually the "most challenged" books. A book is "challenged" when someone issues a formal complaint to an institution that provides access to books (like a school or a library) saying "This book is not appropriate for your collection and/or curriculum, please remove it." Many of these challenges fail - the institution reviews the use of the book and decides to keep it after all - but the OIF still complies these unsuccessful challenges for their annual statistics. The bigger problem today is self-censorship, i.e., libraries and schools choosing not to put a controversial book in the collection in the first place just because they don't want to deal with the firestorm of criticism the book might cause.

FYI, today's the last day of Banned Books Week. Here's the ALA's Top Ten for 2015:


E: I think that Banned Books Week is still a good thing because it gets people to read books, even if the books aren't as badly under siege as the ALA might suggest.

E2: Also, I should note that probably 70-80% of challenges aren't reported.

Khazar-khum posted:

I always thought the most banned book was 'Huckleberry Finn'.