|
calandryll posted:I've run into the occasional issue where images from other sites than imgur don't load. There is no box around them, I figure it has to do with inline loading but it's infrequent enough that I forget to try and fix it. Ideas of where to look? vvvvv What Astral posted.
|
#
?
Jul 31, 2016 03:50
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 31, 2024 19:20 |
|
|
calandryll posted:I've run into the occasional issue where images from other sites than imgur don't load. There is no box around them, I figure it has to do with inline loading but it's infrequent enough that I forget to try and fix it. Ideas of where to look? relevant ZDR quote: zen death robot posted:When things moved over to the new servers I was able to use a much newer version of NGINX that supported Security Policy headers like "upgrade insecure requests" instead of having to use a meta tag that was only supported by Chrome. This is why if you're browsing using SSL some image hosts won't work properly. You can work around this by browsing the forums via http:, but the sites hosting the images should properly configure themselves to host images over https. There's little excuse for it these days since letsencrypt exists and is free! Also, people should stop posting images from hosts that don't support SSL.
|
|
#
?
Jul 31, 2016 03:50
|
|
|
Ah, that explains a lot. As I said it's usually only a handful of things that don't work so I usually end up hitting the quote and copying and pasting the link if I care that much.
|
|
#
?
Jul 31, 2016 11:35
|
|
|
EDIT: wow there was a whole new page with the answer.
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2016 03:22
|
|
|
You've probably noticed this already if so, but with e10s/electrolysis enabled in Firefox 48 the quick reply window doesn't auto-close when preview/submit are clicked. Does this sound like a side-effect of the new sandboxing system?
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2016 10:33
|
|
|
Tesseraction posted:You've probably noticed this already if so, but with e10s/electrolysis enabled in Firefox 48 the quick reply window doesn't auto-close when preview/submit are clicked. Does this sound like a side-effect of the new sandboxing system? Disclaimer: That falls into unsupported configuration territory (e10s is only supposed to be enabled on release for ~1% of people who have no addons). SALR+e10s are working fine for me on Firefox 50 (Developer Edition) with e10s. That said, I tested it by attempting to force e10s on in Firefox Beta (also an unsupported configuration) and the good news is I have a general idea of what is failing in that situation. I'll see what I can do. Edit: Testing rewritten submit. Edit2: Success! Edit3: Testing next set of changes.. astral fucked around with this message at 00:44 on Aug 5, 2016 |
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2016 16:53
|
|
|
testing rewritten quick quote submit attaching a file (the thing that took the longest for misguided mozilla security reasons) e: success!
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2016 22:30
|
|
|
Good to know! I'm not demanding a fix as I know I'm on an unsupported edition but figured that beta testing while being naughty might help prevent headaches once rollout goes larger. Thanks for the quick look at it!
|
|
#
?
Aug 5, 2016 00:28
|
|
|
Tesseraction posted:Good to know! I'm not demanding a fix as I know I'm on an unsupported edition but figured that beta testing while being naughty might help prevent headaches once rollout goes larger. Thanks for the quick look at it! I appreciate the report. Just working on the last bit now - redoing the attaching/reattaching. e: Testing again. Success! astral fucked around with this message at 01:09 on Aug 5, 2016 |
|
#
?
Aug 5, 2016 00:43
|
|
|
 SALR v4.1.1-dev.2 is out.(note: you will not auto-update to this version, but this version will auto-update to the next release version) New in v4.1.1-dev:
For this version, I rewrote how Quick Quote submits posts, attaches files to posts, and manages the quick window's "attached" status to the thread you're quick whatevering from. Please help thoroughly test it and report any errors so the fixes and improvements can be pushed out to everyone!  quote:New (old) in v4.1.0:
|
|
#
?
Aug 5, 2016 01:27
|
|
|
astral posted:For this version, I rewrote how Quick Quote submits posts, attaches files to posts, and manages the quick window's "attached" status to the thread you're quick whatevering from. Please help thoroughly test it and report any errors so the fixes and improvements can be pushed out to everyone! Testing this out now! Ninja edit: works perfectly so far! Great work. 
|
|
#
?
Aug 5, 2016 01:36
|
|
|
Since embedded tweets became a thing, the "re-anchor thread" feature hasn't worked properly. When the tweets load, they push the page down. I know there are related features in both SALR and the forums options, but I don't know how to test if it's one or the other causing this. I'm on Firefox 47.0 and SALR 4.1.0
|
|
#
?
Aug 15, 2016 06:27
|
|
|
vortmax posted:Since embedded tweets became a thing, the "re-anchor thread" feature hasn't worked properly. When the tweets load, they push the page down. I know there are related features in both SALR and the forums options, but I don't know how to test if it's one or the other causing this. I'm on Firefox 47.0 and SALR 4.1.0 Neither one will work properly because the tweets embed after those events fire. Pitfall of the way the forums' javascript-based tweet embedding works. astral fucked around with this message at 06:34 on Aug 15, 2016 |
|
#
?
Aug 15, 2016 06:32
|
|
|
astral posted:Neither one will work properly because the tweets embed after those events fire. Pitfall of the way the forums' javascript-based tweet embedding works. Thanks for the answer. It's not a big deal, I just wanted to report it.
|
|
#
?
Aug 15, 2016 06:55
|
|
|
vortmax posted:Thanks for the answer. It's not a big deal, I just wanted to report it. Much appreciated! Sorry I don't have a real solution for it. Personally I try to work around it by letting Firefox's tracking protection block the twitter embeds but I understand that's not for everyone (and the forums' js-based webm/mp4 embeds still shift the page around anyway).
|
|
#
?
Aug 15, 2016 06:59
|
|
|
vortmax posted:Thanks for the answer. It's not a big deal, I just wanted to report it. Note that if you have keyboard shortcuts enabled, you can hit "o" to re-anchor manually.
|
|
#
?
Aug 17, 2016 04:03
|
|
|
Are the custom colorings for users supposed to work when that user is quoted? It doesn't seem to happen for me.
|
|
#
?
Aug 22, 2016 12:03
|
|
|
Oh Astral - you know the fantastic set-quick-reply-relative-to-parent-window you added a while back? I realised the other day that there's something else it could do with - the imgur upload tool still goes to the primary monitor. The attach button works fine but could the upload dialogue have the same relative-to-parent setting, please?
|
|
#
?
Aug 22, 2016 12:11
|
|
|
nexus6 posted:Are the custom colorings for users supposed to work when that user is quoted? It doesn't seem to happen for me. They're supposed to. I'll try to fix that soon. Tesseraction posted:Oh Astral - you know the fantastic set-quick-reply-relative-to-parent-window you added a while back? I realised the other day that there's something else it could do with - the imgur upload tool still goes to the primary monitor. The attach button works fine but could the upload dialogue have the same relative-to-parent setting, please? Yeah, that's a good idea.
|
|
#
?
Aug 22, 2016 16:29
|
|
|
  SALR v4.1.1 is out!(note: you will auto-update to this version!) New in v4.1.1:
previously new in v4.1.0 posted:
If you run into any problems or have any questions / comments, feel free to post in this thread or hop on IRC at irc.synirc.net channel #salr
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2016 22:36
|
|
|
How often do Firefox plugins check, download, and install updates? I seem to not have given v4.1.1-dev.2 the chance to auto-update and it suddenly occurred to me that maybe someone should check if auto-update is actually working when expected. It doesn't seem to be on Firefox's start-up at least.
|
|
#
?
Aug 27, 2016 22:04
|
|
|
ElTipejoLoco posted:How often do Firefox plugins check, download, and install updates? I seem to not have given v4.1.1-dev.2 the chance to auto-update and it suddenly occurred to me that maybe someone should check if auto-update is actually working when expected. This quora question seems to have the answer: quote:Firefox checks for updates to both itself and add-ons once a day. If you don't have Firefox open during its scheduled check time, it will check the next time you start it up. The download stats (those are available through github's public api; SALR itself doesn't do any sort of user/download tracking or telemetry) seem to confirm that; there are a ton of downloads during the first two days, then it slows down. Sidenotes:
|
|
#
?
Aug 27, 2016 23:38
|
|
|
At some point in the last couple of weeks, SALast Reads right-click page navigator and Snaplinks Plus have started interfering with each other. When one is disabled, the other works, but with both enabled both's graphics show up but neither's actions happen. Anyone have any suggestions? I can live without Snaplinks plus if I have to, but it's an extension I really like.
|
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2016 15:58
|
|
|
I thought it was Firefox updating which did it. Snap Links still works for me, just looks all messed up. For instance. This is what it should look like:  Whereas thread lists look like this:  I actually selected the unread post counts on the left in the above image, but both the selection box and the red highlighted boxes are all off to one side. But, it does still open what I wanted. So, only half borked for me. Would really like to find a solution, though.
|
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2016 16:33
|
|
|
Looking at the addon page for Snap Links Plus, there seem to be reviews that it doesn't work properly in Firefox 49: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-us/firefox/addon/snaplinksplus/reviews/
|
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2016 18:19
|
|
|
Snaplinks seems to be the #1 "broken by ff updates" addon of all time. I think I have had it broken at least 20 times by updates. I wonder wtf it's doing that is so fragile.
|
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2016 22:18
|
|
|
I've just started trying out Multi Links Plus and it has a few more options than Snap Links, but is still doing the "everything shifted to the left" that Snap Links did on the forums lists and a couple of other sites. It also does this with SALR disabled. Which is good, because now I know that the problem is most likely the same as what caused it with Snap Links. I.e. most likely the last Firefox update - (EDIT) or some script the sites are running. Megillah Gorilla fucked around with this message at 05:40 on Oct 4, 2016 |
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2016 05:34
|
|
|
I'm having a completely different problem with Snap Links Plus - the selection highlights are aligned correctly, but it doesn't respect the hotkey I have set, or the "on release". (I only want it to activate when I hold ctrl, and pop a menu asking what I want to do on release.)
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2016 06:09
|
|
|
m2pt5 posted:I'm having a completely different problem with Snap Links Plus - the selection highlights are aligned correctly, but it doesn't respect the hotkey I have set, or the "on release". (I only want it to activate when I hold ctrl, and pop a menu asking what I want to do on release.) There was an update to Snap Links recently which disables any configuration settings and forces you to use the default. You can manually revert to 2.4.3 from the version list on the addon page: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/snaplinksplus/versions/
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2016 06:55
|
|
|
jaydee864 posted:There was an update to Snap Links recently which disables any configuration settings and forces you to use the default. That seems terribly inconsiderate and/or stupid. Thanks. Edit: Oh, it's because the 3+ version is for multiprocess Firefox, so most of the features are stripped out. Still seems stupid to have it as an automatic update. As for the 2.4.3 version, it's working fine for me on FF 49.0.1, aligned selection boxes and all. 
m2pt5 fucked around with this message at 07:17 on Oct 4, 2016 |
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2016 07:10
|
|
|
Excellent, thanks. That fixed my alignment problems. The 2.4.3 version isn't quite as good at magically selecting the links I want it to, but I can live with that.
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2016 07:52
|
|
|
jaydee864 posted:There was an update to Snap Links recently which disables any configuration settings and forces you to use the default. You can manually revert to 2.4.3 from the version list on the addon page: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/snaplinksplus/versions/ this solved my problems with it fighting salr as well. thank you!
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2016 16:00
|
|
|
One thing to note, which I nearly forgot myself: If you do revert Snap Links to 2.4.3, make sure to disable automatic updates in the Extension menu for Snap Links, otherwise Firefox will put you back onto the 3.X version within the next couple browser sessions.
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2016 02:01
|
|
|
Hah, just came here to post exactly that. Had a few very annoyed seconds before I realised what was going on.
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2016 04:59
|
|
|
what a coincidence, i just had to do that this morning too, lol
|
|
#
?
Oct 6, 2016 15:29
|
|
|
I upgraded to a Surface Pro 4, which has a high-ish dpi, and I'm balancing out my image scaling settings again and I'm noticing they don't seem to influence what happens when I click timg'd images (both clicking the size label (wouldn't expect SALR to interfere there) and clicking the picture). Is this something outside of the influence SALR can have? I never noticed before. Mostly seeing pictures expand not as wide as they could, as well as pictures expanding taller than they should. Just checking whether this is an anomaly. What with Lowtax looking into switching away from vbulletin, I suspect it's not worth doing anything about it.
|
|
#
?
Oct 19, 2016 15:03
|
|
|
Flipperwaldt posted:I upgraded to a Surface Pro 4, which has a high-ish dpi, and I'm balancing out my image scaling settings again and I'm noticing they don't seem to influence what happens when I click timg'd images (both clicking the size label (wouldn't expect SALR to interfere there) and clicking the picture). Is this something outside of the influence SALR can have? I never noticed before. timg stuff is done via forums javascript; it could probably be fixed but quote:What with Lowtax looking into switching away from vbulletin, I suspect it's not worth doing anything about it. bingo. I'm not going to spend time on edge cases if the whole thing's getting tossed soon.
|
|
#
?
Oct 19, 2016 18:05
|
|
|
Ah well. 
|
|
#
?
Oct 19, 2016 18:29
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 31, 2024 19:20 |
|
|
Is anyone else not able to post to GBS with SALR? I'm getting weird javascript errors....
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2016 20:37
|
|
