|
Junior Jr. posted:Plinkett's TFA review was so great, the hugs montage was the one thing I kept coming back to. So I made an extended version to get it out of my brain. shout outs for exerting effort.
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2016 08:44
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 11, 2024 07:58 |
|
|
also the new plinkett video has already reached 1 million views in less than 3 days.
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2016 09:13
|
|
|
Rubellavator posted:But Starship Troopers is not a good movie even when you know it's a satire. Unlike the Satr Wars, it's a good movie that aged well.
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2016 09:19
|
|
|
dreezy posted:also the new plinkett video has already reached 1 million views in less than 3 days. How much does that get them in YouTube checks?
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2016 09:28
|
|
|
8 track betamax posted:How much does that get them in YouTube checks? 6.
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2016 09:42
|
|
|
6 dollars or 6 chechssk?
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2016 09:47
|
|
|
6 bottles of Dan Aykroyd vodka.
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2016 09:52
|
|
|
8 track betamax posted:How much does that get them in YouTube checks? A comically oversized check presented by Youtube president, Steve Google. Not entitling the bearer to any sum of real money.
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2016 09:55
|
|
dreezy posted:the main problem with redlettermedia threads is they always start talking about things that aren't redlettermedia and that way madness lies. I have written a 108 page response to your so-called Batman v Superman review.
|
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2016 10:47
|
|
|
steinrokkan posted:Unlike the Satr Wars, it's a good movie that aged well. lmao no
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2016 11:26
|
|
|
Clawtopsy posted:gotta put somebody in r2d2 As far as I know it is all remote controlled now. That Grant guy from Mythbusters is actually one of the few people who are rated by Lucasfilm to be an official R2D2 operator.
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2016 12:41
|
|
|
Been thinking about it, and....unfortunately, 10 months is a long time in the world of online media consumption and most of Plinkett’s gripes with the movie are well-trod territory. The first 45 minutes is spent on the Disney buyout and the farfetched “Ring Theory,” all so he can ultimately say Force Awakens is too similar to the A New Hope. He then spends the remainder of the review claiming that diverse representation on film doesn’t matter to kids and people in Star Wars should have sex more, which certainly represents one school of thought. The criticisms of the producer’s allegiance to the fandom and the Disney-fication of Star Wars are valid, but if Plinkett wants these reviews to have the same bite as the old ones, maybe he should get them out a little sooner. Especially with a whole new Star Wars film waiting around every corner.
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2016 13:02
|
|
|
8 track betamax posted:Been thinking about it, and....unfortunately, 10 months is a long time in the world of online media consumption and most of Plinkett’s gripes with the movie are well-trod territory. The first 45 minutes is spent on the Disney buyout and the farfetched “Ring Theory,” all so he can ultimately say Force Awakens is too similar to the A New Hope. He then spends the remainder of the review claiming that diverse representation on film doesn’t matter to kids and people in Star Wars should have sex more, which certainly represents one school of thought. Yeah but did you see the part where he listed youtube channels
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2016 13:31
|
|
|
8 track betamax posted:Been thinking about it, and....unfortunately, 10 months is a long time in the world of online media consumption and most of Plinkett’s gripes with the movie are well-trod territory. The first 45 minutes is spent on the Disney buyout and the farfetched “Ring Theory,” all so he can ultimately say Force Awakens is too similar to the A New Hope. He then spends the remainder of the review claiming that diverse representation on film doesn’t matter to kids and people in Star Wars should have sex more, which certainly represents one school of thought. If you've seen the lineup for the rest of the Star Wars films (including the other anthology stories), I doubt Plinkett's going to cover EVERY film Disney's planning. It'd be too much work to handle, and I don't think you can say that much about Rogue One, because those type of films are just filler for the main event (episodes VII - IX). Like he said, it's all gotten out of hand just like the Marvel films. Also get ready to see tons of merch that either get wasted or end up in bargain stores every year from now on.
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2016 13:45
|
|
|
Junior Jr. posted:If you've seen the lineup for the rest of the Star Wars films (including the other anthology stories), I doubt Plinkett's going to cover EVERY film Disney's planning. It'd be too much work to handle, and I don't think you can say that much about Rogue One, because those type of films are just filler for the main event (episodes VII - IX). Like he said, it's all gotten out of hand just like the Marvel films. Also get ready to see tons of merch that either get wasted or end up in bargain stores every year from now on. But see, here's the thing...nearly 10 months have passed after the film’s box office record-breaking release, the independent-filmmakers-turned-film-reviewers over at Red Letter Media have finally shared Mr. Plinkett’s review of Star Wars: The Force Awakens, and it’s nearly as long as the movie itself. If you’re thinking there’s no way a review— even one clocking in at an hour and 45 minutes —can tell you something you haven’t already read about the newest Star Wars installment, you’re mostly right. Still, it has its moments......................................................................................... 
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2016 13:54
|
|
|
8 track betamax posted:Been thinking about it, and....unfortunately, 10 months is a long time in the world of online media consumption and most of Plinkett’s gripes with the movie are well-trod territory. The first 45 minutes is spent on the Disney buyout and the farfetched “Ring Theory,” all so he can ultimately say Force Awakens is too similar to the A New Hope. He then spends the remainder of the review claiming that diverse representation on film doesn’t matter to kids and people in Star Wars should have sex more, which certainly represents one school of thought. i didnt know you wrote for av club
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2016 13:57
|
|
|
Warren Ellis was also scared off (well, more like he threw a tantrum when someone called him a dickhead) by Goons. The dude who does Achewood was scared off because people were obsessing over his baby. We all know what happened to Robin Williams... Is DeadMau5 the only Goon Celebrity success story?
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2016 13:59
|
|
|
8 track betamax posted:But see, here's the thing...nearly 10 months have passed after the film’s box office record-breaking release, the independent-filmmakers-turned-film-reviewers over at Red Letter Media have finally shared Mr. Plinkett’s review of Star Wars: The Force Awakens, and it’s nearly as long as the movie itself. If you’re thinking there’s no way a review— even one clocking in at an hour and 45 minutes —can tell you something you haven’t already read about the newest Star Wars installment, you’re mostly right. Still, it has its moments......................................................................................... lonely gay
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2016 14:39
|
|
|
Drunken Baker posted:Warren Ellis was also scared off (well, more like he threw a tantrum when someone called him a dickhead) by Goons. Dr. Derek Smart.
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2016 14:42
|
|
|
spooky like this! posted:As far as I know it is all remote controlled now. That Grant guy from Mythbusters is actually one of the few people who are rated by Lucasfilm to be an official R2D2 operator. I think they put him in R2 for one quick scene so they can have his name in the credits. Then R2 is radio controlled for 99.9% of the time.
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2016 14:50
|
|
|
FuturePastNow posted:I think they put him in R2 for one quick scene so they can have his name in the credits. Then R2 is radio controlled for 99.9% of the time. and same type of situation for chewie and c3po.
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2016 14:52
|
|
|
8 track betamax posted:Been thinking about it, and....unfortunately, 10 months is a long time in the world of online media consumption and most of Plinkett’s gripes with the movie are well-trod territory. The first 45 minutes is spent on the Disney buyout and the farfetched “Ring Theory,” all so he can ultimately say Force Awakens is too similar to the A New Hope. He then spends the remainder of the review claiming that diverse representation on film doesn’t matter to kids and people in Star Wars should have sex more, which certainly represents one school of thought. He just released the episode 3 review in May. I think a few months to do the next one for TFA was more than fair. This time around, he doesn't have the prequel trilogy to work on so he'll get the R1 review done sooner after release.
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2016 15:23
|
|
|
The episode 3 review was like two years ago dude.
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2016 15:24
|
|
|
FedEx Mercury posted:The episode 3 review was like two years ago dude. Maybe he was in a coma
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2016 15:27
|
|
|
FedEx Mercury posted:The episode 3 review was like two years ago dude. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bYWAHuFbLoc Says may 2016 
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2016 15:35
|
|
|
They reuploaded the review to their youtube channel a few months ago, he's probably confusing that with the original. Read the video description. turn off the TV fucked around with this message at 15:39 on Oct 5, 2016 |
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2016 15:35
|
|
|
Drunken Baker posted:Warren Ellis was also scared off (well, more like he threw a tantrum when someone called him a dickhead) by Goons. We've still got Brown Moses, at least until the Russians get him.
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2016 15:43
|
|
|
You can't trust the YouTube dates they have been reuploaded many times. The episode two review went up late 2012 (I think) and the episode 3 review was less than a year after that.
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2016 15:44
|
|
|
KakerMix posted:Starship Troopers was badass when I thought it was a weird future-war movie when I was in middle school. My friends and I loving loved it. Then later when I read the actual book Starship Troopers and got into the whole whacked-out author and his ideas on government and poo poo and Verhoeven ripping into that dude and the movie was a result of that I loved it even more. Goddamn Starship Troopers is ace. I unironically love the movie as an action flick and the book as a 60's era sci-fi classic. When I watched the movie I didn't get "War is hell, nationalistic military juntas are fascism with a different name, celebrating violence is bread and circuses of the new age" I was thinking "Oh man those aliens just took that guy's loving arm off! This is so cool! Why aren't all war movies like this?"
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2016 15:44
|
|
|
Starship Troopers is really good, any scify with mormons is good. I love the expanse for that.
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2016 15:46
|
|
|
FedEx Mercury posted:You can't trust the YouTube dates they have been reuploaded many times. The episode two review went up late 2012 (I think) and the episode 3 review was less than a year after that. According to this and my memory, ROTS was 2010. Then there was Indiana Jones, Titanic, and some commentary.
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2016 15:48
|
|
|
Just gonna drop this here.. I didn't realize how old some of the original Plinkett stuff was. I also didn't realize that Crystal Skull came out almost a decade ago. Date Title 2008-12-12 Star Trek Generations 2009-05-06 Star Trek First Contact 2009-06-10 Star Trek Insurrection 2009-08-13 Star Trek Nemesis 2009-12-10 The Phantom Menace 2010-04-03 Attack of the Clones 2010-05-21 Avatar 2010-06-17 Baby's Day Out 2010-09-01 Star Trek 2009 2010-12-31 Revenge of the Sith 2011-06-24 Cop Dog 2011-12-22 Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull 2012-02-10 The Phantom Menace Commentary Track 2012-08-04 A New Hope Commentary 2012-12-09 Titanic 2013-03-04 Star Trek V Commentary
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2016 15:54
|
|
|
Well that's actually really depressing to think how long ago it all was.
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2016 16:14
|
|
|
Are there really posters....ITT... who don't watch the RLM videos exclusively on their website. And also have the RLM website set as their homepage?
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2016 16:17
|
|
|
Trunko posted:Are there really posters....ITT... who don't watch the RLM videos exclusively on their website. And also have the RLM website set as their homepage? My work place is lame like that 
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2016 16:24
|
|
|
It's a livin'
----------------
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2016 16:29
|
|
|
I re-watched the Revenge of the Sith review last week, it was great like the last time I saw...all except for the ending. They made a Now I really miss blip.
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2016 16:31
|
|
|
Trunko posted:Are there really posters....ITT... who don't watch the RLM videos exclusively on their website. And also have the RLM website set as their homepage? Until the RLM webzone supports theater mode; Youtube supremacy 
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2016 16:32
|
|
|
Berious posted:Until the RLM webzone supports theater mode; Youtube supremacy What's wrong with Fullscreen?
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2016 16:34
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 11, 2024 07:58 |
|
|
Trunko posted:Are there really posters....ITT... who don't watch the RLM videos exclusively on their website. And also have the RLM website set as their homepage? And wallpaper. I mean actual for real wallpaper. I live surrounded by Jays.
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2016 16:34
|
|