|
SeanBeansShako posted:I say 7TP. So, what was the penetration-resistance of Rokossowski's medal-mail? (Yeah, I'm curious about these, too)
|
# ? Oct 8, 2016 23:06 |
|
|
# ? May 23, 2024 12:15 |
|
Ensign Expendable posted:As most of you know, I translate articles written for the World of Tanks website (and more recently, warspot). Since you can never have too much tankchat, I figured I'd let you guys pick the queue and not just the WoT thread. Cool!
|
# ? Oct 9, 2016 00:25 |
|
I'd love to hear about the Japanese tanks. Also about the 37 mm Pak, the little gun that everyone forgot about. (I assume it did more than 'fail to penetrate a KV1')
Fangz fucked around with this message at 01:28 on Oct 9, 2016 |
# ? Oct 9, 2016 00:49 |
|
The 3.7 cm Pak lit a fire under everyone's rear end when it turned out it could penetrate any tank that existed from an obscene distance during the Spanish Civil War. It's a seriously underrated gun.
|
# ? Oct 9, 2016 03:03 |
|
Fuligin posted:I'm no expert, but- This is exactly what I was looking for and also rules in many ways. Gimme more! More!!
|
# ? Oct 9, 2016 03:39 |
|
Ensign Expendable posted:The 3.7 cm Pak lit a fire under everyone's rear end when it turned out it could penetrate any tank that existed from an obscene distance during the Spanish Civil War. It's a seriously underrated gun. Yeah there are reasons that so many were kicking around. It basically gave birth to modern AT gun doctrine. edit: plus even after it was obsolete for killing things from the front it was still a handy as gently caress little gun that could kill a lot of poo poo from an ambush position
|
# ? Oct 9, 2016 03:48 |
|
So I just went to a bar for dinner and the lady sitting next to me was there celebrating her 95th birthday with her son. She was a facilitator for B-29 parts shipments during the war, her dead husband was a B-29 pilot who flew bombing missions during Operation Matterhorn, and they were introduced to each other by Paul Tibbets. Oh and her daughter works for JP Morgan and had a big hand in setting up the Bank of Iraq post-invasion. You can't make that poo poo up.
|
# ? Oct 9, 2016 04:53 |
|
Cyrano4747 posted:Yeah there are reasons that so many were kicking around. It basically gave birth to modern AT gun doctrine. Plus you could turn it into a supersized muzzleloader to kill anything at ambush ranges - not awfully practical and it became obsolete real quick thanks to better infantry at weapons, but still cool. Here being fitted on a 3.7cm FlaK which I assume is preparing to shoot down a Flying Fortress.
|
# ? Oct 9, 2016 06:51 |
|
"hay, did someone call for a stug?? well dey were busy so I came to stand in for them. trust me i know what I'm doing"
|
# ? Oct 9, 2016 06:57 |
|
Nenonen posted:"hay, did someone call for a stug?? well dey were busy so I came to stand in for them. trust me i know what I'm doing" Probably worked better than most Italian tanks.
|
# ? Oct 9, 2016 07:09 |
|
Oh come on, that's almost exactly an Ork vehicle.
|
# ? Oct 9, 2016 07:26 |
|
So, I was looking through some battleship history, trying to understand how these ships were classified and how they worked and what they were designed for, when I came across the USS Indiana (BB-1). Looking at this image of her, several things stood out to me: 1. This thing would sink in anything more than a really minor storm, but since she was designed for coast defence, it doesn't really matter. 2. Those lifeboats. The way the batteries are set up, the lifeboats would be blown to poo poo by the gun blasts from the big guns, or by the tertiary turrets firing. How were lifeboats handled on these hilariously small and cramped early US BB designs?
|
# ? Oct 9, 2016 07:59 |
I imagine when the enemy was sighted they were brought onto the deck and tied down in a designated safe zone like they've always done with furniture and other objects on ships. These ships engage in pretty long distant gunfire now and would have plenty of time to get that stuff sorted before engaging the enemy.
|
|
# ? Oct 9, 2016 14:15 |
|
SeanBeansShako posted:I imagine when the enemy was sighted they were brought onto the deck and tied down in a designated safe zone like they've always done with furniture and other objects on ships. The Indiana was well before the fad for torpedoes on battleships really got going when both torpedoes and guns could reach out to the astounding range of 3000 yards.
|
# ? Oct 9, 2016 14:43 |
|
I think some of them came up with the novel idea of storing the lifeboats on the turrets. USS Cleveland
|
# ? Oct 9, 2016 15:20 |
|
SlothfulCobra posted:Oh come on, that's almost exactly an Ork vehicle.
|
# ? Oct 9, 2016 15:28 |
|
SlothfulCobra posted:Jerry was a titan with jungle cats that attacked on his word, but Tommy fought him off until at the last moment some guy named Joe Sherman came in to help. John Frum, surely?
|
# ? Oct 9, 2016 15:44 |
|
I wonder if anyone named Sherman ever crewed a Sherman tank.
|
# ? Oct 9, 2016 16:10 |
|
OwlFancier posted:I think some of them came up with the novel idea of storing the lifeboats on the turrets. Those look like inflatable or semi-inflatable lifeboats, though - the ancient wooden lifeboats that we saw earlier are goddamn heavy. Now -I'm- wondering what they did with them...
|
# ? Oct 9, 2016 17:35 |
|
Those are Carley floats.
|
# ? Oct 9, 2016 18:41 |
|
The Kaiser class ships also have racks on top of the turrets which I think are for proper wooden lifeboats but I can't find any pictures of them, only the racks, and I don't want to cite world of warships as a source. E: though my attempts to find an image of it turned some some... interesting images lacking context: OwlFancier fucked around with this message at 20:21 on Oct 9, 2016 |
# ? Oct 9, 2016 20:05 |
|
Ensign Expendable posted:Renault R35 in German service
|
# ? Oct 9, 2016 20:32 |
|
Fangz posted:There's disadvantages to slings. The effective range is limited, accuracy requires a lot of training (recall that David smacking Goliath in the forehead was considered a miraculous feat of skill), a slinger needs space to work, and has difficulty shooting over the head of the man in front of him. It's also not easy to make use of arrow slits in fortifications. Slings had better ranges than bows during those time.
|
# ? Oct 9, 2016 20:34 |
|
gradenko_2000 posted:Thank you by the way to everyone who answered my WW1 question yesterday, I have a better idea of how the artillery interaction with infantry and breakthroughs works now. Who were the masterminds behind Romania joining the Entente?
|
# ? Oct 9, 2016 20:35 |
|
OwlFancier posted:The Kaiser class ships also have racks on top of the turrets which I think are for proper wooden lifeboats but I can't find any pictures of them, only the racks, and I don't want to cite world of warships as a source. Battlestar Dreadnoughtica?
|
# ? Oct 9, 2016 23:19 |
|
Macross concept art looking good
|
# ? Oct 9, 2016 23:37 |
|
I guess that's one way to do simultaneous launch and recovery.
|
# ? Oct 10, 2016 00:05 |
|
OwlFancier posted:The Kaiser class ships also have racks on top of the turrets which I think are for proper wooden lifeboats but I can't find any pictures of them, only the racks, and I don't want to cite world of warships as a source.
|
# ? Oct 10, 2016 00:53 |
|
I'm the completely unnecessary and useless second bridge.
|
# ? Oct 10, 2016 00:56 |
|
As it turns out, it's very easy to make a warship in mspaint.
|
# ? Oct 10, 2016 01:23 |
|
How much would that thing weigh
|
# ? Oct 10, 2016 01:26 |
|
I just noticed that thing has 6 wing turrets below the main deck.
|
# ? Oct 10, 2016 01:37 |
|
I'm the on-again off-again use of superfiring positioning on the main turrets.
|
# ? Oct 10, 2016 01:38 |
|
All I know is that I better be able to build that in Rule the Waves 2.
|
# ? Oct 10, 2016 02:09 |
|
could you even launch/recover planes while firing your guns?
|
# ? Oct 10, 2016 03:08 |
|
Pornographic Memory posted:could you even launch/recover planes while firing your guns? Sure you can, just a bit of crosswind! In actuality no you couldn't even have things on the flight deck while firing those guns, you'd be lucky if the deck itself even survived intact. Also the forward lift appears to be sticking out past the suspended portion of the flight deck so I think that's just painted on. OwlFancier fucked around with this message at 03:33 on Oct 10, 2016 |
# ? Oct 10, 2016 03:31 |
|
ALL-PRO SEXMAN posted:I'm the completely unnecessary and useless second bridge. Well you know it probably doesn't maneuver very well and it would be extremely hard to turn it around in confined waters without running it aground. For example the entire Indian Ocean. It probably just has two sets of screws at either end, like a freight train with forward and rear locomotives, and if they need to turn around everybody just moves from the forward bridge to the aft bridge.
|
# ? Oct 10, 2016 03:48 |
|
EvanSchenck posted:Well you know it probably doesn't maneuver very well and it would be extremely hard to turn it around in confined waters without running it aground. For example the entire Indian Ocean. It probably just has two sets of screws at either end, like a freight train with forward and rear locomotives, and if they need to turn around everybody just moves from the forward bridge to the aft bridge. There are ferries that work that way. Most modern ships with that kind of configuration just have swivel chairs on the bridge though.
|
# ? Oct 10, 2016 04:02 |
|
seriously how much does it weigh?
|
# ? Oct 10, 2016 04:07 |
|
|
# ? May 23, 2024 12:15 |
|
bewbies posted:seriously how much does it weigh? I hope it has other weight-increasing features that aren't immediately evident from the picture. Tell me it has armored flight decks like the RN carriers from WWII. FrozenVent posted:There are ferries that work that way. Oh or better yet this ship has two entire duplicate command staffs and they just take turns. During normal operations the aft captain and his guys are just chilling out with sudoku or taking naps, but when it's time to reverse they go on duty and the forward bridge gets to relax. Schenck v. U.S. fucked around with this message at 04:23 on Oct 10, 2016 |
# ? Oct 10, 2016 04:15 |