|
I've been wondering the same thing about whether "Wikileaks" hits. My gut feels like that's going to be a repeat of the Panama Papers market, a small group just "sure" that it'll hit because it seems big online. I'm also feeling a little bullish on "You're Hired" as YES. Hillary's camp seems to really like their slogan, and if the job market comes up I feel like it'll hit.
|
#
?
Oct 9, 2016 22:14
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 29, 2024 19:48 |
|
|
"Wikileaks" NO at 35c and "Your Hired" YES at 27c both seem like good bets, but I don't know if I feel confident enough in either to actually pull the trigger.
|
|
#
?
Oct 9, 2016 22:20
|
|
|
I'm going NO on Wikileaks. I feel like the mods/questioners and Hillary won't dignify Assange by naming him or his organization. Trump is the wild card, but when isn't he? My CPD2 bets: China YES Syria YES Common Core YES (got in cheap, counting on Trump here) Podesta NO Wikileaks NO Also went negative risk on viewership. I don't have a bead on it and its fluctuated wildly before and after the tapes came out.
|
|
#
?
Oct 9, 2016 22:43
|
|
|
I'm passing, this debate just feels too unpredictable for me to drop money on.
|
|
#
?
Oct 9, 2016 23:51
|
|
|
I'm going in on wall street / wikileaks no.
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2016 00:05
|
|
|
All I have is Common Core NO e: Trash Trick posted:I'm going in on wall street / wikileaks no. Why did you change your name? FourLeaf has issued a correction as of 00:11 on Oct 10, 2016 |
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2016 00:09
|
|
|
I bought "you're hired" yes, it's the only one I really like and the price is super low in my opinion.
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2016 00:27
|
|
|
FourLeaf posted:All I have is Common Core NO There was a name change thread and I thought heck, why not!!
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2016 01:10
|
|
|
I got shellacked on Super Tuesday then got insult added to injury on Bernie.NO in MI but I have a credit left on this so gently caress it I'm in on Wiki.NO Hired.YES and Broaddrick.YES because I'm an idiot also have 500 shares of REP.PREZPRTY16 that I'll probably ride out until the end
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2016 01:26
|
|
|
the swings in the broddrick market in the last hour have been interesting
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2016 01:27
|
|
|
I picked up some wiki.no because the price got better.
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2016 01:31
|
|
|
Common Core is moderator or candidate mentions. Doesn't the addition of candidate mentions make it much more likely to be Yes?
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2016 01:33
|
|
|
null posted:Common Core is moderator or candidate mentions. Doesn't the addition of candidate mentions make it much more likely to be Yes? Yeah, I'm guessing that's why it made it up to 50 cents for a minute. But for it to come up, education has to come up, which isn't all that certain. There's a lot of material to cover, and not a ton of time.
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2016 01:38
|
|
|
null posted:Common Core is moderator or candidate mentions. Doesn't the addition of candidate mentions make it much more likely to be Yes? Yes... but I don't think they'll get to it. There are so many other topics that will have a greater priority. The Trump tapes. Bill Clinton, apparently. Syria. Black Lives Matter, veterans, immigration, and so on. I could be wrong obviously, but it's a gamble I'm willing to make.
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2016 01:39
|
|
|
Bought some wall st no at 15c. It's surely more likely than not going to be mentioned, but I'm a sucker for deals.
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2016 01:51
|
|
|
everybody loves the underdog especially compulsive gamblers 
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2016 01:52
|
|
|
My predictions: Syria - Yes Podesta - No Common Core - No NAFTA - No
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2016 01:57
|
|
|
Wall Street No is basically the "this debate is going to be a total clusterfuck" bet, which honestly seems like a good bet at around 15. Bets: NAFTA - No Syria - Yes Common Core - No Wall Street - No Wikileaks - No You're Hired - Yes Broaddrick - Yes And I didn't bet on it, but Gun Control Yes seemed like a decent buy, especially with 2nd Amendment included, but, I just had a bad feeling at those odds.
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2016 02:00
|
|
|
well that's two of the four "special trump women guests" in attendance. thanks for the blue balls, Donnie
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2016 02:20
|
|
|
I will laugh if there's no Broaddrick mention despite her actual presence at the drat event. (Didn't put any money in that one myself.) Edit: Wikileaks hit. Vox Nihili has issued a correction as of 02:27 on Oct 10, 2016 |
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2016 02:21
|
|
|
if you're gonna bet the long shot you better get ready for some disappointment
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2016 02:29
|
|
|
"Syrian" . And a thank you to Donald for rambling into it.
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2016 02:46
|
|
|
They said wikileaks. Mother fucker.
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2016 02:50
|
|
|
Well, drat.
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2016 03:01
|
|
|
donnie just basically dropped a "whose man is that?" on his own vice presidential running mate re: russian & syria. what in the world is going on
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2016 03:11
|
|
|
welp I came back to run my balance and i lost on 150 shares of broaddrick guess i should cash out and never touch this again
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2016 03:40
|
|
|
FourLeaf posted:All I have is Common Core NO Hell yeah!
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2016 03:40
|
|
|
Putin No came through and covered my long shots, up about $50 on the debate.
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2016 03:41
|
|
|
FourLeaf posted:Hell yeah! I had that one as well. Also had No on the "You're hired" nonsense.
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2016 03:42
|
|
|
Did Donald say Wall Street? I don't remember it (thought he only said banks and wealthy), but the comments section on PI is saying he did. And yeah, picking up Common Core NO at 52 is going to be a saving grace. Still can't believe he didn't mention Broaddrick.
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2016 03:44
|
|
|
I'm down about fifty tonight, no big deal compared to my othe r losses this week lol.
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2016 03:48
|
|
|
Parakeet vs. Phone posted:Did Donald say Wall Street? I don't remember it (thought he only said banks and wealthy), but the comments section on PI is saying he did. I think he did, but I wasn't certain. It was during a long rant. If he actually didn't I'll be up quite a bit.
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2016 03:51
|
|
|
He said wall street. Once. The motherfucker.
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2016 03:53
|
|
|
Raivin posted:
Welp! Didn't expect to lose China.
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2016 03:56
|
|
|
Raivin posted:Welp! Didn't expect to lose China. Trump said China ??
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2016 03:58
|
|
|
Trash Trick posted:Trump said China ?? Hillary definitely mentioned China, while bringing up Trump's illegal Chinese steel deals.
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2016 04:00
|
|
|
Trash Trick posted:Trump said China ?? Moderators had to mention it for that market, and they didn't. Clinton and Trump both said China many times.
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2016 04:08
|
|
|
Zeta Taskforce posted:My predictions: Looks like I'm 4/4. I didn't bet more than 20 shares on any of them though.
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2016 04:09
|
|
|
China was absolutely mentioned in the context of steel
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2016 04:09
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 29, 2024 19:48 |
|
|
What does the format of the third debate look like?
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2016 04:15
|
|