|
KOTEX GOD OF BLOOD posted:Uh, context? The amount of votes the loser received in various landslide victories.
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2016 17:05
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 11, 2024 13:50 |
|
|
BI NOW GAY LATER posted:That's supposed to make us not happier? No, I'm saying you should be creaming your entire wardrobe. Every pair of pants you own should be ruined.
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2016 17:05
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/NateSilver538/status/785510457826238464
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2016 17:06
|
|
|
Dexo posted:Welp gently caress Ruth Bader Ginsburg too Liberal justices on the Supreme Court are oddly defensive when it comes to the flag/patriotic symbols. In the Texas v. Johnson case regarding flag burning, liberal justice John Paul Stevens actually wrote a dissent that was basically flag worship. John Paul Stevens posted:Justice John Paul Stevens also wrote a dissenting opinion. Stevens argued that the flag "is more than a proud symbol of the courage, the determination, and the gifts of nature that transformed 13 fledgling Colonies into a world power. It is a symbol of freedom, of equal opportunity, of religious tolerance, and of good will for other peoples who share our aspirations. ... The value of the flag as a symbol cannot be measured." Stevens concluded, therefore, that "The case has nothing to do with 'disagreeable ideas.' It involves disagreeable conduct that, in my opinion, diminishes the value of an important national asset," and that Johnson was punished only for the means by which he expressed his opinion, not the opinion itself.
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2016 17:06
|
|
|
Noam Chomsky posted:I guess you guys can't understand how misinterpreting the context of something can affect the way you see the content. You couldn't be bothered to watch all of a less than two minute video dude, how is this reaction at all shocking? The RBG quote is somewhat surprising, but it is definitely funny considering how many "gently caress yeah, Notorious RBG the badass!" people it bummed out.
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2016 17:06
|
|
|
mdemone posted:Okay, if we are the Clinton camp, when do we release Oppo Thing #1 ("on par with pussy-grabbing") and when do we release Oppo Thing #2 ("worse than pussy-grabbing, ugh")? #1, two days before the next debate #2, five days before election day
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2016 17:06
|
|
|
rare Magic card l00k posted:No, I'm saying you should be creaming your entire wardrobe. ah, good, carry on
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2016 17:06
|
|
|
In a way, being completely out of blood is kind of like stopping the bleeding.
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2016 17:06
|
|
|
Sweet, now I don't have to leave the house and waste time voting. J/K, I live in a good state, so I vote by mail anyway. Please vote and help smoosh Rs like bug.
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2016 17:06
|
|
|
rare Magic card l00k posted:To everyone creaming themselves over those polls. That's the best part. After he loses in a landslide the GOP will do everything they can to insist that Clinton didn't win a referendum, voters were just rejecting Trump. But Trump is going to lash out like a rabid dog when they try to throw him under the bus, and the deplorables are going to be on his side 
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2016 17:06
|
|
|
If those numbers hold up until election day does anyone have any idea what the electoral map will look like? How many electoral votes would that land Abuela?
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2016 17:06
|
|
|
Phone posted:Original post: What makes this lovely dehumanizing trolling so dumb is, this was the post originally: Mel Mudkiper posted:I don't have access to speakers right now, what is she saying? So Noam lied and made poo poo up to denigrate a women to answer a factual question about a video.
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2016 17:06
|
|
|
This is playing on repeat in the Clinton campaign: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=04F4xlWSFh0
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2016 17:07
|
|
|
Noam Chomsky posted:I'm married to a sexual assault survivor, actually. So, gently caress off. This isn't any better than saying "I have black friends" fyi.
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2016 17:07
|
|
|
Keep in mind that poll is post Pussygate but before the debate
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2016 17:07
|
|
|
KOTEX GOD OF BLOOD posted:Uh, context? My guess is lowest pop vote % in modern elections
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2016 17:07
|
|
|
Xarthor posted:If those numbers hold up until election day does anyone have any idea what the electoral map will look like? How many electoral votes would that land Abuela? This is in the 450+ range. States like OK will stay red with these margins but this is Blue Texas territory.
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2016 17:08
|
|
|
Honestly it really pisses me off that RGB considers nonviolent protest against massive police abuse "stupid and arrogant." The justice system she is part of is doing nothing so what should these people do instead?
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2016 17:08
|
|
|
On one hand I'm glad I work from home but on the other it's all MY stuff this erection keeps knocking on the floor.
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2016 17:08
|
|
|
Huzanko fucked around with this message at 17:29 on Oct 10, 2016 |
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2016 17:08
|
|
|
Xarthor posted:If those numbers hold up until election day does anyone have any idea what the electoral map will look like? How many electoral votes would that land Abuela? 10-14% is prolly enough to flip AZ, GA and put Texas in play. Would also likely secure the House and Senate.
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2016 17:08
|
|
|
Radish posted:Honestly it really pisses me off that RGB considers nonviolent protest against massive police abuse "stupid and arrogant." She's white.
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2016 17:08
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/kylegriffin1/status/785511181154971648 Also, fav numbers (Very/Somewhat Positive/Neutral/Somewhat/Very Negative) Clinton: 22/18/10/13/37 (-10) Trump: 16/13/8/11/52 (-34)
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2016 17:09
|
|
|
i like noam chomsky
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2016 17:09
|
|
|
Nate is officially unshook. 538-0 victory confirmed.
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2016 17:09
|
|
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_hHDxlm66dE
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2016 17:10
|
|
|
Xarthor posted:If those numbers hold up until election day does anyone have any idea what the electoral map will look like? How many electoral votes would that land Abuela? If we base it on 2012 turnout and results, it would look something like this: http://www.270towin.com/maps/1Av93 Clinton: 378 Trump: 150 Too Close to call: 10 If we base it closer to how Trump is performing generally, Texas would go blue.
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2016 17:10
|
|
|
Soup du Jour posted:You couldn't be bothered to watch all of a less than two minute video dude, how is this reaction at all shocking? It is encouraging that people are engaging with the lovely thing RGB said rather than hastening to make excuses for her because she's traditionally on our team.
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2016 17:10
|
|
|
vyelkin posted:WHAT Let's not get carried away. A ~12 point lead is massive, but not Era of Good Feelings massive. If I were Clinton, I would be directing money downstream to support Senate and House races. The race for the presidency seems all but won, but she can significantly carve into the Republican lead in both houses if things go right.
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2016 17:10
|
|
|
I really hope this isn't an outlier because 
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2016 17:10
|
|
|
Let us take a moment to reflect, a few pages ago, posters were disappointed that a breaking news story was only the Republican Speaker of the House, who was the Vice-Presidential candidate last election cycle, saying he will not support the Republican nominee for President, and saying the Presidential race is finished. That is how low the Trump campaign has gone.
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2016 17:10
|
|
|
Mondale got blasted into smithereens and still got 40.6% of the popular vote? Trump dead.
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2016 17:11
|
|
|
Noam Chomsky posted:I said I was sorry for misinterpreting the video. The context I thought I had for the video, the fact that I only watched a short bit of it, and the fact that I just don't take anything involving politics or campaigns at face value, resulted in me assuming the girl was crying crocodile tears and I made a bad post. I'm skeptical of Broaddrick, yeah but for reasons entirely not to do with her being on the other team. Her story about Clinton intimidating her is ridiculous and the GOP was looking for anything they could use against Bill and still dismissed that as it wouldn't do anything. Y'know, actual substantive reasons instead of just calling her a fake.
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2016 17:11
|
|
|
That is just one poll at the worst moment of Trump's campaign so don't start getting too excited. Still, goddamn
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2016 17:11
|
|
|
Can we get a GIF of the High Sparrow with Paul Ryan's head superimposed being incinerated by wildfire while his house blows up TIA.
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2016 17:11
|
|
|
Is anyone else concerned that these numbers are coming a full 4 weeks before Election Day instead of closer to it?
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2016 17:12
|
|
|
ImpAtom posted:That is just one poll at the worst moment of Trump's campaign so don't start getting too excited. I don't think the debate gonna help him.
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2016 17:12
|
|
|
Purely anecdotal, but the coworkers I've talked to today all think Trump made an rear end of himself last night. Also anecdotal, one of them switched dentists recently because the hygeinist was pro-Trump, and another decided not to have her kid's birthday party at a local farm because there were too many Trump signs on nearby houses. She's black and was honestly worried about being there after dark.
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2016 17:12
|
|
|
Xarthor posted:If those numbers hold up until election day does anyone have any idea what the electoral map will look like? How many electoral votes would that land Abuela? Incredibly simple and reductive way: 538 has Clinton +6 nationally (49 to 43%) compared to +11/+14 in the NBC poll. If we were to take every state 538 currently has at Trump +6 or less and flip them to Hillary (therefore assuming that the shift from Clinton +6 to Clinton +12ish is universal across the country in every state), you get this map (leaving Trump +6~8 neutral as tossups): 
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2016 17:12
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 11, 2024 13:50 |
|
|
djw175 posted:I'm skeptical of Broaddrick, yeah but for reasons entirely not to do with her being on the other team. Her story about Clinton intimidating her is ridiculous and the GOP was looking for anything they could use against Bill and still dismissed that as it wouldn't do anything. Y'know, actual substantive reasons instead of just calling her a fake.
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2016 17:12
|
|
