|
Geostomp posted:But that would imply that Drudge and Breitbart were wrong and that can't be right. Surely it must be the entire rest of the world that is wrong. Those evil DemonRATs simply corrupted everything. I'm certainly not at fault. Honestly I'm almost positive if the news ran an article saying stepping in front of a semi would kill you and Briebart ran a response saying it might, but not really, every one of those freepers would walk out in front of speeding semis because they thought Briebart was right
|
# ? Oct 12, 2016 07:31 |
|
|
# ? May 13, 2024 07:22 |
|
McGlockenshire posted:I love this example. There was only one debate that year, and it took place two days after the poll was released. Remember, what Trump said almost ten years ago doesn't count. But this poll from almost 40 years ago does....loving freep quote:To: buckalfa This is priceless. Someone hasn't watched anything of the campaign prior to this apparently. Either that or alzheimers is taking its toll McGlockenshire posted:A few snacks from At San Antonio Fundraiser, Trump Attacks Paul Ryan for "Disloyalty" posted by freeper drewh BURN ALL THE BRIDGES!!! SocketWrench fucked around with this message at 07:39 on Oct 12, 2016 |
# ? Oct 12, 2016 07:35 |
|
From Endorsement: We're with Hillary Clinton. Frankly, Donald Trump's dangerous. posted by freeper where's_the_Outrage? This'll be an endorsement from AL.com, a major Alabama news outlet. Alabama is solid red this year. the article posted:Alabama has voted for every Republican candidate since Ronald Reagan, a man that captured our imagination with a hopeful view of America as a shining city upon a hill. Nearly 40 years later, Donald Trump offers a deeply cynical view of an America in ruin, an America that seems to exist only in his own dangerous mind. Even before the revelation of video evidence of Trump making lewd, demeaning comments advocating sexual advances on women against their will, we knew that he was unfit to lead this country. We unite with people across this nation — people of all parties, including an increasing number of Republicans — to reject the pessimism of his candidacy. quote:To: where's_the_Outrage? I mean, on one hand, it's good that they're finally starting to be told this stuff straight up if they can't figure it out for themselves. But still, "I'm automatically attracted to beautiful [women]—I just start kissing them. It's like a magnet. Just kiss. I don't even wait." is molestey, and "And when you're a star they let you do it. You can do anything ... Grab them by the pussy. You can do anything." is goddamn sexual assault. The language has never been the main issue, you goddamn troglodytes. You want to know what's worse here? No replies at all to that comment. But here's 7, 8, 9, and 10. quote:To: where's_the_Outrage? quote:To: where's_the_Outrage? The article is rather long. quote:To: where's_the_Outrage? quote:To: where's_the_Outrage? BUT MUH quote:To: where's_the_Outrage? One of the great things we've seen this week is a whooole bunch of conservative women waking up to how poo poo their men are. quote:To: where's_the_Outrage? quote:To: Hildy There's also a slapfight over what kind of wording to use to describe how horrible America is now, but it's really just stupid and not funny at all.
|
# ? Oct 12, 2016 07:38 |
|
I love how they think that there are 150mil+ real American conservatives just waiting to do uh whatever.
|
# ? Oct 12, 2016 07:42 |
|
From Pence chides woman calling for 'revolution' if Clinton wins posted by freeper Timpanagos1 There's a video of the lady in the article the article posted:"Our lives depend on this election. Our kids' futures depend on this election and I will tell you just for me, and I don't want this to happen but I will tell you for me personally if Hillary Clinton gets in, I myself, I'm ready for a revolution because we can't have her in," she said emotionally. Hey, remember that nut that asked McCain about Obama being a foreigner and McCain defending him? We had no way of knowing that the birthers would be with us for years and years. As we've speculated in this thread, the nuts out there seem to be actively preparing for militia action. A real campaign would be pushing back against this in a very large and dramatic fashion. But not this campaign. Trump wants them angry and fearful. I wonder how many posts it'll be before someone accuses her of being a plant or some sort of false flag. quote:To: dp0622 quote:To: Gene Eric It took sixteen posts before someone suggests that an armed revolution is probably a bad idea. quote:To: Timpanagos1 quote:To: Timpanagos1 quote:To: Terry Mross quote:To: All 55 posts in. No false flags. Only one not calling for literal unironic actual revolution, and they're making fun of him. quote:To: Laser_Ray Here's a second poster not advocating armed revolution. quote:To: walkingdead 70 posts total. Only two posters even dared to suggest that armed revolution was not the way. Nobody called her a plant, or suggested that the question was a false flag. I have submitted that thread to the FBI's tip line. McGlockenshire fucked around with this message at 08:14 on Oct 12, 2016 |
# ? Oct 12, 2016 08:11 |
|
McGlockenshire posted:To: Rocky Mountain Wild Turkey I know, freep, but it's amazing that this guy is 100% convinced that Trump assaulted women, and is lying about it, and that the women will come forward and he does not care. Does not care. Amazing. Also hilarious that he thinks "Trump is a rapist and that's fine, but look Bill is a rapist and that's horrible" is a good strategy. Like, at least Trump's current strategy is "what I said was just words, Bill actually did it".
|
# ? Oct 12, 2016 09:16 |
|
I love the simultaneous "Trump is ahead by a mile, the media's just trying to discourage us" and "...maybe God will directly intervene and let him win".
|
# ? Oct 12, 2016 12:44 |
|
McGlockenshire posted:A few snacks from At San Antonio Fundraiser, Trump Attacks Paul Ryan for "Disloyalty" posted by freeper drewh Paul Ryan is doing everything he can to ensure that the Republican Party walks out of this election even somewhat intact, and Freep loving HATES him for it. It's amazing.
|
# ? Oct 12, 2016 12:48 |
It's selfish of me but part of the reason I want Hillary to win is I can't wait to see the dreams of these lazy fascists along with Scott Adams and Ben Garrison crushed along with their idiot candidate.
|
|
# ? Oct 12, 2016 13:11 |
|
I want to see if that Freeper who was doing the End of Obama countdown (with a new adjective added each day) starts a Clinton countdown if Trump loses
|
# ? Oct 12, 2016 13:18 |
|
McGlockenshire posted:70 posts total. Only two posters even dared to suggest that armed revolution was not the way. Nobody called her a plant, or suggested that the question was a false flag.
|
# ? Oct 12, 2016 13:25 |
|
Krazyface posted:I love the simultaneous "Trump is ahead by a mile, the media's just trying to discourage us" and "...maybe God will directly intervene and let him win". God was supposed to save Romney too.
|
# ? Oct 12, 2016 15:10 |
|
Yeah, but he was a sinful, non-Christian Mormon. Trump's just sinful!
|
# ? Oct 12, 2016 15:19 |
|
VitalSigns posted:I know, freep, but it's amazing that this guy is 100% convinced that Trump assaulted women, and is lying about it, and that the women will come forward and he does not care. Does not care. Amazing. Because the multiple lawsuits already suffered by Trump for sexual assault aren't damaging enough. The guy's a sexual predator and normally freep would be screaming for his head, but no, he's our guy this time so we need to abandon our morals and support this emperor god child
|
# ? Oct 12, 2016 15:30 |
|
Islam is the Lite Rock FM posted:God was supposed to save Romney too. God does whatever they tell Him to. They pay his salary by being "good Christians" and not murdering people that they don't hate. SocketWrench posted:Because the multiple lawsuits already suffered by Trump for sexual assault aren't damaging enough. The guy's a sexual predator and normally freep would be screaming for his head, but no, he's our guy this time so we need to abandon our morals and support this emperor god child Freepers having morals, that's a good one. These old bastards wouldn't know a what conviction if it bit them on the rear end. All that matters is what is useful to them at this particular moment or having an excuse to be terrible. Trump legitimizes their worst impulses, so they'll forever bow at his feet. He's what they really want, so they will do whatever they must to convince themselves that he's the embodiment of all that is good just like they do to convince themselves that anything they dislike or fear is pure demonic evil. Geostomp fucked around with this message at 15:34 on Oct 12, 2016 |
# ? Oct 12, 2016 15:31 |
|
SocketWrench posted:Honestly I'm almost positive if the news ran an article saying stepping in front of a semi would kill you and Briebart ran a response saying it might, but not really, every one of those freepers would walk out in front of speeding semis because they thought Briebart was right You might be surprised how many of them know the sources they trust are wrong and don't care because politics is just a "our team must win" type or sport to them. It's why so many of them are willing to blatantly say they don't care about facts or polls or statistics. As long as their team (Trump) wins it doesn't matter how hard they willingly blocked out reality to make it happen, like that one guy's "Your facts turn to lies in my head" quote or whatever
|
# ? Oct 12, 2016 16:02 |
|
I like the contrast between a) the implication that the "grab em by the pussy" remark was totally not that bad at all and what kind of safe-space lefty feminazi would have a problem with it, and b) the number of posts where Freepers can't bring themselves to type pussy and instead say "p***y" or "pu$$y" or "kitty" or something.
|
# ? Oct 12, 2016 16:11 |
|
Radish posted:It's selfish of me but part of the reason I want Hillary to win is I can't wait to see the dreams of these lazy fascists along with Scott Adams and Ben Garrison crushed along with their idiot candidate. Scott Adams will do his usual "I cast 7th level deflection and (pretended) to support Johnson!! Can't blame me!" bullshit. I dunno where to place Garrison but he's always come off as more of a slightly right guy who's willing to do anything gross for a buck, so it might actually be in his favor so the alt-right can continue to pay him to draw Hillary like a prostitute pig person
|
# ? Oct 12, 2016 16:15 |
|
quote:To: usafa92 That's weird - I'm also in NH, and all I see are Trump signs everywhere - I never see any Hillary signs, or even downticket Dem signs. And I'm not even in the boonies, I'm right on the MA border. I wonder where this guy is that seems to be a Dem pocket.
|
# ? Oct 12, 2016 16:18 |
|
Your daily dose of hate, unrelated to reality in general: Wall Street Journal: Only One in Five Millennials Has Ever Eaten a Big Mac quote:To: C19fan Words likely never uttered about burgers in general, or a Big Mac in particular
|
# ? Oct 12, 2016 16:23 |
|
As one of the ones who has tasted a Big Mac, I wish I hadn't.
|
# ? Oct 12, 2016 16:26 |
|
Icon Of Sin posted:Words likely never uttered about burgers in general, or a Big Mac in particular
|
# ? Oct 12, 2016 16:29 |
|
I thought I'd stop with that first one, but then I stumbled across this one. Rasmussen Poll: Trump Cuts Clinton's National Lead to 4 Points Denial: quote:To: mandaladon quote:To: mandaladon quote:To: mandaladon ALERT: REALITY INTRUDING quote:To: Dilbert San Diego quote:To: mandaladon That was close, crisis averted! quote:To: mandaladon
|
# ? Oct 12, 2016 16:35 |
|
It took them four days to notice, but WA Congressman Dave Reichert won’t vote for Trump in wake of comments about women posted by freeper Baynative Dave Reichert's district is really weird. It includes south and east suburban sprawl from Seattle, a huge chunk of the Cascades, and significantish cities in super-Republican eastern Washington. He probably thinks he'll be safe with this decision given where the population base is, and he's probably right. quote:To: Baynative quote:To: Baynative quote:To: Baynative quote:To: Baynative quote:To: Baynative quote:To: HiTech RedNeck quote:To: Electric Graffiti quote:To: Baynative Shocker: representative of divided district votes moderately! quote:To: Baynative quote:To: Baynative This probably isn't stdh, and the entire rest of the thread is consumed by stuff like this. quote:To: Baynative I hope he's stepped in it. I really wanted Dave Ross in congress, not Dave Reichert. Oh well.
|
# ? Oct 12, 2016 19:41 |
|
lmfao "have they listened to any of the rap music".
|
# ? Oct 12, 2016 20:13 |
|
Well now, this is interesting. From NBC PLANNED TO USE TRUMP AUDIO TO INFLUENCE DEBATE, ELECTION posted by freeper AmusedBystander So, get out your salt shaker, you're going to need it for this one: It's a TMZ article.
quote:To: Mr. K quote:To: AmusedBystander quote:To: cgbg quote:To: cgbg quote:To: TTFlyer quote:To: AmusedBystander quote:To: AmusedBystander quote:To: 1Old Pro Goddamn I really wish freep had toxx clauses. quote:To: TTFlyer gently caress the first amendment guys, amirite? quote:To: pfflier quote:To: DiogenesLamp quote:To: AmusedBystander quote:To: AmusedBystander
|
# ? Oct 12, 2016 20:16 |
|
Here's another thing that this guy is posting all over freep. Sourced from the thread above.quote:To: AmusedBystander
|
# ? Oct 12, 2016 20:18 |
|
Man, I'm loving these wikileaks ones. And by love I mean dread. Almost every single one of them has been so amazingly boring but that hasn't stopped the right wing nuts from whipping themselves into a frenzy. From WikiLeaks: Podesta and Left-Wing Activist Plot ‘Catholic Spring’ posted by freeper Trump_vs_Evil_Witch, what a delightful name. The lovely article doesn't even link to the email itself. Here's what some wonk wrote. quote:Hi, John, Podesta replies, quote:We created Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good to organize for a moment like this. But I think it lacks the leadership to do so now. Likewise Catholics United. Like most Spring movements, I think this one will have to be bottom up. I'll discuss with Tara. Kathleen Kennedy Townsend is the other person to consult. There's nothing new here. They've been trying to use birth control as a wedge issue for ages. But here's what the lovely freep article writes about Podesta's response. the article posted:In response, Podesta assures Newman to rest easy for he and his progressive pals have already created organizations explicitly designed to infiltrate the Catholic Church with progressive ideology, though he cautions that the time may not be right for full revolution — just yet. And with the rhetoric turned up that high, it's only natural that the OP writes quote:Hillary's team conspiring to subvert Roman Catholic Church into the one-world, new age, globalist conspiracy......(totally anti-Christ agenda) Yup, "Can we use birth control as a wedge issue to drive reform in the Catholic church?" becomes "NEW AGE GLOBALIST CONSPIRACY!!!11" quote:To: Trump_vs_Evil_Witch quote:To: Trump_vs_Evil_Witch quote:To: Trump_vs_Evil_Witch quote:To: Trump_vs_Evil_Witch quote:To: Trump_vs_Evil_Witch
|
# ? Oct 12, 2016 20:33 |
|
You know, it won't be FReepers, but I am legit scared for what some of these fringe, extreme right-wing nutjobs will do when Trump loses. Like, a "revolution" is way too strong a word, but people committing terroristic acts on US soil in the name of "FREEDUMB" and misguided rage is a very, very real possibility. There are enough psychos who think that those kinds of actions would be a good idea to make me honestly believe that poo poo will actually go down, and the threats made thus far have at least some base in reality. I'm sure also that because I live in the south that these ideas could come to fruition much easier than the rest of the country, what with the unending supply of guns and ignorance.
|
# ? Oct 12, 2016 20:39 |
|
McGlockenshire posted:To: AmusedBystander Ah, yes, I remember when the NFL shuttered thanks to the freep boycott. I know it's trivial, but it's the little freep things that keep me going.
|
# ? Oct 12, 2016 20:47 |
|
quote:So now, the liberal view has morphed, from shock at Trump using obscene language, to now saying he’s advocating sexual advances against women’s will?????? Are these people messed up the head??? What the heck??? Where’s this odd interpretation of what he said coming from????? Trump: "I suck cock." Freep: "Those dumb liberals really think Trump was talking about giving blowjobs? Where's that odd interpretation come from? Trump was obviously talking about when you eat chicken soup, and you slurp up the broth after the noodles are gone. Any idiot five year old could figure out that's what he meant." quote:I know that just saying those things does not mean he doesn't respect women. I know this because I have said far worse in my lifetime and I have nothing but respect for women. I have nothing but respect for women, that's why I talk about them as if they're objects with the sole purpose of giving me sexual pleasure. quote:if Pence is going to be nice and agreeable... that won’t work with the bunch they are competing against. Nice against evil, loses. Good to see this Freeper gets his outlook on life from the movie Spaceballs. Pontius Pilate posted:Ah, yes, I remember when the NFL shuttered thanks to the freep boycott. That's a good joke there. Everybody knows the NFL shuttered due to Conservapedia's boycott.
|
# ? Oct 12, 2016 21:02 |
Zipperelli. posted:You know, it won't be FReepers, but I am legit scared for what some of these fringe, extreme right-wing nutjobs will do when Trump loses. Like, a "revolution" is way too strong a word, but people committing terroristic acts on US soil in the name of "FREEDUMB" and misguided rage is a very, very real possibility. There are enough psychos who think that those kinds of actions would be a good idea to make me honestly believe that poo poo will actually go down, and the threats made thus far have at least some base in reality. I mean, Obama's election was also the "last chance America has!" and there was a lot of talk about revolution, but all we got was 5 people dead in a Walmart shooting two years later and a failed occupation that only resulted in one dead terrorist at the beginning of 2016. For every one person willing to commit violence and sacrifice their life for the cause, there's 500,000 who can't be arsed to get off the couch or give up Social Security.
|
|
# ? Oct 12, 2016 21:16 |
|
chitoryu12 posted:I mean, Obama's election was also the "last chance America has!" and there was a lot of talk about revolution, but all we got was 5 people dead in a Walmart shooting two years later and a failed occupation that only resulted in one dead terrorist at the beginning of 2016. For every one person willing to commit violence and sacrifice their life for the cause, there's 500,000 who can't be arsed to get off the couch or give up Social Security. But don't worry, there's a lot of powder and it's very dry.
|
# ? Oct 12, 2016 21:20 |
Zanzibar Ham posted:But don't worry, there's a lot of powder and it's very dry. Again, we've thought this for a long time. I have no doubt that we'll see some kind of response, like increased hate crimes, but I don't think we're at risk of an attempted revolution or anything (at least nothing bigger than Malheur, which was a few dozen unprepared ranchers and suburbanites who forgot to bring food and mostly ran away as soon as it looked like they'd get arrested). For all the crap we get, the United States is a pretty stable first world nation with little danger in daily life. We're simply not the kind of society that's susceptible to mass uprisings or an American Spring or anything like that.
|
|
# ? Oct 12, 2016 21:45 |
|
chitoryu12 posted:Again, we've thought this for a long time. I have no doubt that we'll see some kind of response, like increased hate crimes, but I don't think we're at risk of an attempted revolution or anything (at least nothing bigger than Malheur, which was a few dozen unprepared ranchers and suburbanites who forgot to bring food and mostly ran away as soon as it looked like they'd get arrested). For all the crap we get, the United States is a pretty stable first world nation with little danger in daily life. We're simply not the kind of society that's susceptible to mass uprisings or an American Spring or anything like that. Yeah, the powder's never dry enough.
|
# ? Oct 12, 2016 21:48 |
|
Zipperelli. posted:Like, a "revolution" is way too strong a word, but people committing terroristic acts on US soil in the name of "FREEDUMB" and misguided rage is a very, very real possibility. Pontius Pilate posted:Ah, yes, I remember when the NFL shuttered thanks to the freep boycott. https://twitter.com/darrenrovell/status/784428496089182208 They are confident that player protests are not a significant reason for the ratings decline. From USC Dornsife/LA Times Poll: 10/12 -- Trump down 1.3, Clinton up 1.1 -- CLINTON IN LEAD !!! posted by freeper BlessedBeGod These keywords are fun: 2016polls; allislost; catowner; chickenlittles; debbiedowners; frconcerntrolls; handsabandonship; handwringing; itsover; jumpoutofthewindow; ohno; ratsfleeingship; skyisfalling; wristslitters ... cat owner? This is that infamous tracking poll. It's the only one that's been reliably pro-Trump lately. Nate Cohn of the New York Times dug into the data to figure out why. NYT posted:There is a 19-year-old black man in Illinois who has no idea of the role he is playing in this election. The polls we see released every day aren't raw data. The data is massaged and manipulated in order to try and transform the random sample polled into a better representation of what the pollster thinks the actual voter turnout will be. This can cause some individual people to have their responses highly weighed and others to be weighed less. Apparently it's normal for you to cap the weights, but this poll doesn't do that. NYT posted:Jill Darling, the survey director at the U.S.C. Center for Economic and Social Research, noted that they had decided not to “trim” the weights (that’s when a poll prevents one person from being weighted up by more than some amount, like five or 10) because the sample would otherwise underrepresent African-American and young voters. So now we're in a position where we know that this poll has one specific pro-Trump voter in an underrepresented demographic that is getting their opinion amplified out of proportion. But freep doesn't know, and they don't care. quote:
quote:To: BlessedBeGod quote:To: BlessedBeGod quote:To: Dog quote:To: freespirit2012 quote:To: goldstategop quote:To: LegendHasIt quote:To: dp0622 quote:To: goldstategop quote:To: BlessedBeGod quote:To: BlessedBeGod quote:To: BinaryBoy Jesus, this is disgusting. quote:To: Dog quote:To: SoFloFreeper quote:To: BlessedBeGod Freeper dp0622 is coming unglued. quote:To: who knows what evil? quote:To: BlessedBeGod Jesus. quote:To: BeadCounter Guys, it's not that wikileaks has nothing, it's quote:To: WildHighlander57 quote:To: All Oh wow, they noticed. quote:To: libh8er Oops, no, wait, nevermind. quote:To: BlessedBeGod quote:To: mrs9x quote:To: dp0622 This is clearly copy/paste, but oh boy are they winding up the end of the world poo poo quote:To: BlessedBeGod
|
# ? Oct 12, 2016 21:50 |
McGlockenshire posted:As it happens, NFL ratings are down by a huge chunk. An NFL internal memo got leaked last week... Is this just covering television network ratings? I think TV in general has taken a big hit because of the ease with which it can be watched at your leisure online now, so people are becoming less tied to the TV to see stuff they're interested in. I know the Olympics this year suffered a big ratings hit because everyone just kept up with online streams and whatnot.
|
|
# ? Oct 12, 2016 21:59 |
|
quote:Gloria Allred is rounding up the "abused" Trump floozies. The women our guy abused are just sluts who are lying about it to make him look bad! The women their guy abused are purehearted honest souls who prove he's a rapist! Ugh. quote:Most minority communities are essentially dens of the devil. Godless, violent, ruled by gang warlords where murder and torture are commonplace. We have domestic terrorism right no and they are more dangerous than the Islamists, they are named Towanda and Lemangello. Oh hi Stormfront, nice to see you here on Freep.
|
# ? Oct 12, 2016 23:02 |
Zipperelli. posted:You know, it won't be FReepers, but I am legit scared for what some of these fringe, extreme right-wing nutjobs will do when Trump loses. Like, a "revolution" is way too strong a word, but people committing terroristic acts on US soil in the name of "FREEDUMB" and misguided rage is a very, very real possibility. There are enough psychos who think that those kinds of actions would be a good idea to make me honestly believe that poo poo will actually go down, and the threats made thus far have at least some base in reality. I'm expecting to see another run on ammunition and gun sales if Hillary wins, similar to what happened shortly after Newtown. I'm predicting a lot of of the usual 'Gonna take our guns!' fearmongering that happens whenever a Democrat takes power but I'm half-wondering if it won't be a self-fulfilling prophecy this time because some brainwashed wingnut decides to take a shot at Clinton.
|
|
# ? Oct 12, 2016 23:11 |
|
|
# ? May 13, 2024 07:22 |
|
Uncle Ulty posted:That's weird - I'm also in NH, and all I see are Trump signs everywhere - I never see any Hillary signs, or even downticket Dem signs. And I'm not even in the boonies, I'm right on the MA border. I wonder where this guy is that seems to be a Dem pocket. In reality's defense, he probably saw one and got pissed Cape Cod Crab Chip posted:lmfao "have they listened to any of the rap music". The party of personal responsibility doesn't want their leader to take personal responsibility...shocker SocketWrench fucked around with this message at 23:17 on Oct 12, 2016 |
# ? Oct 12, 2016 23:12 |