|
Honest to god that isn't even in the top ten of insane things from his rallies today.
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2016 01:43
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 8, 2024 19:13 |
|
|
FactsAreUseless posted:Intimidation lawsuits for libel already existed. The Gawker case hasn't changed that. Until it actually becomes a precedent for courts to change libel or defamation laws, you're just speculating wildly. My concern with Gawker isn't the legal precedent but the business one. Mother Jones just got through a similar experience much to their great cost. Small time investigative reporting is dying off and I fear someone might put the Texas Tribune or similar through the ringer and they might not survive it either or have to sacrifice ethics to surivive. Crowsbeak posted:Does the tabloid need to publish the sex tape then? So why do you think a couples privacy always overrides the public interest no matter the crime committed or public audacity? Literally never? If so, why? Is it the nakedness or that sex shouldn't enter the publicsphere? I'm just curious because it is rare to have such clear bright lines on speech.
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2016 01:44
|
|
|
Sensible Thursday posted:They wouldn't be doing this unless their internal polls vs Trump were rock solid
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2016 01:44
|
|
|
what does this even mean? jesus gently caress can he be any more incoherent?
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2016 01:45
|
|
|
Gawker is gross but more importantly hosed up real bad and mounted like the worst defense I have ever seen. SLAPP lawsuits are a blight and we should have laws protecting people and especially journalists from them and requiring plaintiffs to pay their opponents' legal fees. Everybody happy?
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2016 01:46
|
|
|
Podhoretz is an idiot. Tiffany Trump's middle name is Arianna.
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2016 01:46
|
|
|
SomeMathGuy posted:Nothing left to win Obama is maybe my favorite Obama. Fixed that for you.
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2016 01:46
|
|
|
I think he's referring to her collapsing from  pneumonia while speaking abroad.I think.
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2016 01:46
|
|
|
Trabisnikof posted:My concern with Gawker isn't the legal precedent but the business one. Mother Jones just got through a similar experience much to their great cost. Small time investigative reporting is dying off and I fear someone might put the Texas Tribune or similar through the ringer and they might not survive it either or have to sacrifice ethics to surivive.
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2016 01:47
|
|
|
Agrajag posted:what does this even mean? jesus gently caress can he be any more incoherent? It might be referencing the Chinese lack of good samaritan laws; where people won't help each other for fear of being sued. So she trips in Tiananmen square, they won't help her up. That's my take on it, anyways (its super incoherent)
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2016 01:48
|
|
|
FactsAreUseless posted:I'm not saying there are no concerns with Gawker, I just don't think it's settled yet. That's another thing to keep in mind- Gawker wasn't destroyed by losing their case, they were destroyed by procedural maneuvering without a ruling being issued. There's a good chance the judge will take their side and that they will have done nothing wrong in the eyes of the law, but they're still destroyed. That's what everyone is up in arms about, not whether or not it was right to publish a sex tape. haveblue fucked around with this message at 01:52 on Oct 14, 2016 |
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2016 01:49
|
|
|
Trabisnikof posted:My concern with Gawker isn't the legal precedent but the business one. Mother Jones just got through a similar experience much to their great cost. Small time investigative reporting is dying off and I fear someone might put the Texas Tribune or similar through the ringer and they might not survive it either or have to sacrifice ethics to surivive. Well did Terry commit a crime during the video? Even if he did then the only people who should be watching it are people directly involved in a trial that would concern said crime. You know rather then anyone who can access the internet and play streaming videos. Fine I am against procedural maneuvering, you happy?
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2016 01:50
|
|
|
He's saying if she falls over in Tiananmen Square, the Chinese won't help her up because she doesn't get the Art of the Deal.
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2016 01:50
|
|
|
Shimrra Jamaane posted:lol this headline on NBC News A Vast Always Wings Conspiracy.
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2016 01:51
|
|
|
Once more, Last Year of Term Obama proves to be truly the best Obama.
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2016 01:52
|
|
|
The non-Ana Navarro lady on CNN just gave a more eloquent explanation for why these victims of sexual assault waited to tell their stories until now than I have ever heard on tv.
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2016 01:52
|
|
|
cult member at airport posted:
It's not good but it's fast and it's cheap sooooooo 
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2016 01:52
|
|
|
disjoe posted:The non-Ana Navarro lady on CNN just gave a more eloquent explanation for why these victims of sexual assault waited to tell their stories until now than I have ever heard on tv.
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2016 01:53
|
|
|
Augus posted:so...where does "filing multiple libel suits over accusations of rape less than a month from election day" fit in on the optics scale? You know how toward the end of the Reich Hitler was moving imaginary divisions on the map to thwart enemy advances, until in that iconic Downfall scene he had to face the reality that everything is lost. At the end he'll blow his brains out.
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2016 01:54
|
|
|
This was on my Steam front page today. Wonder if I should live out a fantasy with it or not. http://store.steampowered.com/app/507010/
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2016 01:56
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/ScottBaio/status/786730841741275137 gently caress you scott baio. I don't even know where to start here.
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2016 01:57
|
|
|
"Random hot women can't hope to win against a billionaire in court" is probably where I'd try, but gently caress it, it's not worth it.
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2016 01:58
|
|
|
disjoe posted:The non-Ana Navarro lady on CNN just gave a more eloquent explanation for why these victims of sexual assault waited to tell their stories until now than I have ever heard on tv. Hopefully Smash! Will have a clip. I've heard several people express distrust because they didn't immediately go to the police.
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2016 01:58
|
|
|
Spaced God posted:https://twitter.com/ScottBaio/status/786730841741275137 here's where you start: he was accused of assault multiple times already before running for president
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2016 01:59
|
|
|
disjoe posted:The non-Ana Navarro lady on CNN just gave a more eloquent explanation for why these victims of sexual assault waited to tell their stories until now than I have ever heard on tv. Did it involve saying that nobody gave a gently caress when the Jill Harth story broke in July, but that Trump himself admitting to that kind of behavior being leaked on tape would maybe make their stories more believable in the eyes of the public and maybe less life-ruining? I mean, it's very easy to explain why none of these specific women came forward until now. Look at what happened to the women who did. Trump should probably not use that argument in debate 3, but he probably will because he's a super dumb motherfucker. This Melania intimidation poo poo today is real hosed too. His entire anti-Hillary argument with Bill's affairs is that she went after his victims public. Now his own wife appears to be going after his own victims publicly. It's like he's trying to systematically undermine every single anti-Hillary claim that has ever come out of his mouth. ErIog fucked around with this message at 02:01 on Oct 14, 2016 |
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2016 01:59
|
|
|
Spaced God posted:https://twitter.com/ScottBaio/status/786730841741275137 So, uh. Bill Cosby, Scott Baio?
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2016 01:59
|
|
|
overdesigned posted:"Random hot women can't hope to win against a billionaire in court" is probably where I'd try, but gently caress it, it's not worth it. Also hush money exists also a gross (meaning both large and disgusting) percentage of sexual assaults go unreported BECAUSE PEOPLE DO poo poo LIKE DOX THEM also it has happened with Trump's ex but those records are sealed for some reason
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2016 01:59
|
|
|
Spaced God posted:https://twitter.com/ScottBaio/status/786730841741275137 He's, like, the one bad thing about Arrested Development. Even then, his casting can be written off as charity.
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2016 02:00
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/SopanDeb/status/786732697158815744 god he's so dumb
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2016 02:00
|
|
|
The point of that stupid kids wrestling photo is that boys should never be beaten by girls right? Because girls are weak and feminine and boys are strong and aggressive? I hate that stupid photo.
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2016 02:01
|
|
|
I'm confused. It seems they're actually referring to Tiffany (Marla's child) and not Ivanka. And a vaguely remember it being news he named the girl after the famous jeweler. Weird.
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2016 02:01
|
|
|
ohiovoters.jpg
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2016 02:01
|
|
|
Star Man posted:This was on my Steam front page today. Wonder if I should live out a fantasy with it or not. which member of Hillary's media team made this? because he needs a promotion
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2016 02:02
|
|
|
Crowsbeak posted:Well did Terry commit a crime during the video? Even if he did then the only people who should be watching it are people directly involved in a trial that would concern said crime. You know rather then anyone who can access the internet and play streaming videos. So are you just opposed to releasing a sex tape if no crime is committed? If there was a tape of a politician saying the most heinous thing you can imagine but they deny the stills and audio are them, claiming it as a hatchet job, still then releasing it is uncalled for? What if it's just someone jacking off? Or like a Hillary/Donald slashfic come to life, where they both say horrible things and are public figures? Or if it something important but impossible to prove with just a still image or two and audio? If you are against procedural maneuvering are you sure you're on the right side of this case? There was a lot of procedural maneuvering to ruin Gawker regardless of the final outcome.
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2016 02:02
|
|
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vvIrdg-epwA&t=15s
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2016 02:03
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/allinwithchris/status/786730276936306688 <3 Obama <3 
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2016 02:03
|
|
|
Have Some Flowers! posted:ohiovoters.jpg Never have wounded egos been so visible
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2016 02:04
|
|
|
To me, Trump's locker room conversation was more than just admitting to sexual assault, it was him explicitly saying why women were not able to speak out against him until now. I mean, the mechanics of it are not rocket science but if someone doesn't get it then Professor Trump can teach them.
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2016 02:05
|
|
|
BaDandy posted:Ohhh I can't wait to see Rudy's reaction to this. It's right there: quote:"Every time New York City suffered a tragedy Donald Trump was there to help," Giuliani said. "He's not going to like my telling you this but he did it anonymously.” Trump is such a selfless hero! He also killed Osama bin Laden but kept the information to himself!
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2016 02:05
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 8, 2024 19:13 |
|
|
How often does Trump say "believe me?" Someone make a word cloud.
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2016 02:06
|
|
