|
Captain_Maclaine posted:Do not actually do this. 
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2016 15:42
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 29, 2024 19:28 |
|
|
At least we'll always have ZDR to poke the ineffectual hornets' nest.
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2016 15:57
|
|
|
Considering how other election toxxes go we'll be free to post in the other one after victory. Please Be Patient
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2016 16:00
|
|
|
i'm just gonna wait until the election gets called and we get the go-ahead to post in the other thread, then i'll clown on them edit: John McCain: 81 Toxxes Mitt Romney: 117 Toxxes Donald Trump: not sure what the total toxx count is yet. not sure what any of this data means but there you go Instant Sunrise has issued a correction as of 16:59 on Oct 14, 2016 |
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2016 16:41
|
|
|
Mirthless posted:it's amazing how much they're crying over the new terms, like they really can't handle the idea that, yes, we really don't want you in our community anymore if you refuse to repudiate (possible) serial rapist Donald "Grab Em' By the Pussy" Trump Yeah I don't know why they're whining, all they have to do is renounce Trump and they're off free with a probation. If you stay on past that point you're supporting a pedophile/rapist/etc and deserve the perma.
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2016 17:01
|
|
|
Even cspam mascot Baloogan who's entire posting career is "give no fucks at all times" renounced Donny T.
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2016 17:03
|
|
|
I'm not sure what's funnier. The people who aren't renouncing because they believe that Trump can honestly win or the ones who are ~~too honorable~~ to renounce the serial rapist racist idiot manbaby.
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2016 17:24
|
|
|
djw175 posted:I'm not sure what's funnier. The people who aren't renouncing because they believe that Trump can honestly win or the ones who are ~~too honorable~~ to renounce the serial rapist racist idiot manbaby. what's really sad is if you look at the old romney toxx thread and seeing all the maga towers under people's names.
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2016 18:10
|
|
|
Just donated to the RAINN thread, realized I hadn't  yet. Time to get the gently caress in!
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2016 19:09
|
|
|
Captain_Maclaine posted:Why, that sounds like a double-toxx, which around here often leads to a... Mod challenge update: I'm writing a great response, probably the greatest response.
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2016 19:21
|
|
MOD CHALLENGE
|
Instant Sunrise posted:what's really sad is if you look at the old romney toxx thread and seeing all the maga towers under people's names. This is honestly why I'm fine with their bets being upped to permas
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2016 20:14
|
|
|
JT Jag posted:Yo, I've held off on this but consider me to be toxxing for abuela holy loving poo poo, talk about coming in during the victory lap
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2016 20:26
|
|
|
RACHET posted:Mod challenge update: don't do it man
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2016 20:27
|
|
|
Chris James 2 posted:This is honestly why I'm fine with their bets being upped to permas yeah I mean why be honorable if you're gonna be a hillary supporter
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2016 20:27
|
|
|
I'm not doing any mod challenge so feel free to ban me whenever.
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2016 20:28
|
|
|
fade5 posted:Hillary's got a strange new supporter: best Republican president this century so far, why not have all the right wing stooges support her
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2016 20:28
|
|
|
nice meltdown
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2016 20:29
|
|
|
The Rokstar posted:I feel kind of bad about posting in this thread now, there's just no sport in it. Can I upgrade to a permaban Toxx or something? Let's make it at least slightly interesting. you're right, you definitely waited until there was zero risk, very brave
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2016 20:29
|
|
|
Alan Smithee posted:i for one welcome the universal healthcare injection straight into my eyeballs I'm voting yes on Colorado Amendment 69 too, thanks for your support.
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2016 20:30
|
|
|
I gave $2700 to Bernie on the first(ish) day of his campaign and the only thing I regret is that the "leftists" on this forum are completely okay with Hillary stealing away an assured socialist victory against Donald Trump
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2016 20:33
|
|
|
yikes
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2016 20:35
|
|
|
i aspire to be living sunk cost fallacy too
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2016 20:36
|
|
|
Saagonsa posted:yikes I hear this is the Clinton friendly part of town, you wanna fight?
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2016 20:37
|
|
|
Al! posted:i aspire to be living sunk cost fallacy too sunk cost would be continuing to support the Democratic Party after they show a preference to a right-wing candidate
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2016 20:38
|
|
|
Better to bern out than to fade away (USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST)
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2016 20:39
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2016 20:46
|
|
|
Utah's got the right idea, go all in on McMuffin.
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2016 20:49
|
|
|
Sweet a real-time meltdown, these are always fun to watch.
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2016 21:01
|
|
|
Engineersean why don't you want to support the candidate with the most progressive platform. You can't spell progressive without progress!!
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2016 21:03
|
|
|
hahahha go read the fuckin trump toxx thread if you haven't meltdowns galore
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2016 21:04
|
|
|
Bass Bottles posted:Engineersean why don't you want to support the candidate with the most progressive platform. I do but Hillary Clinton is not the candidate with the most progressive platform!
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2016 21:14
|
|
|
EngineerSean posted:I gave $2700 to Bernie on the first(ish) day of his campaign and the only thing I regret is that the "leftists" on this forum are completely okay with Hillary stealing away an assured socialist victory against Donald Trump Hey man, I like Bernie just as much as the next guy, but uh, hmmmnmmmm
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2016 21:16
|
|
|
EngineerSean posted:I do but Hillary Clinton is not the candidate with the most progressive platform! Bernie is no longer running. I'm sorry we lost, but Bernie is not there anymore. We have to move on.
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2016 21:17
|
|
|
EngineerSean posted:I do but Hillary Clinton is not the candidate with the most progressive platform! My question was dumb, let me rephrase it. You believed in Bernie enough to donate $2700 to his campaign. That's pretty cool. Judging from that, and from the passion you display right now, in this thread!!! I have to ask: Why do you ignore Bernie's current stance that Hillary Clinton is the only choice? Why do you think he took this stance? Why is he wrong? And you said you were double-toxxing, so you support Trump? Why would you support the very candidate that Bernie says CANNOT become president? And if you're voting third party, I mean, I guess I just hope you live in a state where she's going to win anyway? Because that is the only excuse for wasting a vote on a third party candidate, though in this election it still isn't a good idea. Bernie is right that Trump cannot become president. The consequences would be extreme.
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2016 21:22
|
|
|
EngineerSean posted:you're right, you definitely waited until there was zero risk, very brave #ThatMakesMeSmart Smartassy ironic usage of Trump hashtags is cool right?
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2016 21:25
|
|
|
Pakled posted:nice meltdown
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2016 21:29
|
|
|
Bass Bottles posted:Why do you ignore Bernie's current stance that Hillary Clinton is the only choice? Why do you think he took this stance? Why is he wrong? I think it's a joke to be honest. quote:And you said you were double-toxxing, so you support Trump? Why would you support the very candidate that Bernie says CANNOT become president? I toxxed for him months ago (first page of the Toxx thread) and it's because I thought he would win, not that I supported him. quote:And if you're voting third party, I mean, I guess I just hope you live in a state where she's going to win anyway? Because that is the only excuse for wasting a vote on a third party candidate, though in this election it still isn't a good idea. She's going to win regardless of how you or I vote.
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2016 21:45
|
|
|
The Rokstar posted:#ThatMakesMeSmart Yeah it's cool :fistbump: It's still a -EV bet so not too smart.
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2016 21:46
|
|
|
Chris James 2 posted:Bernie is no longer running. I'm sorry we lost, but Bernie is not there anymore. We have to move on. Bernie would not approve of this post, please self-reflect. Chris James 2 posted:This is honestly why I'm fine with their bets being upped to permas
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2016 21:47
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 29, 2024 19:28 |
|
|
EngineerSean posted:Bernie would not approve of this post, please self-reflect. Bernie lost, backed a winner, and stepped aside. Romney toxxers took a really bad decision (toxxing for Romney), re-registered after their punishment, and followed by making a historically bad decision (toxxing for Trump). Very un-Bernie like at best, cowardice at worst, and either way it gets no sympathy from me that they're now facing a perma. For the few facing it who didn't make those two bad decisions back to back, congrats on making two more bad decisions back to back (toxxing for the worst man and sticking by it after being warned of a free pass out of it)
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2016 21:53
|
|