- McDragon
- Sep 11, 2007
-
|
well according to dictionary.com he's making up words now and there are a lot more repeats than before. I don't know if he can make it another 90 days unless he starts using bad foreign words
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2016 23:58
|
|
- Adbot
-
ADBOT LOVES YOU
|
|
#
?
May 11, 2024 10:24
|
|
- Goatse James Bond
- Mar 28, 2010
-
If you see me posting please remind me that I have Charlie Work in the reports forum to do instead
|
Zeetoo, I wish to apply to be purchased as one of your spouses if you can agree with my father on a price, as established in the Good Book.
|
#
?
Oct 23, 2016 00:14
|
|
- SocketWrench
- Jul 8, 2012
-
by Fritz the Horse
|
From Obama Blames ‘Far-Right Media’ for ‘Pumping Out All Kinds of Crazy Toxic Stuff(LOL!) posted by freeper rktman
It's a Breitbart article covering some things that Obama allegedly said at a campaign speech in Miami the other day. I say allegedly because only nutjob right wing media sites have any of these quotes and I'm short enough on time to not watch the video of the speech itself.
You all know what's coming, but that doesn't make it any less funny/tragic.
8 years of saying the exact same poo poo in the article and now that it's been brought up by Obama they deny deny deny. What a bunch of lying halfwits
well according to dictionary.com he's making up words now and there are a lot more repeats than before. I don't know if he can make it another 90 days unless he starts using bad foreign words
Heh, after November 8th he's gonna have to reset his clock for another four years at least
SocketWrench fucked around with this message at 00:30 on Oct 23, 2016
|
#
?
Oct 23, 2016 00:27
|
|
- Jagged Jim
- Sep 26, 2013
-
I... I can only look though the window...
|
Trump promises to sue accusers after election
So much revenge, so little time.
Yes, because that's how lawsuits work.
quote:To: kevcol
Sue their accusers AND their lawyers.
2 posted on 10/22/2016 9:43:32 AM PDT by unixfox (Abolish Slavery, Repeal the 16th Amendment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]
quote:To: kevcol
He needs to also sue the crap out of that b(tch Gloria Allred!!
3 posted on 10/22/2016 9:43:52 AM PDT by MagUSNRET
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]
quote:To: MagUSNRET
This Gettysburg speech is awesome!!!!!!!
6 posted on 10/22/2016 9:45:30 AM PDT by JBW1949 (I'm really PC....PATRIOTICALLY CORRECT!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]
And sue you, too!
quote:To: unixfox
He will, through information found during discovery, launch a suit against the DNC
7 posted on 10/22/2016 9:45:50 AM PDT by Balding_Eagle ( The Great Wall of Trump ---- 100% sealing of the border. Coming soon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]
Indeed.
quote:To: kevcol
Just watched his speech and loved it.
The Hillary hacks on Fox are now flailing to disarm it but anyone who heard his words and have half a brain will see through them.
9 posted on 10/22/2016 9:47:54 AM PDT by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]
quote:To: kevcol
I’m thankful DONALD TRUMP has the means to put these slimy people out of business. JUSTICE WILL PREVAIL.
HEBREWS 10:30
For we know HIM Who said, “It is mine to avenge; I will repay,” and again, “The LORD will judge His people.”
10 posted on 10/22/2016 9:47:54 AM PDT by stars & stripes forever (Blessed is the nation whose God is the Lord. Psalm 33:12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]
quote:To: MagUSNRET
Allred is worth around 25 million. Could be another nice payday for Mr Trump.
Pray America wakes
13 posted on 10/22/2016 9:50:52 AM PDT by bray (Because you would be in jail)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]
quote:To: kevcol
Clinton: threaten, intimidate, visciously attack, pay off, settle out of court since claims substantiated and easily verified
Trump: sue their lyin’ asses
16 posted on 10/22/2016 9:52:34 AM PDT by thefixisin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]
quote:To: kevcol
President Trump will do no such thing!
He will never sue his accusers.
He will not sue his accusers as President Trump would never let himself be deposed by the defense.
18 posted on 10/22/2016 9:53:05 AM PDT by Timpanagos1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]
quote:To: Timpanagos1
You’re wrong.
He can, and will.
19 posted on 10/22/2016 9:55:08 AM PDT by Balding_Eagle ( The Great Wall of Trump ---- 100% sealing of the border. Coming soon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]
quote:To: trebb
Agree. Fuchs News is galloping to the Left — didn’t take long after the bimbo news readers forced out Ailes.
24 posted on 10/22/2016 9:59:12 AM PDT by nickedknack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]
quote:To: unixfox
Let's see how fast the Clinton's run away from these useful idiots after the election. I don't know how anyone can believe these politically motivated attacks on Trump. These women didn't say anything for years but they come out two weeks before a presidential election
No way. I hope people can see through the Clinton smears and see the truth. Hillary Clinton belongs underneath the big-house, not in the white house.
25 posted on 10/22/2016 9:59:17 AM PDT by peeps36 (Obama = the skidmark on America's underwear.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]
quote:To: Jim 0216
Well is it malice enough to go public when victim is running for election? What other non malicious motive could they have?
29 posted on 10/22/2016 10:03:04 AM PDT by amihow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]
Trump doesn't afraid of anything!
quote:To: Timpanagos1
What do you mean by that? That Trump would be scared of the questions?
LOL!
Donald’s not scared of anything, but he is determined, damned determined, that he is going to end this cycle of corruption in our election process.
35 posted on 10/22/2016 10:07:58 AM PDT by Balding_Eagle ( The Great Wall of Trump ---- 100% sealing of the border. Coming soon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]
...and you! ...and you! ...and especially you!
quote:To: unixfox
“Sue their accusers AND their lawyers.”
And the DNC, and the Clinton Campaign, and the media shills and everyone else remotely connected.
Trump has spent 100 Million of his own money on this election. That payback for damages is going to hurt.
36 posted on 10/22/2016 10:08:25 AM PDT by No Socialist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]
quote:To: kevcol
People are very poorly advised to go against Trump. I like him, so it comes easy to me. I also see him as a winner so that part’s easy, too. Plus I see him as the non-schmoozer-extraordinaire, so easy to see why to just be quiet if I’d have to work with him in the future. He’s the kind of winner that has zero time for anyone not with him. To say the least
38 posted on 10/22/2016 10:10:08 AM PDT by stanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]
Repeal the removal of Common Core!
quote:To: kevcol; neverdem; SunkenCiv; Cindy; LucyT; decimon; freedumb2003; ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas; ...
Other minor items you missed:
Repeal Obamacare.
Repeal Remove Common Core and return local control to education.
Repeal Lifetime ban on White House workers lobbying foreign countries.
Repeal Remove the backlog of 4000 drugs awaiting approval.
Repeal Undo all of Obama's unconstitutional executive orders.
Repeal 15% top tax bracket on Business -- tax cuts FOR THE MIDDLE CLASS.
Repeal Deportation of illegal criminal aliens: 5 year mandatory sentence if you re-enter with a felony conviction or multiple misdemeanor convictions.
Repeal Require removal of 2 new federal regulations for each new regulation issued.
Repeal Defund the UN on Climate Change, use the money for US infrastructure.
Repeal Hiring Freeze on Federal workers.
Repeal Remove restrictions on the Trans Canada Pipeline.
Repeal Cancel ALL Federal Funding for Sanctuary Cities.
57 posted on 10/22/2016 10:24:45 AM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]
Repeal!
quote:To: grey_whiskers
Oh, and label China a currency manipulator.
61 posted on 10/22/2016 10:26:17 AM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]
quote:To: unixfox
No. First appoint a few judges and Attorney General and gut the Just Us dept.
then sue
63 posted on 10/22/2016 10:35:40 AM PDT by TheNext (Hillary Hurts Children & Women)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]
You know I think Freep may not understand what the Discovery Phase of trial entails.
quote:To: EDINVA
Do you seriously think these were not deliberate, malicious lies? You truly believe these women lived with their tales for decades, right up until weeks before the election?
I am pretty sure he can prove easily both that they were lies and that they were published with malice, i.e., the intent to destroy his reputation and thus to deprive him of a fair election.
Yep. Just wait for discovery when we can find out about Hillary's campaign communicating with these beotches providing the animus and malice to try to take down his campaign.
64 posted on 10/22/2016 10:40:30 AM PDT by Lent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]
quote:To: Jim 0216
Oh yes he will. He will have damages and actual malice if he lost the election after spending $100 million of his own money and everyone in corrupt MSM is bragging those false allegations crashed his campaign
67 posted on 10/22/2016 10:47:39 AM PDT by GOPe Means Bend Over Spell Run (GO GALT - VOTE TRUMP!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]
quote:To: kevcol
Trump is the one they have always feared. He is not a pushover.
70 posted on 10/22/2016 10:48:54 AM PDT by Leep (Just say no to half dead hillary and wrong lane kaine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]
quote:To: trebb
“The Hillary hacks on Fox are now flailing to disarm it but anyone who heard his words and have half a brain will see through them. “
Screw Fox! We bought their bull$hit lies about “fair and balanced,” and helped them build their network. Now that we know the “real truth,” we can be the driving force to put them out of business.
74 posted on 10/22/2016 10:51:48 AM PDT by vette6387
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]
quote:To: kevcol
IIRC, something in the WikiLeaks showed Allred scheming with Clinton campaign many months ago to get the ball rolling to fabricate accusations by females if Trump won.
80 posted on 10/22/2016 10:56:20 AM PDT by MayflowerMadam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]
Wait a minute...
quote:To: kevcol
I was hoping that Trump would have more important things to do after the election.
90 posted on 10/22/2016 11:09:14 AM PDT by Poincare (Reality is not a fool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]
I'm sure.
quote:To: bray
And after Trump’s expenses, I’d bet he’d donate the money to vets.
92 posted on 10/22/2016 11:09:48 AM PDT by kiltie65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]
quote:To: Poincare
“I was hoping that Trump would have more important things to do after the election.”
Lord willing, he will. The lawsuits would be prosecuted by his personal attorneys as is usually the case.
101 posted on 10/22/2016 11:34:48 AM PDT by EDINVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]
quote:To: kevcol
Trump’s smart.
Let it be known, right now, that he’ll be suing these women after the election. These women know Hillary’s not going to provide cover after the election. One or more, in order to sidestep a trial against a BILLIONAIRE, may just offer up information to Trump RE the false accusations...the HRC campaign instigator/contact person, etc.
This could very well be a fishing expedition. Hope he catches a big one.
103 posted on 10/22/2016 11:37:45 AM PDT by moovova
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]
quote:To: Poincare
Don’t you worry your little heart. Trump can multitask. Or just one of his children to take on that task.
106 posted on 10/22/2016 11:44:17 AM PDT by McGruff (Time for a Tea Party II)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]
quote:To: Jim 0216
“He’s not going to “sue his accusers” because he’s a public figure UNLESS he can show that deliberate lies were published with MALICE, then he has a case.”
Anyone can sue anyone else at any time for practically anything, whether they have a case or not. Just because Trump might not win due to a technicality, he potentially could create havoc for this accusers and at least cause the truth to come out, and certainly part of that would be attempting to prove malice.
111 posted on 10/22/2016 12:21:13 PM PDT by catnipman (Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]
quote:To: unixfox
It's bothersome that hillary and her stormtroopers chose this disgusting topic to AGAIN put off discussion the issues. This BS is seriously harmful to real victims of abuse. It trivializes the horror so many women have faced.
If what these women said has even an ounce of truth to this, they're horrible role models. They didn't report it, they didn't say to him they were offended. They aren't believable, not at all.
117 posted on 10/22/2016 12:32:11 PM PDT by grania (I'm Deplorable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]
What does Pro Bono mean?
quote:To: Jim 0216
He will blow through their collective entire net worth on day 2 of the lawsuit. If Gloria wants to put up a few hundred thousand each to defend these lying hoes, I’ll be surprised.
122 posted on 10/22/2016 12:36:47 PM PDT by anton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]
quote:To: Jim 0216
“He’s not going to “sue his accusers” because he’s a public figure UNLESS he can show that deliberate lies were published with MALICE, then he has a case.”
The intent was to destroy Trump and install a corrupt evil hellbitch as POTUS! That is about as malicious as can be!
127 posted on 10/22/2016 12:54:16 PM PDT by Frank_2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]
quote:To: anton
Well I loathe and despise the use of lawsuits without merit to destroy people and their means. Even lawsuits with merit should be to right wrongs done by the defendant.
Don’t forget, the Left loves to use lawsuits, often without merit, to silence and destroy their enemies (us). Let’s be careful not to cheer our side along by applauding the same despicable tactics the bad guys use.
Having said that, I don’t think Trump’s suits are without merit and I hope he is trying to right wrongs, not destroy people.
132 posted on 10/22/2016 1:29:18 PM PDT by Jim 0216
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]
quote:To: vette6387
Why is it RAT women seem to have all the worst attributes of all the worlds worst ex-wives?
Is it something they learn in college during their womens studies?
Maybe it’s just their own evil natures bubbling to the surface like scum on a dead pond?
146 posted on 10/22/2016 3:11:09 PM PDT by oldvirginian (If someone tells you biscuits and gravy ain't a meal, just walk away. You don't need the negativity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]
|
#
?
Oct 23, 2016 01:58
|
|
- daydrinking
- Mar 30, 2016
-
|
If only I could give a middle finger hard enough to blow things up.
this election proves that psychic powers aren't real because if they were, pure hate would've caused at least a few people to spontaneously combust
|
#
?
Oct 23, 2016 02:47
|
|
- stan worship
- Oct 23, 2013
-
|
this election proves that psychic powers aren't real because if they were, pure hate would've caused at least a few people to spontaneously combust
On the other hand, that third debate would've been absolutely enthralling if prayers were an effective way of making things happen...
|
#
?
Oct 23, 2016 03:15
|
|
- Twelve by Pies
- May 4, 2012
-
Again a very likpatous story
|
quote:To: unixfox
It's bothersome that hillary and her stormtroopers chose this disgusting topic to AGAIN put off discussion the issues. This BS is seriously harmful to real victims of abuse. It trivializes the horror so many women have faced.
If what these women said has even an ounce of truth to this, they're horrible role models. They didn't report it, they didn't say to him they were offended. They aren't believable, not at all.
117 posted on 10/22/2016 12:32:11 PM PDT by grania (I'm Deplorable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]
Believing women who speak up about being abused is harmful to victims of abuse.
Get hosed forever, you lovely rear end in a top hat.
|
#
?
Oct 23, 2016 03:16
|
|
- Geostomp
- Oct 22, 2008
-
Unite: MASH!!
~They've got the bad guys on the run!~
|
Believing women who speak up about being abused is harmful to victims of abuse.
Get hosed forever, you lovely rear end in a top hat.
It makes sense to them in the same way that they "aren't racist": by changing their personal definitions of the crime to suit their positions. Just like they are clearly not racist because they don't use full slurs and aren't physically murdering minorities, they and their lord and master Trump aren't sexist or abusers because the women didn't give formal indication that being touched was unacceptable in triplicate immediately after being assaulted. Since Trump is good and only attacks what has bad, these women are just deceitful harpies for KKKillary attacking poor Lil' Donnie for ancient history and he is fully justified in burying them with his lawyers like everyone else who defies him.
It's the good old cognitive dissonance that Freep was built on that lets them ignore even the most obvious facts by simply re-classifying them into some lesser offense while pretending they would totally fight for some hypothetical real victim (like themselves) at a later date.
|
#
?
Oct 23, 2016 04:58
|
|
- Twelve by Pies
- May 4, 2012
-
Again a very likpatous story
|
They fight for real, not hypothetical victims, as long as those real victims are accusing Democrats.
|
#
?
Oct 23, 2016 05:25
|
|
- SocketWrench
- Jul 8, 2012
-
by Fritz the Horse
|
Christ, he's like the stereotypical rich spoiled brat...a real Billy Madison
quote:To: unixfox
Let's see how fast the Clinton's run away from these useful idiots after the election. I don't know how anyone can believe these politically motivated attacks on Trump. These women didn't say anything for years but they come out two weeks before a presidential election
No way. I hope people can see through the Clinton smears and see the truth. Hillary Clinton belongs underneath the big-house, not in the white house.
25 posted on 10/22/2016 9:59:17 AM PDT by peeps36 (Obama = the skidmark on America's underwear.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]
You know, this is what happened to Bill Clinton, right? His accusers didn't come out till he was pres...and because of that you 100% believe them and think he's a rapist.
Oh yeah, I forgot, this is freep where "as long as it's my side it's ok"
Believing women who speak up about being abused is harmful to victims of abuse.
Get hosed forever, you lovely rear end in a top hat.
I just get a kick out of the double standards
"I can't believe Clinton is mentioning sex scandals again, but i love it when Trump drags them through two debates and even tries to lie and trick people into listening to it too. He even drags out Benghazi again because my views of that are totally true even though the reports say otherwise because RINOs and because Trump is always right."
These guys are such closet party Nazis it's astounding
SocketWrench fucked around with this message at 06:53 on Oct 23, 2016
|
#
?
Oct 23, 2016 06:44
|
|
- McGlockenshire
- Dec 16, 2005
-
GOLLOCKS!
|
From FOX News: The widespread cyber attack yesterday was "perpetrated by a government.", a vanity thread posted by Jim Robinson
the OP posted:FOX News: The widespread cyber attack yesterday was "perpetrated by a government."
Yeah. Our own.
This is unproven speculation, but since when did that stop freep from talking about something?
quote:To: Jim Robinson
Bingo. They tested regional shutoffs of the Internet Kill Switch in advance of the coup.
2 posted on 10/22/2016, 4:21:30 PM by Publius ("Who is John Galt?" by Billthedrill and Publius now available at Amazon.)
quote:To: Jim Robinson
correct
our current government is our enemy
5 posted on 10/22/2016, 4:22:48 PM by Thibodeaux (Exile Barack, Exile the Wookie, Exile Malia, Exile Shasha)
It is unclear if the group that came forward claiming credit actually has any credibility to their claim.
quote:To: Bogie
They are so utterly corrupt and contemptuous of the people they’re not even trying to hide it. They believe the general population is too stupid to know or even care. And they’re about half right on that. The average person is too stupid to know or care. And half of them are even stupider than that. That’s why they are democrats.
21 posted on 10/22/2016, 4:30:41 PM by Jim Robinson (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!)
quote:quote:quote:To: Publius
The coup has already happened, January 20, 2009, Usurpation Day
All of our elected and appointed oath takers who took an oath to protect and defend the Constitution stood around and let an ineligible usurper assume the office he was ineligible to hold.
32 posted on 10/22/2016, 4:49:05 PM by Lurkinanloomin (Know Islam, No Peace - No Islam , Know Peace)
Had that been a real coup, we would have seen the Internet go down, foreign troops in the streets and mass arrests. If it was a coup, it was a stealth coup.
36 posted on 10/22/2016, 4:51:26 PM by Publius ("Who is John Galt?" by Billthedrill and Publius now available at Amazon.)
It was a stealth coup, designed to place an enemy agent in power to complete the task of eliminating US sovereignty and citizen control of the government.
50 posted on 10/22/2016, 4:58:59 PM by Lurkinanloomin (Know Islam, No Peace - No Islam , Know Peace)
quote:To: Jim Robinson
You can bet Obama and democrats are behind this. All this talk of Russian hackers, and trying to link Trump to Putin is part of their attempt to provide cover when Hillary loses the election. They will claim the Russians hacked voter machines and stole the election for Trump; therefore, the election must be annulled, and Obama must remain until things are sorted out. Of course that sorting out will lead to a Hillary victory.
66 posted on 10/22/2016, 5:15:47 PM by Jay Redhawk (Diversity for the sake of diversity is just flat out stupidity.)
quote:To: tbw2; All
“As of 2:00 AM EDT on Sat., Oct. 22, Cyber-Sleuths are still working to mitigate ongoing “attacks”causing massive Internet outages across the U.S. all day. But a troubling pattern is emerging: The attacks originate (mostly) INSIDE the U.S. According to the automated attack-monitoring-map offered by FortiGuard, much of today’s Internet trouble was caused by attacks launched against Data Centers in Boston, New York, Washington, DC, San Francisco and Seattle. But the largest bursts of these attacks originated repeatedly from Wichita, Kansas.
Using the GeoIP lookup system, open public records seem to indicate the attacks originated from a geographic area about 5 miles southeast of downtown Wichita, but there are no large public data centers located in that part of the city. In fact, the only large anything in that area is McConnell Air Force Base. HMMMMM. According to the public web site of McConnell Air Force Base, the first- and perhaps most important function- of that base is the 184th Intelligence Wing. “Intelligence” as in... information... as in computers! HMMMMM.
http://coyoteprime-runningcauseicantfly.blogspot.com/2016/10/cyber-attacks-which-crippled-us.html
83 posted on 10/22/2016, 5:51:53 PM by fudimo
Jeez, not this poo poo again. Check out that article for another dose of nuttery. But let's talk about this Kansas thing. See: How an internet mapping glitch turned a random Kansas farm into a digital hell. tl;dr: MaxMind's GeoIP database used a lake outside of Wichita as the geographical center of the US when it doesn't actually have a proper location for the IP and this has caused all sorts of problems. This has been a well-known problem for years and years, and anyone with enough background to write an intelligent story about yesterday's attacks wouldn't make the mistake of mentioning it.
|
#
?
Oct 23, 2016 08:07
|
|
- McGlockenshire
- Dec 16, 2005
-
GOLLOCKS!
|
From BREAKING: Paul Ryan Is In Some DEEP Trouble posted by freeper cotton1706
This "breaking" news of "deep" trouble is just that the nuts in the Freedom Caucus (House members in the Tea Party) are getting angry calls from deplorables whining about Paul Ryan not really backing Trump. Coincidentally, the thread is just angry freepers whining about Paul Ryan not really backing Trump.
But first, a rare moment of clarity.
quote:To: cotton1706
This coincides with another report, which quoted an unnamed Freedom Caucus member saying it is “a pretty sure bet there will be” a GOP challenger taking on Paul Ryan for the Speaker’s gavel.
PFFFFTTTT!!! The Republican's will be lucky to hold the House of Representatives at this point. Looks like they may lose the Senate because of milquetoasts like Ryan over there.
6 posted on 10/23/2016, 6:22:35 AM by usconservative (When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
So, let me get this straight. You admit that it's plausible that the House could go Democratic this year - a thing that would only be possible with an astoundingly poor Republican turnout and an amazingly huge Democrat turnout - but you're going to blame Paul Ryan for probably losing the Senate?
So let's talk about this one.
quote:To: cotton1706
The next Speaker needs to deliver an actual annual budget, not this nonsense of continuing resolutions. If nothing else, the Speaker of the House should act like a grown-up.
11 posted on 10/23/2016, 6:25:47 AM by Bernard (The Road To Hell Is Not Paved With Good Results)
Yes, that'd be a great thing, wouldn't it? But let's think realistically about what it would mean for the House to deliver a proper budget. First, they'd have to pass something knowing that it'd also have to pass a likely Democrat-controlled Senate, and then it'd have to be signed by a likely Democrat president. If the House remains under Republican control, yet they'd propose and pass a bill that makes a good faith attempt to be accepted by the Democrats, that means that they'd also likely have to negotiate and compromise. I'm pretty sure that if this was pointed out, freeper Bernard would retract their statement.
quote:To: usconservative
Extremely unlikely Republicans lose the house. Trump would have to lose by at least 6% if that happens, more likely 8% or higher for that to happen. Senate will likely be 50/50 or 51R/49D so who wins the presidency will matter a lot for tie-breaker.
19 posted on 10/23/2016, 6:31:55 AM by rb22982
I wish fivethirtyeight did a forecast for House seats. I suspect there just isn't enough polling to do it, though. Articles published there and in the NYT also say that the minimum difference in votes would indeed be 7-8%. It happens that this is the current range Hillary is up over Trump, but we're still a few weeks out and it could narrow instead of widen.
Freepers: Paul Ryan is part of a GOP cuckcell working against Trump
quote:To: cotton1706
21 posted on 10/23/2016, 6:36:06 AM by Byron_the_Aussie (choo choo)
This is what happens when you train people to be distrustful by default.
quote:To: Byron_the_Aussie
So far there are two articles with this exact same message: Payl Ryan is in Trouble! That indicates it’s a coordinated Establishment message. Which in turn means it’s a lie.
23 posted on 10/23/2016, 6:37:29 AM by uncitizen (JFK: The first victim of the New World Order)
quote:To: InterceptPoint
That’s because if the so called CONSERVATIVE REPUBLICANS were in leadership positions, they’d be expected to actually stand up for their supposed convictions, which they have no interest in doing. They didn’t sign up for a fight, they signed up for a gravy train! THROW ALL THE BUMS OUT!
52 posted on 10/23/2016, 6:57:57 AM by uncitizen (JFK: The first victim of the New World Order)
Wait for it...
quote:To: ecomcon
“Ultra Conservative”.
For the umpteenth time, why do we never hear the characterization “Ultra Liberal”?
Because the Leftist psychopaths have had total control of information and “language” for 100 years and it is the Overton Window——to move us into total Mind control.........
It is their M.O. to destroy the “thinking” of the masses by controlling what Words they see/hear. Now they have made sodomy into a virtue, just with the brainwashing of generations with lies and misinformation and the “marketing of ideas” straight out of Eddy Bernay’s book Propaganda...(Freud’s nephew).
This is their plan since Fichte stated in 1810 that it was necessary to destroy Free Wlll (Christianity) in children so that individualism would be impossible (thinking for self).
What they have done is make the word meaningless....ultra conservative is a moderate, wishy-washy Christian now. Like Marriage-—the word and all our most important institutions are being destroyed (for the children) so they can create the NWO-—the “utopia” where children can not know the past and have no idea that when the State says “Snow is Black”, it is not so.
78 posted on 10/23/2016, 7:49:34 AM by savagesusie (When Law ceases to be Just, it ceases to be Law. (Thomas A./Founders/John Marshall)/Nuremberg)
Not just one, but two savagesusie posts!
quote:To: rb22982
They “cave” because the only reason most are in Congress (like Ryan) is because of Libido Dominandi——the Rothschild NWO cabal has “dirt” on them-—offered them millions (along with their families) and they literally sold their souls for power, and if they go off of the agenda which is dictated for the NWO——they will be Hasterted or Brietbarted or Scaliad.
They know it, just like Assange and Snowdon knows.
They all have skeletons in their closet and the Soros/Rothschild’s only allowed their “rise” because they had dirt on them.
My guess is Ryan and Justice Roberts have little boys in their closet-—and pictures to go with it. Just as bad as Clinton’s and Obama’s closet—or worse. It has to be really bad because they are so obviously controlled by the sodomite satanists. We don’t know the worst of the Clintons or Obama-—they are true satanists.
To be a member of the satanic cult, (to be allowed power), the stooges like obama have to perform evil, diabolical rituals with children, so the cult has total control of their souls. (They tape the rituals to their He-She goat-god” where Up is Down, Girls are Boys (total insanity). They are serious-—it is a demonic war we face. Always has been. God v. Satan. When F. Nietzsche stated “God is Dead”, he meant it. We have seen the rise of the Bolsheviks (godless sodomites funded by the banisters) whom destroyed all aspects of Christianity in Russia, and then they create Mao—(China is our “utopian” society)-—their “plan” in action.
81 posted on 10/23/2016, 8:05:33 AM by savagesusie (When Law ceases to be Just, it ceases to be Law. (Thomas A./Founders/John Marshall)/Nuremberg)
|
#
?
Oct 23, 2016 19:09
|
|
- McGlockenshire
- Dec 16, 2005
-
GOLLOCKS!
|
From 350 women rabbis sign letter condemning Trump ‘hate speech’ posted by freeper Salman
the excerpt posted:The letter, entitled “Women Rabbis Condemn Trump Hate Speech,” was deliberately planned to coincide with Simhat Torah, the annual time of year in which Jews around the world conclude and then restart their reading cycle of Judaism’s holiest text.
One of its signatories, Rabbi Julie Schonfeld, executive vice president of the Rabbinical Assembly who delivered an invocation at this year’s Democratic National Convention, said in an email to reporters that the idea derived from a similar letter sent by Christian clergywomen, which accrued more than 1,000 signatures.
Each of the women rabbis who signed the letter did so in their private role as citizens, not in association with their respective synagogues.
quote:To: Salman
Liberal JINOs
3 posted on 10/23/2016, 6:47:18 AM by stocksthatgoup (When the MSM wants your opinion, they will give it to you)
quote:To: Salman
Women rabbis? Like women priests. Or male mothers. Or Hillary not lying. Or flying pigs.
7 posted on 10/23/2016, 6:49:50 AM by faithhopecharity ("Politicians are not born. They're excreted." Marcus Tullius Cicero.)
quote:To: Salman
Why, again, are Jews liberal? They certainly don’t live their daily lives like liberals, very strict in not mingling with other races, religions, etc. I don’t get it.
10 posted on 10/23/2016, 6:50:28 AM by New Jersey Realist (America is the land of the free BECAUSE of the brave)
quote:To: Salman
They are as much Rabbis as Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton are “Reverends”....
15 posted on 10/23/2016, 6:52:34 AM by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
Looks like af_vet_1981 got his account back. Just in time to make me not like him as much.
quote:To: Salman
There are no legitimate female rabbis, as there are no legitimate female priests.
38 posted on 10/23/2016, 7:55:30 AM by af_vet_1981 (The bus came by and I got on, That's when it all began.)
quote:To: Salman
What a laugh!!! First of all, there is no such thing as “women rabbis”. Only libtard denominations of reform and conservative recognize “women rabbis”, which is outside of Jewish law. So even if they insist that they did this in “their private role as citizens, not in association with their respective synagogues”, it could not have been otherwise. They are NOT rabbis, merely women marching around pretending to be so. So they have no extra credence due to their positions, because according to Jewish law (which trumps libtard law for me), they do not HAVE the exalted positions to which they lay claim.
39 posted on 10/23/2016, 7:58:46 AM by EinNYC
Hi savagesusie!
quote:To: faithhopecharity
Women rabbis——LOL——for the children to normalize the idea that Boys are Girls and Up is Down-—there is no Natural instincts or differences in males or females. That is why control of language to eliminate words like hostess and stewardess—to normalize “the same” for the children.
(Destroying Language is essential to flip 2000 years of Ethics to Satanism—radical egalitarianism where there is no age limit/sex limit—nothing).
It is Radical Egalitarianism to destroy the concept of Unity/One Flesh between male and female (The Bible). To make sodomy “Good”, you have to destroy all natural instincts in little girls and boys-—make them “see” women as men and men as women and normalize it by the culture.
It is the MO of the sodomite psychopaths who want to recreate the homosexual cultures of Sparta/Greece and Samurai and Afghanistan where women and men are segregated, and Man/Boy “love” was the norm. It is the Ancient Babylonian rituals of sodomiizing little boys which is the Rothschild’s pscychopaths “youth”/demon rituals, they want normalized (for the children). Talmud/Kabbala and the Koran embrace sodomy, incest, pederasty. (Google it).
Christianity has been targeted for over 500 years because it is what created Free Will and Individualism (dignity in ALL people)-—where using people as a Means/object is evil. No other religion/worldview is equivalent to the worldview which created the Age of Reason and Modern Science because their is no Reason and Logic (Laws of Non-Contradicition) in the other worldviews.
It is NO accident that ONLY Christian Ethics are targeted-—no other. To make slavery and pederasty and sodomy “good” again, they have to control the Minds of all the children and demonize Christianity 24/7 in “culture”. Our toxic culture is worse than the homo-erotic, vulgar Weimar Republic now....and it will create children who become jackboots for the State (Soros/Satanists).
44 posted on 10/23/2016, 8:38:10 AM by savagesusie (When Law ceases to be Just, it ceases to be Law. (Thomas A./Founders/John Marshall)/Nuremberg)
quote:To: stocksthatgoup
Are they just REALLY REALLY dumb or did no one tell them the libs HATE THEIR GUTS and just use them.
Today’s college crowd is vehemently anti Jewish, and if hillary wins, the 5 million or so muzzies that enter will REALLY amp the hate.
Stupid is as stupid does.
45 posted on 10/23/2016, 8:38:36 AM by dp0622 (IThe only thing an upper crust conservative hates more than a liberal is a middle class conservative)
quote:To: Salman
So? Women think that pu$$y whipping the contry will aid in its governance?
hardly.
Hell, using the p$$y groping litmus test for presidential candidates, we would not have had Theodore Roosevelt who groped his secretary continuously, JFK who had a stable of bimbos, and William Jefferson Clinton who screwed everything but the family dog, and was defended for it by his wife, destroying the lives of Bill’s victims in the process.
Pu$$y whipping does not belong in politics. It belongs in a court of law where rules of evidence can be applied.
53 posted on 10/23/2016, 10:12:25 AM by Candor7 ( Obama fascism article:(hxxp://www.americanthinker.com/2009/05/barack_obama_the_quintessentia_1.html)
quote:To: hal ogen
Affirmative action Rabbis have no place in politics
57 posted on 10/23/2016, 10:40:42 AM by bert ((K.E.; N.P.; GOPc;WASP .... Hilary is an Ameriphobe)
|
#
?
Oct 23, 2016 19:21
|
|
- Twelve by Pies
- May 4, 2012
-
Again a very likpatous story
|
quote:the homosexual cultures of Sparta/Greece and Samurai and Afghanistan
I've never been to Samurai, is it nice there?
|
#
?
Oct 23, 2016 19:33
|
|
- McGlockenshire
- Dec 16, 2005
-
GOLLOCKS!
|
From Clinton Vaults to a Double-Digit Lead, Boosted by Broad Disapproval of Trump (POLL) posted by freeper DOC44
50% Clinton, 38% Trump. That's an astounding difference and shows a much larger gap than other recent polls... on the other hand, it was done after the final debate.
the excerpt posted:This ABC News poll was conducted by landline and cellular telephone Oct. 20-22, 2016, in English and Spanish, among a random national sample of 874 likely voters. Results have a margin of sampling error of 3.5 points, including the design effect. Partisan divisions are 36-27-31 percent, Democrats-Republicans-independents.
It's mostly whining about "oversampling Democrats" as usual.
But there's also projection.
quote:To: DOC44
The tone of the media is one of panic not confidence. They have lost control of the narrative at this point.
The attacks ensure that a President Trump will be a radical and aggressive President Trump. If Clinton “wins” they have undermined the legitimacy of the current order of things in a way that won’t be reverseable.
Deep down they know the game is ending for them.
7 posted on 10/23/2016, 8:04:01 AM by Mad_as_heck (The MSM - America's (domestic) public enemy #1.)
quote:To: Trump20162020
Either the “science” of polling is utterly broken or the pollsters are perpetrating out and out fraud.
Trump can’t be winning, tied, and loosing outside of the stated margins of error all at the same time. As usual, which ever poll is the closest to right will be so only by dumb luck.
This election is an extraordinary event. No one knows who is actually going to show up on election day. Anyone waving these polls about is trying to influence the election in an illegitimate way not practice journalism.
22 posted on 10/23/2016, 8:09:52 AM by Mad_as_heck (The MSM - America's (domestic) public enemy #1.)
"The only three polls showing Trump up are clearly right and all of the others are wrong."
quote:To: Trump20162020
IBD: Trump +2.
LAT/USC: Trump +1
Rasmussen: Trump +2
ABC Clinton +12
Someone’s either lying or their polling method is completely out of wack.
26 posted on 10/23/2016, 8:11:12 AM by Signalman
Freeper WENDLE is such a delightful troll.
quote:To: DOC44
This is a contrived poll intended to demoralize . It is helpful is telling hillary idiotd,”no need to vote”. the reality is that Trump people tend to tell pollsters to go the hell. I tell them that I will answer for $10 paid in advance. Then I remind them that if they are making money for my data , why should I give it way? Never answer these polls. You are marked in data bases and sold like cattle for everything from advertisers to Isis murderers. STOP the polls as a public nuisance.
33 posted on 10/23/2016, 8:13:08 AM by WENDLE (Hillary provided Weapons to ISIS!! There is no doubt.)
quote:To: DOC44
This is a game. This poll is simply not true. There is no way in hell Clinton is winning men. This is an end of the election narrative driver for the msm. Notice how they are totally ignoring IBD TPP which has basically confirmed the LA Times USC poll?
50 posted on 10/23/2016, 8:24:04 AM by Maelstorm (Free is just another word for someone else has to pay.)
[citation needed]
quote:To: grey_whiskers
They polled a majority of people who thought Clinton ‘won’ the 3rd debate. Explains a lot. This was probably the first question asked. If the respondents said Trump they were hung up on
72 posted on 10/23/2016, 8:41:58 AM by Mjreagan
drat, I wish I knew what this was.
quote:To: babble-on
quote:Comment #51 Removed by Moderator
I love when the obvious troll gets so upset, he types out his retardation in a fit of rage and then realizes that FR does not have an edit button.
75 posted on 10/23/2016, 8:42:32 AM by VanDeKoik
quote:To: DOC44
Wow.....Really...that ABC poll is naught but, pure HOGWASH!!! Media and Clinton campaign is in pure “full panic” mode!!! Geez...I thought Hillary & Kaine were going to stomp around in Arizona and Texas.
Wonder why they (Clinton/Kaine & company) are still fooling around in Ohio. Florida, Pennsylvania, Virginia and North Carolina. Answer....they are losing in those states!!! Rest easy folks, with our strong, determined, support and votes....Trump will easily carry, Texas, Florida, Ohio, Pennsylvania & North Carolina Ya know what that means...game over for Clinton, Kaine, Obama & the Democrat Party!!! ABC & the rest of the Clinton/Obama media is smoking way too much reefer!!!
81 posted on 10/23/2016, 8:51:30 AM by JLAGRAYFOX (Defeat both the Republican (e) & Democrat (e) political parties....Forever!!!)
Fivethirtyeight shows Florida, Pennsylvania, Virginia, and North Carolina as having a 75-90% chance of going blue this year. Ohio is the only one of those states that might go Trump. Even if Ohio, Iowa, and all the other tossup states go Trump, with just those other four other states going Hillary, Trump still has no pathway to victory. (Source: the tool at the bottom of the NYT forecast page)
This is another reply to the deleted post 51. It accidentally ends up doing some truthspeaking.
quote:To: babble-on
Take your bitter #NeverTrump garbage and shove it.
Regardless of the wet dreams of Ted Cruz fanboys, he was not a viable national candidate. Cruz had zero chance of making the demographic inroads critical to being competitive. The results in his "stronghold" (the South) bore that out quite convincingly.
In case you haven't noticed, the Republican "base" is insufficient to winning national elections.
83 posted on 10/23/2016, 8:55:18 AM by sargon (The Revolution is ON! Vote Trump!)
Reality check time.
quote:To: eekitsagreek
I hope you and others dismissing these polls are right. I recall a similar dismissal of the polls in 2012, and they ended up being totally accurate.
84 posted on 10/23/2016, 8:55:46 AM by LittleSpotBlog
quote:To: Mjreagan
They polled a majority of people who thought Clinton ‘won’ the 3rd debate. Explains a lot. This was probably the first question asked. If the respondents said Trump they were hung up on.
This is the MOST IMPORTANT internal of this poll. Hildebeast won the third debate? IN WHAT ALTERNATIVE UNIVERSE?
AS NOTED ABOVE THE POLLING OF MEN HAD TO BE THOSE IN Greenwich Village and the Upper West side of NYC!
There are no real men there anyway!
96 posted on 10/23/2016, 9:36:05 AM by EarlT357
|
#
?
Oct 23, 2016 19:50
|
|
- FMguru
- Sep 10, 2003
-
peed on;
sexually
|
Media and Clinton campaign is in pure “full panic” mode!!! Geez...I thought Hillary & Kaine were going to stomp around in Arizona and Texas.
Wonder why they (Clinton/Kaine & company) are still fooling around in Ohio. Florida, Pennsylvania, Virginia and North Carolina. Answer....they are losing in those states!!!
The #1 most reliable Freeper tell is when they accuse liberals/democrats of desperation or panicking. It never fails. It's an ironclad admission that they're getting their asses kicked.
And the reason that Clinton & Crew are campaigning in Florida and Pennsylvania and North Carolina is that those states have in-play Senate seats, and as much fun as running up the EV score in Arizona and Missouri and Georgia might be, it's a much better use of Hillary's resources to build the Democratic margin in the Senate.
And that 50-38 poll is a stunner. First sign of total across-the-board collapse of the Republican electoral coalition. Remember, the polls don't account for the gaping difference between each party's GOTV efforts, so if anything they're over-estimating the Republican position.
|
#
?
Oct 23, 2016 20:43
|
|
- McGlockenshire
- Dec 16, 2005
-
GOLLOCKS!
|
Screw all this election stuff, let's get to the important things in life.
From What kind of car would Jesus drive?, a vanity thread posted by freeper Dallas59
quote:He would drive a Honda. But he wouldn't talk about it very much.
John 12:49 :
For I did not speak of my own Accord.
quote:To: Dallas59
Convertible for easy Assention access IMO.
2 posted on 10/23/2016, 11:46:27 AM by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God Bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
quote:To: Dallas59
What a dumb question.
Jesus would not drive.
Peter would be the driver. Duh!
9 posted on 10/23/2016, 11:49:29 AM by Sapwolf (Talkers are usually more articulate than doers, since talk is their specialty. -Sowell)
I finally laughed.
quote:quote:To: Dallas59
Duh, a Genesis.
15 posted on 10/23/2016, 11:55:57 AM by Phinneous
A Plymouth, since God drove Adam and Eve out of the garden in a Fury.
16 posted on 10/23/2016, 11:58:56 AM by CondorFlight (I)
quote:To: CondorFlight
And we know that the sound of King David’s Triumph was heard throughout the land.
17 posted on 10/23/2016, 11:59:29 AM by CondorFlight (I)
quote:To: Dallas59
He drove a Demon. Several, in fact.
21 posted on 10/23/2016, 12:07:27 PM by Excellence (Marine mom since April 11, 2014)
And then they get in a stupid slapfight over whether or not the translation of "carpenter" is accurate (it might be "stonemason" instead or something?) and it turns to poo poo when serious people arrive.
quote:To: Dallas59
Yeshua didn’t participate in Earthly events. He was here to do his Father’s business.
23 posted on 10/23/2016, 12:08:15 PM by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
Even freepers can gently caress up a joke thread.
|
#
?
Oct 23, 2016 22:22
|
|
- McGlockenshire
- Dec 16, 2005
-
GOLLOCKS!
|
From Top LGBT Republican group declines to endorse Trump posted by freeper C19fan
That'll be the Log Cabin Republicans. They're not upset at Trump, but at Pence and his blatant bigotry.
quote:To: C19fan
They will be trying to slither in under the White House bathroom door January 21st.
6 posted on 10/23/2016, 12:38:22 PM by Iron Munro (If Illegals voted Rebublican 50 Million Democrats Would Be Screaming "Build The Wall!")
quote:To: C19fan
Insane.
Trump has never said one negative thing about gays but they want to object to some of his advisors? They need to drop “Republicans” from their name. Maybe “Log Cabin Boys” or “Woodsy Faggots” might be better.
7 posted on 10/23/2016, 12:39:04 PM by Artemis Webb (Ted Kennedy burns in hell.)
quote:To: C19fan
The LCR is not a Republican group at all. They have one agendum and that’s to homosexualize the GOP. If it weren’t so, why wouldn’t they support Trump for everything else they supposedly agree on with Trump. But forget that. Why even identify themselves as a homosexual Republican group ? True Republicans are not into identity politics.
12 posted on 10/23/2016, 12:45:56 PM by libh8er
Tell us how you really feel.
quote:To: C19fan
Faggots.
15 posted on 10/23/2016, 12:54:36 PM by gaijin
Normally I skip the unfunny gimmick accounts, but here's a reminder that they exist.
quote:To: C19fan; All
LGBT groups are reminded that regardless that crooked Hillary is trying to win your votes by supporting politically correct LGBT “rights,” the states have never amended the Constitution to expressly protect LGBT “rights" like the Founding States did with the rights expressly protected by the Bill of Rights. So despite Hillary’s support for LGBT voters, she is wrongly ignoring that feds have no constitutional authority to address constitutionally unprotected LGBT “rights,” or to strengthen such rights.
quote:”From the accepted doctrine that the United States is a government of delegated powers, it follows that those not expressly granted, or reasonably to be implied from such as are conferred, are reserved to the states, or to the people. To forestall any suggestion to the contrary, the Tenth Amendment was adopted. The same proposition, otherwise stated, is that powers not granted are prohibited.” —United States v. Butler, 1936.
Note that corrupt, state sovereignty-ignoring, pro-LGBT activist justices wrongly stole 10th Amentment-protected state powers to wrongly legislate gay “marriage” from the bench.
17 posted on 10/23/2016, 1:00:05 PM by Amendment10
Seriously though, this guy shows up all over the drat place and he's never funny or interesting enough to post.
This is the hell I go through for you, goons.
quote:To: C19fan
Memo to queers....... he goeth to prepare a place for you
in a closet
20 posted on 10/23/2016, 1:06:41 PM by Thibodeaux (Exile Barack, Exile the Wookie, Exile Malia, Exile Shasha)
quote:To: C19fan
All 50 of them. Wait till Huma is running the country and orders a fatwa that all homosexuals should be put to death.
25 posted on 10/23/2016, 1:19:07 PM by txrefugee
PUT AWAY THE GODDAMN THESAURUS
quote:To: C19fan
Homosexuals
Faggots
Queers
Etc ..
People, never forget - precisely - the activity(s) involved under the dark umbrella of the bastardized term 'gay'.
Nature will not be mocked.
In the long run, the deviance of adopting homosexuality is a biologically self-negating choice.
But the damage it inflicts in the short term is all around us.
Never be lulled into accepting it as merely another harmless 'lifestyle alternative'.
Mankind's historic revulsion implicit in the above perjoratives didn't just coalesce from the ether.
30 posted on 10/23/2016, 1:24:19 PM by tomkat
|
#
?
Oct 23, 2016 22:33
|
|
- McGlockenshire
- Dec 16, 2005
-
GOLLOCKS!
|
From Nuclear war 'IMMINENT' as Russia tells citizens to find out where the closest bunkers are posted by freeper COBOL2Java
Ah yes, the completely trustworthy Daily Express. I mean, how could you not look at the current top stories and trust them.
So yeah, it's a story in a right-wing UK tabloid about an alleged news story on state-owned Russian TV that included the words "If it should one day happen, every one of you should know where the nearest bomb shelter is. It’s best to find out now"
Now let's put something into perspective here. Remember that headline story the other day about how the CIA was totally ready to hack Russia and only the President could authorize that strike? And remember how freepers totally took it seriously? That was the closest thing I've seen in my adult life to actual propaganda from the US government. You would think that, being as old as they are, freepers would be able to immediately identify and mentally filter international saber rattling.
You'd think.
quote:To: COBOL2Java
I am seeing posts on FaceBook which seem to indicate Putin gave BO 24 hours or Putin’s ships will open fire. I don’t know how true that news is as I am not familiar with the sites this tidbit came from.
4 posted on 10/23/2016, 10:57:11 AM by hsmomx3 (Love my Steelers!!)
Some are paying attention.
quote:To: JusPasenThru
Barry and Hillary aided by the media trying to scare voters into electing Hillary by creating fear of war with Russia.
Will we soon see another false flag event conducted to start a war like the sinking of the U.S. battleship Maine or the Gulf of Tonkin incident?
19 posted on 10/23/2016, 11:21:26 AM by Iron Munro (If Illegals voted Rebublican 50 Million Democrats Would Be Screaming "Build The Wall!")
quote:To: COBOL2Java
This is the problem with being a pussy. Nobody believes you when you finally get fed up and stand up to the bullies. So they call your bluff and since you're a pussy, you back down once again.
If you had had the nuts to stand up all along the line, they would have found someone easier to pick on.
Don't even think about challenging Putin, odumbo. He would beat you like a parlor rug and then go to breakfast.
28 posted on 10/23/2016, 11:32:33 AM by IronJack
quote:To: Jimmy The Snake
“Open fire on who and where and why?”
Why? To bring about world government with Obama as world tyrant. He’ll stay in for a third and permanent term.
We’ll have a single world tyrant, a single government, a single bank, a single currency, a single language, a single police force, a single military, a single education (indoctrination) system, a single criminal justice system, a single health (death) care system, a etc.
The elites have been pushing collectivism in all its forms (socialism, communism, et al) for the past 200 years to bring about world government. The USA was created for just that purpose. Just look on the back of your one dollar bill.
51 posted on 10/23/2016, 12:27:44 PM by Jack Hydrazine (Pubbies = national collectivists; Dems = international collectivists; We need a second party!)
This is one of like ten ETL posts in this thread, and they're all just 100% copypasta... except for this.
quote:To: COBOL2Java
It's becoming more and more clear to me every day that the Russians are deliberately throwing out these notions/threats of war in order to get HILLARY elected, not Trump, as voters do not typically like to change course during times of overseas crises. It's a standard "Wag the Dog" scenario. This while she disingenuously huffs and puffs about Russia. Meanwhile, her husband turned over between 20 and 50% of our uranium production to the Russians!
Makes all the sense in the world that this is what they're doing as it was the Soros-supported Obama administration that has been helping to strengthen the Russians.
The O admin, not only handed Putin everything that he wanted on all-important missile defense and nukes, including the Iran nuke deal, which Putin loves and claims to have played a major role in, he (Obama) practically took apart our military. So don't so easily fall for the smoke and mirrors BS coming from the Russians, or this administration. The facts speak for themselves...
[snip]
67 posted on 10/23/2016, 12:54:50 PM by ETL (Trump-PENCE 2016!!)
quote:To: dfwgator
you eventually try to show them you aren’t.
But you ARE! You just think that if you ACT like you're not, they'll back down. But these are guys who have been pushing weenies like you around so long, they've got a pretty good idea who's the real thing and who's just a poser.
Vladimir Putin knows that blecccchhhh Obama is the wimpiest poser to ever soil the White House.
80 posted on 10/23/2016, 1:32:50 PM by IronJack
[citation needed]
quote:To: Talisker
FYI, anything east of the Mississippi has already been irradiated from the above ground tests. That’s why cancer is so prevalent on the east coast. Strontium will be there pretty much forever. Anyone that has had a lifetime radiation exposure maximum limit is told not to ever go there.
86 posted on 10/23/2016, 1:50:34 PM by HWGruene (REMEMBER THE ALAMO!)
|
#
?
Oct 23, 2016 22:57
|
|
- Twelve by Pies
- May 4, 2012
-
Again a very likpatous story
|
No see they can't stump for him because if the polls show Trump up by 30 then all the conservatives will stay home and not vote, because they think they've got it in the bag. Thus, they must appear as if they are losing to motivate conservatives to go to the polls, even though all the conservatives know that Trump is going to win and is actually ahead.
|
#
?
Oct 23, 2016 23:18
|
|
- MeLKoR
- Dec 23, 2004
-
by FactsAreUseless
|
It's 1/3 NU-UH of the "democrat lies" and "that's right democrats, no need to vote" varieties; 1/3 WHY WOULD YOU SAY THIS? YOU SHOULD HAVE LIED YOU STUPID oval office; and 1/3 "well no wonder, what with jew Soros money and the jew media conspiracy".
MeLKoR fucked around with this message at 23:34 on Oct 23, 2016
|
#
?
Oct 23, 2016 23:24
|
|
- Mister Bates
- Aug 4, 2010
-
|
When Trump inevitably gets pureed in the general election, I wonder how long it will take before it becomes a zottable offense to admit having supported Trump.
|
#
?
Oct 23, 2016 23:30
|
|
- Cythereal
- Nov 8, 2009
-
I love the potoo,
and the potoo loves you.
|
No female priests? Lutherans (ELCA, at least), Methodists, Presbyterians, and Anglicans all say hi.
|
#
?
Oct 23, 2016 23:35
|
|
- SocketWrench
- Jul 8, 2012
-
by Fritz the Horse
|
To: cotton1706
21 posted on 10/23/2016, 6:36:06 AM by Byron_the_Aussie (choo choo)
This is Byron who uses hype words he learns like a five year old and should go die. Also, if he is an Aussie, he should gtfo
|
#
?
Oct 23, 2016 23:54
|
|
- Islam is the Lite Rock FM
- Jul 27, 2007
-
by exmarx
|
I'm really happy that the alt right and rascal regiment adopted cuck. It's such a perfect word for paranoid delusional rear end hats.
|
#
?
Oct 23, 2016 23:59
|
|
- Zwabu
- Aug 7, 2006
-
|
I'm really happy that the alt right and rascal regiment adopted cuck. It's such a perfect word for paranoid delusional rear end hats.
Plus, all the alt right signposts are really easy to spot and label the person as someone to avoid who doesn't deserve your attention or respect. Green frogs, red MAGA hats, use of CUCK and SJW, incorporating deplorable into a username.
These people stick the fluorescent yellow dunce hats onto themselves.
Zwabu fucked around with this message at 00:09 on Oct 24, 2016
|
#
?
Oct 24, 2016 00:02
|
|
- SocketWrench
- Jul 8, 2012
-
by Fritz the Horse
|
People, never forget - precisely - the activity(s) involved under the dark umbrella of the bastardized term 'gay'.
We don't. You loving Republicans are so obsessed with it you won't go 24 hours without mentioning it
|
#
?
Oct 24, 2016 00:22
|
|
- Adbot
-
ADBOT LOVES YOU
|
|
#
?
May 11, 2024 10:24
|
|