|
Covok posted:I can accept this. I can't. I'd like the hope that a SCOTUS nominee can get a single loving hearing in the next four years.
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2016 16:35
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 24, 2024 06:25 |
|
|
moist turtleneck posted:I just want Hillary elected so she can take even more guns away than Obama did So one gun?
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2016 16:35
|
|
|
Tom Guycot posted:Holy poo poo, was Tashan Dorrsett former insane poster Tweak all this time? That would explain so much... who was Tweak?
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2016 16:35
|
|
|
computer parts posted:I'm actually betting it's less Hillary specifically and more that Russia gave them a bunch of support if they did things in a certain way. Remember Assange is a self-centered little twerp. Everything that happens goes through the lens of 'I am the most important guy on the planet', and Hillary was secretary of state when he fled into the little hole he's in. He probably really does think she keeps trying to kill him.
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2016 16:36
|
|
|
Mel Mudkiper posted:Like, to the transgender community of this thread, is there a precedent for some people within the transgender community still having very traditional ideas of gender roles and sexuality and being kind of lovely about them? Its genuinely surprising to me to see a trans person going around calling people "low testosterone beta cucks" and "50 year old bisexuals" because it seems to me like those would be insults and ideas a trans person would be pretty sensitive about. See Caitlyn Jenner's remarks on same sex marriage
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2016 16:36
|
|
|
Non Serviam posted:Switching gears a bit, does anyone have any theories as to why Assange has it out for Clinton? She criticized him for posting all the diplomatic cables Manning leaked because it contained personal information and put people's lives at risk.
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2016 16:36
|
|
|
Harrow posted:I'm not super familiar with all of the laws, but I do work for an electronic medical record company and I know if I released private health information about someone that I accessed through our system, I'd be fired and my company would be sued hard. Those laws (HIPPA specifically) only apply to health care professionals. The press and the public can do whatever they want.
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2016 16:36
|
|
|
Covok posted:I can accept this. It would be an epic disaster for a party getting to run against Trump.
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2016 16:38
|
|
|
Night10194 posted:Remember Assange is a self-centered little twerp. Everything that happens goes through the lens of 'I am the most important guy on the planet', and Hillary was secretary of state when he fled into the little hole he's in. He probably really does think she keeps trying to kill him. Yeah, but at least their twitter account has been spreading Russian BS that's completely unrelated to the campaign and chronologically precedes it (stuff like Russian MH-17 conspiracy theories).
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2016 16:38
|
|
|
Roland Jones posted:
Mel Mudkiper posted:who was Tweak? Tweek used to put on blackface on GBS video chatrooms, especially if there were black posters already chatting. And was pretty crazy in other ways but man they loved to do blackface.
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2016 16:39
|
|
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Oy8HRdlLGCQ
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2016 16:39
|
|
|
Non Serviam posted:Switching gears a bit, does anyone have any theories as to why Assange has it out for Clinton? I'm not sure, but him hating her and him wanting out of the embassy aren't connected; he didn't enter it until after the thing with his rape charges, which was after the Manning leaks. It's just a convenient excuse for him to not acknowledge that he's hiding because he's a rapist and justice would come down on his head hard if he didn't hide there.
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2016 16:39
|
|
|
Wikileaks prays on people not connecting that politicians talk in private just like we talk in private. I would make jokes or talk hella poo poo about co-workers or rivals to people privately(or something I perceive as private anyway). Like man if people/customers/users at my old job could see or hear the jokes I made about them I would be fuuucked. Politicians are the same way. No loving poo poo the Clinton campaign was tossing around ideas(some of them terrible ones they never used, but it's just brainstorming). But it's treated as some loving affront unto man that a campaign team was doing it's job.
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2016 16:40
|
|
|
Pablo Gigante posted:See Caitlyn Jenner's remarks on same sex marriage Or her attempt to become Ted Cruz's "trans ambassador." 
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2016 16:40
|
|
|
If the GOP controls the Senate then it doesn't matter because they'll never stop investigating
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2016 16:41
|
|
|
Pablo Gigante posted:See Caitlyn Jenner's remarks on same sex marriage I googled this and what I found is completely unobjectionable? Jenner's blog posted:Like many people, there was a time when I didn’t realize how important it is for gay couples to have the right to get married. But after hearing from my gay friends and learning more about the hardships they faced because of discrimination, it became clear to me that everyone should be able to marry the person they love. http://caitlynjenner.com/2015/09/what-ive-learned/
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2016 16:41
|
|
|
I think the only reasonable conclusion about Caitlyn Jenner is that she is dumb as hell as was just as dumb when she presented as a man.
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2016 16:42
|
|
|
I always under the impression Caitlyn Jenner was kind of a unique figure because she enjoys a lot of privileges that protect her from some of the realities of most trans individuals. I could be way off base though
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2016 16:42
|
|
|
The only reason Bernie might be doing better in a general election against Trump is because the anti-semitism against him would be so loving extreme that only the most hardcore neonazis would be supporting the GOP at this point. Look at the crazy (((globalist))) stuff and then replace KKKilary KKKlinton with Socialist Jew Commie Bernie Sanders and try to imagine how much more extreme it would be. Sanders isn't nearly as stone-faced as Clinton and the odds of Trump getting under his skin and causing an Old Man Yells At Cloud moment in the debates would be much greater. Plus there's that whole "Sanders did next to nothing for his downticket people in the primaries" which would be bad in the general when paired with Schumber being such a self-serving rear end in a top hat. FactsAreUseless posted:Yes you are, you just have to know your audience and how to market it. See: Star Citizen computer parts posted:Aren't Obama's approval ratings only like 55% right now? And that's people in general, not voters, and with the assumption that he will never ever be president ever again? Obama's approval ratings are currently among the highest for any outgoing POTUS, yes. Crain posted:Don't know if this was posted but it seems that our buddy Tashan Dorrsett is getting the FBI involved with investigating her ban: Well the FBI does like fighting with the CIA... OddObserver posted:It's also why Wikileaks are scumbags: it's private health information about a private citizen. Not something anyone has any business publishing. AFAIK this wouldn't fall under pretty much any medical information law because it's not posting the actual medical records and a law that says "you can't post about someone having an illness" would be beyond broad and likely an outright 1A violation as a result. Ein Sexmonster posted:I think they're straight wrong about senate. IL, WI, NV, and PA are all pretty much over. NC, NH, FL are competitive. I'm skeptical about PA unless the polling there has been consistently bad for Toomey and not just "this one poll shows him with an absurdly large deficit." When did FL get competitive? And hasn't IL/WI had bad trends for the Dems over the last week or 2? I'd love for you to be right and the Dems win due to ground game and such but I'm not hugely optimistic.
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2016 16:42
|
|
|
What if the upcoming FBI investigation on SA finds HRC's secret platinum account? 
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2016 16:43
|
|
|
Crain posted:Don't know if this was posted but it seems that our buddy Tashan Dorrsett is getting the FBI involved with investigating her ban: what
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2016 16:43
|
|
|
Pablo Gigante posted:See Caitlyn Jenner's remarks on same sex marriage Alternatively - don't
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2016 16:43
|
|
|
eviltastic posted:I googled this and what I found is completely unobjectionable? Fair enough, but prior to that she had a very "traditional" view of marriage even after transitioning
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2016 16:43
|
|
|
Mel Mudkiper posted:Like, to the transgender community of this thread, is there a precedent for some people within the transgender community still having very traditional ideas of gender roles and sexuality and being kind of lovely about them? Its genuinely surprising to me to see a trans person going around calling people "low testosterone beta cucks" and "50 year old bisexuals" because it seems to me like those would be insults and ideas a trans person would be pretty sensitive about. I'm like, 93% sure that transgender people can believe anything cisgender people can believe. Don't quote me on that, though.
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2016 16:44
|
|
|
I'm not sure where they're getting this idea that the Republicans are going to retain the Senate. Also I'm fairly sure in retrospect that there's no world where the Dems retook the House this year because hypothetical landslides don't matter when you aren't actually running enough good downballot candidates to win suddenly competitive seats.
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2016 16:44
|
|
|
Unreported in that earlier advertising blitz from Camp Trump - they pulled ads from PA. Read it as you will.
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2016 16:44
|
|
|
So this person was some kind of pro-Trump troll? That's seriously pathetic.
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2016 16:45
|
|
|
FlamingLiberal posted:So this person was some kind of pro-Trump troll? Even worse, Pro-Trump sincere!
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2016 16:45
|
|
|
Ein Sexmonster posted:No. No he hasn't said that. Progressives are a true minority of the Democratic party because their policies are notoriously horrible.
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2016 16:45
|
|
|
Non Serviam posted:Switching gears a bit, does anyone have any theories as to why Assange has it out for Clinton? She was head of the state dept when he leaked the state dept cables so he thinks she's after him because he's an insane narcissist.
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2016 16:46
|
|
|
In terms of who I'd like to share forums with, "self hating racist sjw's and weird 52 year old men in open bisexual relationships" > Trump voters.
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2016 16:46
|
|
|
I honestly believe that Trump is going to underperform the polls. There's gonna be an unusually high Latino turnout, and shy Clinton supporting Republican women, two factors that the polls can't account for.
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2016 16:46
|
|
|
Guy Goodbody posted:I honestly believe that Trump is going to underperform the polls. There's gonna be an unusually high Latino turnout, and shy Clinton supporting Republican women, two factors that the polls can't account for. And modern data driven voter registration and mobilization.
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2016 16:48
|
|
|
canepazzo posted:Unreported in that earlier advertising blitz from Camp Trump - they pulled ads from PA. Read it as you will. That's batshit insane, but then, Trump. Also, I think this may be the one year a shy tory effect isn't insane to hope for. I remember prior polls found way, way more husbands think their wives are supporting Trump than actually are. We're winning without it, just...It'd be a good surprise to cap this off.
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2016 16:48
|
|
|
Evil Fluffy posted:And hasn't IL/WI had bad trends for the Dems over the last week or 2? I don't know about WI, but Kirk has been absolutely bombing in IL after claiming that Duckworth was lying about her family serving in the US military since the Revolutionary War(which is true) because her mom is from Thailand during a debate.
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2016 16:48
|
|
|
I'm glad we finally have the proper thread title after months of waiting.
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2016 16:48
|
|
|
Guy Goodbody posted:I honestly believe that Trump is going to underperform the polls. There's gonna be an unusually high Latino turnout, and shy Clinton supporting Republican women, two factors that the polls can't account for. Bleh. Don't put too much faith in that. Obama outperformed his 2012 polling but it wasn't by some huge margin. I expect Hillary might outperform her polling by a max of about 3% (i.e. the margin of error), which is meaningful but not absurdly huge.
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2016 16:48
|
|
|
Yawn. While it's all horrible stuff he's said, it feels like every Hillary ad I've seen for months is just compilations of the same clips. They need something better than "listen to what Donald said in an interview ten or more years ago" and sometimes "he incites violence and also he mocked a reporter with a disability." I mean, I guess maybe they don't have much else to go on since he hasn't been in office, but there has to be something else they can hit on from the debates, his rallies, etc.
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2016 16:49
|
|
|
Non Serviam posted:Switching gears a bit, does anyone have any theories as to why Assange has it out for Clinton? The US state department made it really loving hard for wikileaks to raise money while Clinton was at the helm to start with. Also Assange has a huge hate boner for the US, jews, and women while also being the pawn of Putin.
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2016 16:49
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 24, 2024 06:25 |
|
|
Crain posted:Don't know if this was posted but it seems that our buddy Tashan Dorrsett is getting the FBI involved with investigating her ban: im not selfhating
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2016 16:51
|
|
