|
Mel Mudkiper posted:Yeah, any other evidence of anti semitism other than the anti-semitism computer parts posted:http://forward.com/news/national/347546/why-does-wikileaks-have-a-reputation-for-anti-semitism/
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2016 17:29
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 23, 2024 19:54 |
|
|
Cingulate posted:Any other evidence for that beyond a single usage of "((()))" and one mention of Soros? https://www.buzzfeed.com/jamesball/heres-what-i-learned-about-julian-assange?utm_term=.imMoGL99W#.rso7zGOOp quote:“Adam” was different: He immediately asked for everything relating to Russia, eastern Europe, and Israel – and got it, more than 100,000 documents in all. A few stray comments of his about “Jews” prompted a few concerns on my part, dismissed quickly by another WikiLeaker – “don’t be silly… He’s Jewish himself, isn’t he?” E: I might be wrong about Shamir running the twitter account but that just makes Assange look worse. Godlessdonut fucked around with this message at 17:35 on Nov 1, 2016 |
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2016 17:29
|
|
|
We totally should go to war with Russia, btw
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2016 17:30
|
|
|
http://www.politico.com/states/flor...1#ixzz4Ol6gtH00 RIP Hillary's ground game. At least the ads for the Twitter audience were good.
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2016 17:30
|
|
|
Imagine what a powerful tool Wikileaks would have been for the right if they played it cool and didn't out themselves as partisans. Release a Trump tidbit here and there that gets okay'd by Trump and Putin as something that'll never matter while reserving the biting stuff for HRC. They keep their air of legitimacy and preserve whatever modicum of goodwill they still had from left-leaning people not in on the joke. Though they're even failing at that last bit. Has Wikileaks done anything but flail around like a wet noodle this whole election?
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2016 17:32
|
|
|
TyrantWD posted:RIP Hillary's ground game. You constantly spread fear and bad info about her chances, I don't believe your pronouncements are valid.
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2016 17:32
|
|
|
Guy Goodbody posted:We totally should go to war with Russia, btw  They're twice as likely to start wars on sketchy as gently caress grounds as the US has been in the last 15 years.
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2016 17:32
|
|
|
WampaLord posted:You constantly spread fear and bad info about her chances, I don't believe your pronouncements are valid. I'd like to point out that with NC and VA seemingly in the bag for Hillary, FL going red will not do much to sink her campaign.
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2016 17:35
|
|
|
The Little Kielbasa posted:Eh, the Democratic nomination process was basically a Soviet election. She was anointed years before it began. No other serious Democrats ran because all the $ backed her. Couple of pages ago at this point, but just because all the money is backing you doesn't mean you're going to win. Remember those halcyon days of February 2015 when we all just kind of assumed Jeb(!) would be the nominee?
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2016 17:35
|
|
|
Guy Goodbody posted:I'm sure they could promise Assange that they will get him out. But without the co-operation of the British government, it's basically impossible without going to war with Britain. And nobody gives that much of a poo poo about Assange. He's, at best, a useful idiot. Getting him out will also destroy what little implausible deniability he has left.
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2016 17:36
|
|
|
A Winner is Jew posted:
But homework explainer told me they were anti-imperialist heroes!
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2016 17:36
|
|
|
WampaLord posted:You constantly spread fear and bad info about her chances, I don't believe your pronouncements are valid. I mean the article has numbers and it doesn't look great. A Winner is Jew posted:
Iraq and Afghanistan say hello. Also holy poo poo guys no we shouldn't go to war with Russia. They're also not actually a material threat to us. Like what the gently caress.
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2016 17:36
|
|
|
TyrantWD posted:http://www.politico.com/states/flor...1#ixzz4Ol6gtH00 I'm not seeing any hard (absolute) numbers in that article. All it seems to be saying "Hispanics voted a fuckton more than 4 years ago".
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2016 17:37
|
|
|
OddObserver posted:Getting him out will also destroy what little implausible deniability he has left.
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2016 17:37
|
|
|
Lightning Knight posted:Also holy poo poo guys no we shouldn't go to war with Russia. They're also not actually a material threat to us. Like what the gently caress. They're trying to interfere with our election
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2016 17:38
|
|
|
If the SEPTA strike looks like it will continue into next week I might get in touch with the Clinton campaign in Philly and see if I can be a driver for their GOTV The advantages of living in a state that makes voting day a holiday 
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2016 17:38
|
|
|
The weird thing is, when you look at the polls for this election, Hillary will dominate for exactly one month then start to slide back towards a narrow lead, then jump back up like the electorate found a spider under their toilet seat. It's happened like clockwork. We might just be unlucky in having the actual election fall during one of the slides so the win isn't as crushing.
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2016 17:38
|
|
|
Guy Goodbody posted:We totally should go to war with Russia, btw Not the best idea while their current leader is a soulless monster from the KGB (particularly after he smugly unveils a new generation of nuke that can "Destroy an area the size of Texas or France.") I'd rather we just stop all cultural exports and, if at all possible, block any Russian IP's from being able to access U.S. websites.
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2016 17:38
|
|
|
Lightning Knight posted:Also holy poo poo guys no we shouldn't go to war with Russia. They're also not actually a material threat to us. Like what the gently caress.
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2016 17:38
|
|
|
Lightning Knight posted:Iraq and Afghanistan say hello. Iraq I will 100% give you and what I was weighing Georgia and Crimea against. Afghanistan though...
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2016 17:39
|
|
|
El Disco posted:https://www.buzzfeed.com/jamesball/heres-what-i-learned-about-julian-assange?utm_term=.imMoGL99W#.rso7zGOOp Yeah I don't think Shamir is running the twitter. I think Assange does keep up a relationship with him though - as recently as december last year the wikileaks twitter was sharing conspiracy theory stuff from Shamir's blog.
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2016 17:39
|
|
|
Hillary's big lead spikes are directly tied to Trump getting on TV and speaking. The conventions and the debates, mainly.
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2016 17:39
|
|
|
Night10194 posted:The weird thing is, when you look at the polls for this election, Hillary will dominate for exactly one month then start to slide back towards a narrow lead, then jump back up like the electorate found a spider under their toilet seat. It's happened like clockwork. It could also, like Sam Wang has argued, be a sign of a relatively stable election. IF the swings are all still strongly correlated to a medium it may just be statistical noise obfuscating an obvious outcome
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2016 17:39
|
|
|
A Winner is Jew posted:
Soros is complicated to people who don't understand why he does what he does because he gets 80% of it right and the other 20% is completely bonkers poo poo he probably thought about at 3am taking a piss. The same goes for Rothschild.
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2016 17:40
|
|
|
Talmonis posted:Not the best idea while their current leader is a soulless monster from the KGB (particularly after he smugly unveils a new generation of nuke that can "Destroy an area the size of Texas or France." I'd rather we just stop all cultural exports and, if at all possible, block any Russian IP's from being able to access U.S. websites. This. Cut them off from the west.
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2016 17:40
|
|
|
Teriyaki Koinku posted:Holy poo poo it's actually November, it's finally here. Our long national nightmare will finally be over soon. 
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2016 17:40
|
|
|
computer parts posted:I'm not seeing any hard (absolute) numbers in that article.  Article posted:The lowest-performing group: African Americans. They cast about 421,000 early and absentee ballots as of Monday morning, accounting for 55 percent of the total early ballots that black voters cast in 2012, AIF’s analysis shows.
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2016 17:41
|
|
|
Good plan. Russian dissenters should have no means to contact anyone, such as human rights organizations. That way they can't threaten Superman's Pal Vladdy Putin.
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2016 17:42
|
|
|
Lightning Knight posted:
I'm not suggesting War but Russia is literally supporting Trump in this election and trying to get him elected.
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2016 17:42
|
|
|
Talmonis posted:Not the best idea while their current leader is a soulless monster from the KGB (particularly after he smugly unveils a new generation of nuke that can "Destroy an area the size of Texas or France.") It's not 1987, we don't have to be afraid of pretend Russian super weapons anymore
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2016 17:42
|
|
|
Not funny onion. NOT FUNNY.
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2016 17:42
|
|
|
Guy Goodbody posted:They're trying to interfere with our election Yeah, poorly. While their military rusts and their economy collapses. A Winner is Jew posted:Iraq I will 100% give you and what I was weighing Georgia and Crimea against. Afghanistan was a disaster in practice even if it was theoretically justified. Russia has pushed over tiny countries near it but we can't deny that American fascists have done a lot more damage in the last generation than Russian fascists. None of this changes that there are plenty of diplomatic and counterintelligence options for countering Russia and war is a preposterously stupid and pointless option. Russia still has nuclear weapons guys. Edit: supporting Trump is not a material threat. Material threat means military, physical. At worst the Russians are trolling us.
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2016 17:43
|
|
|
So it's comparing one week of early voting to the whole early voting season four years ago?
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2016 17:43
|
|
|
Lightning Knight posted:I mean the article has numbers and it doesn't look great. Hmm yeah good thing we're voting to go to war with Russia.
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2016 17:43
|
|
|
Lightning Knight posted:Also holy poo poo guys no we shouldn't go to war with Russia. They're also not actually a material threat to us. Like what the gently caress. We aren't going to go with war with Russia. We are going to put the screws to them diplomatically and economically. It's far more effective, and there's sweet gently caress all they can do about it.
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2016 17:43
|
|
|
Crain posted:Don't know if this was posted but it seems that our buddy Tashan Dorrsett is getting the FBI involved with investigating her ban: https://twitter.com/lowtax/status/793488922965864448 Man, the poo poo Lowtax has to put up with. Read that whole conversation chain for a laugh.
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2016 17:44
|
|
|
Mel Mudkiper posted:It could also, like Sam Wang has argued, be a sign of a relatively stable election. IF the swings are all still strongly correlated to a medium it may just be statistical noise obfuscating an obvious outcome This is basically my guess. I think he makes a good case for it. The big swings happen when the partisanship gets shaken for a moment, but they come back home when they realize 'gently caress he's still a Republican' and aren't presented with any overwhelming evidence he's insane for a week or two. Would've been nice if the election had hit at a moment of terrible enthusiasm for Trump, though.
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2016 17:44
|
|
|
FactsAreUseless posted:Good plan. Russian dissenters should have no means to contact anyone, such as human rights organizations. That way they can't threaten Superman's Pal Vladdy Putin. Oligarchs should have no means of moving their money.
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2016 17:44
|
|
|
Ein Sexmonster posted:I'm glad insane Trump supporter #111 is here to preach to us about what we would totally do. Im insane? Yorue voting for the most corrupt, most vile, worst lying sociopath to ever run for president. The one that's threatening war with Russia? hosed up Lybia, hosed up Iraq, hosed up Syria, And now Obama is bombing and supplying munitions to Saudis to bomb Yemen, And Im insane? I thought you libs were anti war? WTF happened? Look at you guys embracing the Russian lies hook line and sinker. As if it were 1965.
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2016 17:44
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 23, 2024 19:54 |
|
|
BarbarianElephant posted:I'm sure they could think of something. Or at least promise Assange they could think of something. It'd have to be pretty crazy like a cheap spy thriller, but Russia assassinated a man using radioactive tea, so they clearly have no problem with silliness. i 100% guarantee that Putin will not devote any effort into accomplishing anything of the kind
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2016 17:44
|
|
