|
Moatman posted:Well he left out the fanfic part but yes. There used to be a thread about how utterly insane he is but I think it got rolled into the Dark Enlightenment thread. There was also a good Let's Read of HPMOR in TBB but I think it died 
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2016 05:28
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 24, 2024 19:41 |
|
|
Is anyone else planning to take the day off next Wednesday? There are 3 possible outcomes I'll either be recovering from a hangover after a night spent bathing in glorious Trump tears and watching Hillary's speech 2 or 3 times, or I'll still be awake looking at the latest on the vote count updates for a tied decisive state, or I'll be too depressed to get out of bed. Either way, I'd be useless at my job the next day.
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2016 05:29
|
|
|
axeil posted:wait is the alt-right seriously based on a loving harry potter fanfic? They're talking about the Rationalist weirdos that jerk off to anything that comes out of Eliezer Yudkowsky's keyboard.
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2016 05:29
|
|
|
climboutonalimb posted:This is gonna be a lovely week In addition to what other people have said, just look at the color difference of the background between the header and the body.
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2016 05:29
|
|
|
fadam posted:Seeing the gap on the 538 win percentage narrow every time I check the site is really bumming me out. Check PEC then.
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2016 05:30
|
|
climboutonalimb posted:This is gonna be a lovely week So, bets on what the other 30 gigs are? Usually with 4chan people it's dolphin porn.
|
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2016 05:31
|
|
|
Ogmius815 posted:Oh poo poo that NYTimes article about black turnout is going to kill me. The part about the Florida vote is total horse poo poo. The data they link to compares 2012 early voting composition 8 days before the election to 2016 composition 8 days prior to the election. In 2012 that was a 2 days of In Person voting plus absentee ballots. In 2016 that was 7 days of In Person voting plus absentee ballots. Why the gently caress would you worry about that? But hey, if comparing totally non similar things makes you happy: https://twitter.com/electionsmith/status/793278422415872000 https://twitter.com/electionsmith/status/793644967822368768 Black turnout is down guys, but also up 49%, maybe we're just loving idiots looking for a click! Gyges fucked around with this message at 05:36 on Nov 2, 2016 |
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2016 05:31
|
|
|
Pakled posted:Ahahaha, $150 million, huh? So like, about 30% of her ENTIRE campaign fundraising comes from one donation from the Rothschilds? Give me a loving break. Follow the money.
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2016 05:32
|
|
|
im gay posted:Follow the money. im gay
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2016 05:32
|
|
|
fadam posted:Seeing the gap on the 538 win percentage narrow every time I check the site is really bumming me out.
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2016 05:33
|
|
|
im gay posted:Follow the (((money.)))
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2016 05:33
|
|
|
Here's the FBI's statement on releasing those Marc Rich documents today:quote:The FBI's Records Management Division receives thousands of FOIA requests annually which are processed on a first in, first out (FIFO) basis. By law, FOIA materials that have been requested three or more times are posted electronically to the FBI’s public reading room shortly after they are processed. Per the standard procedure for FOIA, these materials became available for release and were posted automatically and electronically to the FBI’s public reading room in accordance with the law and established procedures. I'm not buying it...
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2016 05:34
|
|
|
cult member at airport posted:Here's the FBI's statement on releasing those Marc Rich documents today:
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2016 05:35
|
|
|
ymgve posted:In addition to what other people have said, just look at the color difference of the background between the header and the body. It was re tweeted by @daveweigel so it has a strong likelihood of seeing media light. Also, if it's not obvious you should NOT download the files at that link or try to open them.
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2016 05:35
|
|
|
Nessus posted:Yeah but if he says "the Rothschilds," he either has to explain who they are - and there's no real way to do that without sounding anti-Semitic - or he has to get huge cheers for the reference, which would let the news media explain it. The sad thing is that he doesn't because he can speak in Breitbart memes and anyone who regularly reads it will know that 'Rothschild' is code for (((JAY EEE DOUBLEYOU ESSSSSSS))) and everyone else will either google it and be enlightened or assume it's more word salad
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2016 05:35
|
|
|
Exposure posted:So the co-founder of the data consulting firm Rubio uses commented on that Florida poll, and specifically quoted a tweet mentioning the "28% of republicans going for Hillary" part: Is he implying that internals have been showing these numbers consistently? That would be landslide territory for Clinton, holy poo poo
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2016 05:36
|
|
|
Nessus posted:Careful now, Peter Thiel may believe in this, he'll sue you and take your blood if you're slandering him Hey well it's not murder to kill a vampire. Cut off the head and burn the body right? Also this election really has opened my eyes to antisemitism.
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2016 05:37
|
|
|
Nessus posted:Yeah uh huh after a whole year of zero posts, mm hmm. I figure someone there is thinking "Well in for a penny, in for a pound!" Comey must really want some new concrete shoes.
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2016 05:37
|
|
|
HorseRenoir posted:Is he implying that internals have been showing these numbers consistently? That would be landslide territory for Clinton, holy poo poo Crowsbeak posted:Hey well it's not murder to kill a vampire. Cut off the head and burn the body right?
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2016 05:40
|
|
|
climboutonalimb posted:It was re tweeted by @daveweigel so it has a strong likelihood of seeing media light. I dunno if you 'get' Dave Weigel.
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2016 05:40
|
|
|
HorseRenoir posted:Is he implying that internals have been showing these numbers consistently? That would be landslide territory for Clinton, holy poo poo Wasn't there some report a couple of weeks ago that the Trump campaign's internal polling was showing things were even worse than what the public polls showed in some state? I think it may have been Virginia but who knows. Remember that the campaign pulled out of there some time ago.
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2016 05:40
|
|
|
HorseRenoir posted:Is he implying that internals have been showing these numbers consistently? That would be landslide territory for Clinton, holy poo poo At least a few times if they're surprised it hadn't leaked before.
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2016 05:41
|
|
|
Nessus posted:I think he is, yes. This may explain why Comey did this: it wasn't that he was trying to win it for Trump, it was a desperation move to try to stop the bleeding. Do you know if the watchers council is still in business?
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2016 05:43
|
|
|
Has early vote already been counted or do they wait till Election Day?
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2016 05:45
|
|
|
Mid 13 hr night shift, time to watch some anime and arnzy up. Where'd we leave off last night? Last thing I remember was Goku is closing in on the polls and Black Trump fused with Zamasu.
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2016 05:46
|
|
|
Dr. VooDoo posted:Oh poo poo they found more secret totally real not bullshit hacked Hillary Emails with damning evidence in this one! Stolen. Like this election. Bigly. Amirite?
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2016 05:48
|
|
|
Deadulus posted:Has early vote already been counted or do they wait till Election Day? On election day it's the first of the votes reported. It's been counted in the sense that it's all been run through computers, but not in the sense that it's been reported or is available for anyone to look at in any sense other than who has voted.
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2016 05:48
|
|
|
Gyges posted:On election day it's the first of the votes reported. It's been counted in the sense that it's all been run through computers, but not in the sense that it's been reported or is available for anyone to look at in any sense other than who has voted. So you would have to rely on polling early voters to figure out what is happening prior to Election Day?
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2016 05:50
|
|
|
Dr. VooDoo posted:Oh poo poo they found more secret totally real not bullshit hacked Hillary Emails with damning evidence in this one! Fake; not seeing anything about (((GEORGE SOROS)))) in there.
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2016 05:50
|
|
|
Deadulus posted:Has early vote already been counted or do they wait till Election Day?  and all the Rs will vote for  except that there is evidence that a significant fraction of Rs are abandoning their orange god in favor of the Iron Meme Queen. Possibly as many as 28%. To which I see four outcomes. If it's just Florida and just for President it makes Hillary a lock. If it's also downballot races in FL, well, maybe a few House seats. If it's not just Florida, but is just for President, comical defeat. If it's not just florida, and includes downballot, 992 yrs. lib. drkness
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2016 05:50
|
|
|
Tweet, Trump, Tweet! Tweet! Tweet! Tweet!
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2016 05:51
|
|
|
im gay posted:Follow the money.
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2016 05:51
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/tashmahal/status/792870706044243968
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2016 05:52
|
|
|
Deadulus posted:So you would have to rely on polling early voters to figure out what is happening prior to Election Day? Yes, allowing for a massive coordinated prank where millions of early voters are coached to tell pollsters they voted for the other candidate in order to gently caress with people.
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2016 05:52
|
|
|
Nessus posted:Votes aren't formally counted until election day I think, but they've been able to loosely track # of registered partisans/unregistered types who have sent theirs in. The idea is that generally speaking you can assume all the Ds will vote for Yeah I saw that. I have hard time believing it. 28% would be insane.
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2016 05:52
|
|
|
If all these young people claim to be liberal, why hasn't there been a marked drop in republican voter proportionality over time?
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2016 05:52
|
|
|
Relin posted:If all these young people claim to be liberal, why hasn't there been a marked drop in republican voter proportionality over time? Because the past 50 years have seen a lot of older people switch to the Republican party.
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2016 05:53
|
|
|
Relin posted:If all these young people claim to be liberal, why hasn't there been a marked drop in republican voter proportionality over time? Young people don't vote
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2016 05:53
|
|
|
Relin posted:If all these young people claim to be liberal, why hasn't there been a marked drop in republican voter proportionality over time? Well compare now to1984. Also remember in 92 and 96 a lot of Perot voters leaned GOP.
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2016 05:55
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 24, 2024 19:41 |
|
|
theflyingorc posted:Young people don't vote
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2016 05:55
|
|