|
mcmagic posted:Is it not true that she locked up the primary in 2014 and that no other viable candidates ran against her? That isn't a fact? That's weird, I remember Democrats voting for her and some other people earlier this year for... some reason.
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2016 20:24
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 25, 2024 23:00 |
|
|
It's gonna be loving 2024 and we're gonna be riding around on hover boards talking about how the corpse of Bernie Sanders would be doing better than Cory Booker against David Duke because Booker is "corrupt" and gosh darn it those white people just have all this anxiety about the economy and poo poo, we should've maintained there was no war but the class war.
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2016 20:24
|
|
|
Does RealClear have a pollster rating on 538?
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2016 20:24
|
|
|
Too Shy Guy posted:That's weird, I remember Democrats voting for her and some other people earlier this year for... some reason. The last season of American Idol got really weird.
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2016 20:26
|
|
|
Tiny Brontosaurus posted:Seriously, mcmagic, actually answer me: What are you going to do when the next Dem nominee also isn't a white man? Tangent to this, who are you more excited for in 2024, Harris or Duckworth?
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2016 20:26
|
|
|
mcmagic posted:This is actually funny and more creative than this sexist bullshit. Permaban yourself
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2016 20:26
|
|
|
Tiny Brontosaurus posted:I'm calling you a sexist because you constantly, like literally every single day, every time you can wedge it into conversation, do the classically sexist thing of demeaning a woman's accomplishments and comparing her unfavorably to a less-qualified man. That is textbook sexism and it's revolting. The standard we're talking about is electability. And by that standard she's NOT more qualified or accomplished and is dropping hourly.
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2016 20:26
|
|
|
CascadeBeta posted:Does RealClear have a pollster rating on 538? they don't poll, they just aggregate polls
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2016 20:26
|
|
|
CascadeBeta posted:Does RealClear have a pollster rating on 538? 538 isn't a pollster so without looking, I'm going to guess no
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2016 20:26
|
|
|
Lightning Knight posted:It's gonna be loving 2024 and we're gonna be riding around on hover boards talking about how the corpse of Bernie Sanders would be doing better than Cory Booker against David Duke because Booker is "corrupt" and gosh darn it those white people just have all this anxiety about the economy and poo poo, we should've maintained there was no war but the class war. Oh please god not Cory Booker.
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2016 20:26
|
|
|
There were actually 3 polls of Utah today. The +6 Trump was mentioned earlier. Rasmussen and Emerson both did one as well. Trump +11 and Trump +12. The McMuffin difference in them is 8 points. So a lot of soft supporters of Trump / Hillary / McMuffin. Senator and Governor are going to be R landslides (SHOCK)
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2016 20:26
|
|
|
White men killed their own unions because they didn't want to let black people in and now they have no choice but to "become" racist. Because of the economy you see.
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2016 20:26
|
|
|
Tiny Brontosaurus posted:Oh boy we got a live one. What did you think of the new Ghostbusters movie? Today's shithead didn't show up till 3pm. They're slipping.
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2016 20:27
|
|
|
CascadeBeta posted:Does RealClear have a pollster rating on 538? They just aggregate polls. They post every major poll from a News Outlet, Professional Polling Firm, and University in one spot.
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2016 20:27
|
|
mcmagic posted:The standard we're talking about is electability. And by that she's NOT more qualified or accomplished and is dropping hourly. Bernie had the chance to prove himself to be more electable in the primary. He failed.
|
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2016 20:27
|
|
|
mcmagic posted:The standard we're talking about is electability. And by that standard she's NOT more qualified or accomplished and is dropping hourly. 
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2016 20:28
|
|
|
mcmagic posted:The standard we're talking about is electability. And by that standard she's NOT more qualified or accomplished and is dropping hourly. Lying makes you look like a loving idiot, and you are only telling these lies because you are sexist. What's your line going to be next week you hysterical douchebag?
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2016 20:27
|
|
|
mcmagic posted:Is it not true that she locked up the primary in 2014 and that no other viable candidates ran against her? That isn't a fact? Biden may have had a chance an repeatedly turned down any chance to run. Warren while a new Senaor also had her chance and turned down.
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2016 20:28
|
|
|
A Winner is Jew posted:Tangent to this, who are you more excited for in 2024, Harris or Duckworth? 
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2016 20:28
|
|
|
emdash posted:they don't poll, they just aggregate polls  Thanks, I'm stupid.
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2016 20:28
|
|
|
Tiny Brontosaurus posted:White men killed their own unions because they didn't want to let black people in and now they have no choice but to "become" racist. Because of the economy you see. Is this really the story behind the dismantling of unions?
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2016 20:28
|
|
|
If you need words like those, stick to romance literature. Strange is still one of the best words.
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2016 20:28
|
|
|
Bless you and your gimmick.
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2016 20:28
|
|
|
GalacticAcid posted:Oh please god not Cory Booker. Serious question: what can the right throw at Booker and stick that they can't stick to Clinton?
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2016 20:28
|
|
|
mcmagic posted:You have no argument other than to beat the sexism drum. It's frankly embarrassing. mcmagic posted:Of course it's true. You don't like what I'm saying so your refuge is to call me a sexist. Or, and bear with me here on this, it's because you're a loving sexist.
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2016 20:29
|
|
|
mcmagic posted:The standard we're talking about is electability. And by that standard she's NOT more qualified or accomplished and is dropping hourly. She is not dropping hourly, and your incessant delusions are offensive and annoying.
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2016 20:29
|
|
|
Tiny Brontosaurus posted:White men killed their own unions because they didn't want to let black people in and now they have no choice but to "become" racist. Because of the economy you see. lmao
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2016 20:29
|
|
|
mcmagic posted:The standard we're talking about is electability. And by that standard she's NOT more qualified or accomplished and is dropping hourly. ... and yet, she'll be elected president by an indisputable majority. Have you considered that you may, in fact, be wrong?
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2016 20:29
|
|
|
mcmagic posted:The standard we're talking about is electability. And by that she's NOT more qualified or accomplished and is dropping hourly. Okay duder. Let's take you at face value (you're wrong, but whatever.) What do you want us to do about it? Build a time machine so we can go back and tell Hillary not to run? Like you're just squawking endless here like some dude on Rivals.
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2016 20:29
|
|
|
Tiny Brontosaurus posted:Bless you and your gimmick. It's not really a gimmick, mcmagic is just dumb as gently caress and I like posting these Simpson jpgs at them
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2016 20:29
|
|
|
Lightning Knight posted:My concern about whether or not we're actually going to win is increasing. http://www.oldnorthstatepolitics.com/2016/11/nc-absentee-ballots-continue-pace-ahead.html quote:What is notable is that with three days to go for in-person absentee balloting, registered Democrats have just about caught up to their cumulative 2012 numbers, down only 0.8 percent. Registered Republicans are well ahead of their 2012 numbers, up 11.1 percent, but the truly remarkable line on the above chart is from registered unaffiliated voters: up 42 percent from the same day totals in 2012. That's your wildcard for the 2016 election so far.
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2016 20:30
|
|
|
I hate to be that guy, but what the gently caress happened in the last 24 hours? It sounds like the FBI has gone crazy and Clinton is dropping severely in polls?
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2016 20:30
|
|
|
Browbeating mcmagic on sexism isn't productive, and actually it isn't necessarily correct. Could be, but not necessarily. Stop.
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2016 20:30
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/SopanDeb/status/794257817960071173 apparently Melania gave a speech on civility in the US just now? and people's heads didn't literally explode or melt from the cognitive friction?
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2016 20:30
|
|
|
Feral Integral posted:Is this really the story behind the dismantling of unions? One of them, they obviously got a lot of help from pro-business conservatives who wanted the unions dead for financial reasons. Basically the money guys came in and did a one-two punch of "do you really want THOSE PEOPLE getting the same rights as you?" and enormously highlighting the cases of actual union corruption in the mobbed-up parts of the country. It's actually really easy to kill off any progressive thing that way in America. Racist fearmongering to get the right wing on your side, perfect-is-the-enemy-of-good to get the left wing on your side.
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2016 20:30
|
|
|
Tiny Brontosaurus posted:Lying makes you look like a loving idiot, and you are only telling these lies because you are sexist. What's your line going to be next week you hysterical douchebag? "Didn't win bigly enough, failed us majorly. Going to lose bigly in 2018 and even more bigly in 2020. Bernie should primary her!"
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2016 20:30
|
|
|
Crowsbeak posted:Biden may have had a chance an repeatedly turned down any chance to run. Warren while a new Senaor also had her chance and turned down. And if the current Republican nominee proves anything, it's obviously that having a lot of people competing to be the nominee can't possibly backfire in any way! Also, mcmagic, I'm pretty sure you're a sexist. There's a slight chance that you're simply insane and not a sexist, but I feel pretty confident that you are in fact a sexist.
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2016 20:31
|
|
|
Potato Salad posted:Browbeating mcmagic on sexism isn't productive, and actually it isn't necessarily correct. Could be, but not necessarily. Can I browbeat them for just being dumb and annoying
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2016 20:31
|
|
|
Crowsbeak posted:Biden may have had a chance an repeatedly turned down any chance to run. Warren while a new Senaor also had her chance and turned down. And they didn't run because Clinton already had the support of the vast majority of the party behind her and they didn't see a path to victory. Tiny Brontosaurus posted:Lying makes you look like a loving idiot, and you are only telling these lies because you are sexist. What's your line going to be next week you hysterical douchebag? You are the loving idiot for spewing nonsense about me being sexist because I have the nerve to criticize one woman who you like. You're doing a disservice to the actual sexism that exists in the world.
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2016 20:31
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 25, 2024 23:00 |
|
|
Tiny Brontosaurus posted:Oh boy we got a live one. What did you think of the new Ghostbusters movie? Saw it, Thought it sucked. Which is a shame because I loved the first Ghostbusters and I'm a fan of Melissa Mccarthy's comedy.
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2016 20:31
|
|
