|
Good. Read the article this was a follow-up to. http://internet.gawker.com/tony-the-tiger-cant-tweet-without-furries-begging-him-f-1740600010 Furries have bad manners.
|
# ? Oct 31, 2016 18:22 |
|
|
# ? May 11, 2024 16:39 |
|
furries are decadent and depraved
|
# ? Oct 31, 2016 18:29 |
|
What was once thought an impossible dream is now a reality. Estrella Jalisco presents the first Hispanic hologram! http://www.billboard.com/amp/articles/columns/latin/7557820/jenni-rivera-hologram-day-of-the-dead-hollywood-forever-cemetary?client=safari
|
# ? Nov 3, 2016 02:57 |
|
two women vets tell veterans how to transition back to civilian life on the Facebook page of one of the prime causes of perpetual war
|
# ? Nov 3, 2016 07:01 |
|
|
# ? Nov 3, 2016 18:08 |
|
Lena Dunham has to be a sleeper agent for the right.
|
# ? Nov 3, 2016 18:16 |
|
so many layers, and they're all bad
|
# ? Nov 3, 2016 18:20 |
|
lena dunham, just... stop all of this stuff you are doing
|
# ? Nov 3, 2016 19:05 |
|
https://twitter.com/ellievhall/status/794182427279261696
|
# ? Nov 3, 2016 19:09 |
|
Karl Barks posted:so many layers, and they're all bad The only layers I'm seeing are on her gut
|
# ? Nov 4, 2016 03:00 |
|
Quick Draw McGraw posted:The only layers I'm seeing are on her gut nah that's usual for non size-0 women in that pose without photoshop. dont bring it down to appearance when there are other legitimate reasons to mock it
|
# ? Nov 4, 2016 14:14 |
|
ChickenOfTomorrow posted:nah that's usual for non size-0 women in that pose without photoshop. dont bring it down to appearance when there are other legitimate reasons to mock it Guess my non-size 0 wife is unusual then
|
# ? Nov 4, 2016 18:26 |
|
|
# ? Nov 4, 2016 19:27 |
|
lena dunham is the stupidest person with celebrity status in america and that's saying something. my dad used to agree but i think he's read one too many New Yorker articles praising her because i brought that up again and he doesn't anymore. getting old sucks
|
# ? Nov 4, 2016 20:17 |
|
that's a kickass hat
|
# ? Nov 4, 2016 20:18 |
|
can everyone please stop being so sexist against lena dunham, holy gently caress
|
# ? Nov 4, 2016 20:20 |
|
this post is relevant again:get that OUT of my face posted:i used to think that Girls had the greatest disconnect between economically-advantaged culture critics and everyone else, but Hamilton has it beat by a country mile snakeandbake posted:can everyone please stop being so sexist against lena dunham, holy gently caress
|
# ? Nov 4, 2016 20:31 |
|
why can't yall make a post about lena dunham without being weird and depressing, it's not hard
|
# ? Nov 4, 2016 20:35 |
|
I don't think I "get" Lena dunham
|
# ? Nov 4, 2016 20:38 |
|
devtesla posted:why can't yall make a post about lena dunham without being weird and depressing, it's not hard Why are you depressed that people dislike Lena Dunham for her privileged, smug attitude, Jastiger?
|
# ? Nov 4, 2016 20:42 |
|
i dont know or care who lena dunham is but she makes annoying nerds angry so more power to her
|
# ? Nov 4, 2016 20:46 |
|
steinrokkan posted:Why are you depressed that people dislike Lena Dunham for her privileged, smug attitude, Jastiger? I'm depressed that they're not funny about lol
|
# ? Nov 4, 2016 20:46 |
|
https://twitter.com/TheAVClub/status/794713384289792000
|
# ? Nov 5, 2016 03:05 |
|
get that OUT of my face posted:this post is relevant again: What do you mean about Hamilton? I haven't seen it.
|
# ? Nov 5, 2016 03:17 |
|
https://twitter.com/DoobiesDogHouse/status/377784831284756480
|
# ? Nov 5, 2016 03:42 |
|
Jeb! Repetition posted:What do you mean about Hamilton? I haven't seen it.
|
# ? Nov 5, 2016 05:04 |
|
get that OUT of my face posted:neither has the vast majority of america, but that doesn't stop pop culture critics from saying it's a cultural juggernaut It's like how most articles about millennials are only based on the young affluent white people in large coastal cities.
|
# ? Nov 5, 2016 17:42 |
|
So I take it Hamilton is just another fad for bored bourgies to cling to as they try to convince themselves they are both progressive, and "with it".
|
# ? Nov 5, 2016 18:15 |
|
ALL-PRO SEXMAN posted:it literally is unreal because it wasn't the Navy who painted the thing pink, it was some museum's dumb show of wokeness so a MUSEUM literally defaced a historical piece of technology for the sake of wokeness? dang
|
# ? Nov 5, 2016 18:36 |
|
This is what long term exposure to woke brands does to a person. Please keep your children away from the brands. https://twitter.com/rachelmillman/status/794947992788893696
|
# ? Nov 5, 2016 18:36 |
|
They seem pretty cool actually.
|
# ? Nov 5, 2016 18:38 |
|
The Saurus posted:so a MUSEUM literally defaced a historical piece of technology for the sake of wokeness?
|
# ? Nov 5, 2016 18:45 |
|
Tatum Girlparts posted:I mean it's dumb to be all 'my god why, WHY has Taylor Swift not waded in? Truly she is failing to do her duty to America...' but yea it's not fuckin crazy to say 'maybe celebrities who have more direct access to their fans then ever before could be very influential in politics when they typically already have causes and all that fall under the political sphere to begin with'. But a lot of celebrities, such as JK Rowling have lovely regressive viewpoints and use their influence to forward those instead. Why should we act like celebrities' opinions are more valuable than other peoples simply because they're famous? It's ridiculous to put that kind of pressure on someone who performs for a living. They have no duty to speak out publicly on political issues just like anyone is free to keep their politics to themselves in their professional and public life. I don't think we should be encouraging or demanding famous people to get involved in politics just because they have influence, that's a terrible idea.
|
# ? Nov 5, 2016 19:53 |
|
Hello, this is my first time in Cspam. Is that a pink tank with a giant middle finger on it
|
# ? Nov 5, 2016 20:18 |
|
A Spider Covets posted:Hello, this is my first time in Cspam. Yes, thank you for your custom.
|
# ? Nov 5, 2016 21:55 |
|
The Saurus posted:But a lot of celebrities, such as JK Rowling have lovely regressive viewpoints and use their influence to forward those instead. We Are The World
|
# ? Nov 5, 2016 22:21 |
|
The Saurus posted:But a lot of celebrities, such as JK Rowling have lovely regressive viewpoints and use their influence to forward those instead. I mean they're not 'more valuable' but JK Rowling making stupid tweets about Scotland was seen by a poo poo ton more people than, say, some rando saying 'no that's real dumb'. So, they do have more weight even if they're not more valuable in the sense that somehow famous people are More Citizens than us or whatever.
|
# ? Nov 5, 2016 22:25 |
|
extrapolating pop culture onto current events is one of the dumbest, most surface-level mental exercises out there and jk rowling regularly does it with the characters she created. also she's a welfare state supporter who is vehemently opposed to someone who would help expand itsteinrokkan posted:So I take it Hamilton is just another fad for bored bourgies to cling to as they try to convince themselves they are both progressive, and "with it".
|
# ? Nov 5, 2016 22:31 |
|
Powercrazy posted:Guess my non-size 0 wife is unusual then The anatomy of the hand is complex, intricate, and fascinating. Its integrity is absolutely essential for our everyday functional living. Our hands may be affected by many disorders, most commonly traumatic injury. For any physician or therapist treating hand problems, the mastery of such anatomy is fundamental in order to provide the best quality of care. Surface anatomy of the left hand. A is the dorsum of the left hand, and B is the palm of the left hand. Number 1 is the position of the extensor retinaculum, 2 is the position of the flexor retinaculum, 3 is the position of the head of the metacarpals, 4 is the ulnar artery, 5 is the radial artery, 6 is the level of the deep palmar arch, and 7 is the level of the superficial palmar arch. A total of 27 bones constitute the basic skeleton of the wrist and hand. The hand is innervated by 3 ner
|
# ? Nov 5, 2016 22:33 |
|
|
# ? May 11, 2024 16:39 |
|
quote:So I take it Hamilton is just another fad for bored bourgies to cling to as they try to convince themselves they are both progressive, and "with it". This quote reminds me of a news article I read about elite, expensive private schools which include classes on privilege. I mean, I'm not one of those people saying it doesn't exist. I mean that the people running those places tend to be hypocritical and think sacrificing words on the altar of progressivism makes tax sheltering their old-money okay. Also, it's about wanting their kids to know how to stay within the lines when they do PR. galenanorth has issued a correction as of 23:01 on Nov 5, 2016 |
# ? Nov 5, 2016 22:55 |