Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
DaveWoo
Aug 14, 2004

Fun Shoe

Nate RFB posted:

I believe the point is that RCP undersold Obama's numbers by near as makes no difference 4 points, and in general just seem to go out of their way to make any given race always seem closer than it actually is.

It's not RCP's fault in this case - Nevada polling is notoriously inaccurate in general.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

sourdough
Apr 30, 2012

Leon Trotsky 2012 posted:

The 2012 results prove it. Heller ran 8 points better than Romney. That is by definition not a 1:1 correlation between ticket results.

People saying that NV-Sen is "a lock" because Clinton is ahead are not looking at the full picture. I agree that Cortez is the slight favorite, but not a lock at all.

He is talking about polling errors being consistent between top of the ticket and down ballot, not that votes are equal.

Leon Trotsky 2012
Aug 27, 2009

YOU CAN TRUST ME!*


*Israeli Government-affiliated poster

RVProfootballer posted:

He is talking about polling errors being consistent between top of the ticket and down ballot

I know and I agree with that. Nevada is notoriously difficult to poll. It was in dispute of people saying that NV-Sen is a lock because of the Clinton vote. He quoted the part about 1:1 ticket result correlation and said it hadn't been proven.

Doorknob Slobber
Sep 10, 2006

by Fluffdaddy

seiferguy posted:

I'm pretty familiar with the demographics of WA State (I live here, I figured my av might have given that away :) ), it was more how did he get picked by the Dems and now he's got a chance to be a faithless electorate. Seems like there should have been some better vetting going on.

Yeah, who would have thought making an native activist an elector was a good idea(if what they wanted was obedience)? Its a reasonable question that should be put to the people who pick electors in WA state. It looks like they're decided at convention? It may have been something done to try to bring Bernie supporters more in line that has hilariously back fired.

also I feel dumb for not noticing your avatar, I tend to tune them out.

Doorknob Slobber fucked around with this message at 18:03 on Nov 7, 2016

Combed Thunderclap
Jan 4, 2011



Trump is doing five rallies today? Makes me feel exhausted just thinking about it.

What's Hillary's schedule look like today?

Cingulate
Oct 23, 2012

by Fluffdaddy
Early votes are probably not a random sample of total votes.

BonoMan
Feb 20, 2002

Jade Ear Joe

Combed Thunderclap posted:

Trump is doing five rallies today? Makes me feel exhausted just thinking about it.

What's Hillary's schedule look like today?

Chillin' on the beach drinkin' a fuckin' mai tai

Leon Trotsky 2012
Aug 27, 2009

YOU CAN TRUST ME!*


*Israeli Government-affiliated poster

Combed Thunderclap posted:

Trump is doing five rallies today? Makes me feel exhausted just thinking about it.

What's Hillary's schedule look like today?

Pittsburgh and Michigan.

Doredrin
Sep 5, 2016

by zen death robot

Combed Thunderclap posted:

What's Hillary's schedule look like today?

Very low energy probably.

Sarmhan
Nov 1, 2011


Leon Trotsky 2012 posted:

I know and I agree with that. Nevada is notoriously difficult to poll. It was in dispute of people saying that NV-Sen is a lock because of the Clinton vote. He quoted the part about 1:1 ticket result correlation and said it hadn't been proven.
NV senate has been polling in line with NV president though. There's no reason to assume Masto will massively underperform. You can't just say "Well senate and president aren't always in line" and leave it at that.

sheri
Dec 30, 2002

Combed Thunderclap posted:

Trump is doing five rallies today? Makes me feel exhausted just thinking about it.

What's Hillary's schedule look like today?

https://hillaryspeeches.com/scheduled-events/

Looks like 4 events for HRC today

Hollismason
Jun 30, 2007
An alright dude.

computer parts posted:

Every indication this year has been that Nevada is not being polled correctly.

We are in 2016 Hillary and Trump are running for president.

Sarmhan
Nov 1, 2011


Hollismason posted:

We are in 2016 Hillary and Trump are running for president.
And the data from NV early vote indicates that the polling margin may be more off than usual, but not in Trump's favor. The NV GOP is in complete panic for a reason.

FizFashizzle
Mar 30, 2005







Keep in mind trump has to do so many rallies because he only had himself and pence.

Hillary has a other people that will turn out voters like Obama, Michelle, Warren, etc

Trump has mike pence.

Majorian
Jul 1, 2009

DaveWoo posted:

It's not RCP's fault in this case - Nevada polling is notoriously inaccurate in general.

Plus let's face the facts, Reid has a habit of blowing GOTV expectations out of the water.

Fred Breakfast
Aug 12, 2003

BobTheJanitor posted:

It says something when even Oklahoma early voting numbers are more than double the previous record. Not sure what it says exactly, but my hope is that people don't turn out early and in force because they want to vote for the fascist molester. That said, there's no way in hell OK ever turns blue, but I have some vague hope that maybe not every single county is red this time.

This is from a few pages back, but I did it on Saturday morning and was way longer than it was in 2008, and that was on a weekday. I think a lot of the early voting probably has more to do with the state questions than anything else, considering that there's criminal justice and alcohol sales reform on the ballot.

On the cool side of things, when I went to my county office to vote, the buses from a large African-American church pulled up and I got to stand in line in the middle of a huge African congregation. I also got to hear an old minister who clearly marched during the civil rights era give an impromptu but impassioned speech about voting. It made waiting in line for hours worth it.

computer parts
Nov 18, 2010

PLEASE CLAP

Hollismason posted:

We are in 2016 Hillary and Trump are running for president.

The person who narrowly lost in 2008 and the id of the Republican Party are running for President, who could've guessed that?

Leon Trotsky 2012
Aug 27, 2009

YOU CAN TRUST ME!*


*Israeli Government-affiliated poster

Ein Sexmonster posted:

NV senate has been polling in line with NV president though. There's no reason to assume Masto will massively underperform. You can't just say "Well senate and president aren't always in line" and leave it at that.

Agreed. I was just disputing the people saying that NV-Sen is a lock because of Clinton's early votes.

1) There is not a 1:1 ticket correlation.
2) Polling is volatile, especially in NV.
3) Polling is very very close in the Senate race.
4) Republican down ballot candidates tend to run better in NV in general and probably will do much better than Trump this year.

For these reasons, it is not fair to call NV-Sen a lock, even though the Early Vote turnout for Dems looks good.

Mr. Belding
May 19, 2006
^
|
<- IS LAME-O PHOBE ->
|
V

Guy Goodbody posted:

As I understand it, there's three possible outcomes tomorrow

Virtually guaranteed - Clinton wins. The world doesn't explode

Very possible - Clinton wins and Dems take the senate. Senate becomes an appointment rubber stamping machine, vacancies are filled so we get a functioning federal government and a generation of liberal darkness from the Supreme Court

Unlikely but possible - Clinton wins and Dems take Senate and House. Functioning government, sin-cursed Supreme Court, big parts of Clinton's platform passed into law, everything is wonderful and flowers until the next midterm election

What I really want when all of this is said and done is something like this. Hillary wins. The GOP continues to collapse. The Democrats become the intellectual and spiritual successors to Dwight Eisenhower. The new challenge comes from a legitimate leftist democratic socialist party. By 2024 the election is a business friendly centrist Democrat duking it out with a clone of Jeremy Corbyn made by the newly leftist, post-purge FBI using a stolen saliva sample.

Mr. Belding fucked around with this message at 18:09 on Nov 7, 2016

Shrecknet
Jan 2, 2005


https://twitter.com/brianlehrer/status/795643861326589952

huge if true

PT6A
Jan 5, 2006

Public school teachers are callous dictators who won't lift a finger to stop children from peeing in my plane

FizFashizzle posted:

Keep in mind trump has to do so many rallies because he only had himself and pence.

Hillary has a other people that will turn out voters like Obama, Michelle, Warren, etc

Trump has mike pence.

Does anyone actually not hate Mike Pence? He's the least charismatic person I can possibly imagine, next to Scott Walker.

Majorian
Jul 1, 2009

Spiffster posted:

The eternal political pessimist in me will always believe in the worst case scenario on polls.

Usually a good policy, in my book, but this time around, I think one can afford to be a little more dismissive of 538. Their model has budget too much for catastrophic polling errors in Trump's favor, and I'm not sure that makes sense at this point.

Lightning Knight
Feb 24, 2012

Pray for Answer

Bird in a Blender posted:

We should go to just popular vote, but if we are keeping it, we should at least go to electoral votes based just on the House instead of House + Senate, that at least evens up the electoral vote disparity between small and large states, it also hurts Republicans.

I'm super late, but since any change at that level to the Electoral College requires an amendment, we might as well get rid of it at the stage where we'd have enough support to change anything about it. It's a dumb, anti-voter system.

cant cook creole bream
Aug 15, 2011
I think Fahrenheit is better for weather
Running a campaign is kind of a stressful job. I don't think they get a lot of chances to rehearse those speeches either.
I know it's only because it's feeding his ego. But I can't help but giving Trump the smallest amount of respect for not keeling over. I'm sure I would, even though I'm only 25 and mostly fit.

SamuraiFoochs
Jan 16, 2007




Grimey Drawer
Uhhh I posted this in C-SPAM because I didn't realize this thread was back but Nate has the Republicans holding onto the Senate. PEC has it 79% Dem. Who has been more right in recent history?

Feldegast42
Oct 29, 2011

COMMENCE THE RITE OF SHITPOSTING

PT6A posted:

Does anyone actually not hate Mike Pence? He's the least charismatic person I can possibly imagine, next to Scott Walker.

Hes so boring and forgettable that nobody knows or cares who he is on the national stage. He's way overshadowed by Trump.

stone cold
Feb 15, 2014

Mr. Belding posted:

What I really want when all of this is said and done is something like this. Hillary wins. The GOP continues to collapse. The Democrats become the intellectual and spiritual successors to Dwight Eisenhower. The new challenge comes from a legitimate leftist democratic socialist party. By 2024 the election is a business friendly centrist Democrat duking it out with a clone of Jeremy Corbyn made by the newly leftist, post-purge FBI using a stolen saliva sample.

Would cloned Corbyn be considered a natural-born citizen?

What is the bigger issue going forward: that or EC reform?

PT6A
Jan 5, 2006

Public school teachers are callous dictators who won't lift a finger to stop children from peeing in my plane

cant cook creole bream posted:

Running a campaign is kind of a stressful job. I don't think they get a lot of chances to rehearse those speeches either.
I know it's only because it's feeding his ego. But I can't help but giving Trump the smallest amount of respect for not keeling over. I'm sure I would, even though I'm only 25 and mostly fit.

I don't think he practices his speeches, considering his sentences have a nasty habit of consisting of three or more completely unrelated and nonsensical topics. If that's what a practiced speech looks like, I can only loving imagine what he'd be like without practice.

OJ MIST 2 THE DICK
Sep 11, 2008

Anytime I need to see your face I just close my eyes
And I am taken to a place
Where your crystal minds and magenta feelings
Take up shelter in the base of my spine
Sweet like a chica cherry cola

-Cheap Trick

Nap Ghost

Lightning Knight posted:

I'm super late, but since any change at that level to the Electoral College requires an amendment, we might as well get rid of it at the stage where we'd have enough support to change anything about it. It's a dumb, anti-voter system.

Half of this country is about to vote for Donald Trump

Mr Hootington
Jul 24, 2008

I'M HAVING A HOOT EATING CORNETTE THE LONG WAY
https://twitter.com/RaleighReporter/status/795669824135430145

Sarmhan
Nov 1, 2011


Leon Trotsky 2012 posted:

Agreed. I was just disputing the people saying that NV-Sen is a lock because of Clinton's early votes.

1) There is not a 1:1 ticket correlation.
2) Polling is volatile, especially in NV.
3) Polling is very very close in the Senate race.
4) Republican down ballot candidates tend to run better in NV in general and probably will do much better than Trump this year.

For these reasons, it is not fair to call NV-Sen a lock, even though the Early Vote turnout for Dems looks good.
1: In general yes, but you can look at how senate vs state polls line up. In this case they appear to quite neatly.
2: Yes, but not in a way that favors the GOP usually, especially when NV hispanics turn out, which they are.
3: See above
4: In general yes. But again the polling data seems to show that Masto is performing strongly enough that she'll win if Hillary does.

WampaLord
Jan 14, 2010

exploding mummy posted:

Half of this country is about to vote for Donald Trump

No, 40-something percent of the 60-something percent of people who actually vote are going to.

If 50% of the country were voting for Trump, he'd win.

Have Some Flowers!
Aug 27, 2004
Hey, I've got Navigate...

This election would benefit from John Madden commentary. "If he doesn't get over 270 electoral votes, I don't see how he can win."

computer parts
Nov 18, 2010

PLEASE CLAP

If only those polling stations hadn't been reduced this year.

Raenir Salazar
Nov 5, 2010

College Slice

PT6A posted:

Does anyone actually not hate Mike Pence? He's the least charismatic person I can possibly imagine, next to Scott Walker.

He's like an uncharismatic unfunny version of Steve Carell. Or that Eagle from the Muppets.

CascadeBeta
Feb 14, 2009

by Cyrano4747

What a shock, when you cut down early voting centers from 16 to 1 in primarily black communities, they get disenfranchised.

I loving hate Republicans.

ddogflex
Sep 19, 2004

blahblahblah

PT6A posted:

Does anyone actually not hate Mike Pence? He's the least charismatic person I can possibly imagine, next to Scott Walker.

Evangelicals love him.

Mr. Belding
May 19, 2006
^
|
<- IS LAME-O PHOBE ->
|
V

Spiffster posted:

Dear lord its now 45% chance wise for senate to be retaken by Dems. I am NOT going to make it through at this rate. :ohdear:


The eternal political pessimist in me will always believe in the worst case scenario on polls.

If the Wang is wrong, the country won't last long.

Luigi Thirty
Apr 30, 2006

Emergency confection port.

Donald Trump guy on public radio: "I hope the Florida election will be fair. We have an election office controlled by a Republican candidate, so we have to trust but verify our system."

He also claimed to have seen voter fraud in person in the northeast but in Republican Florida it doesn't happen, but it's important for you to monitor your polling place.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Cingulate
Oct 23, 2012

by Fluffdaddy

Majorian posted:

Usually a good policy, in my book, but this time around, I think one can afford to be a little more dismissive of 538. Their model has budget too much for catastrophic polling errors in Trump's favor, and I'm not sure that makes sense at this point.
Related, but different, I think if you have 3 or 4 or so forecasters (538, PEC, Upshot, Huffpost ... maybe even throw RCP in there ...), it's entirely sensible that the truth is in the middle. Clinton's chances are probably lower than >99% and probably higher than 65%. E.g., if you just take the mean or median of 538, Upshot and PEC, you're at ~83%, which seems much more reasonable than >99%, but also probably more reasonable than <65%.

Yes, I am aggregating aggregators. It's all the rage in statistics right now.

  • Locked thread