|
   
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2016 10:16
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 6, 2024 17:37 |
|
|
Attitude Indicator posted:the sequel to Trainspotting was called Porno, can't imagine why they'd change that for the movie adaption Reading up on it, Boyle doesn't think Porno is a terribly great book, and this film is only loosely based on it.
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2016 15:18
|
|
|
I really like highlighting which actors you are looking at.
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2016 19:11
|
|
|
kiimo posted:I really like highlighting which actors you are looking at. I was right about to say, that is a great idea implemented for the weirdest choice of a movie. Also, I was thinking about one of your posts, kiimo, when I saw Dr. Strange last night EMBERS EVERYWHERE. I didn't realize you have to sign up for some stupid bullshit AMC Club thing if you want a chance to get the IMAX posters. I was really hoping to get a copy of that Dr. Strange blacklight poster that was posted earlier. ruddiger fucked around with this message at 19:31 on Nov 4, 2016 |
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2016 19:18
|
|
|
Half those things end up on the floor anyway. Just run around the theater picking them up afterwards.
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2016 19:36
|
|
|
The little watch tower in the logo is goatse.
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2016 23:22
|
|
|
Wendell posted:The little watch tower in the logo is goatse. 
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2016 00:11
|
|
|
Huh, i never realized the size of the rock on the ring until now.
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2016 04:18
|
|
|
The MSJ posted:But will Han fight a giant weasel? He looks like a white Frylock
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2016 15:42
|
|
|
Project X: Grown-Ups Edition
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2016 15:49
|
|
|
I'm still marvelling at how far Jennifer Aniston has fallen that she gets last billing in that lineup. Friends was a long , long time ago.
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2016 16:05
|
|
|
Gorilla Salad posted:I'm still marvelling at how far Jennifer Aniston has fallen that she gets last billing in that lineup. Last billing isn't the bottom rung when it comes to posters and title sequences if it's proceeded by a "with" or "and".
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2016 16:11
|
|
|
But I'm still allowed to think she's poo poo though, right?
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2016 16:13
|
|
|
She pretty much only exclusively does these kinds of comedies now too.
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2016 16:21
|
|
|
Only now that I see this image on my laptop and not my phone have I figured out what that is over the angel girl's head. It's a fuzzy halo, but the little flecks of black in the middle from the poster background made it so that on my phone it kept looking like she had a thought bubble over her head with tiny unintelligible words, like she's secretly grumbling to herself about all this.
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2016 16:34
|
|
|
Mierenneuker posted:Last billing isn't the bottom rung when it comes to posters and title sequences if it's proceeded by a "with" or "and". I think and is better than with.
|
|
#
?
Nov 6, 2016 13:49
|
|
|
It goes: starring, with, and, special appearance by. e: 'with' can be lesser than 'starring' if opening credits.
|
|
#
?
Nov 6, 2016 14:30
|
|
|
Lizard Combatant posted:It goes: starring, with, and, special appearance by. And then there's "featuring" if they rap 3/4s into the movie.
|
|
#
?
Nov 6, 2016 14:33
|
|
|
Lobok posted:And then there's "featuring" if they rap 3/4s into the movie. Doesn't "featuring" in that context mean they also get some percentage of the songwriting credit?
|
|
#
?
Nov 6, 2016 14:40
|
|
|
Lizard Combatant posted:It goes: starring, with, and, special appearance by. Would 'introducing' be considered a special appearance? There was a recent movie that used that one for comedic purposes. Was it The Hateful Eight?
|
|
#
?
Nov 6, 2016 15:09
|
|
|
Mierenneuker posted:Would 'introducing' be considered a special appearance? 
|
|
#
?
Nov 6, 2016 15:35
|
|
|
I have no desire to see the movie but that's a terrific joke poster, it even has all the embers and sparks and poo poo.
|
|
#
?
Nov 6, 2016 17:10
|
|
|
MacheteZombie posted:Yo that looks dope. I think Gore Verbinski is a pretty good director even if I don't like the Pirate films, so I am going to check this out. Gore Verbinski : The Reasonable David Fincher Alternative
|
|
#
?
Nov 6, 2016 17:45
|
|
|
Mierenneuker posted:Would 'introducing' be considered a special appearance? Introducing is for a young actor usually, or Carlos Estevez
|
|
#
?
Nov 6, 2016 18:36
|
|
|
Lizard Combatant posted:Introducing is for a young actor usually, or Carlos Estevez Or Julia Roberts.
|
|
#
?
Nov 6, 2016 18:38
|
|
|
Or Don Johnson.
|
|
#
?
Nov 6, 2016 19:08
|
|
|
I'm confused why anyone believes that Jennifer Aniston's star has fallen. Just because of billing? She's reliable in comedy roles. Her star was never higher than that. Also being in a comedy movie in perceived clout echelon is higher than being in a hit TV show.
|
|
#
?
Nov 7, 2016 19:30
|
|
|
Plus, she's at an age where most Hollywood women can't get any decent jobs and then disappear until they're grandma aged. She's doing pretty well for herself.
|
|
#
?
Nov 7, 2016 19:33
|
|
|
plus she just recently got married to justin theroux and brad pitt is on the fast-track to a divorce. everything's coming up jen!
|
|
#
?
Nov 7, 2016 19:49
|
|
|
Isn't she one of the highest paid Hollywood actresses of all time?
|
|
#
?
Nov 7, 2016 20:31
|
|
|
Even if she wasn't getting any work she could probably live of her Friends money for the rest of her life.
|
|
#
?
Nov 7, 2016 21:01
|
|
|
FreudianSlippers posted:Even if she wasn't getting any work she could probably live of her Friends money for the rest of her life. I'll always respect her for, allegedly, threatening to walk if the rest of the main Friends did not get paid as much as her.
|
|
#
?
Nov 7, 2016 21:29
|
|
|
FreudianSlippers posted:Even if she wasn't getting any work she could probably live of her Friends money for the rest of her life. Oh absolutely. I listened to the WTF with David Schwimmer and he said as much (for all of them) that they were lucky because Friends basically provided them with the financial freedom to do whatever the gently caress they wanted for the rest of their lives.
|
|
#
?
Nov 7, 2016 21:41
|
|
|
FreudianSlippers posted:Even if she wasn't getting any work she could probably live of her Friends money for the rest of her life. She still earns 20 million a year in syndication to this day, so I hope so.
|
|
#
?
Nov 7, 2016 22:04
|
|
|
We're not even taking into account her Leprechaun royalties. So many pennies.
|
|
#
?
Nov 7, 2016 22:15
|
|
|
I hope she keeps her Leprechaun pennies in a treasure chest and murders people with a pogostick if they mess with it.kiimo posted:She still earns 20 million a year in syndication to this day, so I hope so. I mean she could be insanely bad with money. Like maybe she spends 30 million per year on buying castles in Europe, flying in Sherpas to tear them down with only their bare hands, and then shipping those bricks to California on galleons to reassemble them as a mega-castle. or does drugs. FreudianSlippers fucked around with this message at 23:16 on Nov 7, 2016 |
|
#
?
Nov 7, 2016 23:13
|
|
|
 I was wondering how long it would take for someone to bring up Leprechaun.
|
|
#
?
Nov 7, 2016 23:24
|
|
|
She needs to jump back into that franchise. Hell, bring back the entire cast from the first one. Francis from Pee Wee's Big Adventure, the kid from Don't Tell Mom the Babysitter's Dead and the male stripper from Summer School probably already have a script ready to go, they just need Jennifer Aniston on board to get the green light.
|
|
#
?
Nov 8, 2016 01:17
|
|
|
ruddiger posted:She needs to jump back into that franchise. Hell, bring back the entire cast from the first one. Francis from Pee Wee's Big Adventure, the kid from Don't Tell Mom the Babysitter's Dead and the male stripper from Summer School probably already have a script ready to go, they just need Jennifer Aniston on board to get the green light. I'd watch Leprechaun: The Series: A Netflix Original.
|
|
#
?
Nov 8, 2016 01:23
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 6, 2024 17:37 |
|
|
I wonder who gets the good trailer on set
|
|
#
?
Nov 8, 2016 01:25
|
|