|
Grandmother of Five posted:as much as those kids might need a reality check of some kind, i feel that their classmates is probably more appropriately suited for delivering those wake-up calls, than a herd of adult goons more than twice their age. Sorry your grandchildren are a disappointment.
|
#
?
Nov 8, 2016 09:37
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 21, 2024 16:33 |
|
|
Abe getting owned by an idiot 14 year old was p lol
|
|
#
?
Nov 8, 2016 12:53
|
|
|
Grandmother of Five posted:
If a kid signs up to post here they should get the same kind of replies as anyone else would for being an idiot.
|
|
#
?
Nov 8, 2016 13:09
|
|
|
The Saddest Rhino posted:Abe getting owned by an idiot 14 year old was p lol I've seen the twitter conversation with this, posted even in this thread, but I must've missed something, because I don't recall him getting 'owned'. He was insulting someone, and he comes off like a complete fuckhead, but what was the 14 year old's reply?
|
|
#
?
Nov 8, 2016 15:04
|
|
|
Rupert Buttermilk posted:I've seen the twitter conversation with this, posted even in this thread, but I must've missed something, because I don't recall him getting 'owned'. He was insulting someone, and he comes off like a complete fuckhead, but what was the 14 year old's reply? He got extremely owned, in the sense that the little boy responded in a totally mature way while the "adults" were trying to rile him up, there were even death threats and doxxing attempts. The kid just went like "You don't need to defend me, guys, this is just the Internet and there's no reason to lose your calm, these people are just too immature to know any better,"
|
|
#
?
Nov 8, 2016 15:22
|
|
|
steinrokkan posted:He got extremely owned, in the sense that the little boy responded in a totally mature way while the "adults" were trying to rile him up, there were even death threats and doxxing attempts. Ah, ok. I thought it was some sort of sick burn that I missed. That's also a totally acceptable response. Good on that kid.
|
|
#
?
Nov 8, 2016 15:44
|
|
|
Grandmother of Five posted:i like weird stories about crazy idiot on-line people, but adults making fun of kids is just weird and off-putting in itself i only laugh at kids because i, too, was an idiot child on the internet not so long ago
|
|
#
?
Nov 8, 2016 16:55
|
|
|
every time people talk about that twitter thing with abe and the 14 year old is amazing because apparently their definition of being owned is taking this comic 100% unironically
|
|
#
?
Nov 8, 2016 19:21
|
|
|
Alaois posted:every time people talk about that twitter thing with abe and the 14 year old is amazing because apparently their definition of being owned is taking this comic 100% unironically Yeah, that kid was a literal Hitler for agreeing with a popular comedian. Furthermore, that little poo poo had a photo of himself holding a cat. What a loving moron. I hope he dies, lmao. In fact, I am going to kill him and his cat. I'm not owned, by the way. I AM NOT OWNED!
|
|
#
?
Nov 8, 2016 19:24
|
|
|
the important thing is that you expressed yourself, i guess
|
|
#
?
Nov 8, 2016 19:27
|
|
|
Mycroft Holmes posted:I actually liked Snatter. I thought it was cute. GBS doesn't deserve snatter clause and wigggle he.
|
|
#
?
Nov 8, 2016 19:33
|
|
|
Nobody deserved that mess. And definitely not 8 years of it.
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2016 01:33
|
|
|
"wiggle he" sounds kind of amusing out of context i am hesitant to ask if there is a context because i'm sure the context is pretty stupid
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2016 03:15
|
|
|
I Said No posted:"wiggle he" sounds kind of amusing out of context the evil mecha santa is defeated by being shaken violently by real Santa. Christmas is saved.
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2016 05:02
|
|
|
Free Market Mambo posted:The Curse of Cheddar Bay I'm still 20 pages behind this thread but THANK YOU for this, lol, I'd totally forgotten about it. Who was the goon who had replica movie cars, like a Ghostbusters Subaru wagon and a Jurassic Park Jeep (and had to mention them in nearly every post he made)? There was a classic "reversal of fortune" style saga about him lending his JP jeep for a con wherein the jeep got damaged, and he posted asking about how to get reimbursed and screw over the con organizers or something. At first goons were like "gently caress those con guys!" and doling out advice until some goons looked into it, and turns out he was the one that skimped on protecting the vehicle during the shipping process, and the whole thread turned on him. Tasty stuff.
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2016 05:21
|
|
|
JacquelineDempsey posted:I'm still 20 pages behind this thread but THANK YOU for this, lol, I'd totally forgotten about it. Boomerjinks http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3314547&pagenumber=29#post397521437
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2016 06:19
|
|
|
Congrats Blattdorf for his hilarious Toxx.
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2016 17:22
|
|
|
Nckdictator posted:Congrats Blattdorf for his hilarious Toxx. Details?
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2016 17:30
|
|
|
RFC2324 posted:Details? Check out the Steam thread. In short, since it was summarized for me, dude bet that Trump would win. He'd pay $60 worth of games to each goon who took the bet. Well, something like 16 goons took the bet, so now they all owe HIM (or her?) $60 in Steam games now. Some have taken the ban instead.
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2016 17:32
|
|
|
RFC2324 posted:Details? Quoting the Schadenfreude thread. Mierenneuker posted:This is a very cyclical schadenfreude, because it's all going to bite us in the rear end at some point.
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2016 17:33
|
|
|
Rupert Buttermilk posted:Check out the Steam thread. In short, since it was summarized for me, dude bet that Trump would win. He'd pay $60 worth of games to each goon who took the bet. Well, something like 16 goons took the bet, so now they all owe HIM (or her?) $60 in Steam games now. Some have taken the ban instead. So one thing good came out of this election! 
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2016 18:00
|
|
|
lol people not honoring the toxx and only out 10 bux for the single ban.
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2016 20:10
|
|
|
George H.W. oval office posted:lol people not honoring the toxx and only out 10 bux for the single ban. They should be perma'd or banned 6 times. That's some lame bullshit and that dude would have absolutely been held to his end if it had gone the other way or been perma'd.
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2016 22:18
|
|
|
Toxx's used to mean something around here. If a man had to gently caress a flask of raw meat then by god he drat well hosed it good.
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2016 23:52
|
|
|
Charles Bukowski posted:Toxx's used to mean something around here. If a man had to gently caress a flask of raw meat then by god he drat well hosed it good. Money ruins everything!
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2016 23:54
|
|
|
VendaGoat posted:Money ruins everything! Thanks Trump.
|
|
#
?
Nov 10, 2016 05:51
|
|
|
Charles Bukowski posted:Toxx's used to mean something around here. If a man had to gently caress a flask of raw meat then by god he drat well hosed it good. fruit hats were a slippery slope who knew? mods knew
|
|
#
?
Nov 10, 2016 14:25
|
|
|
Ladies and gentlemen, Lowtax is draining the swamp!Lowtax posted:Okay, gonna have to side with tradition and rules on this one, and unfortunately going to have to go over a moderator's head, which I absolutely do not ever like doing. The conservatards shall inherit DND. 
|
|
#
?
Nov 10, 2016 16:14
|
|
This poster loves police brutality, but only when its against minorities!
|
DeusExMachinima posted:Ladies and gentlemen, Lowtax is draining the swamp! A good decision. Toxx is a toxx. Can't just weak sauce it because they didn't think they'd have to stump up the tenbux.
|
|
#
?
Nov 10, 2016 17:00
|
|
|
Good. It's loving bullshit that so many idiots were super-eager to siphon $60 off someone and are now acting all bitchmade about it. Alternatively anyone who doesn't want to pony up can eat a Perma instead of a regular band 
|
|
#
?
Nov 10, 2016 17:22
|
|
|
That's actually awesome that Lowtax is doing that.
|
|
#
?
Nov 10, 2016 17:32
|
|
|
Kelp Me! posted:Good. It's loving bullshit that so many idiots were super-eager to siphon $60 off someone and are now acting all bitchmade about it. Wrong toxx
|
|
#
?
Nov 10, 2016 18:35
|
|
|
Rhyno posted:That's actually awesome that Lowtax is doing that. No it isn't.
|
|
#
?
Nov 10, 2016 18:41
|
|
|
VanSandman posted:No it isn't. Why not?
|
|
#
?
Nov 10, 2016 18:43
|
|
|
VanSandman posted:No it isn't. yes it is
|
|
#
?
Nov 10, 2016 18:58
|
|
|
VanSandman posted:No it isn't.
|
|
#
?
Nov 10, 2016 19:00
|
|
|
Avenging_Mikon posted:Wrong toxx If he's enforcing one set of election-related Toxx's there's every reason to think he's going to enforce all of the election-related Toxx's VanSandman posted:No it isn't. yeah how dare Lowtax step in and make people follow through on their claims
|
|
#
?
Nov 10, 2016 19:12
|
|
|
Also it's pretty funny how the Steam Toxx almost instantly turned into a giant hugbox of "oh you poor optimistic soul, I'm sorry you lost a bet and now owe $60 in games to a Trump supporter, let me gift you all some games"
|
|
#
?
Nov 10, 2016 19:14
|
|
|
Kelp Me! posted:Also it's pretty funny how the Steam Toxx almost instantly turned into a giant hugbox of "oh you poor optimistic soul, I'm sorry you lost a bet and now owe $60 in games to a Trump supporter, let me gift you all some games" Trumps already stimulating the economy!
|
|
#
?
Nov 10, 2016 19:19
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 21, 2024 16:33 |
|
|
VanSandman posted:No it isn't. 
|
|
#
?
Nov 10, 2016 19:23
|
|
