steinrokkan posted:Why should they get more money if they didn't even theach me how to make a sensible chart. Assuming it's not from some anti-public education thinktank, of course.
|
|
# ? Nov 6, 2016 20:53 |
|
|
# ? May 17, 2024 04:39 |
|
steinrokkan posted:Why should they get more money if they didn't even theach me how to make a sensible chart. Nice, the Donald Trump school of debate. My mistakes are your fault.
|
# ? Nov 6, 2016 21:02 |
|
Outrail posted:The chart is absolutely succeeding at its #1 purpose. Which is to show you, the dimwitted taxpayer, how much raises for those undeserving greedy drat teachers is costing you, the hardworking taxpayer. That is it's exact purpose, to convince you to vote against a raise for teachers.
|
# ? Nov 6, 2016 22:04 |
|
(from some twitter my friend was following, not mine)
|
# ? Nov 8, 2016 03:09 |
|
WrenP-Complete posted:
|
# ? Nov 8, 2016 03:48 |
|
WrenP-Complete posted:
That is a startlingly accurate representation of how current AI systems work, except for the bit about "infallible." "Superhuman" would be more accurate.
|
# ? Nov 8, 2016 06:33 |
|
https://twitter.com/ABC/status/796127140106354689
|
# ? Nov 9, 2016 00:18 |
|
TotalLossBrain posted:Edit: Whatever OK is spending on their teachers, they clearly need to spend much more. I voted for 779 today, and it was the most important thing on the ballot imo. But i'm cynical of its passing because lol at boomers voting to pay more on sales tax for their grandkids education.
|
# ? Nov 9, 2016 01:33 |
|
|
# ? Nov 9, 2016 01:34 |
|
|
# ? Nov 9, 2016 20:37 |
|
I'm the enormous farallon islands.
|
# ? Nov 9, 2016 20:39 |
|
The bottom two graphs are fine, but the top two graphs are stylized to the point of obfuscation. (USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST)
|
# ? Nov 9, 2016 20:49 |
|
trapped mouse posted:
The bottle one is okay but the marijuana one is godawful.
|
# ? Nov 9, 2016 22:43 |
|
If the points of the marijuana leaves corresponded to each year on the x-axis, that would be pretty inspired. But that's asking too much.
|
# ? Nov 10, 2016 00:17 |
|
|
# ? Nov 10, 2016 00:25 |
|
trapped mouse posted:
Those graphs are fantastic. Really dropped the ball on the sex one though.
|
# ? Nov 10, 2016 02:27 |
|
I like that they chose not to abbreviate or use commas in the Y-axis. Because people traditionally understand large numbers super well, right?
|
# ? Nov 10, 2016 02:41 |
|
Tiggum posted:Those graphs are fantastic. Really dropped the ball on the sex one though. Bedsheets is a fine way to indicate sexual activity in a g-rated manner
|
# ? Nov 10, 2016 02:57 |
|
The Cheshire Cat posted:I like that they chose not to abbreviate or use commas in the Y-axis. Because people traditionally understand large numbers super well, right? Logarithmic axis in Yen would have been better.
|
# ? Nov 10, 2016 03:38 |
|
Outrail posted:Logarithmic axis in Yen would have been better. Every number should be in a different currency.
|
# ? Nov 10, 2016 05:25 |
|
Somfin posted:Bedsheets is a fine way to indicate sexual activity in a g-rated manner Yeah but imagine a bar graph were all the bars are dicks.
|
# ? Nov 10, 2016 09:31 |
|
Fathis Munk posted:Yeah but imagine a bar graph were all the bars are dicks. What about the girl bars
|
# ? Nov 10, 2016 12:10 |
|
I keep getting kicked out of those
|
# ? Nov 10, 2016 12:23 |
|
Nice. Uh, weirdly elongated tits ? Or maybe just the nipples.
|
# ? Nov 10, 2016 12:24 |
|
Fathis Munk posted:Nice. vaginas of various lengths
|
# ? Nov 10, 2016 17:54 |
|
Somfin posted:What about the girl bars Hitachi Magic Wands
|
# ? Nov 10, 2016 18:42 |
|
God bless the Wayback Machine, remember seeing this when studying for my undergrad.
|
# ? Nov 11, 2016 18:38 |
Slimchandi posted:
|
|
# ? Nov 11, 2016 19:06 |
|
a Violent doppler radar
|
# ? Nov 11, 2016 20:28 |
|
cinci zoo sniper posted:Hold on, let me adjust it. this gave me motion sickness
|
# ? Nov 12, 2016 02:01 |
|
|
# ? Nov 12, 2016 13:21 |
|
Kudos
|
# ? Nov 12, 2016 15:42 |
|
|
# ? Nov 13, 2016 06:30 |
|
This chart is truth.
|
# ? Nov 13, 2016 06:35 |
|
Lol, the amount of fucks is so far under 100%
|
# ? Nov 13, 2016 06:45 |
|
Inspector 34 posted:Lol, the amount of fucks is so far under 100% I guess they ran out of fucks to give
|
# ? Nov 13, 2016 08:48 |
|
|
# ? Nov 13, 2016 22:02 |
|
I was just looking for that one to post! Do you have the one with all the spirals too?
|
# ? Nov 13, 2016 23:11 |
|
Note spelling
|
# ? Nov 14, 2016 00:10 |
|
|
# ? May 17, 2024 04:39 |
|
Slimchandi posted:
WTF WAS YOUR UNDERGRAD IN?!
|
# ? Nov 14, 2016 01:38 |