Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
My Linux Rig
Mar 27, 2010
Probation
Can't post for 6 years!

BarbarianElephant posted:

This website says $40 billion to build the wall

https://www.technologyreview.com/s/602494/bad-math-props-up-trumps-border-wall/?utm_campaign=add_this&utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=post

Sounds a lots, but he'd just add it to the debt. No problem.

Lol you Dems actually think he was serious about that, how cute!

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

greatn
Nov 15, 2006

by Lowtax

Doctor Butts posted:

I guess.

I mean I don't want regressive bullshit rubberstamped as much as the next person, but is stoking the paranoia of a dude we've characterized as not being even-tempered enough to resist nuking the planet a good idea?

Stoking his paranoia might not be the right phrase, cause in this case people like Gingrich really ARE just using him to empower themselves and don't give a poo poo about him.

Obama is probably legitimately more invested in Trump having a successful presidency than any Republican.

And, God, after that meeting today, it's loving insane but if he had just invited Trump over for golf in 2009 this never would have happened. NOT THAT HE SHOULD HAVE TO AND I PLACE NO BLAME ON OBAMA.

steinrokkan
Apr 2, 2011



Soiled Meat

Those weren't useless busywork projects. They achieved things in addition to giving people a paychck.

Public works aimed at renewing infrastructure and protecting environment would totally be a good idea even in tyool 2016.

steinrokkan fucked around with this message at 22:42 on Nov 10, 2016

JawKnee
Mar 24, 2007





You'll take the ride to leave this town along that yellow line

ah yes, all those things posted there had no use at all

BarbarianElephant
Feb 12, 2015
The fairy of forgiveness has removed your red text.

steinrokkan posted:

Those weren't useless busywork projects. They achieved things in addition to giving people a paychck.

Well, yes, that would be better. But this is Trump we are talking about here. He's going to build that wall!

If you'd wanted someone who built useful things, America, perhaps you shouldn't have elected Trump.

Trabisnikof
Dec 24, 2005

My Linux Rig posted:

Lol you Dems actually think he was serious about that, how cute!

What's your point exactly? "That trump gets to say anything and get away with it. Haha sucks to be America!" Or what?

DACK FAYDEN
Feb 25, 2013

Bear Witness

steinrokkan posted:

Making something with no use is not an economic boost. They might as well just receive a government check, or be paid to sit in an empty room, looking at a blank wall.

John Maynard Keynes posted:

If the Treasury were to fill old bottles with banknotes, bury them at suitable depths in disused coalmines which are then filled up to the surface with town rubbish, and leave it to private enterprise on well-tried principles of laissez-faire to dig the notes up again (the right to do so being obtained, of course, by tendering for leases of the note-bearing territory), there need be no more unemployment and, with the help of the repercussions, the real income of the community, and its capital wealth also, would probably become a good deal greater than it actually is. It would, indeed, be more sensible to build houses and the like; but if there are political and practical difficulties in the way of this, the above would be better than nothing.
e: And in case it's not clear from this post, I'm Keynesian on this issue to the point of being a Modern Monetary Theorist. The government should be spending more and running a deficit to promote private-sector surplus.

Gynocentric Regime
Jun 9, 2010

by Cyrano4747
Wound't it be crazy if Trump were the President to bring us mincome?

Who What Now
Sep 10, 2006

by Azathoth

BarbarianElephant posted:

Well, yes, that would be better. But this is Trump we are talking about here. He's going to build that wall!

If you'd wanted someone who built useful things, America, perhaps you shouldn't have elected Trump.

He wasn't elected to build, he was elected to destroy.


Primarily people who can't pass the paper bag test or who pop a boner looking at the wrong gender.

Trabisnikof
Dec 24, 2005

Glazier posted:

Wound't it be crazy if Trump were the President to bring us mincome?

"Only Trump could sign a free trade deal with China" they will say

The Ol Spicy Keychain
Jan 17, 2013

I MEPHISTO MY OWN ASSHOLE

quote:

Donna Brazile, the interim leader of the Democratic National Committee, was giving what one attendee described as “a rip-roaring speech” to about 150 employees, about the need to have hope for wins going forward, when a staffer identified only as Zach stood up with a question.

“Why should we trust you as chair to lead us through this?” he asked, according to two people in the room. “You backed a flawed candidate, and your friend [former DNC chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz] plotted through this to support your own gain and yourself.”

http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/us_5824cb95e4b0ddd4fe7954e8

Excellent

steinrokkan
Apr 2, 2011



Soiled Meat

DACK FAYDEN posted:

e: And in case it's not clear from this post, I'm Keynesian on this issue to the point of being a Modern Monetary Theorist. The government should be spending more and running a deficit to promote private-sector surplus.

Yeah, that is not the brightest solution except as an ad absurdum example, which it was meant to be, there is always productive work to be done and agreed upon by members of the respective community that creates value. Even if it is basic landscaping or repairing potholes.

Trabisnikof
Dec 24, 2005


Lol Zach didn't even stay to listen to her answer. But I'm sure that was worth shutting down the effort to motivate people.

Feral Integral
Jun 6, 2006

YOSPOS

BarbarianElephant posted:

This website says $40 billion to build the wall

https://www.technologyreview.com/s/602494/bad-math-props-up-trumps-border-wall/?utm_campaign=add_this&utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=post

Sounds a lots, but he'd just add it to the debt. No problem.

Rofl if it only costs 40 billion

Gynocentric Regime
Jun 9, 2010

by Cyrano4747

Good, I'd like to see Bernie or John Lewis at the top setting vision with Warren running the day to day.

Nessus
Dec 22, 2003

After a Speaker vote, you may be entitled to a valuable coupon or voucher!



Trabisnikof posted:

What's your point exactly? "That trump gets to say anything and get away with it. Haha sucks to be America!" Or what?
He's a ghost who died in a Bitcoin mining accident, don't trust his deceitful ghostwords

mbt
Aug 13, 2012


my god they wrote the word trump on a wall

im literally loving shaking

and a bunch of stories people wrote???? holy poo poo

but theres a real video of someone getting beaten up for voting for trump.....meh...kill racist scum tbh

Trabisnikof posted:

What's your point exactly? "That trump gets to say anything and get away with it. Haha sucks to be America!" Or what?

he got the racist vote by making promises he had no intention of keeping, a new and bold strategy that no one has ever done before

BetterToRuleInHell
Jul 2, 2007

Touch my mask top
Get the chop chop

WampaLord posted:

LOL "faith in my vote."

Toxxing is idiotic, I don't see the point in making a bet where I can't win anything. And now I'm around to annoy the deplorables who have taken over D&D, so that's neat.

Word of advice, don't troll the thread about how bad the Trump government is. That kind of stuff seems to upset some goons.

Trabisnikof
Dec 24, 2005

Glazier posted:

Good, I'd like to see Bernie or John Lewis at the top setting vision with Warren running the day to day.

Well is Sanders even a Democrat anymore? so it probably won't be him.

DACK FAYDEN
Feb 25, 2013

Bear Witness

steinrokkan posted:

Yeah, that is not the brightest solution except as an ad absurdum example, which it was meant to be, there is always productive work to be done and agreed upon by members of the respective community that creates value. Even if it is basic landscaping or repairing potholes.
Sure, but if that productive work won't pass because "we don't want big government doing X" but the wall will pass because "we want a wall", then gently caress it, build the wall. Useless Keynesian boondoggle is better than no spending at all.

Too Shy Guy
Jun 14, 2003


I have destroyed more of your kind than I can count.



steinrokkan posted:

Those weren't useless busywork projects. They achieved things in addition to giving people a paychck.

Public works aimed at renewing infrastructure and protecting environment would totally be a good idea even in tyool 2016.

Trump actually called out a lot of infrastructure work he wants to get done in his victory speech. He specifically named highways, bridges, and a few other important facets. Ironically I think it was McConnell who said the Senate isn't really interested in taking that on.

Fojar38
Sep 2, 2011


Sorry I meant to say I hope that the police use maximum force and kill or maim a bunch of innocent people, thus paving a way for a proletarian uprising and socialist utopia


also here's a stupid take
---------------------------->
Reminder that the GOP hates spending and Trump wants to spend. There are already cracks in the right-wing coalition that just aren't apparent yet.

BarbarianElephant
Feb 12, 2015
The fairy of forgiveness has removed your red text.

Feral Integral posted:

Rofl if it only costs 40 billion

Don't worry, Mexico will pay for it.

LOL

Iraq war cost: $1.7 trillion.

The wall will be cheaper if it distracts him from declaring war on somewhere. It'll be a big clusterfuck of a project, bogged down in corruption issues and rising costs. Can't wait to hear about its progress on the Daily Show!

BetterToRuleInHell
Jul 2, 2007

Touch my mask top
Get the chop chop

Trabisnikof posted:

Lol Zach didn't even stay to listen to her answer. But I'm sure that was worth shutting down the effort to motivate people.

No one is going to take Donna Brazile seriously. Thanks to the leaked emails she is already seen as another DWS.

Fojar38
Sep 2, 2011


Sorry I meant to say I hope that the police use maximum force and kill or maim a bunch of innocent people, thus paving a way for a proletarian uprising and socialist utopia


also here's a stupid take
---------------------------->

Too Shy Guy posted:

Trump actually called out a lot of infrastructure work he wants to get done in his victory speech. He specifically named highways, bridges, and a few other important facets. Ironically I think it was McConnell who said the Senate isn't really interested in taking that on.

And the Democrats can say to Trump "Well, we might be able to give you the senate votes to get this infrastructure bill passed if you do X and Y with these other things"

This is how governing works and always has been.

esto es malo
Aug 3, 2006

Don't want to end up a cartoon

In a cartoon graveyard

Fojar38 posted:

Reminder that the GOP hates spending and Trump wants to spend. There are already cracks in the right-wing coalition that just aren't apparent yet.

not a crack that racist clarion calls cant fix

The Ol Spicy Keychain
Jan 17, 2013

I MEPHISTO MY OWN ASSHOLE
Here's what democrats actually needed during the presidential run:

https://twitter.com/sensanders/status/796785451713593344

actual loving leadership and willingness to stand up and fight just as viciously as the GOP has for their party.

This pacifist liberal bullshit Hillary tried lost us the government

The Ol Spicy Keychain fucked around with this message at 22:55 on Nov 10, 2016

idiotsavant
Jun 4, 2000

chumbler posted:

If those 6 million people could not summon up the energy to prevent a backslide on nearly all social progress in at least a decade, there's nothing the party or candidate could have done. This is in the fake progressives who say it out. Don't try to pretend it's not.

Bullshit. Yeah, maybe you can put some blame on them for sitting it out. But you can put all of the blame on the Democratic Party for years of "do as I say, not as I do" and lesser of two evils garbage. For burying progressive issues that their constituents demonstrably want. Private speech transcripts come out where Hillary tells bankers that sometimes you have to tell different people different things, and voters take a look at how the Democratic track record has affected their lives, and walk. That doesn't make any kind of sense to you?

DaveWoo
Aug 14, 2004

Fun Shoe

Trabisnikof posted:

Lol Zach didn't even stay to listen to her answer. But I'm sure that was worth shutting down the effort to motivate people.

What's the point of giving a pep talk if you're not going address and fix the underlying problems?

Glazier posted:

Good, I'd like to see Bernie or John Lewis at the top setting vision with Warren running the day to day.

Bernie's reportedly pushing for Keith Ellison to take over the DNC, so there's that.

Trabisnikof
Dec 24, 2005

Scent of Worf posted:

Here's what democrats actually needed during the presidential run:

https://twitter.com/sensanders/status/796785451713593344

actual loving leadership and willingness to stand up and fight just as viciously as the GOP has for their party.

This pacifist liberal bullshit Hillary tried lost us the government

Wait I thought the complaint was Clinton attacked Trump too much? Everyone has been whining in this thread she attacked Trump too much.


But now, after Sanders says he will work with Trump, you're saying she wasn't aggressive enough in attacking Trump?

My Linux Rig
Mar 27, 2010
Probation
Can't post for 6 years!

Trabisnikof posted:

What's your point exactly? "That trump gets to say anything and get away with it. Haha sucks to be America!" Or what?

That's part of the trump magic

Don't worry little Dem, you'll get to see it with your own eyes one day. Trumpster is gonna make America great again :smugdon:

PKJC
May 7, 2009

Scent of Worf posted:

https://twitter.com/sensanders/status/796785451713593344

Here's what democrats actually needed during the presidential run: actual loving leadership and willingness to stand up and fight just as viciously as the GOP has for their party.

This pacifist liberal bullshit Hillary tried lost us the government

It's funny because a lot of people in earlier uspol were assured that if she won she wasn't going to make Obama's mistake of reaching across the aisle in 08 because of being attacked by them for a few decades, but I agree she really should have just been willing to drop the hammer on every Republican in the legislature and never let any of them squirm away from the lovely things they said or the lovely things Trump said that they refused to shout him down for.

Fansy
Feb 26, 2013

I GAVE LOWTAX COOKIE MONEY TO CHANGE YOUR STUPID AVATAR GO FUCK YOURSELF DUDE
Grimey Drawer

Fojar38 posted:

Reminder that the GOP hates spending and Trump wants to spend. There are already cracks in the right-wing coalition that just aren't apparent yet.

I'd love to see Trump get angry at his failures and lash out at Ryan, or endorse democrats for congress. But realistically he'll just blame Obama.

Who What Now
Sep 10, 2006

by Azathoth

idiotsavant posted:

Bullshit. Yeah, maybe you can put some blame on them for sitting it out.

Nah, you can totally put the majority of the blame at the feet of the people who see absolutely nothing wrong with destroying the lives of everyone who isn't straight or white. They might as well have gone ahead and pulled the lever for Trump, the results would have been exactly the same. So gently caress them.

Trabisnikof
Dec 24, 2005

My Linux Rig posted:

That's part of the trump magic

Don't worry little Dem, you'll get to see it with your own eyes one day. Trumpster is gonna make America great again :smugdon:

Unlikely.

Space Cadet Omoly
Jan 15, 2014

~Groovy~


BarbarianElephant posted:

Don't worry, Mexico will pay for it.

LOL

Iraq war cost: $1.7 trillion.

The wall will be cheaper if it distracts him from declaring war on somewhere. It'll be a big clusterfuck of a project, bogged down in corruption issues and rising costs. Can't wait to hear about its progress on the Daily Show!

I really don't think a wall of that size can be built in four years, or at least not built in a way that's structurally sound. And then after it's up it would require lots of repairs and maintenance and all that jazz.

I'm pretty sure one of those things that's just not going to happen.

greatn
Nov 15, 2006

by Lowtax
How is Keith Ellison? All I know is he is on the he and he is Muslim and black. Anything laughably wrong with him?

negromancer
Aug 20, 2014

by FactsAreUseless

idiotsavant posted:

Bullshit. Yeah, maybe you can put some blame on them for sitting it out. But you can put all of the blame on the Democratic Party for years of "do as I say, not as I do" and lesser of two evils garbage. For burying progressive issues that their constituents demonstrably want. Private speech transcripts come out where Hillary tells bankers that sometimes you have to tell different people different things, and voters take a look at how the Democratic track record has affected their lives, and walk. That doesn't make any kind of sense to you?

And if that walk leads us to 1910s, well just gently caress the minorities that will actually be hurt the most, right?

HorseRenoir
Dec 25, 2011



Pillbug

Space Cadet Omoly posted:

I really don't think a wall of that size can be built in four years, or at least not built in a way that's structurally sound. And then after it's up it would require lots of repairs and maintenance and all that jazz.

I'm pretty sure one of those things that's just not going to happen.

Trump, building something structurally sound?

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Doctor Butts
May 21, 2002

Trabisnikof posted:

Wait I thought the complaint was Clinton attacked Trump too much? Everyone has been whining in this thread she attacked Trump too much.


But now, after Sanders says he will work with Trump, you're saying she wasn't aggressive enough in attacking Trump?

This is a really good point. A whooooooole bunch of people in this thread complained how Hillary spent too much time attacking Trump and not doing the whole hope and change routine.

  • Locked thread