Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
Rated PG-34
Jul 1, 2004




Clinton surrounded herself with a sycophant echo chamber and look how that ended up.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Hollismason
Jun 30, 2007
An alright dude.
Oh Holy poo poo, Ivanka Trump is in charge of decorating the White House


edit:

They're gonna put Gold EVERYWHERE.

Quorum
Sep 24, 2014

REMIND ME AGAIN HOW THE LITTLE HORSE-SHAPED ONES MOVE?

Fojar38 posted:

Because they need it and even if they did nuke it it wouldn't stop the Democrats from having influence in the senate. All it takes is one GOP representative to say "no" and their simple majority is gone and they suddenly need Dem support.

Unless I'm missing something, one single defection would render the Senate 50-50 and would just mean Vice President Whiplash would spend all day every day in the Senate instead of in his evil conversion therapy lair?

Rated PG-34 posted:

Clinton surrounded herself with a sycophant echo chamber and look how that ended up.

I mean, so did Bernie; the influence of Jeff Weaver on his campaign was hilariously destructive. This is pretty much normal for political campaigns in general.

Fojar38
Sep 2, 2011


Sorry I meant to say I hope that the police use maximum force and kill or maim a bunch of innocent people, thus paving a way for a proletarian uprising and socialist utopia


also here's a stupid take
---------------------------->

Quorum posted:

Unless I'm missing something, one single defection would render the Senate 50-50 and would just mean Vice President Whiplash would spend all day every day in the Senate instead of in his evil conversion therapy lair?

2 then, and this isn't unbelievable because as I've been saying repeatedly, the GOP is not unified. Boehner resigned for a reason.

Winkie01
Nov 28, 2004

Once it's gone there is no excuses they own every lovely thing that passed 100%

greatn
Nov 15, 2006

by Lowtax
Obama lucked the gently caress out with his team. Or was better at choosing, more accurately.

Bernie kinda has slim pickings choose from though.

negromancer
Aug 20, 2014

by FactsAreUseless

disjoe posted:

Sure, I'm glad to deliver (slightly) good news:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2016/11/09/how-trump-won-the-revenge-of-working-class-whites/

Most didn't vote for Trump because of his hate. Some voted for him in spite of it.

So they didn't mind throwing minorities under the bus because they knew the violence would never visit them, so they tacitly supported it.

Voting isn't a la carte.

Fojar38
Sep 2, 2011


Sorry I meant to say I hope that the police use maximum force and kill or maim a bunch of innocent people, thus paving a way for a proletarian uprising and socialist utopia


also here's a stupid take
---------------------------->
By the way I am very willing to admit that I underestimated the power of the meme this election. Net-game needs to coincide with ground-game going forward. (This is something Obama pioneered)

Morzhovyye
Mar 2, 2013

Rated PG-34 posted:

I never said that this was an echo chamber. I'm saying that if you purge merely on ideology, you will end up with one. If you read the internal nazi memos, they all thought their ideology was double plus good too. Echo chambers are bad news.

remind me again how well open, fair, and reasoned debate with the nazis went in 1930's germany.

Potato Salad
Oct 23, 2014

nobody cares


greatn posted:

Obama lucked the gently caress out with his team. Or was better at choosing, more accurately.

Bernie kinda has slim pickings choose from though.

Particularly given that the way for HRC was cleared well in advance of the primary season.

kartikeya
Mar 17, 2009


PKJC posted:

The problem I am speaking to is not posters saying "Dems need to ignore minorities" but rather posts that have been directed at posters who are minorities saying they were somehow at fault for this result for not reaching out to and educating and coddling the feelings of racist whites. People were victim blaming minorities for allowing Trump to happen because they don't want to interact with the people who would rather see them dead, I think it is plain why that is an unreasonable view that needs to be stomped on and rejected as bigotry.

Hell, people still are. There are posters that have been screaming at anyone that voted Hillary in the general, particularly minorities, for daring to lose the election, while also claiming they did the moral thing of note voting against Trump at all. If you go back to shortly after the election was called in the election thread, you will find a whole collection of people blaming quite literally anyone but white men for Trump, including the white men that voted for him. You'll find lots of posts talking about how bad 'identity politics' are. A minor derail about how women politicians can't be trusted and women in general can't be trusted to vote right, which has occasionally cropped up as 'but why didn't the white women'? repeatedly.

And then every ten pages or so, someone new joins the thread and starts telling people responding to this that they're just labeling everyone who wants to address economic concerns as racists and are being bad for being angry.

It's loving exhausting.

Deadly Ham Sandwich
Aug 19, 2009
Smellrose

negromancer posted:

So they didn't mind throwing minorities under the bus because they knew the violence would never visit them, so they tacitly supported it.

Voting isn't a la carte.

Basically.

Morzhovyye
Mar 2, 2013

Rated PG-34 posted:

Clinton surrounded herself with a sycophant echo chamber and look how that ended up.

I can guarantee that she didn't lose the election because of an absence of nazis and klansmen in her inner circle, though you are free to disagree.

greatn
Nov 15, 2006

by Lowtax

Potato Salad posted:

Particularly given that the way for HRC was cleared well in advance of the primary season.

It's not like people were told "Don't work for anyone else or else". She just hired all the "good" people. If Bernie announced earlier he would have had more options.

WhiskeyJuvenile
Feb 15, 2002

by Nyc_Tattoo

Sharkopath posted:

Don't worry, Ryan is already planning on destroying medicare entirely and replacing it with private carriers lmao.

They're gonna make Obamacare into Medicare for all by making Medicare Obamacare

checkmate, libs

Monaghan
Dec 29, 2006

Fojar38 posted:

By the way I am very willing to admit that I underestimated the power of the meme this election. Net-game needs to coincide with ground-game going forward. (This is something Obama pioneered)

Maybe the next candidate shouldn't tweet poo poo like "Describe how you feel about student loan debt using emojis"

PKJC
May 7, 2009

kartikeya posted:

Hell, people still are. There are posters that have been screaming at anyone that voted Hillary in the general, particularly minorities, for daring to lose the election, while also claiming they did the moral thing of note voting against Trump at all. If you go back to shortly after the election was called in the election thread, you will find a whole collection of people blaming quite literally anyone but white men for Trump, including the white men that voted for him. You'll find lots of posts talking about how bad 'identity politics' are. A minor derail about how women politicians can't be trusted and women in general can't be trusted to vote right, which has occasionally cropped up as 'but why didn't the white women'? repeatedly.

And then every ten pages or so, someone new joins the thread and starts telling people responding to this that they're just labeling everyone who wants to address economic concerns as racists and are being bad for being angry.

It's loving exhausting.

Yeah, agreed, I've posted far too many times on the subject because it keeps coming up. Is sunk post fallacy a thing?

Fojar38
Sep 2, 2011


Sorry I meant to say I hope that the police use maximum force and kill or maim a bunch of innocent people, thus paving a way for a proletarian uprising and socialist utopia


also here's a stupid take
---------------------------->

Monaghan posted:

Maybe the next candidate shouldn't tweet poo poo like "Describe how you feel about student loan debt using emojis"

She had some gems like "delete your account."

Deadly Ham Sandwich
Aug 19, 2009
Smellrose

WhiskeyJuvenile posted:

They're gonna make Obamacare into Medicare for all by making Medicare Obamacare

checkmate, libs

I would laugh pretty hard if Republicans decided to get revenge against Democrats co-opting their platform by stealing the liberal platform.

Fojar38
Sep 2, 2011


Sorry I meant to say I hope that the police use maximum force and kill or maim a bunch of innocent people, thus paving a way for a proletarian uprising and socialist utopia


also here's a stupid take
---------------------------->

Deadly Ham Sandwich posted:

I would laugh pretty hard if Republicans decided to get revenge against Democrats co-opting their platform by stealing the liberal platform.

I can get behind this kind of ownage.

disjoe
Feb 18, 2011


negromancer posted:

So they didn't mind throwing minorities under the bus because they knew the violence would never visit them, so they tacitly supported it.

Voting isn't a la carte.

Right but it means with the right economic message you can win those voters over without abandoning your social issues.

ErIog
Jul 11, 2001

:nsacloud:

pocket pool posted:

Unless they plan on literally winning forever...

Yes, between making it harder to vote and schemes that apportion EC votes by congressional district and packing the court with Scalia clones to rubber stamp it all this is precisely what their plan is.

pocket pool posted:

It is a risky move that could boomerang back to hurt them.

You could have said this about refusing to fill the vacant SCOTUS seat. The GOP, in the absence of a cohesive strategy for winning over a majority of the American people, will push absolutely every single they advantage they can while they are able. The last time this configuration of government happened for that party was 1928.

This is a wet dream kind of scenario for most conservatives. They're going to lose their minds.

Winkie01 posted:

Once it's gone there is no excuses they own every lovely thing that passed 100%

They lie to their base and the American people all the time. They'll pull a different excuse out of thin air.

The base was already quite pissed Obamacare wasn't repealed already through reconciliation. That's why Ted Cruz was #2 after Trump.

ErIog fucked around with this message at 05:23 on Nov 11, 2016

Shammypants
May 25, 2004

Let me tell you about true luxury.

Monaghan posted:

Maybe the next candidate shouldn't tweet poo poo like "Describe how you feel about student loan debt using emojis"

This way you don't have to hear a millennial speak

Colin Mockery
Jun 24, 2007
Rawr



negromancer posted:

So they didn't mind throwing minorities under the bus because they knew the violence would never visit them, so they tacitly supported it.

Voting isn't a la carte.

But remember, it's not racist if you give power to the guy who says he's gonna gently caress up all the brown people.

It's only racist if you, personally, call someone a rude name (and even then it's not racist if they made you mad first).

HorseRenoir
Dec 25, 2011



Pillbug
Here's some positive news for y'all: Maine is no longer FPTP

https://twitter.com/democracynow/status/796919153353486336

Fojar38
Sep 2, 2011


Sorry I meant to say I hope that the police use maximum force and kill or maim a bunch of innocent people, thus paving a way for a proletarian uprising and socialist utopia


also here's a stupid take
---------------------------->

ErIog posted:

You could have said this about refusing to fill the vacant SCOTUS seat. The GOP, in the absence of a cohesive strategy for winning over a majority of the American people, will push absolutely every single they advantage they can while they are able. The last time this configuration of government happened for that party was 1928.

This is a wet dream kind of scenario for most conservatives. They're going to lose their minds.

They're going to eat each other alive arguing over what should be done with this power actually and senate Democrats are going to get to pick who to support.

kartikeya
Mar 17, 2009


I would like to propose the radical idea that there is actually a medium between echo chamber and 'let's listen to what the Nazis have to say'. Because I kind've draw the line at actual Nazis and think that's a good idea.

PKJC
May 7, 2009

Colin Mockery posted:

But remember, it's not racist if you give power to the guy who says he's gonna gently caress up all the brown people.

It's only racist if you, personally, call someone a rude name (and even then it's not racist if they made you mad first).

Also calling someone racist is the most racist. The maximum racism.

negromancer
Aug 20, 2014

by FactsAreUseless

disjoe posted:

Right but it means with the right economic message you can win those voters over without abandoning your social issues.

Not if those voters think that economic message applies to anyone but white people.

Yall really, REALLY underestimate how lovely white people have been in America, mostly because those same lovely people also write the textbooks you read in school.

greatn
Nov 15, 2006

by Lowtax
I found the first draft of Obama's letter to Trump that he'll leave in the oval office:

Dear President Trump,

Please don't throw me in the briar patch.

Sincerely,
Barry Soetero

Deadly Ham Sandwich
Aug 19, 2009
Smellrose

HorseRenoir posted:

Here's some positive news for y'all: Maine is no longer FPTP

https://twitter.com/democracynow/status/796919153353486336

Bu-wuuuuuuuh! In the U-S-of-A?

kartikeya
Mar 17, 2009


Colin Mockery posted:

But remember, it's not racist if you give power to the guy who says he's gonna gently caress up all the brown people.

It's only racist if you, personally, call someone a rude name (and even then it's not racist if they made you mad first).

And even then it's not racist because it probably didn't happen we all know how those browns like to lie and cheat all the time. Hysteria!

Fojar38
Sep 2, 2011


Sorry I meant to say I hope that the police use maximum force and kill or maim a bunch of innocent people, thus paving a way for a proletarian uprising and socialist utopia


also here's a stupid take
---------------------------->

greatn posted:

I found the first draft of Obama's letter to Trump that he'll leave in the oval office:

Dear President Trump,

Please don't throw me in the briar patch.

Sincerely,
Barry Soetero

Now that he's won he seems to be more congenial towards his opponents actually, but we don't know for sure yet. He's complimented both Clinton and Obama in the past 24 hours.

mcmagic
Jul 1, 2004

If you see this avatar while scrolling the succ zone, you have been visited by the mcmagic of shitty lib takes! Good luck and prosperity will come to you, but only if you reply "shut the fuck up mcmagic" to this post!

Sharkopath posted:

Don't worry, Ryan is already planning on destroying medicare entirely and replacing it with private carriers lmao.

Trump did not run on this. Surprise WWC idiots!!!

Wraith of J.O.I.
Jan 25, 2012


negromancer posted:

Go tell that to these minorities then.

https://twitter.com/i/moments/796417517157830656

Because it sure does look like it was THE factor.

What can be done about this? It's so awful and disgusting. I sent a bunch of examples like this to my conservative parents to try and get them to see the other side (and asked them to send me anything they want and I'll look at it). But this is just terrible. Maybe a dumb question, but is there any (*ANY*) chance that Trump gets in front of this? I have no expectations he will, because he never has before, but he needs to get out in front of this now.

SoggyBobcat
Oct 2, 2013

Is Bernie still a Democrat or is he going back to being an Independent?

Admiral Ray
May 17, 2014

Proud Musk and Dogecoin fanboy

disjoe posted:

Sure, I'm glad to deliver (slightly) good news:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2016/11/09/how-trump-won-the-revenge-of-working-class-whites/

Most didn't vote for Trump because of his hate. Some voted for him in spite of it.

"People make terrible, terrible decision while knowing it is terrible" somehow doesn't strike me as good news. That means they are pretty okay with blatant racism as long as get promised the fuckin' moon.

PKJC
May 7, 2009

Fojar38 posted:

Now that he's won he seems to be more congenial towards his opponents actually, but we don't know for sure yet. He's complimented both Clinton and Obama in the past 24 hours.

He's won but also does not actually have the keys to the kingdom yet, any appearance of congeniality is suspect until inauguration at the earliest.

Monaghan
Dec 29, 2006

negromancer posted:

Not if those voters think that economic message applies to anyone but white people.

Yall really, REALLY underestimate how lovely white people have been in America, mostly because those same lovely people also write the textbooks you read in school.

You're more than likely right, but I'd like to see an economic populist actually run before saying they'd refuse if it could benefit minorities.

[

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

ErIog
Jul 11, 2001

:nsacloud:

Fojar38 posted:

They're going to eat each other alive arguing over what should be done with this power actually and senate Democrats are going to get to pick who to support.

It's a possibility. It would be really hilarious if Ryan lost his speakership.

  • Locked thread