|
Lightning Knight posted:Ok I hit the anger/acceptance stage at work. Here is my big huge pointless effort post no one will read. A great post. A lot of the time when people are getting riled up about rear end in a top hat rurals it's actually rear end in a top hat suburbanites/exurbanites and the Democratic party would do well by putting rear end in a top hat suburbanites in a pincer between the cities and the farms. SPEAKING OF FARMS... http://www.omaha.com/money/ricketts...a25971cc0c.html
|
# ? Nov 13, 2016 08:40 |
|
|
# ? Jun 1, 2024 06:26 |
|
Lightning Knight posted:There have been plenty of people from the primary to now saying we need to downplay identity politics and go hard on "no war but the class war." No there haven't. Lightning Knight posted:Even if it isn't common outside of here it's a dumb notion and we shouldn't buy into it. Minority turnout was also down in part because of voter suppression. Keyword: Part. Lightning Knight posted:Not pushing trade deals that don't screw over working people is a good thing but that's not what people want. When people scream "no TPP" they aren't saying "I'm mad this doesn't have environmental and labor protections." People actually want to be anti-immigration and anti-trade but from the left and it's dumb because Donald Trump's take on that will beat us every time. We have to come up with a different platform to win, because trying to out-Republican Republicans doesn't work. This literally makes no sense at all. I mean, literally, I don't understand what point you are trying to make exactly. Lightning Knight posted:I didn't say white working class people vote solely on race or prejudice. I said they are racist and prejudiced. Recognizing this reality doesn't change that we need to appeal to them anyway, it's more about understanding that minorities won't be happy about it. We have to build a coalition and it means getting people who don't like each other to play nice. If white working class don't vote solely on race or prejuidice then you can play nice just fine. Again, these counties voted for Obama twice. It's not going to be much of a problem. Lightning Knight posted:There might not be a strong civil-war against progressives yet but there will be push back when we gain power. You forgot the part where you are suppose to explain why. Lightning Knight posted:I also didn't say that minorities should flee, I said if they feel that they need to (and implicitly if they have the means) then they should. I don't fault people whose lives are at stake from running. I wish they didn't need to, but I don't claim to know what's best for them. Lightning Knight posted:You misunderstand me. I'm not just talking about why we lost the Presidency. I'm talking about why we have systematically lost control of every level of government for fifty years running. We need more than the Presidency to enact change. Obama proved that. We lost the presidency and the house for the same main reason. Turnout. ErIog posted:I like that all of us arguing eventually came to the conclusion of, "Yo, gently caress the DNC." This poo poo. gently caress "coming together". These people are incompetent morons that lost to literally the worst candidate in American history in the worst fashion possible. Purge these fucks from the party.
|
# ? Nov 13, 2016 08:40 |
|
Scent of Worf posted:Let's hope the left can stop fighting itself by the time 2020 rolls around 2018 is more important. If the dems gently caress up bad enough the republicans will have enough power to pass loving constitutional amendments.
|
# ? Nov 13, 2016 08:43 |
|
punk rebel ecks posted:This poo poo. gently caress "coming together". These people are incompetent morons that lost to literally the worst candidate in American history in the worst fashion possible. Purge these fucks from the party. We must purge the wrongthink. Cut it from our hearts... Yeah, no. I beseech you, in the bowels of Christ, think it possible that you may be mistaken
|
# ? Nov 13, 2016 08:45 |
|
Lightning Knight posted:First of all, you're an idiot who subscribes to the just world fallacy. There absolutely is deserving based on past injustice. We enslaved black people for five hundred loving years and built a nation on the backs of their labor, on land taken from murdered natives. That is not even remotely what he said or even hinted at.
|
# ? Nov 13, 2016 08:46 |
|
The one good thing about the right wing is that at least they can come together in the name of particularly lovely goals, and actually stick to it instead of succumbing to infighting. (I think.)
|
# ? Nov 13, 2016 08:48 |
|
There is wrong think. The GOPs leadership with its goal of destroying the social safety net through constitutional amendments. Are wrong think and we should work to purge such subhumans.
|
# ? Nov 13, 2016 08:49 |
|
1. Yes there literally has been itt. Don't expect me to compensate for your lack of reading comprehension. 2. Minorities weren't the ones who primarily didn't show up. We lost white women and college educated white people despite polling positive with them. That indicates a lack of turnout. 3. Donald Trump won by campaigning on anti-immigrant rhetoric, anti-free trade and globalization couched in racist dogwhistling like (((globalists))). We won't win by trying to do the same thing, we've been campaigning as "Republicans lite" for far too long. 4. It's not that simple. Minorities won't turn out in huge numbers if they sense we're abandoning them for poor white people and submerging their issues in bullshit. Likewise we have to avoid having poor white people do the same drat thing they did with Reagan and jump ship for racist dogwhistles. 5. You really think the Democratic leadership will roll over and die? 6. Good job telling people who feel their lives are threatened how to respond, bro. 7. No, we lost the Presidency because of turn out, we lost the Senate because of turn out, and we lost the House because of gerrymandering and literally not running enough candidates. All of this swings back to dissatisfaction with the politics of the party and the candidates we run. It also is because the Republicans successfully set up the rules so they will win more than they lose. 8. lmao if you think we can win without the conservative wing. Millions of people do not subscribe to progressivism as an ideology and full communism now won't just sweep the board.
|
# ? Nov 13, 2016 08:50 |
|
Are people still arguing over how to get the 3 or 4 million votes over Republicans that they actually need to have any hope of winning? Is this some kind of defense mechanism that white Democrats are using to avoid accepting that their vote is worth less than other whites?
|
# ? Nov 13, 2016 09:04 |
|
Crowsbeak posted:If the GOP tries to second convention the country to suicide we may have Please do not embrace literal thoughtcrime and brainwashing people for having opposing political beliefs.
|
# ? Nov 13, 2016 09:10 |
|
Killer robot posted:A thousand times this. Atop it all, the particular approaches to gun control endorsed by most Democrats are as effective in curbing gun violence as the approaches of most anti-abortion people are in protecting children. It's not even a progressive cause so much as it is a socially conservative cause for city folks. If you want to spend any finite amount of money and effort on reducing murder rates, you're better off spending 100% of it on pulling back the war on drugs and strengthening social safety nets. And even if those programs also will get opposition from the same conservatives that fight gun control, they'll fight tooth and nail to protect guns in a way they won't to shut down the rest. Because that's something that affects their daily lives in a visible way. Seriously, call single-issue gun voters dumb all you want, but there's lots of people who are only affected indirectly and abstractly by many political issues but are affected directly and concretely by gun laws. And they know enough about the topic to see what factually ridiculous bullshit AWBs and rantings about mostly imaginary gunshow loopholes are. If you harp on those they'll just assume you're full of poo poo and malice on every other issue too. While I'll never claim there aren't people even in the government who want more gun control, 'gun control', the Issue(tm) is a policy crisis invented by the right. There are vanishingly few Democrats asking for anything other than common-sense gun control laws (often the very same measures that the NRA endorses) but the idea of gun-bans is totally fabricated. Liberals can back off of the issue more certainly but I don't know how they can distance themselves from it anymore besides actively endorsing gun ownership. Actually thought would be pretty funny.
|
# ? Nov 13, 2016 09:12 |
|
https://twitter.com/CNNPolitics/status/797703548519743488 Obama realizing "oh gently caress gently caress gently caress we need to snip this poo poo off know before that orange baboon kills a million people with indiscriminate tag-team bombing sorties alongside his tovarich vladdy"
|
# ? Nov 13, 2016 09:12 |
|
Lightning Knight posted:1. Yes there literally has been itt. Don't expect me to compensate for your lack of reading comprehension. Bad candidate, bad strategy, bad leadership, bad turnout. Ladies and gentlemen your new senate minority leader: Huzanko posted:http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/438481/chuck-schumer-democrats-will-lose-blue-collar-whites-gain-suburbs Sorry, man, this just isn't a "Welp, eveyone that didn't show up is evil and wants to kill all the minorities and all LGBT people. Let's tie a bow on that and also blame the Bernie bros!" situation.
|
# ? Nov 13, 2016 09:16 |
|
Leon Trotsky 2012 posted:Also, Trump actually won the under 30 vote among whites and almost tied union members. I am in a backlog on reading the thread and I just got to this and this is very damning and bad news. I am going to be very, very disappointed if we get trapped into buying into anti-immigrant and free trade rhetoric and actually go full in America First FYGM to the rest of the world. It will not end well. I'm not shocked white young people are lovely though because I've talked extensively to young white people and lol. Mendrian posted:While I'll never claim there aren't people even in the government who want more gun control, 'gun control', the Issue(tm) is a policy crisis invented by the right. There are vanishingly few Democrats asking for anything other than common-sense gun control laws (often the very same measures that the NRA endorses) but the idea of gun-bans is totally fabricated. Liberals can back off of the issue more certainly but I don't know how they can distance themselves from it anymore besides actively endorsing gun ownership. "Common sense gun control" isn't common sense to many gun owners and the NRA vehemently opposes any and all gun control because they're a lobbyist for the industry, what are you talking about? Like we run on gun control measures that poll positive with gun owners and they still vote against us because the NRA is a massively effective lobby group. I bet we could get gun control in a heartbeat if there was organized minority gun ownership but that'll never happen. quote:Bad candidate, bad strategy, bad leadership, bad turnout. k I think we can compromise with the conservative wing but I still want Schumer's head on a pike anyway.
|
# ? Nov 13, 2016 09:16 |
|
I like that there was a post some pages pack that was like "why can't we nominate sherrod brown?" I like the idea of a Tom Waits sounding candidate.
|
# ? Nov 13, 2016 09:18 |
|
Lightning Knight posted:I am in a backlog on reading the thread and I just got to this and this is very damning and bad news. I am going to be very, very disappointed if we get trapped into buying into anti-immigrant and free trade rhetoric and actually go full in America First FYGM to the rest of the world. It will not end well. There is no more conservative wing. The Blue Dogs are gone.
|
# ? Nov 13, 2016 09:19 |
|
Lightning Knight posted:I am in a backlog on reading the thread and I just got to this and this is very damning and bad news. I am going to be very, very disappointed if we get trapped into buying into anti-immigrant and free trade rhetoric and actually go full in America First FYGM to the rest of the world. It will not end well. Most gun owners and most card carrying NRA members are in favor of things like background checks and waiting periods. There are some loud, stupid outliers but if you walk up to any guy on the street he'll usually be in favor of that kind of thing. The difficulty is that there is a persistent belief that liberals want to take away the guns and that's just never really even been on the table before, it's never been a rallying cry, and yet people still believe it. Because it's a fabricated policy position designed to make gun owners paranoid. It's just rhetoric.
|
# ? Nov 13, 2016 09:19 |
|
FAUXTON posted:https://twitter.com/CNNPolitics/status/797703548519743488 meh, the fight against collapsing isis is and has been rolling along quietly all year my fear at this point is that the coalition takes raqqa in mid-spring and yokels across america finally take notice and credit trump for his foreign policy brilliance
|
# ? Nov 13, 2016 09:19 |
|
Cup Runneth Over posted:Please do not embrace literal thoughtcrime and brainwashing people for having opposing political beliefs. that dude is an unironic Trump supporter who is shitposting to make people trying to collect themselves after this defeat give up.
|
# ? Nov 13, 2016 09:20 |
|
I don't see much anti-immigrants so far in any of the discussions, but I think discussion on how these free trade deals really benefited the rich over the working class is a legitimate discussion.
|
# ? Nov 13, 2016 09:20 |
|
boner confessor posted:meh, the fight against collapsing isis is and has been rolling along quietly all year oh god damnit you are totally right. Trump is literally going to get credit for destroying Isis.
|
# ? Nov 13, 2016 09:22 |
|
Huzanko posted:There is no more conservative wing. The Blue Dogs are gone. People keep throwing "neoliberal" around as if everyone in the Democratic Party isn't a neoliberal. Like Bernie wasn't running on socialism guys he was running on "let's have a functioning welfare state to go with our capitalism." He might actually be a socialist in private but that sure as poo poo is not what he ran on. So instead of buying into the "establishment" framing I choose to refer to the Clinton/Schumer wing of the party as the conservative wing and the Bernie/Warren wing as the progressive wing because it's more accurate than some dumb "neoliberal/not neoliberal framing" that isn't even true. FAUXTON posted:I like that there was a post some pages pack that was like "why can't we nominate sherrod brown?" I am wary of a white dude from Ohio as the face of economic populism. I think Bernie's decision to specifically push Keith Ellison, instead of any other progressive Congressmen, is very significant and we should be getting a message from that. I think even he realized that white dudes won't be able to campaign on populism without terrifying minorities.
|
# ? Nov 13, 2016 09:22 |
|
Mendrian posted:Most gun owners and most card carrying NRA members are in favor of things like background checks and waiting periods. There are some loud, stupid outliers but if you walk up to any guy on the street he'll usually be in favor of that kind of thing. The difficulty is that there is a persistent belief that liberals want to take away the guns and that's just never really even been on the table before, it's never been a rallying cry, and yet people still believe it. Because it's a fabricated policy position designed to make gun owners paranoid. It's just rhetoric. "Just rhetoric" won the election. I get what you're saying, but it's gonna take real door-to-door poo poo to convince gun owners that Democrats don't want to disarm them. The NRA is a huge problem here as they are just loving awful propagandaists.
|
# ? Nov 13, 2016 09:22 |
|
boner confessor posted:my fear at this point is that the coalition takes raqqa in mid-spring and yokels across america finally take notice and credit trump for his foreign policy brilliance It's basically a guarantee, to be honest. Whoever is in office gets the credit.
|
# ? Nov 13, 2016 09:22 |
|
Monaghan posted:I think discussion on how these free trade deals really benefited the rich over the working class is a legitimate discussion. for sure, but -free trade globalism has been pushed by both parties because it's a centrist inevitablity -small town america has been economically inefficient since the 1930s -democrats push unions, education, and social benefits, all things which help small town america. republicans dont -you can't push economic solutions like mincome, minwage, job training, and relocation among people who deeply want to stay put and work the same job grandpappy worked essentially, the jobs problem in non-metropolitan america isn't a problem of employment, or income, or benefits, it's a problem of people demanding a purpose in life and a hard day's work for a well earned wage, which is simply no longer realistic absent the sort of full communism now which is completely anathema among the people who demand it the most boner confessor fucked around with this message at 09:25 on Nov 13, 2016 |
# ? Nov 13, 2016 09:23 |
|
Monaghan posted:I don't see much anti-immigrants so far in any of the discussions, but I think discussion on how these free trade deals really benefited the rich over the working class is a legitimate discussion. There have been posters, both progressive and Trump supporting throwing about how letting in immigrants is bad and wrong and how we need to raise tariffs and other poo poo that wouldn't end well. Personally given my immigrant heritage I am deeply, deeply concerned about any moves in that direction because it doesn't bode well. That said I never said that discussion of the impacts of free trade on the working class were wrong and shouldn't be had. Free trade programs have absolutely failed working people but it isn't because free trade is evil. The standard of living we enjoy today is because of trade. The problem is that we let rich people bleed most of the profits of that trade.
|
# ? Nov 13, 2016 09:25 |
|
ErIog posted:
an organization which refused to work with state and local parties during the midterms, leading to the 2010 debacle
|
# ? Nov 13, 2016 09:26 |
|
Literally all white working class people are prejudiced (every single one), being against free trade is unreasonable when it's destroyed swathes of the country, pretending there isn't an establishment that heavily caters to the interests of the ultra rich or that middle-class liberals on the coasts don't often look down their noses at benighted "flyover country" denizens... good grief that post is filled with a lot of stupid loving garbage.
|
# ? Nov 13, 2016 09:26 |
|
Lightning Knight posted:There have been posters, both progressive and Trump supporting throwing about how letting in immigrants is bad and wrong and how we need to raise tariffs and other poo poo that wouldn't end well. Personally given my immigrant heritage I am deeply, deeply concerned about any moves in that direction because it doesn't bode well. That's reasonable, I misinterpreted your post.
|
# ? Nov 13, 2016 09:27 |
|
Lightning Knight posted:Further still I didn't make that point to say we should campaign on "white people are bad." I said that we as progressives must acknowledge this because we expect minorities to put up with being in the same party as these people and it's a lot to ask. Sure, it's a lot to ask. Being part of political coalitions usually is. The reason you are seeing a lot of backlash against "identity politics" right now is because a lot of the people who supported these politics had an attitude of "we've won the numbers battle already, this is the coalition now and it will lead to triumph always, suck it up people who disagree" and now after an electoral failure this argument is utterly destroyed.
|
# ? Nov 13, 2016 09:27 |
|
stranger danger posted:pretending there isn't an establishment that heavily caters to the interests of the ultra rich or that middle-class liberals on the coasts don't often look down their noses at benighted "flyover country" denizens... good grief that post is filled with a lot of stupid loving garbage. the conservative establishment also looks down their noses at benighted "urban ghetto" denizens... look at how often trump talked about minorities being trapped in jobless war zones, at a time when many of them are being pushed out of urban centers due to gentrification and economically booming central cities. there's a lot of sneering on both sides, i really don't think sneering is to blame here the democratic establishment has extended multiple offers for help to rust belt america. it's just not something rust belt america wants - what they want most of all is a midcentury american economic paradigm of high wages for semiskilled factory labor, which simply is not coming back no matter what
|
# ? Nov 13, 2016 09:29 |
|
stranger danger posted:Literally all white working class people are prejudiced (every single one), being against free trade is unreasonable when it's destroyed swathes of the country, pretending there isn't an establishment that heavily caters to the interests of the ultra rich or that middle-class liberals on the coasts don't often look down their noses at benighted "flyover country" denizens... good grief that post is filled with a lot of stupid loving garbage. Yeah I don't think that more conservative democrats shouldn't be involved in the party, but the leadership has to be replaced quite substantially. They've had disasters since 2010 and only really won in 2008 due to bush being a gigantic fuckup along with obama's charisma.
|
# ? Nov 13, 2016 09:30 |
|
stranger danger posted:Literally all white working class people are prejudiced (every single one), being against free trade is unreasonable when it's destroyed swathes of the country, pretending there isn't an establishment that heavily caters to the interests of the ultra rich or that middle-class liberals on the coasts don't often look down their noses at benighted "flyover country" denizens... good grief that post is filled with a lot of stupid loving garbage. * Yes. We live in a racist society. We are all racist. There are merely degrees of understanding of this fact. * Free trade did not destroy the country, even poor working class people have much better things than they did fifty years ago because even poorer working class people get exploited to make them now. That said I love that the message you take away from it is "there are no problems with free trade" and not "we shouldn't be against free trade, we should make free trade better." * I literally said, there is an "establishment" that's just also the way conservatives frame the issue and we fail to message well because we buy into conservative framing all the time. Ultra-rich and middle class liberals aren't the majority of the party and more than half the country lives in urban areas, that should mean something in a democracy. The urban poor aren't any less deserving of our sympathy because they already vote for us. Monaghan posted:That's reasonable, I misinterpreted your post. Pedro De Heredia posted:Sure, it's a lot to ask. Being part of political coalitions usually is. I mean my point is that the "it was the economy, stupid" crowd are ignoring that no, it wasn't just the economy. Donald Trump is a racist and people voted for that message, in addition to the desperate. It wasn't only the working white poor that voted in Donald Trump. We need working class white people and I am willing to accommodate them even if they are prejudiced, but white progressives denying that they are to minorities is bizarre and wrong.
|
# ? Nov 13, 2016 09:33 |
|
it's gonna be pretty amazing when small town voters with a hard on to dismantle free trade discover that wal-mart passes on their costs...
|
# ? Nov 13, 2016 09:34 |
|
Lightning Knight posted:
I believe in affirmative action. I believe congress should research strategies to effectively implement reparations. I also believe that promoting an individual candidate based solely upon their race is racist. While they do face modern institutional and personal racism that need to be eliminated the Cory Bookers of the world deserve nothing based upon the unjust suffering of their ancestors. This goes for every other marginalized group as well. We should pursue a meritocracy. Obviously that's a pursuit that can never actually be achieved, but that only stresses the importance of a robust safety net that excludes no groups. I think a lot of people would be thrilled with the idea of being initially treated the same as every random white dude. But, I am just some random white dude so I'm open to hearing other opinions.
|
# ? Nov 13, 2016 09:35 |
|
Admiral Ray posted:"Just rhetoric" won the election. I get what you're saying, but it's gonna take real door-to-door poo poo to convince gun owners that Democrats don't want to disarm them. The NRA is a huge problem here as they are just loving awful propagandaists. Hell, I'm a leftist gun owner who hates the poo poo out of the NRA, and sill don't fully trust the Democratic Party fully on guns because every time a certain part of the party gets a whiff of the barest chance of it being relevant they go galloping off to tilt at the gun control windmill again.
|
# ? Nov 13, 2016 09:35 |
|
Lightning Knight posted:I am wary of a white dude from Ohio as the face of economic populism. It was mostly cynical/sarcastic, Sherrod Brown would be terrible. e: Also it's important to point out that the "basket of deplorables" remark was immediately preceded by pointing out that half of Trump's supporters had perfectly valid concerns about the economy but everyone conveniently forgets that and just imagines Hillary called every single trump supporter deplorable because it plays into their inner shitbird trying to console their conscience about the actual racist and bigoted poo poo they didn't take as a disqualifying factor. FAUXTON fucked around with this message at 09:38 on Nov 13, 2016 |
# ? Nov 13, 2016 09:36 |
|
The Puppy Bowl posted:I believe in affirmative action. I believe congress should research strategies to effectively implement reparations. I also believe that promoting an individual candidate based solely upon their race is racist. While they do face modern institutional and personal racism that need to be eliminated the Cory Bookers of the world deserve nothing based upon the unjust suffering of their ancestors. This goes for every other marginalized group as well. We should pursue a meritocracy. Obviously that's a pursuit that can never actually be achieved, but that only stresses the importance of a robust safety net that excludes no groups. Ok. I overreacted and I apologize. I didn't say anything about Cory Booker. Ever. In fact I've been very specifically talking about Kamala Harris, for a reason. I don't think we should pick candidates purely for their race but I think our messaging would be more cohesive and our coalition stronger if we pushed for more candidates like Obama: young, charismatic, minority, speaks to economic populism and appeals to white working class people through message. If all else fails and we gotta run Sherrod Brown then whatever, I'm just saying that perceptions matter and minorities justifiably view the white liberal with immense wariness.
|
# ? Nov 13, 2016 09:37 |
|
Lightning Knight posted:Free trade programs have absolutely failed working people but it isn't because free trade is evil. The standard of living we enjoy today is because of trade. The problem is that we let rich people bleed most of the profits of that trade. Trade is property owners saying to everyone else, Hey, I have this property I don't need, but I'm not going to give it to you unless you give me - well, as much as I think I can get you to give me, regardless of your well-being, let alone those poor sods who can't give me as much. It absolutely is evil. Its unregulated outcome is always going to favour those who already have most.
|
# ? Nov 13, 2016 09:38 |
|
|
# ? Jun 1, 2024 06:26 |
|
The Puppy Bowl posted:This is retarded. The people that need to lead the Democratic party are the most capable politicians who can successfully push the best policies. There are no turns. There is no deserving based on past injustice. There is only equal opportunity. The only thing I would add, is that we should keep in mind the race of the people we choose to lead us, if that helps to assure minority allies that we are not abandoning their cause. That's not to say we should poo poo on white people, but if two people of roughly equal quality are trying to take up the same leadership position, and if going with the white fellow alienates minorities (right or wrong), then we should consider not doing that. An example of this might be having Dean as the chair of the DNC vs Ellison. Personally I think Ellison is the better choice, but even if you believe Dean is equally qualified, reconsider Ellison for this reason. I don't like that this is a thing we have to do, but then again I also don't like that there are white progressives who are totally apathetic to racial issues, that I count among my allies. And yet I do, enthusiastically. (And Lightning Knight, for what it's worth, I think you are being very stupid to advocate showing these people the door. Half an ally is better than none, and if some people make economic justice overwhelmingly priority #1, then let them do it.)
|
# ? Nov 13, 2016 09:39 |