|
FlamingLiberal posted:AFL-CIO survey seems to back up the idea that Hillary tanked the union vote, which was probably the difference Yeah. 2020 DNC needs to open the salvo with "DONALD TRUMP OUTSOURCES JOBS, USES CHINESE STEEL, AND DOESN'T PAY PEOPLE WHO WORK FOR HIM" in every state of the Midwest and watch unions come in at like 90% support. God, they made such good ads too and it was all a waste.
|
# ? Nov 13, 2016 20:08 |
|
|
# ? Jun 6, 2024 13:22 |
|
From what I'm hearing, attendance at services of UCC, Quaker, UU, and other liberal congregations has been record breaking today. Pastors are saying they haven't seen filled sanctuaries like this on non holidays since 9/11. I know that shouldn't be surprising, but it's clearly not hyperbolic to say the Left is still truly grieving.
|
# ? Nov 13, 2016 20:09 |
|
Two books I've ordered in the aftermath of this election are: JD Vance's Hillbilly Elegy: A Memoir of a Family and Culture in Crisis and Kathryn Cramer's The Politics of Resentment: Rural Consciousness in Wisconsin and the Rise of Scott Walker I'll let everyone know, but I get the impression that they'll both be crucial to understanding this election cycle.
|
# ? Nov 13, 2016 20:11 |
|
Lightning Knight posted:Yeah. 2020 DNC needs to open the salvo with "DONALD TRUMP OUTSOURCES JOBS, USES CHINESE STEEL, AND DOESN'T PAY PEOPLE WHO WORK FOR HIM" in every state of the Midwest and watch unions come in at like 90% support. I feel like they ran on this exact message and if those idiots want to vote away their collective bargaining rights because MEXICANS, gently caress em.
|
# ? Nov 13, 2016 20:12 |
|
I really want some political scientists to study why voters completely choose to ignore statements from people like Matt Bevin and Trump where they are pretty plainly clear they want to do things that voters think are bad, but those same voters just assume they are 'bluffing' or whatever.
|
# ? Nov 13, 2016 20:12 |
|
Lightning Knight posted:Yeah. 2020 DNC needs to open the salvo with "DONALD TRUMP OUTSOURCES JOBS, USES CHINESE STEEL, AND DOESN'T PAY PEOPLE WHO WORK FOR HIM" in every state of the Midwest and watch unions come in at like 90% support. What they also need is a brushfire-like presence out there demanding their loving mills back every day until then. Turn that orange fucker into a liar and get everyone pissed at him.
|
# ? Nov 13, 2016 20:12 |
|
zegermans posted:I feel like they ran on this exact message and if those idiots want to vote away their collective bargaining rights because MEXICANS, gently caress em. They ran on the message but their actual transmission of that message was poo poo. They ran like ten times as many ads in LA as they did in WI. That's hilariously dumb. Sick nasty ads don't mean poo poo if nobody ever sees them, and telling people in LA that Republicans suck is the epitome of preaching to the choir.
|
# ? Nov 13, 2016 20:13 |
|
zegermans posted:I feel like they ran on this exact message and if those idiots want to vote away their collective bargaining rights because MEXICANS, gently caress em. Depends on the city you were in. Lots of "safe" markets in the Midwest and rust belt never saw the campaign and we're outspent 10:1 on ads. How were they supposed to hear that message?
|
# ? Nov 13, 2016 20:15 |
|
zegermans posted:I feel like they ran on this exact message and if those idiots want to vote away their collective bargaining rights because MEXICANS, gently caress em. I think they did early on, but it got buried early by Trump's Gish Galloping of scandals and WHAT ABOUT EMAILS. Even so, they should have went harder on it. I live in Michigan, where I mostly saw ads about his instability and "Our daughters are watching." Were those national ads? Dr Christmas fucked around with this message at 20:18 on Nov 13, 2016 |
# ? Nov 13, 2016 20:16 |
|
fknlo posted:She won on "the most important issue" in all of the swing states she lost by minuscule amounts. It's almost like if that was actually the most important issue and she won it by 5% among those that turned out she would have won. That almost makes it seem like the "spooky brown people I've never really interacted with" was more of an issue. This was from like 15 pages ago so I'm sorry for dredging it back up, but putting "the most important issue" in scare quotes here makes no sense. The CNN data that you're quoting shows that more people chose "the economy" as the most important issue than any other two issues combined. Like, I don't even disagree that a huge number of people are using economic issues as a dogwhistle for racism, but they aren't all doing it. If Hillary could have poached even a few percentage of these voters she would have won. More people voted against her on the economy than voted for Trump on immigration or terrorism.
|
# ? Nov 13, 2016 20:16 |
|
Lightning Knight posted:They ran like ten times as many ads in LA as they did in WI. That's hilariously dumb. Sick nasty ads don't mean poo poo if nobody ever sees them, and telling people in LA that Republicans suck is the epitome of preaching to the choir. Ironically, exactly the misconception that lost Hilary the 2008 primary. Surely the popular vote matters!
|
# ? Nov 13, 2016 20:16 |
|
not sure if this has been posted already but Harry Reid is endorsing Keith Ellison for DNC chair, too https://twitter.com/zachdcarter/status/797824199716966400
|
# ? Nov 13, 2016 20:17 |
|
Lightning Knight posted:Right, but there are attractions to rural living. It's loving pretty out there man. Have y'all actually seen America? We let the robber barons mine and log all the beautiful places when those people could've spent less time breaking their backs running a gift shop. I realize that's not ~fulfilling~ but it also doesn't disappear on you when the mine closes down. Rural areas a shitholes from massive divestment due to capitalism. I love hiking and camping in rural Missouri but good lord there are large parts of the state where electrification is shaky and people are still living in flea-ridden hovels. There's more work than can be done in our lifetimes with bringing rural America up to first world living standards.
|
# ? Nov 13, 2016 20:18 |
|
FlamingLiberal posted:I really want some political scientists to study why voters completely choose to ignore statements from people like Matt Bevin and Trump where they are pretty plainly clear they want to do things that voters think are bad, but those same voters just assume they are 'bluffing' or whatever. I think the fact that Trump directly contradicts himself so frequently makes it easier for people to maintain the cognitive dissonance required to believe Trump doesn't mean the promises they don't like and will defend to the death the promises they love.
|
# ? Nov 13, 2016 20:19 |
|
Tatsuta Age posted:
I'm not sure that I could in all honesty. One recurring theme of the Republican primary and general election and now his President-Elect status is that people outright admitted that they believed Donald Trump was lying to them and he wouldn't do the things he was saying he'd do? How the gently caress do you combat that?
|
# ? Nov 13, 2016 20:20 |
|
Is this not the thread for Trump tweets anymore? I don't think I've seen these posted. What could the impacts of his tweets be on the world? A bad tweet could move markets, or sell NYT subscriptions... https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/status/797805407179866112 https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/status/797812048805695488 https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/status/797832229800050688
|
# ? Nov 13, 2016 20:20 |
|
fosborb posted:Ironically, exactly the misconception that lost Hilary the 2008 primary. Surely the popular vote matters! I mean, it should. gently caress the Electoral College. Also, just putting this out there, since apparently Hispanic immigrants should also be afraid of brogressives, I want this guy to be important in the new progressive order. Peven Stan posted:Rural areas a shitholes from massive divestment due to capitalism. I love hiking and camping in rural Missouri but good lord there are large parts of the state where electrification is shaky and people are still living in flea-ridden hovels. I'm hearing that there's a bunch of jobs we could train and hire people for in electrician and other work.
|
# ? Nov 13, 2016 20:20 |
|
Lightning Knight posted:They ran on the message but their actual transmission of that message was poo poo. This. I follow politics pretty closely and the first time I heard of "Chinese Steel" was in the 2nd(?) debate. All of her ads on the 'net/social media were ~*sick burns*~ on how Trump is a poo poo head. Also the network presence was poo poo; Conway was on all the time getting the GOP message out while the Clinton camp were too busy huffing their own farts while holding a seance with their personal W.O.P.R. computer.
|
# ? Nov 13, 2016 20:20 |
|
FlamingLiberal posted:I really want some political scientists to study why voters completely choose to ignore statements from people like Matt Bevin and Trump where they are pretty plainly clear they want to do things that voters think are bad, but those same voters just assume they are 'bluffing' or whatever. I have two pet theories (that have some evidence built in): 1) the hardening of political identity, beliefs, and affiliation to the point of religiosity 2) denial ...they're really just two sides of the same coin, though, so I also throw in: 3) I'd sooner gently caress over everyone including myself than let people have nice things that I think they don't deserve This is the problem; I have no idea how to defuse the equivalent of political suicide bombers. EDIT: And neither does the Democrat Party hahaha Combed Thunderclap fucked around with this message at 20:23 on Nov 13, 2016 |
# ? Nov 13, 2016 20:21 |
|
The Puppy Bowl posted:I think the fact that Trump directly contradicts himself so frequently makes it easier for people to maintain the cognitive dissonance required to believe Trump doesn't mean the promises they don't like and will defend to the death the promises they love.
|
# ? Nov 13, 2016 20:21 |
|
Wraith of J.O.I. posted:Is this not the thread for Trump tweets anymore? I don't think I've seen these posted. What could the impacts of his tweets be on the world? A bad tweet could move markets, or sell NYT subscriptions... Man it's gonna be hosed when the FBI raids the NYTimes offices and "finds" evidence of treason.
|
# ? Nov 13, 2016 20:22 |
|
Wraith of J.O.I. posted:Is this not the thread for Trump tweets anymore? I don't think I've seen these posted. What could the impacts of his tweets be on the world? A bad tweet could move markets, or sell NYT subscriptions... Respect the office, bro.
|
# ? Nov 13, 2016 20:23 |
|
NYT reply: EMAILSEMAILSEMAILSEMAILS
|
# ? Nov 13, 2016 20:23 |
|
Tatsuta Age posted:
This 68-year-old woman will probably be fine. It's her daughter (who may not have voted for Trump at all) who's going to die in a ditch because she can't afford healthcare.
|
# ? Nov 13, 2016 20:23 |
|
I had climate change on the right explained to me by a friend. He's more libertarian right. He's a person I consider mostly rational and reasonable and in this case I consider him right. This is how it goes and it depresses me: "I believe in climate change. I believe it's going to be awful. However it's like that line from how I met your mother, "These aren't my problems. These are my kids' problems." He's younger so he'll see it, but a lot of these older people are A. Struggling to get by and B. Not the sort of people who plant trees that they will never live to see grow up." I think we need to fundamentally change the way we see climate change and deal with it. A lot of republicans, especially those who work in the energy sectors, see climate change as an existential threat to their livelihoods. That's because it is. They don't care about thirty years from now because they often don't have the luxury of caring even if they would care. Look at what happened to coal. Coal is a loser energy source that is getting rapidly outmoded by nuclear and even green sources. Now imagine a few years down the road when that happens to gasoline. Imagine places like Texas looking at these old energy sources, knowing they're getting outmoded but not caring because the other option is working at the Wal-Mart if even that. You'll see echos of the coal industry in the oil industry. I think that caring for the environment needs to be couched in utilitarianism for republicans. This coal plant? We're shutting it down because downwind it's killing people and is killing our planet. What are you going to do for jobs? Well we have a retraining program and we're building a new nuclear plant here. Transition 100% guaranteed. Salaries commensurate to what you made so you won't be bleeding cash on that thirty year mortgage you have. What about the coal miners who are going to be out of work? Retraining as well. We're finding them jobs too because we negotiated with businesses to hire these people. The workers get a softer landing and the businesses get tax breaks. Everyone wins. Everyone gets to make money. Everyone gets to keep their homes and feed their families. I think the biggest takeaway is that climate change is couched in entirely negative rhetoric for republicans. I think that the dems need to take some of the pain from these republican states and climate change effected sectors. People aren't rational, merely self-interested. We need to find real workarounds for the tragedy of the commons rather than relying on peoples' better angels. Republicans don't believe in climate change and there are incentives not to believe in it. Democrats can't just keep asking them to take the pain with no tradeoffs. They can't even ask them to get jobs retraining programs without placement. The democrats need to make sacrifices to generate political will so that everyone else can make sacrifices too. Ice Phisherman fucked around with this message at 20:27 on Nov 13, 2016 |
# ? Nov 13, 2016 20:24 |
|
fosborb posted:From what I'm hearing, attendance at services of UCC, Quaker, UU, and other liberal congregations has been record breaking today. Pastors are saying they haven't seen filled sanctuaries like this on non holidays since 9/11.
|
# ? Nov 13, 2016 20:24 |
|
Combed Thunderclap posted:I have two pet theories (that have some evidence built in): We make it so people who don't like them can more easily get out and vote for us? BadOptics posted:This. I follow politics pretty closely and the first time I heard of "Chinese Steel" was in the 2nd(?) debate. All of her ads on the 'net/social media were ~*sick burns*~ on how Trump is a poo poo head. Also the network presence was poo poo; Conway was on all the time getting the GOP message out while the Clinton camp were too busy huffing their own farts while holding a seance with their personal W.O.P.R. computer. Yeah in retrospect I'm actually shocked at how little they were doing. I convinced myself that they must be doing something behind the scenes but no, no they weren't. The tell all book will be most fascinating.
|
# ? Nov 13, 2016 20:24 |
|
HorseRenoir posted:not sure if this has been posted already but Harry Reid is endorsing Keith Ellison for DNC chair, too poo poo, that could be that. I am pleased.
|
# ? Nov 13, 2016 20:28 |
|
GreyjoyBastard posted:poo poo, that could be that. This would be really good
|
# ? Nov 13, 2016 20:33 |
|
Wraith of J.O.I. posted:Is this not the thread for Trump tweets anymore? I don't think I've seen these posted. What could the impacts of his tweets be on the world? A bad tweet could move markets, or sell NYT subscriptions... He won by doing this, so what's the strategy to counter it. How do you change the narrative so that his whining is pointed out for what it is.
|
# ? Nov 13, 2016 20:33 |
|
Lightning Knight posted:Ok I hit the anger/acceptance stage at work. Here is my big huge pointless effort post no one will read. I don't agree with everything in this but it's got enough smartly-written content that it should probably be in the OP
|
# ? Nov 13, 2016 20:34 |
|
zegermans posted:I feel like they ran on this exact message and if those idiots want to vote away their collective bargaining rights because MEXICANS, gently caress em. It doesn't sound like they actively ran on this message. I know they mentioned it a few times, but from what it sounds like, the ads were all Alicia Machado/women bullshit, and given that Hillary never came to Wisconsin during the general, she never seemed to take them seriously to begin with. And no, I don't think 'gently caress em' is the right attitude to have here -- it just pushes them to say 'gently caress YOU' and then we all get hosed. We can't win without them -- the demographics aren't there, and we're sacrificing a lot of country (and getting into dangerous constitutional amendment territory) if we just say we're the coastal elites + racial/gender/sexual/etc social issues party. Actually genuinely hearing them out (which Hillary never seemed to do), addressing their concerns (through more than just policies that were buried somewhere on a website), and effectively attacking Trump on these issues (LOL) is necessary.
|
# ? Nov 13, 2016 20:35 |
|
QuarkJets posted:I don't agree with everything in this but it's got enough smartly-written content that it should probably be in the OP Same, I don't agree with it all either, but it's a coherent and reasonable post we can have a meaningful discussion about. Good job Lightning Knight.
|
# ? Nov 13, 2016 20:36 |
|
|
# ? Nov 13, 2016 20:38 |
|
Fojar38 posted:lol there will be riots when ACA is repealed
|
# ? Nov 13, 2016 20:40 |
|
I think millions of americans are prepared to donate their blood, organs, or other bodily tissues to keep RBG alive for as long as she wants
|
# ? Nov 13, 2016 20:40 |
|
SourKraut posted:Is it wrong that some part of me does want to see the Country split up into separate parts so that you get a West Coast Country, northeast country, and everything else can be one racist shithole country? well you would be relegating all the minorities and gay people in those places to die, for one
|
# ? Nov 13, 2016 20:41 |
|
SourKraut posted:Is it wrong that some part of me does want to see the Country split up into separate parts so that you get a West Coast Country, northeast country, and everything else can be one racist shithole country? Yes? Edit: HorseRenoir posted:well you would be relegating all the minorities and gay people in those places to die, for one
|
# ? Nov 13, 2016 20:42 |
|
Lightning Knight posted:5. White straight male progressives are not the future of our movement. Yes, that means Bernie should not run again. White straight male progressives need to learn to sit down and shut the gently caress up some of the time, and to listen to minority voices. POC, LGBT, and female candidates are our future and we need to pave the way for them, not throw tantrums when we don't get to run the show. And for that guy reaching for his keyboard to say " why do you hate white straight men???" shut the gently caress up. Don't even. White straight men already get to be the center of the universe every other place. If you even want to pretend to be progressive don't you start that poo poo here. Jesus christ. So, as a white guy who'd like to volunteer for economic progressivism, I can go gently caress myself, huh? How is that helpful?
|
# ? Nov 13, 2016 20:42 |
|
|
# ? Jun 6, 2024 13:22 |
|
On Terra Firma posted:He won by doing this, so what's the strategy to counter it. How do you change the narrative so that his whining is pointed out for what it is. This is a great question, because I feel it is so apparent to me that he is the world's biggest loving whiner, but then his supporters see the same thing and cheer it as speaking some weird truth to power. This seems to be part of the broader messaging problem on he left, and I'm not really sure what to do about it.
|
# ? Nov 13, 2016 20:42 |