|
Nevvy Z posted:Based on? Really heavy pushback from liberals at the mere mention of the party actually giving a gently caress about labor again Refusal to admit that maybe HRC lost because she was a terrible candidate Party officials already sending mixed signals about the future of the party. Already willing to bend over backwards for the GOP
|
# ? Nov 14, 2016 18:35 |
|
|
# ? Jun 6, 2024 12:03 |
|
withak posted:Donald Trump had no idea what the president's job actually consists of, and his staff didn't realize that they actually had to hire everyone who would be working in the west wing because the current presidential staff would not be staying on. Barack Obama takes pity on the president-elect and will be doing some additional hand-holding during the transition. If Trump is realizing he's in way over his head and is leaning on Obama, that's...surprisingly good news. Like, the situation is still horrifying. But if Obama somehow stays on the short list of people Trump goes to when he finds himself without a clue, which I assume will be happening on a regular basis, that might really mean something in terms of mitigating the disaster.
|
# ? Nov 14, 2016 18:35 |
|
Main Paineframe posted:He's a black Muslim progressive who was first elected in 2008 and backed Bernie for president. People are really excited about him because he ticks the "progressive appeal", "minority appeal", "young people appeal", and "anti DNC establishment appeal" check boxes, so the Dems can go ahead and take all those demographics completely for granted and focus all their policy and messaging efforts on winning over the middle-aged white lower-middle class instead. He was actually elected in 2006, taking office in 2007. I thought he put his name forward and then was endorsed? quote:Rural voters don't have good schools, they don't have job prospects, there's a heroin epidemic ravaging them, and it's impossible to reach them on any of those because they would rather blame it all on black people and immigrants than accept hard truths. It's not that the Dems don't want to help them. It's that they reject every plan the Dems offer up because they don't like any of the real solutions to their problems - the narrative of "well, all your problems are due to those outsiders and foreigners and when we get rid of then all your problems will magically disappear" is just plain more convenient to them than the truth is. Sure, the truth is a lovely message. But what the hell is the alternative? The rural working class doesn't want retraining, they don't want welfare, they don't want subsidies, and they don't want guaranteed income. They've stood by and done nothing while Republican governors and legislatures axed Dem infrastructure projects and squeezed unions to death. The rural working class has only themselves to blame for their predicament, and while that's not a politically useful observation, it's extremely hard to help people who actively reject and fight against any attempt to help them. While I don't really disagree with this assessment, that doesn't change the fact that we need to come up with something and pretty much come up with it yesterday.
|
# ? Nov 14, 2016 18:35 |
|
This is a good post.
|
# ? Nov 14, 2016 18:38 |
|
Business Gorillas posted:Check this out You are a good loving poster who has been significantly correct on your calls and you deserve more respect from the thread. I just felt the need to say this. The whole loving wild way you were on point about Hilary, millennials, and the working class divide. That deserves recognition and everyone should take note.
|
# ? Nov 14, 2016 18:38 |
|
thechosenone posted:I honestly don't feel like the economy is that good, despite what people say that numbers say. The first step in making things better is admitting that things aren't how we want them to be. The economy as a whole thing is doing okay, mostly we are talking about equitable distribution of incomes. I'm not entirely sure reported data is entirely correct. The wiki article on median income seems to suggest that US median income varies based upon who is doing the counting. Then there is the un/employment numbers and labor force participation.
|
# ? Nov 14, 2016 18:39 |
|
And actually this election has opened my eyes. I'm actually kind of glad Trump became president. Now it's going to be survival of the fittest. No more coasting on neoliberal policies and thinking you can just ignore 90% of the country.
|
# ? Nov 14, 2016 18:39 |
Get them off the white horse and on the white milk! #MAGAA2020
|
|
# ? Nov 14, 2016 18:39 |
|
Martin Random posted:You are a good loving poster who has been significantly correct on your calls and you deserve more respect from the thread. I just felt the need to say this. The whole loving wild way you were on point about Hilary, millennials, and the working class divide. That deserves recognition and everyone should take note. is this another one of your epic fakeposts because it seems a little short
|
# ? Nov 14, 2016 18:39 |
|
boner confessor posted:is this another one of your epic fakeposts because it seems a little short this guy who does literally nothing but whine about how loving affronted he is by literally everything... is actually insanely good...
|
# ? Nov 14, 2016 18:40 |
|
Scent of Worf posted:And actually this election has opened my eyes. I'm actually kind of glad Trump became president. Now it's going to be survival of the fittest. No more coasting on neoliberal policies and thinking you can just ignore 90% of the country. I feel like this isn't going to go the way you want it to go when AG Rudy implements national stop and frisk and every R state implements harsher and harsher voter suppression.
|
# ? Nov 14, 2016 18:41 |
|
Unfortunately it seems Dems actually have to get white people from flyover country who aren't Fully Woke critical theory majors to vote for them if they don't want this poo poo to keep happeningLightning Knight posted:The Clinton Foundation did receive money from a Saudi prince, yes, and yet Hillary didn't run on a platform that was any more pro-Saudi interests than any other American politician and was still running on a platform that was pro-women's and LGBT rights. The conceptual leap required to establish quid pro quo is baseless because there's no proof it made a difference in her actions. taking money from gulf oil barons looks loving awful, even if there is no smoking gun. why are people still defending Hillary on this poo poo?
|
# ? Nov 14, 2016 18:41 |
|
get this: a business.... GORILLA! get mindphreaked, normie
|
# ? Nov 14, 2016 18:41 |
|
icantfindaname posted:taking money from gulf oil barons looks loving awful, even if there is no smoking gun. why are people still defending Hillary on this poo poo? Because he isn't talking about how it looks, he's asserting that it is actually materially bad. I don't give a gently caress about optics, it's a dumb argument regardless. You can gently caress off right now with your "quid pro quo doesn't require pro" garbage.
|
# ? Nov 14, 2016 18:42 |
|
eviltastic posted:If Trump is realizing he's in way over his head and is leaning on Obama, that's...surprisingly good news. Like, the situation is still horrifying. But if Obama somehow stays on the short list of people Trump goes to when he finds himself without a clue, which I assume will be happening on a regular basis, that might really mean something in terms of mitigating the disaster. There's going to be a very frustrating amount of liberals who consider Obama to be a traitor for "working with the enemy" for doing it, though. Obama holding Trump's hand is a very good thing given everything we know about Donald J Trump, and he's doing the right thing for the country beyond any sort of party affiliation. When it comes to doing good? gently caress partisan politics. Leaving Trump hanging is quite possibly the right move from the "advancing Democrat goals" viewpoint, but that's poo poo compared to actually making sure the transition goes smoothly. Niton fucked around with this message at 18:45 on Nov 14, 2016 |
# ? Nov 14, 2016 18:42 |
|
Scent of Worf posted:And actually this election has opened my eyes. I'm actually kind of glad Trump became president. Now it's going to be survival of the fittest. No more coasting on neoliberal policies and thinking you can just ignore 90% of the country. Same here. I didn't really realize why people were going to him in droves while trying their hardest to explain away why trumps racism or radicalism wasn't going to be that bad. They're gambling on what blowing up the status quo might do.
|
# ? Nov 14, 2016 18:43 |
|
Do we really need money from groups that run at cross purposes from us? it appears that the quality of a candidate and consistency are more valuable than whatever dubious advantage money has. We get enough money to get what we need, and any further money is just tying us up with folks who make it harder to show where our loyalties lie.
|
# ? Nov 14, 2016 18:45 |
|
Lightning Knight posted:I feel like this isn't going to go the way you want it to go when AG Rudy implements national stop and frisk and every R state implements harsher and harsher voter suppression. That's fine with me. Too many people out there concerned with what's happening in their neighborhoods and don't do anything to better themselves. Too many lazy people out there who can't go out and vote once every 2-4 years. I live in a blue state and am moving to a very blue big city soon. I've never had problems with cops and I never will. Trump is going to be a wakeup call for a lot of people. If you can't make t in this new world you are literally going to die..
|
# ? Nov 14, 2016 18:45 |
|
My Linux Rig posted:Same here. I didn't really realize why people were going to him in droves while trying their hardest to explain away why trumps racism or radicalism wasn't going to be that bad. They're gambling on what blowing up the status quo might do. Accelerationism doesn't work, moron. All you do is accelerate the suffering of millions - including poor white people who will immensely suffer under the Republicans - while pushing people towards fascism. The Great Depression didn't produce a bunch of friendly socialist countries in Europe eager to hand out hugs to Jewish people. quote:That's fine with me. Too many people out there concerned with what's happening in their neighborhoods and don't do anything to better themselves. Too many lazy people out there who can't go out and vote once every 2-4 years. You might be a sociopath. Just a bit.
|
# ? Nov 14, 2016 18:45 |
|
Lightning Knight posted:We've won the popular vote twice but lost the Presidency. 2000 and 2016. Three times. Learn your history, friend. smdh
|
# ? Nov 14, 2016 18:46 |
|
thechosenone posted:Do we really need money from groups that run at cross purposes from us? it appears that the quality of a candidate and consistency are more valuable than whatever dubious advantage money has. We get enough money to get what we need, and any further money is just tying us up with folks who make it harder to show where our loyalties lie. This. The neoliberals have only weakened the party.
|
# ? Nov 14, 2016 18:47 |
|
Guy Goodbody posted:Three times. Learn your history, friend. smdh Anything regarding the Democrats and Republicans before 1929 isn't "we."
|
# ? Nov 14, 2016 18:48 |
|
Scent of Worf posted:And actually this election has opened my eyes. I'm actually kind of glad Trump became president. Now it's going to be survival of the fittest. No more coasting on neoliberal policies and thinking you can just ignore 90% of the country. I really hope you're right. But I have a sinking feeling that the Dems are gonna run some boring rear end Senator in 2020, assuming people will vote against Trump. As a political party, we are not good at learning from our mistakes.
|
# ? Nov 14, 2016 18:49 |
|
boner confessor posted:is this another one of your epic fakeposts because it seems a little short I'm sorry did you correctly and precisely articulate the views that decided the last election for many months because I must have missed that.
|
# ? Nov 14, 2016 18:49 |
|
What is the only thing possibly worse than President Trump?quote:Representative Hensarling (R-TX) has already spoken to Vice President-elect Pence about hitting the ground running in the new legislative session. Hensarling says that Pence informed him that President-elect Trump had already given him assurances that he would give Pence a wide latitude to set the policy agenda; including staffing decisions and drafting executive actions to promote religious liberty and pro-life health measures.
|
# ? Nov 14, 2016 18:51 |
|
It seems to me that this election has shown some of the limits of money as soft power. You can throw all the money you want at people, but they have the ball. As it is, we are in a position where if the gop fails to deliver improved conditions to folks, we can campaign on improving the lot of people, no matter who they are. If they somehow avoid loving up in any way, then we are in bullshit dream scenario land, and the situation isn't as dire as we were expecting.
|
# ? Nov 14, 2016 18:51 |
|
Martin Random posted:I'm sorry did you correctly and precisely articulate the views that decided the last election for many months because I must have missed that. fanning internet grudge matches about bernie sanders long past the point of tedium decided the election i knew social media was more important this election but jeez
|
# ? Nov 14, 2016 18:52 |
|
Martin Random posted:I'm sorry did you correctly and precisely articulate the views that decided the last election for many months because I must have missed that. You also missed where he's a massive prick who fits the "dismisses racial issues whenever they come up" stereotype to a T. "White exclusion"
|
# ? Nov 14, 2016 18:52 |
|
thechosenone posted:Do we really need money from groups that run at cross purposes from us? it appears that the quality of a candidate and consistency are more valuable than whatever dubious advantage money has. We get enough money to get what we need, and any further money is just tying us up with folks who make it harder to show where our loyalties lie. Sanders raised a poo poo load of money but didn't have the institutional inertia to make it really count. Trump spent peanuts and will be president. Clinton spent all the money and hosed everything up real bad. Jeb Bush had so much money he was mailing tablets out as advertisements. Money isn't everything.
|
# ? Nov 14, 2016 18:52 |
|
Lightning Knight posted:You might be a sociopath. Just a bit. why are you doing that?
|
# ? Nov 14, 2016 18:52 |
|
The Dems helped to systematically destroy unions since the 70s. They also became just as hawkish as the right. They also slashed welfare and made it much harder to qualify for it, all the while passing policies that shipped jobs overseas. All the while ignoring the ballooning rent/home/tuition prices. All the while ignoring our stagnant wages. The Dems have deliberately shifted their party to one that is only concerned with the 10%. They made the already well off, much more well off. They called upon minorities every 4 years to vote and then instantly ignore them right afterwards. Republicans? Well they're not even trying to hide what they want to do, yet tons and tons of white people will vote for them despite the fact that a large percentage of them depend on the very services the GOP wants to kill. Both of these groups deserve the wake up call that's about to come with Trump.
|
# ? Nov 14, 2016 18:53 |
|
icantfindaname posted:Unfortunately it seems Dems actually have to get white people from flyover country who aren't Fully Woke critical theory majors to vote for them if they don't want this poo poo to keep happening The defense of Clinton taking hundreds of thousands of dollars from Wall Street for speeches basically amounted to this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xub8nqHVZ1g I'm torn between saying "Clinton lost, her political career is dead, let's move on and never talk about her again" just to avoid more arguments, and thinking that getting people to accept what made Clinton a bad candidate is critical to make sure we pick a good candidate next time.
|
# ? Nov 14, 2016 18:55 |
|
oh, and i turned out to be right, clinton did her damndest to have trump be who she faced off against in the election: i mean it was already kind of obvious from the memo leaked by wikileaks, but still
|
# ? Nov 14, 2016 18:55 |
|
"ugh could this party that consistently pushes for minimum wage increases ignore wage stagnation any harder?"
|
# ? Nov 14, 2016 18:55 |
|
boner confessor posted:fanning internet grudge matches about bernie sanders long past the point of tedium decided the election i knew social media was more important this election but jeez I'm going to ignore the guy who pointed out the problems with Hilary's candidacy that actually lost her the election and can inform us moving forward because I'm still butt hurt about Berniebros and the primary.
|
# ? Nov 14, 2016 18:56 |
|
somewhere on Twitter someone said that the way to beat automation was to reduce the length of the work day. I wish I could find the tweetstorm because it was really insightful but my initial reaction was that companies would never try to spread the wealth around like that
|
# ? Nov 14, 2016 18:57 |
|
Martin Random posted:I'm going to ignore the guy who pointed out the problems with Hilary's candidacy that actually lost her the election and can inform us moving forward because I'm still butt hurt about Berniebros and the primary. "white exclusion"
|
# ? Nov 14, 2016 18:57 |
|
Condiv posted:why are you doing that? I mean, he's at bare minimum being hugely FYGM about it. "Yup, you guys will all suffer, maybe you'll try harder next time, I'll be just fine tho. "
|
# ? Nov 14, 2016 18:57 |
|
icantfindaname posted:Unfortunately it seems Dems actually have to get white people from flyover country who aren't Fully Woke critical theory majors to vote for them if they don't want this poo poo to keep happening Trump could probably make a social conservative, fiscally left/populist coalition that, if it could appeal to minorities would be pretty unstoppable. Only one thing stands in the way...
|
# ? Nov 14, 2016 18:57 |
|
|
# ? Jun 6, 2024 12:03 |
|
boner confessor posted:"ugh could this party that consistently pushes for minimum wage increases ignore wage stagnation any harder?" Yeah those min wage increases that kicked in just around the time when it's playing catch up to rising cost of living.. How generous of those Dems. Also min wage earners aren't the majority of the work force.
|
# ? Nov 14, 2016 18:59 |