|
I really though we'd have Gingrich but if he selects John Bolton holy poo poo. John Bolt posted:
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/26/opinion/to-stop-irans-bomb-bomb-iran.html "John Crazy Stache Bolton" posted:
He is a K.R.A.Z.Y. person
|
#
?
Nov 14, 2016 22:25
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 1, 2024 05:56 |
|
|
paranoid randroid posted:you really take inordinate amounts of glee from the suffering of others, and thats well and truly hosed up look we can get around to actual politics and real life crap once i've truly aired my grievances about being made fun of on the internet, truly the most important topic of our times
|
|
#
?
Nov 14, 2016 22:26
|
|
|
Why, let's bomb the only place in the Middle East that we aren't at war with. That'd help.
|
|
#
?
Nov 14, 2016 22:26
|
|
|
haveblue posted:The post-media world isn't doing so hot either- stories are circulating that Facebook had a solution ready to crack down on bullshit stories in the news feed, but hesitated to pull the trigger because it would have disproportionately hit right-wing pages. So are liberals going to flip on net neutrality now that the lack of media gatekeepers determining everything people see has temporarily inconvenienced them I don't imagine anyone really believes Facebook is going to start employing an armada of fact-checkers so what's the idea here
|
|
#
?
Nov 14, 2016 22:26
|
|
|
Hollismason posted:I really though we'd have Gingrich but if he selects John Bolton holy poo poo. *whistles*  American foreign policy. Somewhere the Iron Rose weeps.
|
|
#
?
Nov 14, 2016 22:27
|
|
|
boner confessor posted:i agree the guy who soundly lost the primary wouldn't have lost the general. wait no, i dont agree, that's pretty stupid actually Don't sign your posts.
|
|
#
?
Nov 14, 2016 22:28
|
|
|
A Wizard of Goatse posted:So are liberals going to flip on net neutrality now that the lack of media gatekeepers determining everything people see has temporarily inconvenienced them That's not what Net Neutrality means. Net Neutrality specifically refers to preventing ISPs themselves from controlling your ability to browse and throttling sites that didn't bribe them enough. Facebook cracking down on bullshit lies that just happens to "disproportionately" affect Right Wing Media sites (can't imagine why  ) has nothing to do with Net Neutrality.
|
|
#
?
Nov 14, 2016 22:29
|
|
|
A Wizard of Goatse posted:So are liberals going to flip on net neutrality now that the lack of media gatekeepers determining everything people see has temporarily inconvenienced them Net neutrality isn't anything to do with Facebook controlling trending topics. It's not about the net being "neutral." It's about ISPs not favouring one type of traffic over another - for instance throttling Netflix because Amazon Prime paid them more.
|
|
#
?
Nov 14, 2016 22:29
|
|
|
boner confessor posted:i agree the guy who soundly lost the primary wouldn't have lost the general. wait no, i dont agree, that's pretty stupid actually Almost as stupid as the most qualified candidate in history losing to Donald Trump. Almost, but not quite.
|
|
#
?
Nov 14, 2016 22:30
|
|
|
vermin supreme would have won in a crushing landslide and you all know it you cowardly little bitches
|
|
#
?
Nov 14, 2016 22:30
|
|
|
A Wizard of Goatse posted:So are liberals going to flip on net neutrality now that the lack of media gatekeepers determining everything people see has temporarily inconvenienced them You are conflating two issues that have nothing to do with each other.
|
|
#
?
Nov 14, 2016 22:30
|
|
|
Radbot posted:No, I supported Bernie who wouldn't have lost, like your candidate did. Your candidate losing is going to make a lot of people suffer. nah from one Sanders supporter to another you should probably shut the gently caress up because youre a goddamn pimple on face of the movement
|
|
#
?
Nov 14, 2016 22:30
|
|
|
Leon Trotsky 2012 posted:Reminder: Now im actually hoping Putin does control our next president
|
|
#
?
Nov 14, 2016 22:30
|
|
|
Bolton was also I think involved in Iran Contra in some way or connected to it through like I think trying to halt the investigation.
|
|
#
?
Nov 14, 2016 22:30
|
|
|
paranoid randroid posted:nah from one Sanders supporter to another you should probably shut the gently caress up because youre a goddamn pimple on face of the movement Turn your monitor on.
|
|
#
?
Nov 14, 2016 22:30
|
|
|
Maybe they are just floating Bolton to make Giuliani more palatable. Amazing that in 2016 that evil gently caress is still in public life.
|
|
#
?
Nov 14, 2016 22:31
|
|
|
boner confessor posted:look we can get around to actual politics and real life crap once i've truly aired my grievances about being made fun of on the internet, truly the most important topic of our times No, the point is that your political intransigence has condemned Americans to a lack of medical care, and Iranians to a possible genocide. Is that real life enough for you? paranoid randroid posted:nah from one Sanders supporter to another you should probably shut the gently caress up because youre a goddamn pimple on face of the movement Nah your time to tell people to shut up passed about a week ago, you don't know a goddamned thing.
|
|
#
?
Nov 14, 2016 22:31
|
|
|
like you ever try to go out to a bar but that one friend of yours comes along and every time you try to talk to someone he starts cackling like "REE HEE HEE IM GLAD OF THE SUFFERING CAUSED BY YOUR SHRILL BITCH FAILURE OF A CANDIDATE" completely apropos of nothing? yeah thats radbot
|
|
#
?
Nov 14, 2016 22:31
|
|
|
blue squares posted:Now im actually hoping Putin does control our next president Exactly how tight are Russia and Iran? I know that they have converging interests in Syria, but would Russia really care if we bombed them?
|
|
#
?
Nov 14, 2016 22:31
|
|
|
A Wizard of Goatse posted:So are liberals going to flip on net neutrality now that the lack of media gatekeepers determining everything people see has temporarily inconvenienced them Net neutrality really only applies to ISPs. Websites have always had the discretion to determine the content they display. E.g., this website. The facebook filter would really be no different.
|
|
#
?
Nov 14, 2016 22:31
|
|
|
paranoid randroid posted:nah from one Sanders supporter to another you should probably shut the gently caress up because youre a goddamn pimple on face of the movement i dunno i think "insufferably smug and posessing a deep desire to relitigate pointless culture wars" is pretty well indicative of self identified progressives under age 25
|
|
#
?
Nov 14, 2016 22:31
|
|
|
A Wizard of Goatse posted:I don't imagine anyone really believes Facebook is going to start employing an armada of fact-checkers so what's the idea here They used to, they got replaced with machines after being accused of liberal bias.
|
|
#
?
Nov 14, 2016 22:31
|
|
|
Maybe they're just getting Bolton because they want to have good orgies.
|
|
#
?
Nov 14, 2016 22:31
|
|
|
paranoid randroid posted:like you ever try to go out to a bar but that one friend of yours comes along and every time you try to talk to someone he starts cackling like "REE HEE HEE IM GLAD OF THE SUFFERING CAUSED BY YOUR SHRILL BITCH FAILURE OF A CANDIDATE" completely apropos of nothing? yeah thats radbot Who said I was glad about it? I'm really, really sad about the suffering that choosing Clinton caused. We're less than a week out from your utter failure and you expect everyone just to pack it in - after months of impotent gloating, even! boner confessor posted:i dunno i think "insufferably smug and posessing a deep desire to relitigate pointless culture wars" is pretty well indicative of self identified progressives under age 25 AHAHAHAH yeah it's the *Sanders* supporters that want to engage in culture war crap, that's a good one.
|
|
#
?
Nov 14, 2016 22:32
|
|
|
wrong thread
|
|
#
?
Nov 14, 2016 22:33
|
|
|
Radbot posted:Nah your time to tell people to shut up passed about a week ago, you don't know a goddamned thing. im sorry could you rephrase that in the form of ghoulish gloating over the pain of others? that seems to be more your metier
|
|
#
?
Nov 14, 2016 22:33
|
|
|
So, we're going to war with Iran, going bankrupt, and a second holocaust is likely. Wow, we really hosed up. Like, bad.
|
|
#
?
Nov 14, 2016 22:34
|
|
|
deathbysnusnu posted:Exactly how tight are Russia and Iran? I know that they have converging interests in Syria, but would Russia really care if we bombed them? yes. everyone would care
|
|
#
?
Nov 14, 2016 22:34
|
|
|
Radbot posted:Who said I was glad about it? I'm really, really sad about the suffering that choosing Clinton caused. We're less than a week out from your utter failure and you expect everyone just to pack it in - after months of impotent gloating, even! see youre literally incapable of not doing this poo poo. its remarkable.
|
|
#
?
Nov 14, 2016 22:35
|
|
|
deathbysnusnu posted:Exactly how tight are Russia and Iran? I know that they have converging interests in Syria, but would Russia really care if we bombed them? Do they offer Russia a warm water port on the Mediterranean or a Slavic population to lord over?
|
|
#
?
Nov 14, 2016 22:35
|
|
|
paranoid randroid posted:im sorry could you rephrase that in the form of ghoulish gloating over the pain of others? that seems to be more your metier You mean the pain of others caused by a Trump presidency? There's one party responsible for that: Clinton and her supporters. Nobody here is gloating about that, despite your perverse desire for that to be so.
|
|
#
?
Nov 14, 2016 22:35
|
|
|
look if i can't attempt to guilt trip my posting enemies with jabs at the encroaching rollback of LGBT rights then what was the point of withholding my vote in the first place
|
|
#
?
Nov 14, 2016 22:35
|
|
|
boner confessor posted:look if i can't attempt to guilt trip my posting enemies with jabs at the encroaching rollback of LGBT rights then what was the point of withholding my vote in the first place I don't know, who said they withheld their vote
|
|
#
?
Nov 14, 2016 22:36
|
|
|
I for one hope this is but the faintest vanguard of Obama Unchained in the years to come. And I typed "eight years" but decided to have hope for humanity.
|
|
#
?
Nov 14, 2016 22:36
|
|
|
Radbot posted:You mean the pain of others caused by a Trump presidency? There's one party responsible for that: Clinton and her supporters. Nobody here is gloating about that, despite your perverse desire for that to be so. exhibit b
|
|
#
?
Nov 14, 2016 22:36
|
|
|
Radbot posted:You mean the pain of others caused by a Trump presidency? There's one party responsible for that: Clinton and her supporters. Why is everyone blaming Clinton and her voters for losing? Seems a bit backwards. I'm blaming Trump and those who voted for him. Not Clinton, Stein or Johnson voters.
|
|
#
?
Nov 14, 2016 22:36
|
|
|
boner confessor posted:i agree the guy who soundly lost the primary wouldn't have lost the general. wait no, i dont agree, that's pretty stupid actually Populist loses in primary run by Neoliberals to a Neoliberal candidate. Neoliberal loses in general election to Sentient Bag of Cheetos because he pretended to give a poo poo about working class America for three weeks.
|
|
#
?
Nov 14, 2016 22:36
|
|
|
it is with a heavy heart that i firmly, thoroughly click DISLIKE on hillary clinton and her corrupt, vapid campaign. you made me do this. you made me do my duty. god help us all
|
|
#
?
Nov 14, 2016 22:37
|
|
|
BarbarianElephant posted:Why is everyone blaming Clinton and her voters for losing? Seems a bit backwards. I'm blaming Trump and those who voted for him. Not Clinton, Stein or Johnson voters. because hes a loving ghoul who cant help himself
|
|
#
?
Nov 14, 2016 22:37
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 1, 2024 05:56 |
|
|
BarbarianElephant posted:Why is everyone blaming Clinton and her voters for losing? Seems a bit backwards. I'm blaming Trump and those who voted for him. Not Clinton, Stein or Johnson voters. Have you seen how many people Clinton turned out, or the way Ohio and WI voted for Obama?
|
|
#
?
Nov 14, 2016 22:38
|
|