|
They could have traded someone to DC for Mogo.
|
#
?
Nov 15, 2016 17:13
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 30, 2024 19:12 |
|
|
I would love that. DC and Marvel not doing a crossover, just trading two iconic characters for a period of one or two years.
|
|
#
?
Nov 15, 2016 17:16
|
|
|
Electromax posted:He could've just made a new Original Character for the movie Peter, I will answer all of your questions. But first I need you to take out my rival, Ragu the Undead Singularity.
|
|
#
?
Nov 15, 2016 17:16
|
|
|
Jamesman posted:I wonder who has dibs on Gwenpool. Sony, Fox, Marvel, or all three? Probably Marvel because she was created only recently, and outside of the name, has nothing at all to do with Deadpool or Gwen Stacy.
|
|
#
?
Nov 15, 2016 17:32
|
|
|
"I'll just duck behind the far side of this star and don my domino mask to transform from mild-mannered Ego into... Superego! Oh, but... is vigilantism really the right way to go about things? Maybe I shouldn't."
|
|
#
?
Nov 15, 2016 17:41
|
|
|
greatn posted:I would love that. DC and Marvel not doing a crossover, just trading two iconic characters for a period of one or two years. They were going to do this after one team up, but Marvel was lowballing and DC didn't wanna trade Nightwing for Moon Knight.
|
|
#
?
Nov 15, 2016 17:48
|
|
|
Aphrodite posted:At some Q&A this weekend, the Deadpool writers apparently said they needed Marvel's permission to change Negasonic's power set, and that Fox gave Marvel Ego the Living Planet back in exchange. Goddamn I want a book wrapping up these kinds of exchanges once this era of superhero making is done.
|
|
#
?
Nov 15, 2016 18:28
|
|
|
Marvel agrees to Fox's request to remove Namor's stupid little ankle wings, but rejects the secondary request to put him in pants.
|
|
#
?
Nov 15, 2016 18:31
|
|
|
Aphrodite posted:Marvel agrees to Fox's request to remove Namor's stupid little ankle wings, but rejects the secondary request to put him in pants. Look at sub-article VII under undergarments, briefs, and unitards for the relevant case statute
|
|
#
?
Nov 15, 2016 19:29
|
|
|
Aphrodite posted:Marvel agrees to Fox's request to remove Namor's stupid little ankle wings, but rejects the secondary request to put him in pants. Then they cast Randy Orton as Namor and it all works out.
|
|
#
?
Nov 15, 2016 19:30
|
|
|
Cabbit posted:Then they cast Randy Orton as Namor and it all works out. I just looked up who this dude was and now I'm surprised because I thought casting wrestling dudes in comic book movies had ended like last decade ago. Well except for that one guy in GOTG.
|
|
#
?
Nov 15, 2016 19:37
|
|
|
Shageletic posted:I just looked up who this dude was and now I'm surprised because I thought casting wrestling dudes in comic book movies had ended like last decade ago. They didn't actually cast him, it's a wrestling joke. Orton is always in his trunks on camera, never in pants, even when other wrestlers are fully dressed.
|
|
#
?
Nov 15, 2016 19:42
|
|
|
Cabbit posted:They didn't actually cast him, it's a wrestling joke. Orton is always in his trunks on camera, never in pants, even when other wrestlers are fully dressed. Oh I meant fancasting. Circa 2000 it was everywhere.
|
|
#
?
Nov 15, 2016 19:43
|
|
|
It goes way back into the pre-Internet days, in the mid 90s Wizard Magazine would fan cast a different comic movie every issue. Lots of wrestlers there. Might be the origin of Danzig as Wolverine, too.
|
|
#
?
Nov 15, 2016 19:48
|
|
|
purple death ray posted:It goes way back into the pre-Internet days, in the mid 90s Wizard Magazine would fan cast a different comic movie every issue. Lots of wrestlers there. Might be the origin of Danzig as Wolverine, too. People talked about it before Wizard cause short hairy mean guy, but Wizard put it in there as a popular choice. I was one of those that was spergy that they cast a 6' dude for Wolverine. Yes, I was dumb.
|
|
#
?
Nov 15, 2016 19:52
|
|
Cabbit posted:Then they cast Randy Orton as Namor and it all works out. They'd implement that in the comics by making Namor RKO people out of nowhere, but honestly it'd feel pretty organic.
|
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2016 00:02
|
|
|
Diamond Dallas Page did it better
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2016 00:55
|
|
|
ArmyOfMidgets posted:They'd implement that in the comics by making Namor RKO people out of nowhere, but honestly it'd feel pretty organic. Namor being a dick is pretty much canon.
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2016 02:41
|
|
|
Who actually owns the movie rights to Namor, anyway? I saw an infographic months back and it said he belonged to some company other than Marvel, Sony, and Fox.
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2016 03:45
|
|
|
Universal.
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2016 03:52
|
|
|
The other company was Universal, but there's been some confusing statements since.
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2016 03:57
|
|
|
I thought I heard they got Namor back?
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2016 04:10
|
|
|
I think it's like the Hulk, where they could make a movie, but Universal gets the distribution rights, or a cut or something.
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2016 04:16
|
|
|
Retardog posted:My hope is that these rumors of Fox rebooting X-Men are tied to Inhumans being shunted off to the TV realm... probably just a coincidence though Jeph Loeb was at the Fox TV panel at NYCC and said he was there to build bridges. Lots of rumors have been flying since then. howe_sam posted:I think it's like the Hulk, where they could make a movie, but Universal gets the distribution rights, or a cut or something. Last I read it's exactly like the Hulk deal.
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2016 05:02
|
|
|
If Loeb got X-men back at Marvel I might for give him for about...60% of the poo poo he did in Ultimate Comics. Pietro and Wanda loving and Wasp being eaten are unforgivable.
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2016 05:59
|
|
|
twistedmentat posted:If Loeb got X-men back at Marvel I might for give him for about...60% of the poo poo he did in Ultimate Comics. Pietro and Wanda loving and Wasp being eaten are unforgivable. Let's face it, the X-Men films will never make the kind of money the MCU films are raking in. If they want to have any hope of keeping the property valuable they need to fold into the MCU the way Sony did with Spider-man. And yeah, if Loeb can make that happen I would take back a lot of the poo poo I've said about him over the last decade.
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2016 06:34
|
|
|
You have no idea how much petty pleasure i'd get from Inhumans getting shoved down to TV solely because an X-Men deal was made.
|
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2016 06:36
|
|
|
ArmyOfMidgets posted:You have no idea how much petty pleasure i'd get from Inhumans getting shoved down to TV solely because an X-Men deal was made. Well there's been lots of X-Men stuff happening since summer ended. We're getting a lot of new toys, a full comic relaunch, a TV show that supposedly Marvel had a ton of input on. It'd be pretty awesome if the Inhumans house of cards collapsed based on the rumor that the X-Men were coming home.
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2016 06:39
|
|
|
ArmyOfMidgets posted:You have no idea how much petty pleasure i'd get from Inhumans getting shoved down to TV solely because an X-Men deal was made. My pleasure won't peak until their gone from the spotlight entirely. This whole faux mutant business has been annoying as gently caress from start to finish. Retcon Ms. Marvel as having been a mutant all along, throw the rest on a rocket ship to another planet, and we're good.
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2016 06:40
|
|
Rhyno posted:Well there's been lots of X-Men stuff happening since summer ended. We're getting a lot of new toys, a full comic relaunch, a TV show that supposedly Marvel had a ton of input on. It'd be pretty awesome if the Inhumans house of cards collapsed based on the rumor that the X-Men were coming home. I knew of the comic relaunch, but didn't know they were even getting new toys and stuff. Honestly, the whole "fading out the x-men" was too tinfoil-y but dropping mutants from group t-shirts and stuff was noticeable, so i'll be happy if they're back in group merch.
|
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2016 06:45
|
|
|
ArmyOfMidgets posted:I knew of the comic relaunch, but didn't know they were even getting new toys and stuff. Honestly, the whole "fading out the x-men" was too tinfoil-y but dropping mutants from group t-shirts and stuff was noticeable, so i'll be happy if they're back in group merch. I haven't seen anything with them back in the group merch yet, but there's a ton of POP VINYLs coming out and more waves of Marvel Legends. I think I saw something about more ARTFX statues in 2017 as well.
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2016 07:06
|
|
|
Every time the inhumans get brought up for literally any reason the level of petty vindictiveness against them is really gross. I don't really especially like the x-men but I have nothing against people who do (besides adult Scott likers.) and wish their ccomics/movies were good because hey, not everything is for me and thats, you know, fine. Also it doesn't affect me negatively if people like something I don't. But its like every time the inhumans come up for any reason two or three people who have clearly never actually read about the inhumans and certainly none of the Soule stuff, which has all been loving fantastic (uncanny 10 is probably the single best issue of comics I read this year) has to pipe in with how the inhumans suck (they don't) and how they are x-men knockoffs (they arent) and how it would give them infinite pleasure to see inhumans comics canceled forever as opposed to just not thinking about or reading them, like I do with 90% or more of the x-books.
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2016 08:03
|
|
|
Man gently caress the inhumans I am glad they are dead.
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2016 08:07
|
|
|
They ARE mutant rip offs, though-since the bomb went off, in turn wiping out the cool and interesting bits about them so Marvel could have their X-Men movies.
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2016 08:13
|
|
|
Conceptually I prefer mutants to Inhumans, given the icky caste system of the latter. But who knows, Marvel might make something good out of them. Having the X-Men back would be a boon, though, since Fox has mostly screwed up on handling them.
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2016 08:30
|
|
|
Petty Vindictiveness sums up BSS pretty well.
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2016 09:21
|
|
|
That's Batman's shameful secret. We're always angry.
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2016 09:22
|
|
|
I feel Inhumans generally have always been and will always be more interesting than almost all mutants. There are a few exceptions but for the most part I'd pick the Inhumans almost every time.
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2016 09:30
|
|
|
Lick! The! Whisk! posted:Every time the inhumans get brought up for literally any reason the level of petty vindictiveness against them is really gross. I don't really especially like the x-men but I have nothing against people who do (besides adult Scott likers.) The evolution of Scott Summers over the last 15 years or so has been one of the highlights of the line! That slow burn from idealism to fanaticism has been immensely satisfying and incredibly well-executed by multiple writers and I am prepared to die on this hill.
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2016 13:36
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 30, 2024 19:12 |
|
|
Inhumans on TV means we won't be seeing Medusa's power, I suppose. Hair effects like that are hard enough for movies so on a TV show they'd look like garbage. But hey, Black Bolt has the perfect power for a TV show. He never gets to use it!
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2016 13:37
|
|