|
So he accepted the apple already. Didn't take long.
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2016 19:04
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 2, 2024 09:13 |
|
|
If you look behind Trump you see a whole pile of apple cores.
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2016 19:05
|
|
|
https://youtu.be/YbRnO1-vYoc On a side note, I am thrilled to watch to watch Garrison's cartoons grow increasingly despondent. I'm curious to see what happens first, will Trump's hands will be drawn smaller or his gut larger?
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2016 19:06
|
|
|
The Ape of Naples posted:They won't care For context, what has the bigger Obama supporters been saying about the promise of Obama closing Gitmo? What has been their reaction to that?
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2016 19:12
|
|
|
Regalingualius posted:Yeah, no, Stantis is way rougher at lining than that. For comparison:  prefect posted:I get where you're coming from, but I still think it's okay to remind white people that it's going to be worse for other people than it is for them. Careful, don't remind too hard. White Fragility posted:A cogent example of White Fragility occurred recently during a workplace anti-racism training I co-facilitated with an inter-racial team. One of the white participants left the session and went back to her desk, upset at receiving (what appeared to the training team as) sensitive and diplomatic feedback on how some of her statements had impacted several people of color in the room. At break, several other white participants approached us (the trainers) and reported that they had talked to the woman at her desk, and she was very upset that her statements had been challenged. They wanted to alert us to the fact that she literally “might be having a heart-attack.” Upon questioning from us, they clarified that they meant this literally. These co-workers were sincere in their fear that the young woman might actually physically die as a result of the feedback. Of course, when news of the woman’s potentially fatal condition reached the rest of the participant group, all attention was immediately focused back onto her and away from the impact she had had on the people of color.
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2016 19:28
|
|
|
Notable redhead Donald Trump. This looks like a quick doodle you'd do while brainstorming ideas for a cartoon, not a finished product.
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2016 19:57
|
|
|
Internet Webguy posted:
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2016 20:06
|
|
|
As a definite expert on this subject, though, I can safely say that Trump doesn't belong in the fun clown balloon, and that he would be kicked out!
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2016 20:07
|
|
|
 1 2 3
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2016 20:34
|
|
|
Space Cadet Omoly posted:There's never going to be a wall because it would be a huge unfeasible money sink to build and Hillary isn't going to be locked up either. 4 years from now Garrison will be saying "any day now, any day he's going to deliver." Assuming we're not all dead by then, anyway.
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2016 20:37
|
|
|
Trump's tiny hands will never not be funny.
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2016 20:58
|
|
|
Ularg posted:I can't wait for the supporter implosion when they realize Trump won't keep his campaign promises like every other candidate ever. He'll blame minorities. And they'll lap it up.
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2016 21:08
|
|
|
Matt Lubchanksy, the Nihilist Nihilist Boy, is sad sad as usual So You Live in a Nightmare Hellzone... Tips on how to survive the next 4ish years       I'm not mad at Schumer rn but I really like that Schumer anyway
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2016 21:19
|
|
|
Allyson Shwed and Gerardo Alba on mexicans reactions to Donald Trump.
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2016 21:51
|
|
|
logger posted:Trump's tiny hands will never not be funny. Good, because you better believe we'll be seeing a lot of them for the next four years at a minimum.
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2016 21:53
|
|
|
Lubchansky makes me irrationally angry.
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2016 21:55
|
|
|
If Trump compromises, he will gain divine wisdom, learn the difference between good and evil, and pave the way for our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ to walk the earth. If he doesn't, the status quo will remain untouchable for all eternity.
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2016 22:02
|
|
|
So.. what exactly is NRO? I've seen it twice next to Bill Kristol and assume it's something anti-semitic, but I have no idea what it's supposed to be.
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2016 22:14
|
|
|
How... how the gently caress can this be intended to read any other way than Obama trying to forge a new path and lamenting that America chose to repeat the mistakes of the past instead?  I mean, it's obviously meant to be an anti-Obama cartoon and I guess it's trying to say,"Barack Obama - the first black President of the United States of America - won't be remembered by history" but the execution is stunningly bad. Edit: Nope I'm just a dummy who didn't get the obvious "Obama wanted to take the country left but America is going right." Putting "history" in there muddies the waters but it still should have been obvious. Jerusalem fucked around with this message at 22:22 on Nov 16, 2016 |
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2016 22:15
|
|
|
Cpt.Americant posted:So.. what exactly is NRO? I've seen it twice next to Bill Kristol and assume it's something anti-semitic, but I have no idea what it's supposed to be. National Review Online, for which Kristol writes.
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2016 22:16
|
|
|
Captain_Maclaine posted:National Review Online, for which Kristol writes. Wait, is the National Review Online different than the National Review? Or did they just add the "online" recently to the official name to seem less like a dinosaur?
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2016 22:17
|
|
|
Jerusalem posted:How... how the gently caress can this be intended to read any other way than Obama trying to forge a new path and lamenting that America chose to repeat the mistakes of the past instead? Both paths lead to into stormy, dark clouds, too, so apparently we were doomed either way.
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2016 22:23
|
|
|
Jerusalem posted:How... how the gently caress can this be intended to read any other way than Obama trying to forge a new path and lamenting that America chose to repeat the mistakes of the past instead? i don't want to defend a mccoy but maybe the stupid shithead that made that comic meant it in the hegelian sense of a dialectical progression instead of "stuff that happened in the past" E: I missed your edit, that's almost certainly what he meant
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2016 22:26
|
|
|
Cpt.Americant posted:Wait, is the National Review Online different than the National Review? Or did they just add the "online" recently to the official name to seem less like a dinosaur? The latter, as far as I know.
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2016 22:27
|
|
|
Bicyclops posted:Both paths lead to into stormy, dark clouds, too, so apparently we were doomed either way. That's actually black smoke from all the coal-powered factories President Trump had built.
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2016 22:31
|
|
|
Throatwarbler posted:Oh come on it's clearly saying doctrinal agreement on the issue of homosexuality, which is accurate. Not really. I'm sure I could find sects throughout church history that disagreed. The Gnostics had full-on orgies for Christ. Of course, as someone above me pointed out, the answer there is to declare them "not real Christians."
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2016 22:32
|
|
|
"Yeah French people are awful" says a 10-year old fleeing America. I also love the idea that Trump listening to people who have actual experience is a bad thing in Ben's eyes. KillerQueen fucked around with this message at 22:50 on Nov 16, 2016 |
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2016 22:45
|
|
2
|
Cpt.Americant posted:Wait, is the National Review Online different than the National Review? Or did they just add the "online" recently to the official name to seem less like a dinosaur? National Review Online has the content from the paper version, plus a bunch of blogs and articles and "news". It's like the difference between Time.com and Time magazine. They also have a daily Cartoon, which is inevitably either Payne or Ramirez.
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2016 23:35
|
|
|
Selachian posted:Just came across this. Apologies if it's been posted already. amazing
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2016 23:36
|
|
|
 Guardian:  "Steve Bell on plans for Brexit – Whitehall is struggling to cope with the scale of work generated by the Brexit vote and the lack of a common strategy among cabinet ministers, according to a report about a leaked Cabinet Office memo" Telegraph:  Independent:  Times: 
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2016 23:36
|
|
|
Cloud Potato posted:Independent:
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2016 23:49
|
|
|
Is it just me or is the british political cartoon aesthetic just a little too jarring?
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2016 23:50
|
|
|
Selachian posted:Just came across this. Apologies if it's been posted already. See, I don't get Mr. Fish. He has probably the clearest divide between his great work and his crap stuff, and an obvious sign of what the differing factor between them is. Is it just that he can't think of that many brilliant pull no punches purely visual pieces, and when pressed will just write down what he's thinking without any editing? I'm almost amazed Garrison resisted the urge to give Trump a gigantic fig leaf to imply he has a huge dick.
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2016 23:54
|
|
|
Les Affaires posted:Is it just me or is the british political cartoon aesthetic just a little too jarring? I just don't get why they have to hit you over the head with "politicians are grotesque barely human monsters" in every single strip, it feels really one-note and trite but I know nothing about political cartooning in the UK and maybe there's a reason for it
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2016 23:59
|
|
|
OldMemes posted:Notable redhead Donald Trump. This looks like a quick doodle you'd do while brainstorming ideas for a cartoon, not a finished product. I think it's supposed to be stupid. e as in read in a baby's voice Telephones fucked around with this message at 00:04 on Nov 17, 2016 |
|
#
?
Nov 17, 2016 00:01
|
|
|
Les Affaires posted:Is it just me or is the british political cartoon aesthetic just a little too jarring? yeah they're basically unbearable to look at and the symbolism used is a bit annoying if you don't follow them pretty much continuously and/or live here
|
|
#
?
Nov 17, 2016 00:19
|
|
|
nigel really looks like that though
|
|
#
?
Nov 17, 2016 00:23
|
|
|
Im sure everyone will be pleased to hear there's now a >0% chance of a John McNaughton painting hanging in the White House: http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2016/11/will-trump-hang-art-of-obama-trampling-the-constitution.html
|
|
#
?
Nov 17, 2016 00:26
|
|
|
It's an era too late I know, but did anyone talk about how swamps are a necessary part of the ecosystem and shouldn't be drained just because we don't like them?
|
|
#
?
Nov 17, 2016 00:32
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 2, 2024 09:13 |
|
|
Volcanic Vents posted:Im sure everyone will be pleased to hear there's now a >0% chance of a John McNaughton painting hanging in the White House: Like Trump won't just hang up a picture of himself.
|
|
#
?
Nov 17, 2016 00:34
|
|
