|
I did not see a football move on that "catch"
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2016 03:20
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 10, 2024 01:21 |
|
|
Infidel Castro posted:Not quite. Now if Cook had torn an ACL and needed to go on IR, then it would be. All the while giving up a big pass over the middle whilst on defense
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2016 03:20
|
|
|
Thats not a touchdown.
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2016 03:20
|
|
|
has aaron rodgers ever been sacked
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2016 03:20
|
|
|
gently caress the Packers forever if this holds up
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2016 03:20
|
|
|
clear touchdown
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2016 03:21
|
|
|
I wonder what a catch is?
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2016 03:20
|
|
|
Refs are loving us tonight. Water wet.
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2016 03:21
|
|
|
i'm pretty sure if you're on two feet the football move is not necessary in the end zone unless you're going to the ground, i know it's loving weird and stupid
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2016 03:21
|
|
|
Jordy Nelson is not called "Golden Tate," the touchdown is invalid.
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2016 03:21
|
|
|
R.D. Mangles posted:has aaron rodgers ever been sacked Quite a bit, actually!
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2016 03:21
|
|
|
what the hell is happening
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2016 03:21
|
|
|
R.D. Mangles posted:has aaron rodgers ever been sacked marshall newhouse and that other gently caress, what was his name, allen barbie
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2016 03:22
|
|
|
that being said, referees often decide a touchdown means different things almost every week so who loving knows
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2016 03:22
|
|
|
I like how they are jettisoning that whole football move thing. The NFL is just to stubborn to admit they made a mistake on the original Calvin Johnson call so we had to do that whole thing, take it to the ridiculous extreme and slowly walk it back down to whatever catches were before that play.
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2016 03:23
|
|
|
Quest For Glory II posted:i'm pretty sure if you're on two feet the football move is not necessary in the end zone unless you're going to the ground, i know it's loving weird and stupid
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2016 03:23
|
|
|
lmfao thanks for the gift refs
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2016 03:23
|
|
|
That's not a td lol
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2016 03:23
|
|
|
Thats a bullshit touchdown but it wouldn't have mattered because they woulda got it thanks to that penalty anyways.
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2016 03:23
|
|
|
Bullshit. Even Jordy Nelson was grimacing after the refs upheld that. He knew it shouldn't be a TD
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2016 03:23
|
|
|
That's some bullshit.
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2016 03:23
|
|
|
Thanked you Based Refs
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2016 03:24
|
|
|
that should absolutely be a touchdown.
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2016 03:24
|
|
|
Yeah thats bullshit but god drat a 19 play drive or some poo poo. Get off the field defense.
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2016 03:24
|
|
|
If that wouldn't have been a fumble it shouldn't be a touchdown. But...its the Packers so.... 
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2016 03:24
|
|
|
Good freaking god catches are a state of mind
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2016 03:25
|
|
|
I don't think the "football move" rule applies in the end zone because once you've caught the ball the play is over and there are no football moves left to make. Except gyrating your hips for a 15 yard penalty.
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2016 03:25
|
|
|
One thing I hate about Aaron Rodgers is that he will sometimes abuse the rules to protect QBs, such as when he runs to the sidelines to look like he's going out or bounds but then suddenly turns up field. I'm glad the refs didn't allow him to flop on the ground and then pretend like he wasn't giving himself up.
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2016 03:25
|
|
|
anyway my dream of a 7-7 tie is alive
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2016 03:25
|
|
|
pro starcraft loser posted:Refs are loving us tonight.
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2016 03:25
|
|
|
Spudsly posted:I like how they are jettisoning that whole football move thing. The NFL is just to stubborn to admit they made a mistake on the original Calvin Johnson call so we had to do that whole thing, take it to the ridiculous extreme and slowly walk it back down to whatever catches were before that play. they aren't though. the point of a football move is to gain yardage and when you are in the endzone it doesn't matter. it's basically going out of bounds catch rules
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2016 03:25
|
|
|
Quest For Glory II posted:i'm pretty sure if you're on two feet the football move is not necessary in the end zone unless you're going to the ground, i know it's loving weird and stupid Maybe, but there was one in the playoffs with the ravens vs the pats (the one where they then missed the field goal on the next play and lost) that looked a lot like that but with a lot more time in hand for the receiver. I think the answer is that they are trying to bring it back to the "would your mom have said he caught the ball?" standard. Edit: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yIH-GrnnPVM
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2016 03:25
|
|
|
Petite Dinklage posted:Thanked you Based Refs you're missing an "i"
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2016 03:25
|
|
|
hifi posted:they aren't though. the point of a football move is to gain yardage and when you are in the endzone it doesn't matter. it's basically going out of bounds catch rules If it's not a catch in the field it's not a catch in the end zone.
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2016 03:26
|
|
|
Democrazy posted:One thing I hate about Aaron Rodgers is that he will sometimes abuse the rules to protect QBs, such as when he runs to the sidelines to look like he's going out or bounds but then suddenly turns up field. I'm glad the refs didn't allow him to flop on the ground and then pretend like he wasn't giving himself up. Peyton got a big gain out of that BS move in the playoffs vs the Steelers last year 
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2016 03:26
|
|
|
At what point did TV executives decide that what the nation needs is live musicals on television? It seems like if you really liked that sort of thing you'd go support some local arts.
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2016 03:26
|
|
|
Spudsly posted:Maybe, but there was one in the playoffs with the ravens vs the pats (the one where they then missed the field goal on the next play and lost) that looked a lot like that but with a lot more time in hand for the receiver. I think the answer is that they are trying to bring it back to the "would your mom have said he caught the ball?" standard.
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2016 03:27
|
|
|
The Little Kielbasa posted:I don't think the "football move" rule applies in the end zone because once you've caught the ball the play is over and there are no football moves left to make. Yeah I think this is the way the rulebook works. It's pretty annoying that if the exact same thing happened on a sliding catch it wouldn't count though.
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2016 03:27
|
|
|
tk posted:If it's not a catch in the field it's not a catch in the end zone. i'm with you if he was in the process of tucking it away to gain possession as al or chris or whoever said, then that means he didn't have possession i mean, if it's only a catch "but for the defender" then it's dumb because the defender's job is to prevent the catch or maybe i'm just dumb
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2016 03:27
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 10, 2024 01:21 |
|
|
Grittybeard posted:At what point did TV executives decide that what the nation needs is live musicals on television? It's real cheap to produce and probably better overall than reality TV.
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2016 03:27
|
|