|
RENEGADE CUCKSKY posted:It begins: Ugh.
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2016 17:14
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 23, 2024 04:53 |
|
|
Webb was part of ending George Allen's political career, and for that reason alone I can't hate the guy. The main thing I remember about Chafee is that fishmech liked him a lot. Draw what conclusions you will.
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2016 17:14
|
|
|
GlyphGryph posted:Hey, I got some info! Awesome. I live in Candler and commute to Bulloch to work so either place is fine for me. Mind sending me the info for how I can get in touch with him?
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2016 17:15
|
|
|
RENEGADE CUCKSKY posted:It begins: if only there were a way to make rules nation-wide to avoid this sort of state versus state worker killing bullshit...
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2016 17:20
|
|
|
Karl Sharks posted:soros already gets called the leftist version of the koch brothers Well until he gets the memo that living above their expectations isn't doing us much good we can't hold rallies to hoot and holler like idiots while being effective
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2016 17:20
|
|
|
Der Meister posted:if only there were a way to make rules nation-wide to avoid this sort of state versus state worker killing bullshit... don't worry, in the next several years Friedrichs will be reheard and the new SCOTUS pick will help write the 5-4 opinion on nationwide public RTW. Next, that precedent will be used to push a nationwide private RTW. God bless!
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2016 17:26
|
|
|
Fulchrum posted:Maybe you should have searched for a better example than the rein of terror. The reign of terror was a good thing.
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2016 17:27
|
|
|
Tight Booty Shorts posted:The reign of terror was a good thing. bold claim
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2016 17:29
|
|
|
Tight Booty Shorts posted:The reign of terror was a good thing. the name, admittedly, was a bit of a PR blunder
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2016 17:30
|
|
|
Tatum Girlparts posted:bold claim Are you suggesting that the nobility should have kept the people of France starving and poor?
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2016 17:31
|
|
|
Tight Booty Shorts posted:The reign of terror was a good thing. ...for Napoleon
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2016 17:31
|
|
|
You know what was a good plan for France, The Law of Suspects
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2016 17:32
|
|
|
Tight Booty Shorts posted:Are you suggesting that the nobility should have kept the people of France starving and poor? do you know what the reign of terror was, because it wasn't the actual revolution...
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2016 17:33
|
|
|
Tight Booty Shorts in 1793: "The Girondins are the corrupt establishment so anything done to stop them is actually good for France"
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2016 17:35
|
|
|
the reign of terror was actually cool and good - freidrich engels
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2016 17:39
|
|
|
Serf posted:Awesome. I live in Candler and commute to Bulloch to work so either place is fine for me. Mind sending me the info for how I can get in touch with him? Send me an email at glyphgryph@gmail.com and I'll include you in the e-mail chain.
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2016 17:40
|
|
|
if beheading the aristocracy is wrong I don't want to be right
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2016 17:41
|
|
|
Also it's not actually okay to murder people even if they're rich.
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2016 17:41
|
|
|
Tatum Girlparts posted:bold claim are you saying liberalism shouldn't crush its enemies both internal and external?
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2016 17:41
|
|
|
Tatum Girlparts posted:do you know what the reign of terror was, because it wasn't the actual revolution... The two go hand in hand. I'm glad the nobility and their allies were taken out and guillotined. Yea some of the poo poo that happened was bad, but revolutions are messy and bloody things. It also scared the hell out of the Catholic Church.
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2016 17:42
|
|
|
Raskolnikov38 posted:if beheading the aristocracy is wrong I don't want to be right
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2016 17:42
|
|
|
docbeard posted:Also it's not actually okay to murder people even if they're rich. What if killing those rich people means you can save more lives in the long run?
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2016 17:42
|
|
|
docbeard posted:Also it's not actually okay to murder people even if they're rich. or if they knew a rich person, or if they ever say 'maybe it's hosed up you're just murdering people in the streets', or if they looked at a Jacobin crossways
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2016 17:42
|
|
|
docbeard posted:Also it's not actually okay to murder people even if they're rich. I would argue it is only ok to murder people if they are rich, actually
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2016 17:43
|
|
|
Raskolnikov38 posted:if beheading the aristocracy is wrong I don't want to be right
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2016 17:43
|
|
|
docbeard posted:Also it's not actually okay to murder people even if they're rich. that sounds fake but okay
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2016 17:43
|
|
|
Tight Booty Shorts posted:The two go hand in hand. I'm glad the nobility and their allies were taken out and guillotined. Yea some of the poo poo that happened was bad, but revolutions are messy and bloody things. I genuinely am unsure if you fully know what happened in the reign of terror if you think this is a summary of what went down. Like, that's like saying the House Un American Activity Committee was actually good because it caught communists and their allies. A poo poo ton of the people murdered weren't actually part of that group.
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2016 17:44
|
|
|
Robespierre did nothing wrong
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2016 17:44
|
|
|
Tatum Girlparts posted:or if they knew a rich person, or if they ever say 'maybe it's hosed up you're just murdering people in the streets', or if they looked at a Jacobin crossways Or if they're a poor person who said "hey, this revolution isn't actually helping us the way they promised it would".
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2016 17:45
|
|
|
resar posted:Robespierre did nothing wrong The funny thing about the Reign of Terror is that this sentence could be parsed as either a pro- or an anti-Reign-Of-Terror statement
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2016 17:47
|
|
|
docbeard posted:Or if they're a poor person who said "hey, this revolution isn't actually helping us the way they promised it would". or if they were literally anyone in arms reach when the Jacobins decided they needed to do a certain amount of bloodshed a day to keep their whole 'horrific reputation' thing going and they were behind quota at the moment. That isn't even slander from opposition, Jacobins themselves were pretty open about constant violence being an important tool, shockingly that tended to lead to a lot of just randos being murdered.
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2016 17:47
|
|
|
Like, it started off all in good fun, hey, let's murder the aristocrats, they're useless a-holes anyway but then by the end of it the jacobins were guillotining each other based on whose subfaction was losing more arguments this week
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2016 17:48
|
|
|
Tatum Girlparts posted:I genuinely am unsure if you fully know what happened in the reign of terror if you think this is a summary of what went down. Like, that's like saying the House Un American Activity Committee was actually good because it caught communists and their allies. A poo poo ton of the people murdered weren't actually part of that group. Like I said before- some bad poo poo happened. But they also executed the French nobility. Which I think is a good thing.
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2016 17:49
|
|
|
I would have settled for imprisonment
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2016 17:49
|
|
|
loquacius posted:Like, it started off all in good fun, hey, let's murder the aristocrats, they're useless a-holes anyway Yup things got out of hand. Woopsie daisy!
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2016 17:50
|
|
|
loquacius posted:Like, it started off all in good fun, hey, let's murder the aristocrats, they're useless a-holes anyway pretty much. No one's gonna claim the revolution itself was a bad idea, because gently caress the king and his lackeys, but let's not pretend the time mainly dominated by a constant power vacuum filled with guys who's main objective was 'murder everyone I hate as fast as possible before I get murdered back' was actually a v. good and leftist time.
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2016 17:50
|
|
|
Tight Booty Shorts posted:Yup things got out of hand. Woopsie daisy! - Stalin to the Ukraine
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2016 17:51
|
|
|
This is why in the course of SA shitposting I tend to argue against guillotining the rich in favor of tarring and feathering the rich Have you guys ever played the card game Guillotine though, because it's cool and good
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2016 17:51
|
|
docbeard posted:Also it's not actually okay to murder people even if they're rich. what the gently caress is this neoliberal bullshit
|
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2016 17:52
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 23, 2024 04:53 |
|
|
loquacius posted:This is why in the course of SA shitposting I tend to argue against guillotining the rich in favor of tarring and feathering the rich That's the revolution card game where you have to collect heads and avoid/trick your friends into beheading 'martyr' classed nobles and all, right? If so yea that game rules.
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2016 17:54
|
|