|
Raskolnikov38 posted:if beheading the
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2016 17:55
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 24, 2024 01:41 |
|
|
we have to take these ahligachs to the guillotines and tell them "we ah ending your greed for you"
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2016 17:56
|
|
|
Fullhouse posted:we have to take these ahligachs to the guillotines and tell them "we ah ending your greed for you" Yeah p much. Take the capital. Administrate it democratically. Look at anyone whining about economic growth like the pitiful idiot they are.
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2016 17:59
|
|
|
Setting aside the bold correctness of "killing people is bad" as a position, Isn't it more satisfying to take their power and money away and make them watch it happen?
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2016 17:59
|
|
|
Tatum Girlparts posted:That's the revolution card game where you have to collect heads and avoid/trick your friends into beheading 'martyr' classed nobles and all, right? If so yea that game rules. I am really good at Guillotine because I can clearly imagine myself destroying the decadent rich for the satisfaction of a cheering crowd and my own glorification and it feels good IRL of course I am strictly a tar-and-feathers advocate all the way
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2016 18:02
|
|
|
Tatum Girlparts posted:- Stalin to the Ukraine -Obama to America
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2016 18:05
|
|
|
docbeard posted:Setting aside the bold correctness of "killing people is bad" as a position, I think it's much better to take their power and money (which they stole anyway) and then behead them.
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2016 18:06
|
|
|
Hey why do Democrats hate activism that isn't cop hugging and love DAPL?
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2016 18:07
|
|
|
docbeard posted:Setting aside the bold correctness of "killing people is bad" as a position, Not if they might be able to take it back
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2016 18:07
|
|
|
SHY NUDIST GRRL posted:Not if they might be able to take it back It's really hard to take back your money and power when you are a feathery tar golem
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2016 18:08
|
|
|
NumberLast posted:Hey why do Democrats hate activism that isn't cop hugging and love DAPL? what
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2016 18:08
|
|
|
NumberLast posted:Hey why do Democrats hate activism that isn't cop hugging and love DAPL? Hey now, they love themselves some charity 5ks.
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2016 18:09
|
|
|
Right wing populism is winning worldwide because left wing populism is strangled in the crib.
NumberLast has issued a correction as of 18:19 on Nov 21, 2016 |
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2016 18:17
|
|
|
loquacius posted:It's really hard to take back your money and power when you are a feathery tar golem we'd need to use the good bituminous tar tho none of this pussyass pine tar poo poo i wanna see these people disfigured permanently
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2016 18:24
|
|
|
NumberLast posted:Right wing populism is winning worldwide because left wing populism is strangled in the crib. What gets more views though? A train wreck or a successful plane landing? (what I'm saying is gently caress the media)
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2016 18:25
|
|
|
NumberLast posted:Hey why do Democrats hate activism that isn't cop hugging and love DAPL? Most people are just indifferent
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2016 18:25
|
|
|
what the gently caress
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2016 18:26
|
|
|
Heard about this in the Dem Primary 2020 thread and, well, lol
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2016 18:29
|
|
|
lmao
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2016 18:30
|
|
|
I hope all the sellouts that cozy up to Trump get primaried and thrown out like what happened within the GOP
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2016 18:31
|
|
|
loquacius posted:It's really hard to take back your money and power when you are a feathery tar golem Not when you have the conscripted continental armies of the world aristocracy at your back, whipped into killing foreigners so they can smuggle republicanism in its crib and restore your hereditary titles. Fighting an aristocratic nobility isn't like seizing the assets of a capitalist and sending them to a re-education camp. So long as they're alive, then their titles are too. There's always some reactionary group out there that dreams of restoring the monarchy and its attendant class. Their mere existence represents an existential threat to the revolution. Even nowadays, there are long dispossessed heirs of German nobility running around, who plenty of dork nerds cream their jeans over re-instating as sovereigns.
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2016 18:31
|
|
|
Trump said he looks forward to working with Chuck Schumer. I haven't heard anything about Chucky protesting, so I'm guessing he's already dreaming of how much Homeland Defense money he can grab.
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2016 18:33
|
|
|
It would be hilarious(ly awful) if Trump were to stake out every prominent Democrat who even remotely has a chance in 2020 and offer them positions in his administration. Even if they turn him down, that'd probably be enough to poison them in some folks' eyes.
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2016 18:36
|
|
|
turtle_07 posted:NYC Goons: you might consider putting this in the NYC LAN thread?
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2016 18:36
|
|
|
bump_fn posted:you might consider putting this in the NYC LAN thread? Good call. Good call. I'll post it there as well.
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2016 18:40
|
|
|
Pener Kropoopkin posted:Trump said he looks forward to working with Chuck Schumer. I haven't heard anything about Chucky protesting, so I'm guessing he's already dreaming of how much Homeland Defense money he can grab. On one hand, that's what the PEOTUS is supposed to say. On the other, gently caress Schumer for not pulling a McConnell. I know Reid would.
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2016 18:40
|
|
|
Someone tell me what this says, I'm out of free articles there.
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2016 18:41
|
|
|
GlyphGryph posted:Someone tell me what this says, I'm out of free articles there. Tulsi Gabbard met with Trump regarding the possibility of a seat on his cabinet (State/Def probably) He's probably still trying to maintain the illusion that he is Above Party Politics despite filling most of his cabinet with Republican hacks already; I don't know WHAT her deal is because the fact that she's hawkish as poo poo on Muslims has always been her achilles heel w/r/t progressivism She's either trying to worm her way in to do some good in what ways she can, or she really wants to bomb some muslims, it's not clear yet
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2016 18:43
|
|
|
Pener Kropoopkin posted:Trump said he looks forward to working with Chuck Schumer. I haven't heard anything about Chucky protesting, so I'm guessing he's already dreaming of how much Homeland Defense money he can grab. If you are selling yourself as a principled progressive who doesn't compromise then compromising is a bit of a bigger deal than if someone who sells themselves as a slime monster compromises
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2016 18:45
|
|
|
I had heard he was floating Gabbard's name but lol @ her actually meeting him
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2016 18:48
|
|
|
docbeard posted:It would be hilarious(ly awful) if Trump were to stake out every prominent Democrat who even remotely has a chance in 2020 and offer them positions in his administration. Even if they turn him down, that'd probably be enough to poison them in some folks' eyes. Hopefully those folks are all part of the DEMe and they can gently caress off with their black and white world views.
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2016 18:53
|
|
|
Powercrazy posted:Hopefully those folks are all part of the DEMe and they can gently caress off with their black and white world views. ....you're kidding right? Do you think it was the 'establishment' that spent the last primary yelling about purity?
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2016 18:54
|
|
|
actually trump is above party politics by appointing people who were too insane for either party before
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2016 18:54
|
|
|
Tatum Girlparts posted:....you're kidding right? Do you think it was the 'establishment' that spent the last primary yelling about purity? Speaking as someone who had a dissenting opinion from them this cycle, yes (it was both)
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2016 18:55
|
|
|
Tatum Girlparts posted:....you're kidding right? Do you think it was the 'establishment' that spent the last primary yelling about purity? Remind me again, who said that a vote for gary johnson was a vote for trump? Who is bitching and moaning about progressives potentially joining the trump admin? Who claimed Bernie wasn't a "real" democrat?
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2016 18:56
|
|
|
Powercrazy posted:Remind me again, who said that a vote for gary johnson was a vote for trump? Who is bitching and moaning about progressives potentially joining the trump admin?  (dont forget bullshit purity tests)
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2016 19:00
|
|
|
powerCRAZY
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2016 19:01
|
|
|
Bernie wasn't a real democrat though. He's actually a wooden puppet that jangled shiny keys around for his target audience. 
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2016 19:07
|
|
|
Powercrazy posted:Remind me again, who said that a vote for gary johnson was a vote for trump? Who is bitching and moaning about progressives potentially joining the trump admin? He wasn't. But we're going to change what is a real democrat.
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2016 19:18
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 24, 2024 01:41 |
|
|
Bill Buckner posted:Bernie wasn't a real democrat though. Not a puppet. Not a puppet. You're the puppet.
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2016 19:19
|
|