Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
Condiv
May 7, 2008

Sorry to undo the effort of paying a domestic abuser $10 to own this poster, but I am going to lose my dang mind if I keep seeing multiple posters who appear to be Baloogan.

With love,
a mod


Paradoxish posted:

I don't know whether CS programs teach agile (although I'd be shocked if they didn't), but yes, project and resource management is a huge part of traditional engineering programs. Engineering students are generally required to take several courses that are either purely or partially focused on project management. Does that give you the same skill set as someone who has years of experience or training in project management? Of course not, but it is something that's taught and emphasized.

Engineering programs really tend to straddle the line between regular degree programs and job-focused trade stuff. There's a lot of time spent on working in teams, building leadership skills, managing projects, etc. The problem is that a lot of students either brush that stuff off or the skills just don't take.

CS programs don't even teach version control systems or build systems a lot of the time

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Fojar38
Sep 2, 2011


Sorry I meant to say I hope that the police use maximum force and kill or maim a bunch of innocent people, thus paving a way for a proletarian uprising and socialist utopia


also here's a stupid take
---------------------------->

https://poldev.revues.org/1803#tocfrom2n14

quote:

Several issues trouble Singaporean education at the present time. One is that the dominant focus on economic growth and the yoking of the education system to serve manpower needs has meant that both policy makers and citizens adopt an instrumental view of education, notwithstanding rhetoric and calls for holistic education. The curricula emphasis on languages, science, and mathematics has meant a neglect of the humanities. The system is regarded as having become obsessed with certification and parents invest large sums in private tuition. Competition to get into the top schools, programmes in universities, and polytechnics is intense. This orientation has consequences for Singapore’s aspirations to be a major player in the Knowledge-based Economy (KBE). The KBE rewards twenty-first century competencies such as creativity, resilience, entrepreneurship, and communication skills; the present performance orientation is ill suited to meet the needs of such an economy.

More practically you can take the case of China, where prestige and family ties demand STEM educations and since it's an autocracy the humanities are heavily propagandized garbage, which has resulted in a bunch of companies full of people who have good individual technical skills but no clue what to do with them short of copy what's happening in the West and get cheap loans from the government (who is poo poo at governing because it's an autocracy and political science is also heavily propagandized)

FactsAreUseless
Feb 16, 2011

Confounding Factor posted:

Too many universities in this country are nothing more than education resorts, instead of teaching students the skills and knowledge they can use. Someone who graduates with a humanities degree is the most costly to a taxpayer but also the least employable.
"Not enough STEM majors" is not the problem with American universities.

ThePeavstenator
Dec 18, 2012

:burger::burger::burger::burger::burger:

Establish the Buns

:burger::burger::burger::burger::burger:
I say this as an engineer: a lot of engineers can be really loving dumb. The problem is that it's a profession where all you need is a degree. There aren't independent professional societies that you are required to be certified by which takes away the boot in the rear end that makes you keep up with technology and practice. Employers don't always know what to screen for and there are enough jobs available to where having a degree pretty much ensures you'll be able to find work (for most fields). The good engineers end up in management, where they no longer directly do engineering. So you end up with this vicious cycle where career advancement involves no longer directly working in your profession. Then the older guys with experience are tasked with problem solving and they got to where they are because they aren't that easy to replace and they eventually made projects that work by bashing their head against a wall repeatedly.

peter banana
Sep 2, 2008

Feminism is a socialist, anti-family, political movement that encourages women to leave their husbands, kill their children, practice witchcraft, destroy capitalism and become lesbians.

Paradoxish posted:

I don't know whether CS programs teach agile (although I'd be shocked if they didn't), but yes, project and resource management is a huge part of traditional engineering programs. Engineering students are generally required to take several courses that are either purely or partially focused on project management. Does that give you the same skill set as someone who has years of experience or training in project management? Of course not, but it is something that's taught and emphasized.

Engineering programs really tend to straddle the line between regular degree programs and job-focused trade stuff. There's a lot of time spent on working in teams, building leadership skills, managing projects, etc. The problem is that many students either brush that stuff off or the skills just don't take.

Yeah, and I would characterize humanities the same way. Essays and theses are exercises in developing critical thought and arguments and cultivating the research techniques and discipline to make an argument all the way through to prove your point. I think of it as "applied critical thought" in a way if that makes sense? Once you gain those skills, you move into the professional world, and that analytical focus becomes more necessary, and you also have developed skills to see where the holes are in other systems of argumentation.

Also, developing communication skills and writing effectively are loving core competencies in basically any workplace where there are other humans. I am not arguing that either STEM or humanities are better than the other. Ideally, we would have a well-rounded higher education. Alternatively, better yet, there wouldn't be such economic and social stigma against more applied professional training. I hope if unionization sees a resurgence as part of the next phase of leftist politics, trade unionism can fill in that gap and take on the applied training role that I think has fallen to higher education. Which should not be the case, IMO.

theblackw0lf
Apr 15, 2003

"...creating a vision of the sort of society you want to have in miniature"
Man this could really happen

https://twitter.com/BretLemoine/status/801557092406624256

Gyra_Solune
Apr 24, 2014

Kyun kyun
Kyun kyun
Watashi no kare wa louse

the phrase 'could really happen' and 'green party' don't really go together

Xae
Jan 19, 2005

Fojar38 posted:

https://poldev.revues.org/1803#tocfrom2n14


More practically you can take the case of China, where prestige and family ties demand STEM educations and since it's an autocracy the humanities are heavily propagandized garbage, which has resulted in a bunch of companies full of people who have good individual technical skills but no clue what to do with them short of copy what's happening in the West and get cheap loans from the government (who is poo poo at governing because it's an autocracy and political science is also heavily propagandized)

Those issues you describe are also problems inside of STEM and I think a ton of it is culture more than the education. Or rather the education is a reflection of the culture.

I can hand a new grad from the US a task of "design and build X" and they'll do it. They'll gently caress it up hard, but they'll do it. They'll love it too.

I have to handhold people with a decade of experience from offshore because they don't have any capability to operate independently.

peter banana posted:


Also, developing communication skills and writing effectively are loving core competencies in basically any workplace where there are other humans. I am not arguing that either STEM or humanities are better than the other.

A huge part of the problem is that the audiences are different. A communication that is worthless to Audience X may be exactly what Audience Y wants to see.

Xae fucked around with this message at 00:04 on Nov 24, 2016

ThePeavstenator
Dec 18, 2012

:burger::burger::burger::burger::burger:

Establish the Buns

:burger::burger::burger::burger::burger:

Fojar38 posted:

https://poldev.revues.org/1803#tocfrom2n14


More practically you can take the case of China, where prestige and family ties demand STEM educations and since it's an autocracy the humanities are heavily propagandized garbage, which has resulted in a bunch of companies full of people who have good individual technical skills but no clue what to do with them short of copy what's happening in the West and get cheap loans from the government (who is poo poo at governing because it's an autocracy and political science is also heavily propagandized)

To be fair, the main reason US students become engineers is because it's the default "makes a lot of money" career right now like lawyers were in the 80s and less "this will reflect well on our family if you do this".

Condiv
May 7, 2008

Sorry to undo the effort of paying a domestic abuser $10 to own this poster, but I am going to lose my dang mind if I keep seeing multiple posters who appear to be Baloogan.

With love,
a mod


so, assuming jill stein does uncover voter fraud and hillary becomes pres instead of trump (and we don't have a giant civil war). do the greens start to replace the dems? it's not a good look if your party hides while someone else figures out america was cheated

Samurai Sanders
Nov 4, 2003

Pillbug

Xae posted:

Are we really going to go off on a huge STEM/Non-STEM circle jerk?
A "circle jerk" would suggest that we all agree with each other about this and that is usually not the case, so the circle is broken and someone isn't gonna get jerked.

C2C - 2.0
May 14, 2006

Dubs In The Key Of Life


Lipstick Apathy

Xae posted:

Have any of you considered that your stereotyping of other fields of study is just as baseless and wrong as other people's stereotypes of your field of study?

I earned a Mass Comm degree in 2000. Feel free to stereotype it as a useless degree that's not worth the paper it's printed on. That stereotype would actually be true.

N. Senada
May 17, 2011

My kidneys are busted

Condiv posted:

so, assuming jill stein does uncover voter fraud and hillary becomes pres instead of trump (and we don't have a giant civil war). do the greens start to replace the dems? it's not a good look if your party hides while someone else figures out america was cheated

In this list of things I have a hard time believing could happen, the green party replacing the democratic party is perhaps the most insane.

So idk, maybe?

Fojar38
Sep 2, 2011


Sorry I meant to say I hope that the police use maximum force and kill or maim a bunch of innocent people, thus paving a way for a proletarian uprising and socialist utopia


also here's a stupid take
---------------------------->

N. Senada posted:

In this list of things I have a hard time believing could happen, the green party replacing the democratic party is perhaps the most insane.

So idk, maybe?

It's 2016

FactsAreUseless
Feb 16, 2011

Top 5 problems with American universities:

1. University administration is one of the most toxic, backstabbing, misogynist, racist fields in the world. I have never met anyone above faculty at a university whom I would trust to hold my coat, let alone trust with real power. But if you want to get away with a huge amount of sexual harassment in a good-ol'-boy culture while abusing petty power as a middle manager, here's the place for you!

2. Universities, and when I say this I mean almost universally every college in the United States, public or private, is deeply invested in a toxic college culture built around alcohol, athletics, and, you guessed it, misogyny. Administrators pay lip service to responsibility while selling branded beers and bottle openers, and encouraging a Greek system that mostly exists to cover up outright alcoholism among a largely underage student body. I bring up alcohol many times because, while people like to throw around overfunded and undersupervised athletic departments as the big problem, alcohol is a way bigger and more ubiquitous issue. And, related to point one, it comes straight from the top and isn't confined to athletics.

3. Nobody gives a poo poo about students. There is almost no regulation of classroom experiences. There is no recourse for discrimination by teachers, or just plain bad classes. The administration does not care, because that's not where universities make their money. And students are, after a year, in so much debt that leaving is a costly mistake, even more so than getting the degree. There is almost no way for students to know, before they go to school, whether they are going to a good school. And financial issues mean most students don't pick their schools that way anyway. Basically, schools can do whatever they want and nobody will give a poo poo, because whether or not classes are any good doesn't get schools onto Top 100 Schools lists, and it doesn't affect alumni donations, and it doesn't affect research money. Sure, there's accreditation, but when accreditation is all part of this same culture, well... what difference does it make?

4. Most schools are research institutions that also teach sometimes. You think the big money at a university is in athletics? Not even close. As valuable as STEM majors might be, they're also crazy understaffed. If you're getting a degree at a major university, you're probably not getting taught by any of those renowned researchers and professors that work there. You're getting taught by their grad students. Humanities are a little better, but points 1, 2, and 3 means that doesn't make a big difference. Yes, some very good research happens at the college level, but that doesn't translate into real education for students. Because of 3, professors aren't hired or paid based on their ability to teach. They're hired based on their ability to bring grant money to the university.

5. As mentioned in 3: there is no way for students to effectively pick a good school. The majority of students get funneled into one school or another because they get a scholarship there, or it's close to home, or in-state tuition is cheaper. If and when it turns out those schools are terrible, students can do poo poo. First, how would they know? Every college prep guide and list and article measures the success of schools based on things like exclusivity (an artificially-inflated joke measurement) and graduation rates, and maybe post-college job placement. And if you don't realize that post-college job placement has more to do with your economic status and connections than your education, well, good, because that's what these universities want. And once students are in, they're in. You can't get your money back. You can transfer to another school, maybe, but that's difficult and expensive.

Universities are garbage.

FAUXTON
Jun 2, 2005

spero che tu stia bene

Paradoxish posted:

Engineering programs really tend to straddle the line between regular degree programs and job-focused trade stuff. There's a lot of time spent on working in teams, building leadership skills, managing projects, etc. The problem is that a lot of students either brush that stuff off or the skills just don't take.

Not enough though, and certainly not enough in upper level work. Team boatbuilding projects in the intro to engineering class isn't going to cut it when an engineer gets out and starts poo poo-talking architects and draftsmen and designers over aesthetics because it'd be more practical their way.

PerniciousKnid
Sep 13, 2006

Condiv posted:

so, assuming jill stein does uncover voter fraud and hillary becomes pres instead of trump (and we don't have a giant civil war). do the greens start to replace the dems? it's not a good look if your party hides while someone else figures out america was cheated

In a world where impossible conspiracy theories come true, yes the Green party could ascend to dominance.

Quorum
Sep 24, 2014

REMIND ME AGAIN HOW THE LITTLE HORSE-SHAPED ONES MOVE?

FactsAreUseless posted:

Top 5 problems with American universities:

-snip-

All of this rings true to my experience, and makes me all the gladder to have attended a small, formerly all-female and still mostly-female liberal arts school where all teaching was done by the professors. I have friends who went on to grad school at research universities and their stories are almost universally horror stories.

Condiv
May 7, 2008

Sorry to undo the effort of paying a domestic abuser $10 to own this poster, but I am going to lose my dang mind if I keep seeing multiple posters who appear to be Baloogan.

With love,
a mod


N. Senada posted:

In this list of things I have a hard time believing could happen, the green party replacing the democratic party is perhaps the most insane.

So idk, maybe?

that the green party is initiating a recount on behalf of dems is already p insane. besides, we live in the trump dimension now, you should just go ahead and embrace insanity

FactsAreUseless
Feb 16, 2011

Quorum posted:

All of this rings true to my experience, and makes me all the gladder to have attended a small, formerly all-female and still mostly-female liberal arts school where all teaching was done by the professors. I have friends who went on to grad school at research universities and their stories are almost universally horror stories.
I didn't say it, because it's obvious, but universities really hate anyone who's not a middle-class 18-year-old whose parents are paying for college. The outright hostility to minorities, people who work, non-traditional students, and especially disabled people is unbelievable. Anyone who tells you colleges are liberal PC safe spaces is a liar with an agenda who must have had their eyes gouged out, because it's so blatantly not true.

Condiv
May 7, 2008

Sorry to undo the effort of paying a domestic abuser $10 to own this poster, but I am going to lose my dang mind if I keep seeing multiple posters who appear to be Baloogan.

With love,
a mod


PerniciousKnid posted:

In a world where impossible conspiracy theories come true, yes the Green party could ascend to dominance.

voter machine fraud isn't an impossible conspiracy theory, researchers have been demonstrating hacks for years and we just got done with russia hacking the major political parties and leaking their emails. if russia is trying to influence the election, hilariously insecure electronic voting machines would work quite nicely

ThePeavstenator
Dec 18, 2012

:burger::burger::burger::burger::burger:

Establish the Buns

:burger::burger::burger::burger::burger:

FactsAreUseless posted:

Top 5 problems with American universities:

1. University administration is one of the most toxic, backstabbing, misogynist, racist fields in the world. I have never met anyone above faculty at a university whom I would trust to hold my coat, let alone trust with real power. But if you want to get away with a huge amount of sexual harassment in a good-ol'-boy culture while abusing petty power as a middle manager, here's the place for you!

2. Universities, and when I say this I mean almost universally every college in the United States, public or private, is deeply invested in a toxic college culture built around alcohol, athletics, and, you guessed it, misogyny. Administrators pay lip service to responsibility while selling branded beers and bottle openers, and encouraging a Greek system that mostly exists to cover up outright alcoholism among a largely underage student body. I bring up alcohol many times because, while people like to throw around overfunded and undersupervised athletic departments as the big problem, alcohol is a way bigger and more ubiquitous issue. And, related to point one, it comes straight from the top and isn't confined to athletics.

3. Nobody gives a poo poo about students. There is almost no regulation of classroom experiences. There is no recourse for discrimination by teachers, or just plain bad classes. The administration does not care, because that's not where universities make their money. And students are, after a year, in so much debt that leaving is a costly mistake, even more so than getting the degree. There is almost no way for students to know, before they go to school, whether they are going to a good school. And financial issues mean most students don't pick their schools that way anyway. Basically, schools can do whatever they want and nobody will give a poo poo, because whether or not classes are any good doesn't get schools onto Top 100 Schools lists, and it doesn't affect alumni donations, and it doesn't affect research money. Sure, there's accreditation, but when accreditation is all part of this same culture, well... what difference does it make?

4. Most schools are research institutions that also teach sometimes. You think the big money at a university is in athletics? Not even close. As valuable as STEM majors might be, they're also crazy understaffed. If you're getting a degree at a major university, you're probably not getting taught by any of those renowned researchers and professors that work there. You're getting taught by their grad students. Humanities are a little better, but points 1, 2, and 3 means that doesn't make a big difference. Yes, some very good research happens at the college level, but that doesn't translate into real education for students. Because of 3, professors aren't hired or paid based on their ability to teach. They're hired based on their ability to bring grant money to the university.

5. As mentioned in 3: there is no way for students to effectively pick a good school. The majority of students get funneled into one school or another because they get a scholarship there, or it's close to home, or in-state tuition is cheaper. If and when it turns out those schools are terrible, students can do poo poo. First, how would they know? Every college prep guide and list and article measures the success of schools based on things like exclusivity (an artificially-inflated joke measurement) and graduation rates, and maybe post-college job placement. And if you don't realize that post-college job placement has more to do with your economic status and connections than your education, well, good, because that's what these universities want. And once students are in, they're in. You can't get your money back. You can transfer to another school, maybe, but that's difficult and expensive.

Universities are garbage.

A lot of this is because they were never meant to be used as grades 13-16. Good luck getting the soon-to-be administration to regulate and fund trade and technical school alternatives tho.

FactsAreUseless
Feb 16, 2011

In case you're wondering if any of this is going to change, the answer is: these problems can be traced back to the very beginning of American universities. I assume all this poo poo is true outside the U.S., I just can't speak to it. You know why colleges love tradition, and ceremony, and school spirit? Because it protects the power structures that perpetuate these problems. If you've ever bought a piece of university branded gear you should just burn it.

FactsAreUseless
Feb 16, 2011

ThePeavstenator posted:

A lot of this is because they were never meant to be used as grades 13-16. Good luck getting the soon-to-be administration to regulate and fund trade and technical school alternatives tho.
It doesn't help, but these problems would exist without it because they're mostly cultural problems, with some structural/funding issues. They just affect a lot more people now because college is no longer a pursuit of the idle upper-middle.

Fojar38
Sep 2, 2011


Sorry I meant to say I hope that the police use maximum force and kill or maim a bunch of innocent people, thus paving a way for a proletarian uprising and socialist utopia


also here's a stupid take
---------------------------->

FactsAreUseless posted:

In case you're wondering if any of this is going to change, the answer is: these problems can be traced back to the very beginning of American universities. I assume all this poo poo is true outside the U.S., I just can't speak to it. You know why colleges love tradition, and ceremony, and school spirit? Because it protects the power structures that perpetuate these problems. If you've ever bought a piece of university branded gear you should just burn it.

I was going to comment that American universities are actually the best in the world despite all those problems

Edit: Obviously depending on which universities we're talking about

PerniciousKnid
Sep 13, 2006

Condiv posted:

voter machine fraud isn't an impossible conspiracy theory, researchers have been demonstrating hacks for years and we just got done with russia hacking the major political parties and leaking their emails. if russia is trying to influence the election, hilariously insecure electronic voting machines would work quite nicely
Yellowstone supervolcano explosion is also possible, but there's no evidence that either event happened this year.

FactsAreUseless posted:

In case you're wondering if any of this is going to change, the answer is: these problems can be traced back to the very beginning of American universities. I assume all this poo poo is true outside the U.S., I just can't speak to it. You know why colleges love tradition, and ceremony, and school spirit? Because it protects the power structures that perpetuate these problems. If you've ever bought a piece of university branded gear you should just burn it.
This is why I had a great undergrad experience and I still tell my alma mater to gently caress off because I already paid them more than enough.

Fitzy Fitz
May 14, 2005




FactsAreUseless posted:

Universities are garbage.

So where did you learn all those big n fancy words?

Hollismason
Jun 30, 2007
An alright dude.
What's this whole hacked voting MACHINES coming out of Michigan

Samurai Sanders
Nov 4, 2003

Pillbug

FactsAreUseless posted:

In case you're wondering if any of this is going to change, the answer is: these problems can be traced back to the very beginning of American universities. I assume all this poo poo is true outside the U.S., I just can't speak to it. You know why colleges love tradition, and ceremony, and school spirit? Because it protects the power structures that perpetuate these problems. If you've ever bought a piece of university branded gear you should just burn it.
The large Japanese university I work in doesn't have the racial disparity issue so much but most else seems about right. I am told accreditation is way more lax than in America, especially for profs' classroom performance, so they'll just stand there and talk about whatever and leave it to the students to actually learn their subjects. They will though, because they are workoholics to have gotten into this school. The university isn't adding much value to it apart from the facilities and putting students gifted in the various subjects together with each other.

Samurai Sanders fucked around with this message at 00:32 on Nov 24, 2016

Condiv
May 7, 2008

Sorry to undo the effort of paying a domestic abuser $10 to own this poster, but I am going to lose my dang mind if I keep seeing multiple posters who appear to be Baloogan.

With love,
a mod


PerniciousKnid posted:

Yellowstone supervolcano explosion is also possible, but there's no evidence that either event happened this year.

there's been some evidence of voter fraud, which is why recounts are even being mentioned. are you just now learning about this?

Fojar38
Sep 2, 2011


Sorry I meant to say I hope that the police use maximum force and kill or maim a bunch of innocent people, thus paving a way for a proletarian uprising and socialist utopia


also here's a stupid take
---------------------------->

PerniciousKnid posted:

Yellowstone supervolcano explosion is also possible, but there's no evidence that either event happened this year.

This bargaining stage (it must have been rigged! There must have been massive voter fraud!), combined with the hyperbolic declarations of the imminent descent of the USA into dictatorship and the eventual extinction of the human race and that the Democrats are traitors for not being ideologically pure enough to literally cordon off capital hill to stop the GOP from governing is virtually identical to the reaction from the right in 2008.

The Right survived. The Left will also survive as will the Republic.

ThePeavstenator
Dec 18, 2012

:burger::burger::burger::burger::burger:

Establish the Buns

:burger::burger::burger::burger::burger:

PerniciousKnid posted:

Yellowstone supervolcano explosion is also possible, but there's no evidence that either event happened this year.

I don't know what the specs on the devices look like, but if there are open ports to plug poo poo into I don't think it's out of the possibility even though they aren't connected to the internet. You'd be surprised at how may developers think that encrypting data and sending it on a secure channel is good enough for security.

Hollismason
Jun 30, 2007
An alright dude.
Yeah I just don't buy the whole voter fraud because of electronic voting MACHINES

Condiv
May 7, 2008

Sorry to undo the effort of paying a domestic abuser $10 to own this poster, but I am going to lose my dang mind if I keep seeing multiple posters who appear to be Baloogan.

With love,
a mod


Hollismason posted:

What's this whole hacked voting MACHINES coming out of Michigan

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/nov/23/hillary-clinton-election-vote-recount-michigan-pennsylvania-wisconsin

ThePeavstenator
Dec 18, 2012

:burger::burger::burger::burger::burger:

Establish the Buns

:burger::burger::burger::burger::burger:
Highly unlikely that it happened, but we also live in the Trump timeline.

Condiv
May 7, 2008

Sorry to undo the effort of paying a domestic abuser $10 to own this poster, but I am going to lose my dang mind if I keep seeing multiple posters who appear to be Baloogan.

With love,
a mod


ThePeavstenator posted:

I don't know what the specs on the devices look like, but if there are open ports to plug poo poo into I don't think it's out of the possibility even though they aren't connected to the internet. You'd be surprised at how may developers think that encrypting data and sending it on a secure channel is good enough for security.

yep

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ss2fPvXBd7Y

DACK FAYDEN
Feb 25, 2013

Bear Witness

PerniciousKnid posted:

Yellowstone supervolcano explosion is also possible, but there's no evidence that either event happened this year.
Isn't that the whole "7% less for Hillary in districts that used electronic machines" thing NYMag was writing about? I didn't ever see their data so I'm skeptical but they certainly made a lot of noise.

Late edit: Clicking through the links in that Guardian article, I'm not actually convinced by the argument that "Hillary lost districts that Obama won far worse when they were electronic ballot districts" as that doesn't control for literally anything, including race and wealth. There certainly could be something there. It's close enough that a recount is definitely a wise idea in all three states, especially given that if one's been called incorrectly for whatever reason it's likely all three are since the whole point of the swing was that it was all three unexpectedly differing from polling. But I don't know if I actually believe the evidence we have is sufficient to indicate that there must be a recount.

DACK FAYDEN fucked around with this message at 00:34 on Nov 24, 2016

FlamingLiberal
Jan 18, 2009

Would you like to play a game?



We know that Russian hackers got into FL's voter database so none of this is impossible.

N. Senada
May 17, 2011

My kidneys are busted

FactsAreUseless posted:


Universities are garbage.

This is truth.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

WhiskeyJuvenile
Feb 15, 2002

by Nyc_Tattoo

Condiv posted:

CS programs don't even teach version control systems or build systems a lot of the time

CS isn't engineering even though a lot of its practitioners are deluding themselves about that

  • Locked thread