|
Every natural right of a citizen should be provided for free at the expense of the state: healthcare, education, a gun, and whatever the liberal version of Ed Balls is.
|
# ? Nov 25, 2016 07:00 |
|
|
# ? May 24, 2024 20:57 |
|
|
# ? Nov 25, 2016 07:03 |
|
logikv9 posted:i didn't enjoy going through this ugh I'M GAY FOR GUNS circlejerk Man, I got excited thinking we had a new word-filter, but
|
# ? Nov 25, 2016 07:17 |
|
Homework Explainer posted:assad offered to step down in 2012 but the us wanted a friendlier government installed via regime change so they told him and russia to gently caress off lol assad stepping down and being replaced by one of his relatives would have changed nothing. and that's assuming the offer was genuine and not just baiting so they could then turn around and say "see they didn't accept our generous offer!"
|
# ? Nov 25, 2016 07:22 |
|
You know I am honestly amazed LeJackal never showed up for this.
|
# ? Nov 25, 2016 07:24 |
|
Pener Kropoopkin posted:You really can't say anything about gun control because there's no way it won't be twisted according to the paranoid style, into a secret slippery slope plot to take the guns away. Which is why I am against it.
|
# ? Nov 25, 2016 07:40 |
|
Rand alPaul posted:Compulsory militia musters as well. this seems like a better argument for gun control than any kind of research or million dollar ad campaign "look at these chucklefucks"
|
# ? Nov 25, 2016 07:44 |
|
Can someone tell me why GDP growth is such a strong indicator of whether or not a candidate from an incumbent's political party will be elected? I mean the answer should be obvious, but if the population's wages are stagnating or declining, then how are they feeling that the economy is "on the right track"?
|
# ? Nov 25, 2016 07:49 |
|
Yinlock posted:this seems like a better argument for gun control than any kind of research or million dollar ad campaign A lot of the Federalists did not want a universal militia precisely for that picture shown. Guys like Washington were quoted during the Constitutional debates basically saying militias were garbage in battle and they should never be relied upon for anything except putting down riots. The War of 1812 backed up their claims.
|
# ? Nov 25, 2016 08:02 |
|
the fact that were capable of electing someone like Donald Trump is a pretty good argument for keeping the populace armed.
|
# ? Nov 25, 2016 08:17 |
|
Ace of Baes posted:the fact that were capable of electing someone like Donald Trump is a pretty good argument for keeping the populace armed. On the other hand, it shows there are millions of people out there that I wouldn't trust with safety scissors, let alone a gun.
|
# ? Nov 25, 2016 08:21 |
|
Ace of Baes posted:the fact that were capable of electing someone like Donald Trump is a pretty good argument for keeping the populace armed. also equally an argument against it
|
# ? Nov 25, 2016 08:21 |
|
Pretty sure an armed populace is a bit tougher to round up and put in camps than an unarmed one.
|
# ? Nov 25, 2016 08:24 |
|
i'm a sovereign citizen, i'm a sovereign citizen i continue to insist while a predator drone launches a hellfire missile at me
|
# ? Nov 25, 2016 08:26 |
|
Darkman Fanpage posted:lol assad stepping down and being replaced by one of his relatives would have changed nothing. and that's assuming the offer was genuine and not just baiting so they could then turn around and say "see they didn't accept our generous offer!" Basshar was a computer nerd and doting mama's boy, who was practically brow-beaten into cracking down on demonstrations with deadly force. He was never even supposed to assume the presidency, so who's to say a different figure in command wouldn't have been more flexible? Character matters in a presidential dictatorship.
|
# ? Nov 25, 2016 09:26 |
|
Pener Kropoopkin posted:Basshar was a computer nerd and doting mama's boy, who was practically brow-beaten into cracking down on demonstrations with deadly force. He was never even supposed to assume the presidency, so who's to say a different figure in command wouldn't have been more flexible? Character matters in a presidential dictatorship. I'm sure Assad would have just given out the position randomly and not to whatever relative he thought would continue his brutal regime. Totally woulda happened.
|
# ? Nov 25, 2016 09:33 |
|
Fullhouse posted:get some black panthers to stand around with fake guns in open carry states and full gun control will be implemented immediately fyi this is exactly why open carry is illegal in california thanks, reagan
|
# ? Nov 25, 2016 10:21 |
|
H.P. Hovercraft posted:fyi this is exactly why open carry is illegal in california It's also why the FBI cracked down on the black Panthers and they are not around anymore. Everyone tells the Reagan hypocrisy side and leaves out the whole federal government treating them like a terrorist group thing.
|
# ? Nov 25, 2016 10:27 |
|
Ace of Baes posted:Pretty sure an armed populace is a bit tougher to round up and put in camps than an unarmed one.
|
# ? Nov 25, 2016 10:52 |
|
The Second Amendment clearly only applies to whites. It's why you keep seeing those youtube videos of a white guy talking with the police while the black guy open carrying the exact same weapon has SWAT called on him.
|
# ? Nov 25, 2016 10:54 |
|
'Guns for Gals/Gays/Minorities' programs own
|
# ? Nov 25, 2016 10:56 |
|
Ace of Baes posted:Pretty sure an armed populace is a bit tougher to round up and put in camps than an unarmed one. The purpose of an armed populace is to do he rounding up for the police, hth.
|
# ? Nov 25, 2016 11:03 |
|
Fulchrum posted:I'm sure Assad would have just given out the position randomly and not to whatever relative he thought would continue his brutal regime. Totally woulda happened. So an entire country should have been torn apart, hundreds of thousands killed, and millions turned refugee because of your gut assumption that allowing Basshar to step down would have been pointless.
|
# ? Nov 25, 2016 12:09 |
|
Fulchrum posted:It's also why the FBI cracked down on the black Panthers and they are not around anymore. There were plenty of other black gun clubs and self-defense organizations operating in the United States during the 60s and 70s. The reason the Panthers were singled out as a COINTEL target, was because they had a successful socialist political program and were coordinating with other ethnic revolutionary movements in the Rainbow Coalition. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rainbow_Coalition_(Fred_Hampton)
|
# ? Nov 25, 2016 12:14 |
|
Pener Kropoopkin posted:Basshar was a computer nerd and doting mama's boy, who was practically brow-beaten into cracking down on demonstrations with deadly force. He was never even supposed to assume the presidency, so who's to say a different figure in command wouldn't have been more flexible? Character matters in a presidential dictatorship. He kind of reminds me of Nicholas II, someone who was never supposed to be anywhere near power and is at least partially aware of that.
|
# ? Nov 25, 2016 16:06 |
|
Can someone explain the distinction of a presidential dictatorship
|
# ? Nov 25, 2016 16:20 |
|
Hey who would you rather be president, Hillary Clinton or Bashar Al-Assad?
|
# ? Nov 25, 2016 16:29 |
|
zegermans posted:Hey who would you rather be president, Hillary Clinton or Bashar Al-Assad? Assad since he has a better K/D ratio than Hillary.
|
# ? Nov 25, 2016 16:29 |
|
that's only if you count eliminations, when you look at final blows clinton is the slay queen
|
# ? Nov 25, 2016 16:35 |
|
Fulchrum posted:I'm sure Assad would have just given out the position randomly and not to whatever relative he thought would continue his brutal regime. Totally woulda happened. hmm so we were right to not even pursue it and prolong the civil war. gotcha
|
# ? Nov 25, 2016 16:36 |
|
we need to arm cspam for the coming somethingawful civil war imo deadly memes, etc
|
# ? Nov 25, 2016 16:39 |
|
Scrub-Niggurath posted:Can someone explain the distinction of a presidential dictatorship Having the pretense of a presidential election gives the nation a +10 bonus to diplomacy rolls, but a -10 to quashing internal dissent. Also it gives a an additional policy slot once tech level 8 is reached.
|
# ? Nov 25, 2016 19:16 |
|
DAD LOST MY IPOD posted:The problem now isn't HRC, it's the #HillaryMen (and women) still in positions of authority in the party who would rather burn it down around them than cede their power to leftists. I know this is like a thousand pages back but Focusing on the people around her making terrible calls is better for this. It doesnt need to really be said more than Hillary surrounded herself with useless people, then bounce off that to attack her remaining allies trying to cling to power.
|
# ? Nov 25, 2016 19:21 |
|
SHY NUDIST GRRL posted:It doesnt need to really be said more than Hillary surrounded herself with useless people, then bounce off that to attack her remaining allies trying to cling to power. confirmed, we must destroy bernie sanders
|
# ? Nov 25, 2016 19:29 |
|
|
# ? Nov 25, 2016 19:32 |
|
SHY NUDIST GRRL posted:I know this is like a thousand pages back but John "Two republicans for every blue collar" Podesta
|
# ? Nov 25, 2016 19:35 |
|
Homework Explainer posted:hmm so we were right to not even pursue it and prolong the civil war. gotcha The civil war would have continued no matter what. The root problem is the brutality of the Baathist party, not just the brutality of the Assad family. Pandora's box was opened, there was no closing of it as long as the state of Syria remained a single party government without free elections to properly represent the will of the people, and even then I doubt that would appease the jihadists. The Iraq War is the catalyst for all of this. Short of going back in time and stopping that war I doubt anything could stop what has happened. Darkman Fanpage has issued a correction as of 19:41 on Nov 25, 2016 |
# ? Nov 25, 2016 19:37 |
|
Accretionist posted:What's the alternative? Also, is it worth the friction with Russia? I'm not saying we need to do anything but lol if you think a dude with torture camps is at all helping any moves towards peace.
|
# ? Nov 25, 2016 19:40 |
|
Darkman Fanpage posted:The civil war would have continued no matter what. The root problem is the brutality of the Baathist party, not just the brutality of the Assad family. Yea I'm not sure in what world the Baathists weren't pretty psyched to purge the filthy undesirables from go and didn't really need any prodding to keep going from outside forces.
|
# ? Nov 25, 2016 19:42 |
|
|
# ? May 24, 2024 20:57 |
|
Darkman Fanpage posted:The civil war would have continued no matter what. The root problem is the brutality of the Baathist party, not just the brutality of the Assad family. Pandora's box was opened, there was no closing of it as long as the state of Syria remained a single party government without free elections to properly represent the will of the people, and even then I doubt that would appease the jihadists. The Iraq War is the catalyst for all of this. Short of going back in time and stopping that war I doubt anything could stop what has happened. That's not a good reason to funnel weapons and money to the Jihadists so they can make the situation even worse. If somebody offers you a potential out, then you take it no matter how unlikely it seems. After everything else that's happened this year, we can't afford to keep making bad assumptions on assumed wisdom.
|
# ? Nov 25, 2016 20:02 |