Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
ChickenOfTomorrow
Nov 11, 2012

god damn it, you've got to be kind

Hilario Baldness posted:

If we make a new thread one of the posts should be dedicated to listing the 500 different socialist parties.

and which ones are fronts for larouche

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Ruzihm
Aug 11, 2010

Group up and push mid, proletariat!



Smash the bourgeoisie

Ruzihm
Aug 11, 2010

Group up and push mid, proletariat!


And by smash I mean give them productive labor to do and fair compensation for that labor

100 degrees Calcium
Jan 23, 2011



we must seize the means of bashing

Tacky-Ass Rococco
Sep 7, 2010

by R. Guyovich
My local PSL has gotten through the backlog and emailed me to come sit down with them and "discuss moving forward to build a revolutionary socialist organization." Do I need to pretend to be a Marxist, or can I admit to being a soc dem who just wants to hoist the red flag and start slitting throats?

Pener Kropoopkin
Jan 30, 2013

Tacky-rear end Rococco posted:

My local PSL has gotten through the backlog and emailed me to come sit down with them and "discuss moving forward to build a revolutionary socialist organization." Do I need to pretend to be a Marxist, or can I admit to being a soc dem who just wants to hoist the red flag and start slitting throats?

If you talk the same way you post ITT don't expect a warm welcome.

R. Guyovich
Dec 25, 1991

Tacky-Ass Rococco
Sep 7, 2010

by R. Guyovich

Pener Kropoopkin posted:

If you talk the same way you post ITT don't expect a warm welcome.

Wait...do you talk the way you post? Jesus.

Pener Kropoopkin
Jan 30, 2013

Tacky-rear end Rococco posted:

Wait...do you talk the way you post? Jesus.

Girls aren't impressed when I quote urls at them

Concordat
Mar 4, 2007

Secondary Objective: Commit Fraud - Complete

Weeping Wound posted:

are those FN FALs?

resar posted:

not a gun sperg but it looks like aks and ar 15s

I'm more of a gun sperg than either of you probably, but not enough to name specific brands.
from left to right
1- Guy has his gun slung behind his back, can't tell. Looks like the only one that decided to wear proper boots though.
2- Likely some AR-15 derivative with expensive optics on it.
3- An AK-47 derivative, specifically a Hungarian paratrooper carbine (reverse google search led me to a post where someone identified it as a AMD 63)
4- Definitely an AR-15 derivative., appears to have a typical M4 collapsible stock and birdcage flash hider, a plastic magazine and non-M4 ironsights.

FN FALs are pretty large and have straight box magazines.

Concordat fucked around with this message at 22:13 on Nov 23, 2016

Aeolius
Jul 16, 2003

Simon Templeman Fanclub

Fututor Magnus posted:

does anyone know a good, open-access, criticism of neoclassical economics from a marxian perspective?

explicitly marxian is tricky to find compared to, say, post-keynesian. wolff actually wrote a comparative text or two, but it should probably be read critically due to what i understand are some questionably deployed philosophical categories. steve keen is a post-keynesian with an asinine reading of marx, but he dispatches well enough with various tropes of undergraduate economics pedagogy. i also haven't had the chance to vet this essay but Ben Fine generally lives up to or otherwise outperforms his name, so there's probably no harm in linking it (he's actually got a couple new books out this year on micro and macro respectively)

either way, while a marxian perspective might give one a vantage point that might not have otherwise occurred, the best critiques are immanent critiques, taking the theory on its own terms and finding contradictions, inconsistencies, etc. external critique is more about making a case for which theory better fits the observable facts, but usually that's still a correlative process and the problem of underdetermination can and often will leave things far from definitive

but if you come upon any more specific questions, never hurts to ask.

Tacky-rear end Rococco posted:

My local PSL has gotten through the backlog and emailed me to come sit down with them and "discuss moving forward to build a revolutionary socialist organization." Do I need to pretend to be a Marxist, or can I admit to being a soc dem who just wants to hoist the red flag and start slitting throats?

just tell them you killed rosa luxemburg but you're sorry and want to turn over a new leaf

Aeolius fucked around with this message at 05:23 on Nov 24, 2016

VirtualStranger
Aug 20, 2012

:lol:

asdf32
May 15, 2010

I lust for childrens' deaths. Ask me about how I don't care if my kids die.

Aeolius posted:

explicitly marxian is tricky to find compared to, say, post-keynesian. wolff actually wrote a comparative text or two, but it should probably be read critically due to what i understand are some questionably deployed philosophical categories. steve keen is a post-keynesian with an asinine reading of marx, but he dispatches well enough with various tropes of undergraduate economics pedagogy. i also haven't had the chance to vet this essay but Ben Fine generally lives up to or otherwise outperforms his name, so there's probably no harm in linking it (he's actually got a couple new books out this year on micro and macro respectively)

either way, while a marxian perspective might give one a vantage point that might not have otherwise occurred, the best critiques are immanent critiques, taking the theory on its own terms and finding contradictions, inconsistencies, etc. external critique is more about making a case for which theory better fits the observable facts, but usually that's still a correlative process and the problem of underdetermination can and often will leave things far from definitive

but if you come upon any more specific questions, never hurts to ask.


just tell them you killed rosa luxemburg but you're sorry and want to turn over a new leaf

"When critiquing Marx don't worry about real life too much"

The less educated Marxists (umm most in this thread) should take in the full meaning of that advice from their more educated counterpart.


There are actually more farms (~2 million) than hired farm workers in the U.S. (~1 million). So actually more owners than hired workers. Which is the logical result of mechanization. There just arn't that many workers so the idea of the land baron overseeing 100's of field hands just doesn't really happen. The fact is that farming is drastically less corporate than almost literally any other industry.

asdf32 fucked around with this message at 16:11 on Nov 24, 2016

Pener Kropoopkin
Jan 30, 2013

asdf32 posted:

There are actually more farms (~2 million) than hired farm workers in the U.S. (~1 million). So actually more owners than hired workers. Which is the logical result of mechanization. There just arn't that many workers so the idea of the land baron overseeing 100's of field hands just doesn't really happen. The fact is that farming is drastically less corporate than almost literally any other industry.

Do I have to explain how the cropland bar correlates to the farm bar on that graph? Millions of "farm owners" aren't performing the actual productive labor in agriculture. Land barons do oversee hundreds of field hands. Even the seasonal illegal labor used to pick fruit involves dozens of people working constantly, even for small scale farms.

asdf32
May 15, 2010

I lust for childrens' deaths. Ask me about how I don't care if my kids die.

Pener Kropoopkin posted:

Do I have to explain how the cropland bar correlates to the farm bar on that graph? Millions of "farm owners" aren't performing the actual productive labor in agriculture. Land barons do oversee hundreds of field hands. Even the seasonal illegal labor used to pick fruit involves dozens of people working constantly, even for small scale farms.

No because instead of waving at farm size we should look up workers directly: 50% of the roughly 3 million farm owners work their farms entirely. So that's 1.5 million owner/workers compared to ~1 million hired workers. I also assume that many undocumented temp workers arn't counted, and maybe the season numbers go up. But it doesn't add up to the picture you're trying to paint.

https://www.census.gov/prod/1/statbrief/sb93_10.pdf

Pener Kropoopkin
Jan 30, 2013

asdf32 posted:

No because instead of waving at farm size we should look up workers directly: 50% of the roughly 3 million farm owners work their farms entirely. So that's 1.5 million owner/workers compared to ~1 million hired workers. I also assume that many undocumented temp workers arn't counted, and maybe the season numbers go up. But it doesn't add up to the picture you're trying to paint.

https://www.census.gov/prod/1/statbrief/sb93_10.pdf

Don't make sweeping generalizations based on census data from 23 years ago. We're talking about trends which have played out since then. Even in that cited census data, it shows that land ownership is consolidated into a smaller amount of hands, which is germane to this discussion because the point is that a million farm owner/laborers aren't doing the bulk of productive labor. It's the large scale industrial farms which do.

Agricultural labor involves more than just the farm work force as well. You also have to account for all of the people who work for slaughter mills, cooping plants, processing facilities, transport, etc. Once you move beyond the farm level, it is most decisively a corporate-run industry. You also have to take into account that while, on paper, 2/3 of farm land may be owned by actual farmers rather than landlords, they are still indebted to banks and corporate lenders for the highly capital intensive equipment and methods which keep them competitive.

Aeolius
Jul 16, 2003

Simon Templeman Fanclub

asdf32 posted:

"When critiquing Marx don't worry about real life too much"

Just a quick check-in: Does anyone actually need me to respond to this, or are we good on reading comprehension here?

Pener Kropoopkin
Jan 30, 2013

https://twitter.com/PissPigGranddad/status/800615318502641664

Happy thanksgiving, red puppers.

asdf32
May 15, 2010

I lust for childrens' deaths. Ask me about how I don't care if my kids die.

Aeolius posted:

Just a quick check-in: Does anyone actually need me to respond to this, or are we good on reading comprehension here?

Please respond. I get a kick out of seeing "Marxism is a science" arguments juxtaposed with actual Marxism.

Like the other guys who don't actually know Marx are at an advantage but with you it's the real thing in all its comedic/tragic glory. Remember that the world depends on your teachings. Please keep them coming.

Aeolius
Jul 16, 2003

Simon Templeman Fanclub

It's a holiday, asdf32; go be a father to your daughters. Do some good somewhere.

Darkman Fanpage
Jul 4, 2012

Tacky-Ass Rococco
Sep 7, 2010

by R. Guyovich

Aeolius posted:

It's a holiday, asdf32; go be a father to your daughters. Do some good somewhere.

Demanding that people pay attention to their family on Thanksgiving for even a minute longer than is prescribed by custom is the worst kind of communist tyranny. Seize the banks, fine. But be reasonable, for God's sake.

Pener Kropoopkin
Jan 30, 2013

https://twitter.com/alexnpress/status/802048589090488320

Ruzihm
Aug 11, 2010

Group up and push mid, proletariat!


"EXCLUSIVE: DAPL Builds Razor Wire Wall On Native Burial Ground" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l7UavuUxOGM

Consider helping shelter the NODAPL activists if you can this holiday season. https://www.gofundme.com/yurts-for-standing-rock

Grondoth
Feb 18, 2011

Atrocious Joe posted:

Rural and working class America has plenty of weird looking people and lovely beards.

We just have to force leftists to wear tap out or carhartt gear and we'll be fine.

Put your average hipster douche in a camo t-shirt(or jacket), non-skinny jeans, and a camo hat and he's Rural America.

Grondoth fucked around with this message at 00:31 on Nov 26, 2016

R. Guyovich
Dec 25, 1991

zen death robot posted:

It's still true, rebranding does wonders see: the alt-right

probably so, which is why the psl literature avoids using "communism"

i shy away from it too unless i'm in friendly circles or semi-anonymous like this forum

Fiction
Apr 28, 2011
I don't we what's wrong with using "socialism" if you use its original meaning.

Dreddout
Oct 1, 2015

You must stay drunk on writing so reality cannot destroy you.

Fiction posted:

I don't we what's wrong with using "socialism" if you use its original meaning.

60+ years of McCarthyist influence on discourse. :discourse:

Deimus
Aug 17, 2012
"Condemn me. It does not matter. History will absolve me."

Peel
Dec 3, 2007

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m_iXh_iwrwA

DOCTOR ZIMBARDO
May 8, 2006
To die for the people is weightier than Mount Tai

Pener Kropoopkin
Jan 30, 2013

https://twitter.com/EugenePuryear/status/802526871590150144

ChickenOfTomorrow
Nov 11, 2012

god damn it, you've got to be kind

Brothers, sisters, and siblings,

How do we mobilize a revolution in the USA?

(Serious question. Can it be done? Must we follow the DSA's attempts to shift the electorate left, or can we do something outside of the ballot box?)

Pener Kropoopkin
Jan 30, 2013

ChickenOfTomorrow posted:

Brothers, sisters, and siblings,

How do we mobilize a revolution in the USA?

(Serious question. Can it be done? Must we follow the DSA's attempts to shift the electorate left, or can we do something outside of the ballot box?)

Anything done outside the ballot box would be a long-term cultural project, which provides direct assistance to the people.

Pener Kropoopkin posted:

Overcoming the cultural biases against left wing politics in the United States is the first great hurdle that must be overcome. In that sense, the revolution has to start on a cultural base. We should be holding free concerts featuring local artists, where we can introduce people to our respective parties and the direct services we can offer: food, clothes, shelter, maybe even medical care. A socialist party should be a party. People don't have to believe in it, they just have to see that the project works, that it's fun, and that it's an out from the strict confines of inherited culture. Socialist parties shouldn't seek to rival the church as a locus of community activity, but to create bridges between people of all denominations and creeds so that we can form a real common solidarity. We could create a tangible environment of intersectionality upon which to eventually build a socialist mass movement against capitalism.

Listing off appealing policy bullet points won't accomplish anything. If the planks of any particular socialist party actually mattered, then they would be on the ballot in as many states as the Greens. People need an opportunity to live the alternative, even if it's only for one day a week.

G.C. Furr III
Mar 30, 2016



hasta la victoria siempre

Top City Homo
Oct 15, 2014


Ramrod XTreme

ChickenOfTomorrow posted:

Brothers, sisters, and siblings,

How do we mobilize a revolution in the USA?

(Serious question. Can it be done? Must we follow the DSA's attempts to shift the electorate left, or can we do something outside of the ballot box?)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unemployed_Councils

R. Guyovich
Dec 25, 1991

G.C. Furr III posted:

hasta la victoria siempre

platzapS
Aug 4, 2007

I am baffled that Castro wanted to keep all those exiles, they're the fuckin worst

Darkman Fanpage
Jul 4, 2012

platzapS posted:

I am baffled that Castro wanted to keep all those exiles, they're the fuckin worst

yeah and i gotta deal with them every time i go down to miami

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

VirtualStranger
Aug 20, 2012

:lol:
Cuba realized how terrible people like Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio are and rightly kicked them out.

The fact that the people celebrating Castro's death in Miami are waving Trump signs and MAGA hats should tell you something.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5