|
Ace of Baes posted:The DNC was in Hillarys corner despite her obvious flaws because they were all positioning themselves for positions in a Clinton administration that they were positive was coming. 
|
#
?
Nov 27, 2016 23:48
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 26, 2024 02:26 |
|
|
Hillary set them up, another great Abuela failure.
|
|
#
?
Nov 27, 2016 23:49
|
|
|
I legit feel really bad for Huma, been a rough couple of years.
|
|
#
?
Nov 27, 2016 23:50
|
|
|
Here is the discord link for anyone who wants to join the podcast.
|
|
#
?
Nov 27, 2016 23:51
|
|
|
I like the part of the campaign where hillary and her cnn people claimed they were raising more money for down ballet races and welp, lost almost all levels of governments from the state up. So, we're they lying about the fund helping down ballet or what happened? Cause I remember this being a bernie issue.
|
|
#
?
Nov 27, 2016 23:54
|
|
|
frakeaing HAMSTER DANCE posted:I legit feel really bad for Huma, been a rough couple of years. Surprised she even went out in public like that for a few days straight. Would be better off staying at home and watching Netflix.
|
|
#
?
Nov 27, 2016 23:54
|
|
|
Optimus_Rhyme posted:I like the part of the campaign where hillary and her cnn people claimed they were raising more money for down ballet races and welp, lost almost all levels of governments from the state up. For real what happened to that Downballot stuff? I'm aware of the key failures in the rust belt states, but the dems got fuckin' obliterated on a ton of levels and I don't know what happened to that big ol' downballot fund.
|
|
#
?
Nov 27, 2016 23:56
|
|
|
For the down ballot victory fund only a small percentage went to tickets despite what hill folk claim.
|
|
#
?
Nov 27, 2016 23:58
|
|
|
Presidential turnout affects downticket turnout too. You can spend 1.3 billion dollars, but you have to be a good candidate generally to get your people to turn out to vote for you, and thus downtickets
|
|
#
?
Nov 27, 2016 23:58
|
|
|
frakeaing HAMSTER DANCE posted:Presidential turnout affects downticket turnout too. You can spend 1.3 billion dollars, but you have to be a good candidate generally to get your people to turn out to vote for you, and thus downtickets For Michigan dems got more downticket votes than GE support. No wonder why Hillary lost the state.
|
|
#
?
Nov 28, 2016 00:02
|
|
|
Optimus_Rhyme posted:I like the part of the campaign where hillary and her cnn people claimed they were raising more money for down ballet races and welp, lost almost all levels of governments from the state up. Grondoth posted:For real what happened to that Downballot stuff? I'm aware of the key failures in the rust belt states, but the dems got fuckin' obliterated on a ton of levels and I don't know what happened to that big ol' downballot fund. They lied.
|
|
#
?
Nov 28, 2016 00:03
|
|
|
My favorite post-election "analysis" is that Hillarys abysmal turnout was unrelated to downticket because "more people voted for Hillary in (state) than (downticket dem)".
|
|
#
?
Nov 28, 2016 00:03
|
|
|
Yup HIllary and the DNC starved down ticket support to fuel her campaign warchest quote:But during the three-month period when the DNC was working to spin the situation, state parties kept less than one half of one percent of the $82 million raised through the arrangement — validating concerns raised by campaign finance watchdogs, state party allies and Bernie Sanders supporters. State parties got less .5% rest of the money went to Hillary even though the ad campaign said the money was to help elect dems in the downticket races.
|
|
#
?
Nov 28, 2016 00:06
|
|
|
DAD LOST MY IPOD posted:examples of Obama men melting down? I know that wing of the party is all neoliberal stooges but I always more strongly identified that bullshit centrist Third Wayism with Clinton so it's weird to me that his wing of the party is having more trouble with this turn left than hers is It's probably more "why struggle" attitude from her group. They lost, bad. Why would anyone listen to their ideas? Better to try to weather the storm and at least stay in the party.
|
|
#
?
Nov 28, 2016 00:07
|
|
|
The GOP was right all along
|
|
#
?
Nov 28, 2016 00:29
|
|
|
NOTHINGBURGER
|
|
#
?
Nov 28, 2016 00:30
|
|
|
nachos posted:The GOP was right all along Many Hillary supporters claimed this victory fund was sincerely intended to help down tickets, even though actual evidence shows almost none of the fundraising went to help down ticket races.
|
|
#
?
Nov 28, 2016 00:31
|
|
|
hillaried-up trickle-down electioneering
|
|
#
?
Nov 28, 2016 00:37
|
|
|
How strange that Hillary is now avoiding the public eye and not even trying to organize any sort of resistance to Trump.
|
|
#
?
Nov 28, 2016 00:40
|
|
|
etalian posted:How strange that Hillary is now avoiding the public eye and not even trying to organize any sort of resistance to Trump. She's not exactly a cause celebré at the moment.
|
|
#
?
Nov 28, 2016 00:44
|
|
|
RiotGearEpsilon posted:She's not exactly a cause celebré at the moment. Bernie lost but is still trying to rally the troops to find a better direction for the democratic party. It's probably because he has much more inner strength than Hillary due to having many lost elections early in his political career before being to elected as the mayor of Burlington. Hillary by contrast was only able to advance through her vast network of political connectors into her softball senate seat.
|
|
#
?
Nov 28, 2016 00:47
|
|
|
that man behind her has some hosed up proportions
|
|
#
?
Nov 28, 2016 00:47
|
|
|
Listening to Chapo, seriously these guys are awesome.
|
|
#
?
Nov 28, 2016 00:49
|
|
|
how huma liating
|
|
#
?
Nov 28, 2016 00:51
|
|
|
logikv9 posted:I think I might start hitting for its her turn meme because it seems like just skirting the line on dem primary salt while also providing nothing of substance it of itself hillary 2020: third time's a charm
|
|
#
?
Nov 28, 2016 01:09
|
|
|
etalian posted:Surprised she even went out in public like that for a few days straight. yeah she should check out this documentary, weiner
|
|
#
?
Nov 28, 2016 01:19
|
|
|
There should probably be separate threads for leftist dems to discuss the path forward (party positions, integrating socialism in to the platform, messaging) and another for more centrist dems to discuss their plans (arguing with Trump's twitter account, being angry at Russia).
|
|
#
?
Nov 28, 2016 01:25
|
|
|
Fidel Cuckstro posted:There should probably be separate threads for leftist dems to talk about bernie sanders, and another for more centrist dems to discuss their plans (arguing with Trump's twitter account, being angry at Russia).
|
|
#
?
Nov 28, 2016 01:26
|
|
|
so uh why is keith ellison the new hot poo poo? idgi
|
|
#
?
Nov 28, 2016 01:27
|
|
|
there should be a thread for every specific version of left
|
|
#
?
Nov 28, 2016 01:27
|
|
|
UHD posted:so uh why is keith ellison the new hot poo poo? idgi because keith ellison is the black muslim that barack obama wishes he was
|
|
#
?
Nov 28, 2016 01:28
|
|
|
UHD posted:so uh why is keith ellison the new hot poo poo? idgi Because the current bad dem leadership failed miserably, progressives should take over the leadership and messaging for the party.
|
|
#
?
Nov 28, 2016 01:29
|
|
|
Fidel Cuckstro posted:There should probably be separate threads for leftist dems to discuss the path forward (party positions, integrating socialism in to the platform, messaging) and another for more centrist dems to discuss their plans (arguing with Trump's twitter account, being angry at Russia). good idea, people that identify with certain politics should segregate themselves and become estranged from each-other's experiences because that just worked amazingly well
|
|
#
?
Nov 28, 2016 01:31
|
|
|
UHD posted:so uh why is keith ellison the new hot poo poo? idgi Listen to this, then get back to us. https://theringer.com/keepin-it-1600-keith-ellison-dnc-8dd365bd5739 Crowsbeak has issued a correction as of 01:48 on Nov 28, 2016 |
|
#
?
Nov 28, 2016 01:34
|
|
|
Maybe we can get a separate thread only for the person saying we shouldn't do anything different
|
|
#
?
Nov 28, 2016 01:38
|
|
|
UHD posted:so uh why is keith ellison the new hot poo poo? idgi No one knows enough about him yet so he hasn't failed the internet socialist purity test.
|
|
#
?
Nov 28, 2016 01:38
|
|
|
zegermans posted:No one knows enough about him yet so he hasn't failed the internet socialist purity test. b-b-but he defended Louis Farrakhan!!1 
|
|
#
?
Nov 28, 2016 01:40
|
|
|
zegermans posted:No one knows enough about him yet so he hasn't failed the internet socialist purity test. yeah I get the feeling it's this but whatever, can't be worse than anyone else
|
|
#
?
Nov 28, 2016 01:41
|
|
|
Crowsbeak posted:Listen to this, then get back to us. Listen to this, then get back to us. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qG8gZnTuYlY
|
|
#
?
Nov 28, 2016 01:41
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 26, 2024 02:26 |
|
|
UHD posted:so uh why is keith ellison the new hot poo poo? idgi personally blessed by saint bernard (pbuh) to lead the dnc out of the wilderness of centrist policy and into the promised land of actually winning elections.
|
|
#
?
Nov 28, 2016 01:42
|
|