|
Beer4TheBeerGod posted:So if I understand things right, Derek is saying that Star Marine isn't in the Evocati build, but MoMA is saying that Derek is wrong because the Evocati build apparently includes the Star Marine files that are playable if you somehow hack the client similar to what people did years ago when the Illfonic stuff was accessible?
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2016 21:51
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 9, 2024 13:11 |
|
|
Eldragon posted:All fiction requires a certain amount of making poo poo up. And there are few original ideas that someone didn't come up with beforehand. Declaring something as an unoriginal derivative work is as old as Shakespeare. The consumer can either accept that and relax, or can sperg out and post about it on the internet. True. But it's still fun to bitch about it.
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2016 21:52
|
|
|
Beer4TheBeerGod posted:I agree, but I feel like it's important to know the subtle nuances associated with each argument. Fair enough.
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2016 21:52
|
|
|
Beer4TheBeerGod posted:I agree, but I feel like it's important to know the subtle nuances associated with each argument.
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2016 21:52
|
|
|
peter gabriel posted:I dunno it's a bit left field for him 'Cantina' maybe, with alien elephants playing cyber trumpets and poo poo hahaha a few pages back but had a mighty lol and wiped a tear from eye at 'cyber trumpets'
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2016 21:53
|
|
|
Beer4TheBeerGod posted:You're right. It's really not that big of a deal, and since you have to call these things something you might as well go with the trope. However, calling the Banu ship a "Merchantman" make absolutely no sense, since nearly every ship released so far aside the various single seater and obvious military ships fit in that category. The Starfarer, Carrack, the garbage barge, the news van. All merchantman.
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2016 21:54
|
|
|
ManofManyAliases posted:Sean Tracy: " In addition to testing Star Marine and new ships like the Herald, the 85X and the Caterpillar, they’re also going to be helping test the web version of Spectrum. There’s a lot of kinks to work out still, but so far they’ve already done a lot to help us find and tackle bugs."
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2016 21:54
|
|
|
ManofManyAliases posted:Sean Tracy: " In addition to testing Star Marine and new ships like the Herald, the 85X and the Caterpillar, they’re also going to be helping test the web version of Spectrum. There’s a lot of kinks to work out still, but so far they’ve already done a lot to help us find and tackle bugs." As soon as you post the part where there is ANY indication that Star Marine is in the Evocati 2.6 build, we can have a meaningful dialog. ktnx bye.
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2016 21:54
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2016 21:55
|
|
|
throw MoMA from the tane
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2016 21:56
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2016 21:56
|
|
|
ManofManyAliases posted:Holy poo poo.
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2016 21:58
|
|
|
Beer4TheBeerGod posted:So if I understand things right, Derek is saying that Star Marine isn't in the Evocati build, but MoMA is saying that Derek is wrong because the Evocati build apparently includes the Star Marine files that are playable if you somehow hack the client similar to what people did years ago when the Illfonic stuff was accessible? Yea pretty much, the only thing thats been shown was a bit that someone cobbled up from mining the data files. This, MoMA is showing us is indisputable evidence of Star Marine being "in" 2.6. Meanwhile Derek is 100% convinced that it isn't in the build itself, as readily being accessible. I constitute the latter being correct, considering the leaks being posted in the subreddit, none of them have shown actual gameplay.
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2016 21:59
|
|
|
Derek and MOMA are fighting over who's technically correct And it's lookin like both are
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2016 22:02
|
|
|
nawledgelambo posted:Yea pretty much, the only thing thats been shown was a bit that someone cobbled up from mining the data files. This, MoMA is showing us is indisputable evidence of Star Marine being "in" 2.6. Meanwhile Derek is 100% convinced that it isn't in the build itself, as readily being accessible. I constitute the latter being correct, considering the leaks being posted in the subreddit, none of them have shown actual gameplay.
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2016 22:02
|
|
|
CrcleSqreSanchz posted:Hmmm I walk like 17km a day, and need good boots for the -50 winters. My preference is rugged footwear that can take abuse. Day to day I wear some of these but patent leather at the moment  I like them they are comfy and shiny 
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2016 22:02
|
|
|
Derek has been wrong about literally everything except the Aegis POTATO and Moma's only correct prediction was some form of 2.6 going to avocado the other day so until either one of them shows proof I'm sticking with they are both full of poo poo but I am enjoying the slapfight immensely.
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2016 22:03
|
|
|
Smug and sassy Moma is really brightening up the threadOl Cactus Dick posted:Derek has been wrong about literally everything except the Aegis POTATO and Moma's only correct prediction was some form of 2.6 going to avocado the other day so until either one of them shows proof I'm sticking with they are both full of poo poo but I am enjoying the slapfight immensely. hell, fair
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2016 22:02
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2016 22:03
|
|
|
Beer4TheBeerGod posted:So if I understand things right, Derek is saying that Star Marine isn't in the Evocati build, but MoMA is saying that Derek is wrong because the Evocati build apparently includes the Star Marine files that are playable if you somehow hack the client similar to what people did years ago when the Illfonic stuff was accessible? Beer-evocati are playing and testing it right now. Derek is saying it's not even in there.
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2016 22:03
|
|
|
TheAgent posted:whoa star marine is 12v12!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! T-T-T-T-T-TABLE BREAKER! FATALITY!
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2016 22:04
|
|
|
TheAgent posted:hmm wait moma whats your stance on pizza? Not touching this one at all.
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2016 22:04
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2016 22:04
|
|
|
sounds like derek and moma are cruisin towards a showdown at the  corral
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2016 22:05
|
|
|
peter gabriel posted:Day to day I wear some of these but patent leather at the moment I used to wear those when I was a kid, had a billion tags hanging off em.
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2016 22:05
|
|
|
ManofManyAliases posted:Not touching this one at all. At least he is showing proper shame over his ridiculous hipster pizza preference.
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2016 22:05
|
|
|
Beer4TheBeerGod posted:So if I understand things right, Derek is saying that Star Marine isn't in the Evocati build, but MoMA is saying that Derek is wrong because the Evocati build apparently includes the Star Marine files that are playable if you somehow hack the client similar to what people did years ago when the Illfonic stuff was accessible? Yes.
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2016 22:05
|
|
|
D_Smart posted:As soon as you post the part where there is ANY indication that Star Marine is in the Evocati 2.6 build, we can have a meaningful dialog. ktnx bye. Oh. Only the imaginary people I speak with must be playing it then. I'm not outing anyone or giving into this reverse psychology. Go play it if you have evocati (you don't).
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2016 22:06
|
|
|
Ol Cactus Dick posted:It's ok, quoting me can apparently be detrimental to your ability to have your posts read by the wahlord. Perhaps I should add a warning label. You see, goons? We don't have to fight each other! We can get along! We're stronger together!
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2016 22:06
|
|
|
tooterfish posted:Old school Kickers? Yeah! Just one tag on these but they are shiny so that's the good thing
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2016 22:07
|
|
|
like "Oh Star Marine is cancelled or Where's Star Marine!?" Star Marine was just a game mode for people to play the FPS elements of Star Citizen until we could combine everything together: Flying, walking around, shooting, doing all the rest of the stuff, all together, that is what is in 2.0, that's what it's 2.1. and that's what's in 2.6
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2016 22:08
|
|
|
peter gabriel posted:The best way of understanding it is this: But Derek has expressed a dislike of pizza, and MoMA has expressed no preference, so it balances out. Or we just don't care.
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2016 22:08
|
|
|
ManofManyAliases posted:Oh. Only the imaginary people I speak with must be playing it then. I'm not outing anyone or giving into this reverse psychology. Go play it if you have evocati (you don't). Do you have first hand knowledge of Star Marine or is it just the sources you have are so trustworthy to you that you will stand by them?
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2016 22:08
|
|
|
tooterfish posted:But, the watertight NDA?!? Yeah, considering all the images of the Caterpillar and the bar, the NDA is as solid as MoMa's cast-iron ToS that was torn to shreds, then eviscerated by the State of CA.
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2016 22:08
|
|
|
peter gabriel posted:Do you have first hand knowledge of Star Marine or is it just the sources you have are so trustworthy to you that you will stand by them? Yes.
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2016 22:10
|
|
|
Xarbala posted:
Welcome to my ignore filter
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2016 22:10
|
|
|
The Titanic posted:Because you are preparing for your great wolly mammoth hunt, no doubt, you big strong guy you with your aptitude for left and right differentiation. Were I to go, you'd say "Hit the left!" And I'd literally stab myself with my spear as I try to go around to the right side you wanted me to go to. Then I should pat you on the head, take the furs off your feet and walk you back to the firepit, since you couldn't POSSIBLY get back there on your own, amirite?
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2016 22:10
|
|
|
ManofManyAliases posted:Oh. Only the imaginary people I speak with must be playing it then. you jest but i'm starting to sincerely believe this
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2016 22:11
|
|
|
I am bamboozled
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2016 22:12
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 9, 2024 13:11 |
|
|
Meridian posted:The Titanic simply can't turn fast enough. SHE IS TOO AN AMBI-TURNER!
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2016 22:11
|
|