|
HopperUK posted:The Patrick Rothfuss thread over in TBB has convinced me that Name of the Wind is basically just Twilight for boys. I haven't heard this comparison before, but its incredibly apt. I like reading Kvothe's lines in Zapp's voice. "Each woman is like an instrument, waiting to be learned, loved, and finely played."
|
# ? Dec 4, 2016 16:39 |
|
|
# ? May 9, 2024 12:43 |
|
MorgaineDax posted:Thomas Kinkade's gently caress Cabin If this isn't a thread title
|
# ? Dec 4, 2016 16:42 |
|
Pastry of the Year posted:If this isn't a thread title I seriously think that name should be made on something more permanent. Like a house, or a boat.
|
# ? Dec 4, 2016 17:31 |
|
Even as a Name of the Wind fan, that Ferretbrain quote is especially on point. lovely boy wish fulfillment gets lauded while lovely girl wish fulfillment gets derided as the end of civilization. You want an even better example, look at how many Harry Dresden fans get huffy when you group those books in with that other big urban fantasy detective series, Anita Blake. It was inevitable that something with as much cultural saturation as Twilight would get a backlash of some sort. But it's also true that there's a kind of person who just lives to poo poo on girl's media and the backlash gave them a lot of license to do so.
|
# ? Dec 4, 2016 17:37 |
|
The Twilight series is pretty cool when she forgets about the romance poo poo and pretends she's writing X-Men instead. My favourite bit is when the guy who can read minds is playing chess with the girl who can see the future. They just stare at each other over the board and eventually one of them knocks over their king
|
# ? Dec 4, 2016 17:48 |
|
Most of the complaints I heard about Twilight were from the end of the series where things got weird like the baby and werewolf thing.
|
# ? Dec 4, 2016 17:52 |
|
I never heard of Name of the Wind before this thread; I heard about Twilight all the loving time from every corner. That's the main difference, Twilight became a huge success and a cultural phenomenon, so people went "well lemme just take a look at this book.... wow, pretty dumb, and actually really creepy". Wait until the movie of Name of the Wind comes out and the mainstream starts hearing about it and I bet you'll get the same response.
|
# ? Dec 4, 2016 18:37 |
|
muscles like this! posted:Most of the complaints I heard about Twilight were from the end of the series where things got weird like the baby and werewolf thing. Yeah imprinting on a fetus as a romantic partner, then the parent giving the baby to that person to raise is super hosed up
|
# ? Dec 4, 2016 19:31 |
|
Tunicate posted:Yeah imprinting on a fetus as a romantic partner, then the parent giving the baby to that person to raise is super hosed up At the same time, becoming pregnant with a monstrous vampire hybrid that is so strong it breaks your spine when it kicks is super hosed up
|
# ? Dec 4, 2016 19:37 |
|
Tunicate posted:Yeah imprinting on a fetus as a romantic partner, then the parent giving the baby to that person to raise is super hosed up Its okay, though. She grows up faster than a human, so the werewolf only needs to raise her until she's 7 years old.
|
# ? Dec 4, 2016 20:07 |
|
Dienes posted:Its okay, though. She grows up faster than a human, so the werewolf only needs to raise her until she's 7 years old. My mother apparently read these books and watched the movies for the first time a couple months ago. She was embarrassed to admit it, but she likes relationship schlock, so I wasn't too surprised. I was surprised she actually tried to defend the imprinting thing and used the "she grew up really fast" argument. I just kept saying "and she's 7."
|
# ? Dec 4, 2016 20:36 |
|
Name of the Wind is absolutely Twilight for boys.
|
# ? Dec 4, 2016 20:41 |
|
A couple years ago I got involved in a discussion over Bella Swan (and 50 Shades of Grey's protagonist who is Bella with the serial numbers filed off, and who is the same way) and her utter inhuman way of behaving. We concluded a lot of it came down to that instead of having an emotion and behaving like she's having an emotion, she thinks to herself about how she is having an emotion. It's poor writing, of course, in the vein of "show, don't tell," but someone remarked that it when it's used repeatedly like this, it makes Bella appear like she's some sort of robot who's honestly surprised that she's having emotions at all. This sounded to us like a much better book than what Twilight actually was: the story of a girl who is a robot and doesn't realise it, struggling to fit into normal society and not really managing because she just can't understand what passes for her own emotions. We then combined this with the only part of the book any of us found any interest in at all: the barely-there subplot of Bella not really being sure how to connect with her father. We imagined a book about Charlie Swan, small-town blue-collar mad scientist, and how he made himself a robot daughter. In his attempt to care for and protect her (mostly from herself until she learns how to be a functioning human being) he goes on to learn that the town doctor is a vampire and his best friend is a werewolf and that the town is under attack from evil forces blah blah. I don't know if it would've been a better book than Twilight, but it probably would have been more interesting.
|
# ? Dec 4, 2016 21:43 |
|
My favourite not-there subplot of Twilight is how Carlisle Cullen is a completely crazy person who is trying to force his century-old family into acting like a Regular Human Family. We play family baseball! THAT IS WHAT FAMILIES DO. GO TO SCHOOL. KIDS GO TO SCHOOL. We are a happy family. A HAPPY FAMILY.
|
# ? Dec 4, 2016 22:33 |
|
Dienes posted:I like reading Kvothe's lines in Zapp's voice.
|
# ? Dec 4, 2016 23:14 |
|
there wolf posted:Even as a Name of the Wind fan, that Ferretbrain quote is especially on point. lovely boy wish fulfillment gets lauded while lovely girl wish fulfillment gets derided as the end of civilization. You want an even better example, look at how many Harry Dresden fans get huffy when you group those books in with that other big urban fantasy detective series, Anita Blake. To be fair, Dresden Files is popcorn action schlock, Anita Blake is basically just pornography now.
|
# ? Dec 5, 2016 00:08 |
|
Wapole Languray posted:To be fair, Dresden Files is popcorn action schlock, Anita Blake is basically just pornography now. Why is popcorn action schlock better than popcorn orgasm schlock?
|
# ? Dec 5, 2016 00:57 |
|
quote:My name is Kvothe, pronounced nearly the same as “Quothe.” Names are important as they tell you a great deal about a person. I’ve had more names than anyone has a right to.
|
# ? Dec 5, 2016 01:31 |
|
Holy poo poo I was waiting for that to turn out to be a goon joke or something.
|
# ? Dec 5, 2016 01:37 |
|
Every one of those sentences sounds like it should have "This Troper" in front of it.
|
# ? Dec 5, 2016 01:38 |
|
WickedHate posted:Holy poo poo I was waiting for that to turn out to be a goon joke or something. Me too!
|
# ? Dec 5, 2016 01:40 |
|
Anil Dasharez0ne posted:Every one of those sentences sounds like it should have "This Troper" in front of it. quote:This Troper's name is Kvothe, pronounced nearly the same as “Quothe.” Names are important as they tell you a great deal about a person. This Troper has had more names than anyone has a right to. BravestOfTheLamps has a new favorite as of 01:50 on Dec 5, 2016 |
# ? Dec 5, 2016 01:46 |
|
I wonder if there's any way to get Billy West to read some selected passages in his Zapp voice.
|
# ? Dec 5, 2016 01:50 |
|
I thought Eragon was Twilight for boys.
|
# ? Dec 5, 2016 02:18 |
|
Eragon is more like knock off Star Wars.
|
# ? Dec 5, 2016 02:22 |
|
I haven't seen fanfic that poorly-written or blatantly gary-stuish in quite some time. Jesus.
|
# ? Dec 5, 2016 02:23 |
|
there wolf posted:Why is popcorn action schlock better than popcorn orgasm schlock? It's sort of like saying Captain America is just the same as Forrest Hump because they are both movies. One at our books is an action adventure series, one is a lady having an orgy to cast gently caress magic while banging a wereswan and a werewolf. Not saying one is better than the other, but there's a pretty big difference between them, regardless of them both being books.
|
# ? Dec 5, 2016 02:32 |
|
Stupid_Sexy_Flander posted:It's sort of like saying Captain America is just the same as Forrest Hump because they are both movies. They're saying both of them are low-brow wish fulfillment, which is true. They are also saying a certain type of readership passive aggressively defends one because it is wish fulfillment for men, but deride the other because it is wish fulfillment for women, which is also true. They're both poo poo, but some people try to pretend one is less poo poo because it has less loving, and frankly if I'm reading lovely wish fulfillment that's the opposite of what is good.
|
# ? Dec 5, 2016 03:56 |
|
Stupid_Sexy_Flander posted:It's sort of like saying Captain America is just the same as Forrest Hump because they are both movies. Person with magic powers in otherwise contemporary urban setting solves mysteries. Why would anyone think those books are ever in the same genre at all...
|
# ? Dec 5, 2016 04:19 |
|
See and I thought everybody knew that the Twilight backlash was because it was aimed at a female demographic. If you've read this thread from the beginning and somehow haven't clued into Twilight's hosed badness being pretty mild as far as popular fantasy writing goes, then I don't know what would do that for you.
|
# ? Dec 5, 2016 04:29 |
|
ryonguy posted:They're saying both of them are low-brow wish fulfillment, which is true. They are also saying a certain type of readership passive aggressively defends one because it is wish fulfillment for men, but deride the other because it is wish fulfillment for women, which is also true. Its not that Dresden is better because it has less loving. Its just that when Anita Blake shifted to urban fantasy smut (around book six, which is coincidentally when she went through a divorce and her husband and suspected co-author no longer worked with her) the writing quality went off a cliff.
|
# ? Dec 5, 2016 05:11 |
|
I think the issue with Twilight is not that it's Mary-Sue wish fulfillment, it's that it's pathetic wish fulfillment. Bella is just your average stupid teenager. The whole story is about her being pretty/sexy/special enough that superboys wanna gently caress her. Meanwhile boy wish fulfillment fantasy is being the most awesome at everything. It carries on to adulthood, too. Guys get James Bond. Girls get Sex and the City.
|
# ? Dec 5, 2016 05:29 |
|
Domus posted:I think the issue with Twilight is not that it's Mary-Sue wish fulfillment, it's that it's pathetic wish fulfillment. Bella is just your average stupid teenager. The whole story is about her being pretty/sexy/special enough that superboys wanna gently caress her. Meanwhile boy wish fulfillment fantasy is being the most awesome at everything. It carries on to adulthood, too. Guys get James Bond. Girls get Sex and the City. ... I don't even know where to start.
|
# ? Dec 5, 2016 05:42 |
|
I mean, besides "Source your quotes"
|
# ? Dec 5, 2016 05:47 |
|
I dunno, that's about the same point a friend of mine made when I mentioned the "Twilight for boys" comparison that was made here: one's about a guy who's amazing at everything, and the other's about a girl that stuff happens to/around.
|
# ? Dec 5, 2016 05:56 |
|
James Bond is not really comparable to a comedy show, imo
|
# ? Dec 5, 2016 05:59 |
|
I Killed GBS posted:James Bond is not really comparable to a comedy show, imo Fine, but I think the larger point is reasonable, that wish-fulfillment marketed to men and women is pretty different.
|
# ? Dec 5, 2016 06:04 |
|
Toast Museum posted:Fine, but I think the larger point is reasonable, that wish-fulfillment marketed to men and women is pretty different. The larger point wasn't that they were different; it was that they're better because men's fantasies are active while women's are passive. That's debatable on a couple of levels.
|
# ? Dec 5, 2016 06:52 |
|
there wolf posted:The larger point wasn't that they were different; it was that they're better because men's fantasies are active while women's are passive. That's debatable on a couple of levels. If that was the intent, then yeah, gently caress that. I took it as a comment on the different cultural conditioning of men and women.
|
# ? Dec 5, 2016 07:01 |
|
|
# ? May 9, 2024 12:43 |
|
Toast Museum posted:I took it as a comment on the different cultural conditioning of men and women. "Guys get James Bond. Girls get Sex and the City." That's not saying anything about men or women, only what popular culture serves them. And it's not positive. there wolf posted:The larger point wasn't that they were different; it was that they're better because men's fantasies are active while women's are passive. Sham bam bamina! has a new favorite as of 07:27 on Dec 5, 2016 |
# ? Dec 5, 2016 07:10 |