|
http://www.psp-tv.com/r/NiteCrew This poll is closed. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
 |
|
500562 | 49.92% |
 |
|
139 | 0.01% |
 |
|
153 | 0.02% |
 |
|
500888 | 49.95% |
 |
|
940 | 0.09% |
| Total: | 1002682 votes | ||
|
I know I'm late on this but what if I made and sold US flags that weren't accurate? Like 13 stripes and 49 stars. Could people legally burn those in the future? And if Trump gets in a nuclear war with China or India and flags get burned in the process does he get a ticket? Eddie Ballz
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2016 00:35
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 31, 2024 22:07 |
|
|
No he didnt. Unless this is his response. Or you count pence / Conway making up excuses as trumps response
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2016 00:35
|
|
|
next on trump's agenda: appoint colbert's character ching-chong ding-dong as ambassador to china
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2016 00:37
|
|
|
i can't believe identity politics caused ww3!
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2016 00:38
|
|
|
Karl Sharks posted:they can switch their industrial strength to other things a lot quicker than we can build new plants/find new suppliers in other countries What if that's the point of all this. Trigger a meltdown in the main engine of the globalist economy then use the resulting depression to justify massive infrastructure investment to win the support of the masses. The economy is too stable right now for fascists to take power, but kickstart a depression and all bets are off.
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2016 00:41
|
|
|
Lord of Pie posted:Trump loses half a Carrier every time he makes a deal but will be applauded for it 
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2016 00:42
|
|
|
Thatim posted:No he didnt. kk thanks... sry been out of tune all day but the trump/china thing is currently set to grab my ear
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2016 00:42
|
|
|
Brother Friendship posted:What if that's the point of all this. Trigger a meltdown in the main engine of the globalist economy then use the resulting depression to justify massive infrastructure investment to win the support of the masses. The economy is too stable right now for fascists to take power, but kickstart a depression and all bets are off. at this point, if he actually wanted a public infrastructure bill he's the one who could get it done look at how tepid the GOPe pushback is on anything to paraphrase van jones the other day "if a democrat wants to spend money to improve the country it's socialism, but if a republican does it it's patriotism"
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2016 00:43
|
|
|
Samurai Sanders posted:Did Trump ever respond to the Chinese response to his initial tweets and I missed it? I was dreading what he would say. Trump is going to start a twitter war with @china
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2016 00:44
|
|
|
Brother Friendship posted:What if that's the point of all this. Trigger a meltdown in the main engine of the globalist economy then use the resulting depression to justify massive infrastructure investment to win the support of the masses. The economy is too stable right now for fascists to take power, but kickstart a depression and all bets are off. My theory is that he continues the crazy for two years while abusing his power to negotiate with every country to build :TRUMP: hotels. At the end of year two he gets the Republicans and Democrats together and offers to step down in exchange for every tax break, holiday, and easement imaginable. He could make $100 billion easily and join his buddy Putin in the 9 digit club that he's always aspired to.
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2016 00:47
|
|
|
Trump unclenches wang
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2016 00:47
|
|
|
Hey y'all, I think we've might have screwed up on this one.
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2016 00:51
|
|
|
Karl Sharks posted:at this point, if he actually wanted a public infrastructure bill he's the one who could get it done It's an open question what a massive influx of stimulus would do to the economy when it is relatively healthy. We need better wealth distribution, reduced working hours and benefit revamps to stabilize the economy, not a tax cut masquerading as a stimulus plan (This is what Trump is actually proposing). He's not even proposing the thing that would -actually- be useful, which is massive structural spending in infrastructure to revamp our civilization to fit in with the 21st century. I already budgeted to buy a massive chest freezer and make a poo poo ton of food to stock up for a long work season come January. It looks like I'll also be stocking up on grains, spices and canned goods as well! Worst case I don't shop for a year, best case I become a king...A KING!
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2016 00:50
|
|
|
The Puppet Master posted:Hey y'all, I think we've might have screwed up on this one. Don't blame me I voted for harambe
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2016 00:53
|
|
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l-uqZJwOieA
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2016 00:54
|
|
|
orange sky posted:Trump unclenches wang Umm it didnt even make it to court
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2016 00:54
|
|
|
Brother Friendship posted:It's an open question what a massive influx of stimulus would do to the economy when it is relatively healthy. We need better wealth distribution, reduced working hours and benefit revamps to stabilize the economy, not a tax cut masquerading as a stimulus plan (This is what Trump is actually proposing). He's not even proposing the thing that would -actually- be useful, which is massive structural spending in infrastructure to revamp our civilization to fit in with the 21st century. oh i'm not saying go for trump's current plan/proposal, but i'm saying if anyone could do an honest to god new deal style infrastructure proposal and get it passed, it's probably trump at this point which is really sad, but yeah
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2016 00:55
|
|
|
i'm starting to regret convincing my 50,000 pennsylvanian relatives to all vote for trump
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2016 00:55
|
|
|
There is no way the GOP passes kensyian policies. Ever.
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2016 00:55
|
|
|
Guy DeBorgore posted:i'm starting to regret convincing my 50,000 pennsylvanian relatives to all vote for trump way to go, guy
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2016 00:56
|
|
|
Guy DeBorgore posted:i'm starting to regret convincing my 50,000 pennsylvanian relatives to all vote for trump Didn't know that there were so many Catholics in PA
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2016 00:56
|
|
|
Redgrendel2001 posted:To a certain degree, but China's advantage can be mitigated by moving manufacturing out of China and to Mexico/Vietnam/Thailand etc. I think that was what TPP was about. Too bad it won't get passed.
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2016 00:57
|
|
|
euphronius posted:There is no way the GOP passes kensyian policies. Ever.
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2016 00:57
|
|
|
Samurai Sanders posted:I still can't believe that I learned Keynes in macroecon class as if it was what was being practiced in America. What It was
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2016 00:58
|
|
|
euphronius posted:There is no way the GOP passes kensyian policies. Ever. They are going to do it. What do you think Reagan's gigantic increases in military spending were?
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2016 00:58
|
|
|
Samurai Sanders posted:I still can't believe that I learned Keynes in macroecon class as if it was what was being practiced in America. it isn't? the gently caress is it then
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2016 00:58
|
|
|
Vladimir Putin posted:They are going to do it. What do you think Reagan's gigantic increases in military spending were? Well if you butcher the sense of kensyian and new deal to include any gov spending i guess maybe
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2016 00:59
|
|
|
Brother Friendship posted:It's an open question what a massive influx of stimulus would do to the economy when it is relatively healthy. We need better wealth distribution, reduced working hours and benefit revamps to stabilize the economy, not a tax cut masquerading as a stimulus plan (This is what Trump is actually proposing). He's not even proposing the thing that would -actually- be useful, which is massive structural spending in infrastructure to revamp our civilization to fit in with the 21st century. If it comes to that I hope you have a generator for your chest freezer.
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2016 01:00
|
|
|
euphronius posted:There is no way the GOP passes kensyian policies. Ever. this is what my original post was in reply to: Brother Friendship posted:What if that's the point of all this. Trigger a meltdown in the main engine of the globalist economy then use the resulting depression to justify massive infrastructure investment to win the support of the masses. The economy is too stable right now for fascists to take power, but kickstart a depression and all bets are off. so obviously we're dealing in a hosed up weird reality
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2016 00:59
|
|
|
euphronius posted:Well if you butcher the sense of kensyian and new deal to include any gov spending i guess maybe Kensyian just means government counter cyclical spending. It doesn't say for what.
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2016 01:00
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2016 01:00
|
|
|
reminder that uspol is still a thing: http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3800396&userid=208548 http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3800396&userid=217666 (USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2016 01:00
|
|
|
Pollyanna posted:it isn't? the gently caress is it then
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2016 01:00
|
|
|
Karl Sharks posted:he doesn't type his own tweets, he just yells for one of the interns/staff to take down this tweet and send it out asap At 3 AM when he's raging over Alec Baldwin nailing another parody of him perfectly?
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2016 01:02
|
|
|
Anime Schoolgirl posted:reminder that uspol is still a thing: not clicking
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2016 01:05
|
|
|
It's much more likely the GOP would use a economic catastrophe to pass laws stripping the country of wealth and cracking down on political opposition then pass laws that would make Krugman horny.
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2016 01:07
|
|
|
Zyla posted:not clicking Don't worry, i did it's garbage, go on
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2016 01:07
|
|
|
HUGE PUBES A PLUS posted:At 3 AM when he's raging over Alec Baldwin nailing another parody of him perfectly? maybe not those times, but honestly it wouldn't surprise me? like he's all about work ethic so his staff, at least some of them, probably feel pressured to "work" just as hard as him
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2016 01:07
|
|
|
Guy DeBorgore posted:i'm starting to regret convincing my 50,000 pennsylvanian relatives to all vote for trump It's still kind of funny imo
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2016 01:09
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 31, 2024 22:07 |
|
|
euphronius posted:It's much more likely the GOP would use a economic catastrophe to pass laws stripping the country of wealth and cracking down on political opposition then pass laws that would make Krugman horny. i know, i'm just saying when we're talking about massive depression that leads to blatant fascism building up infrastructure, we're dealing in an unlikely world
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2016 01:09
|
|