|
Mirthless posted:Nah gently caress it dude what's the point now is the time, dont you see? the evil clinton monsters have finally been defeated after 30 years. the time to strike is now, before they hoist another one on us
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 22:38
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 11, 2024 20:32 |
|
|
Mirthless posted:Nah gently caress it dude what's the point Perhaps join the Know Nothing Matters Party
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 22:40
|
|
|
The Clinton Monster was definitely Lady Gagas weirdest album
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 22:41
|
|
|
Venom Snake posted:One of my biggest pet peeve's is morons saying that it's lying to tell these people that we can and will give them good high earning jobs. Like politics should be all about the inevitable rather than moving in a desired direction I saw people in D&D talking about how thousands of people are gonna lose their jobs when self-driving trucks become a thing. My thought is, why not just go ahead and ban self-driving trucks?
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 22:42
|
|
|
Guy Goodbody posted:I saw people in D&D talking about how thousands of people are gonna lose their jobs when self-driving trucks become a thing. My thought is, why not just go ahead and ban self-driving trucks? 
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 22:45
|
|
|
Burning Man has a cool area?
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 22:45
|
|
|
100 degrees Calcium posted:Burning Man has a cool area?
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 22:47
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 22:49
|
|
|
AceRimmer posted:https://www.theguardian.com/business/2016/may/02/further-future-festival-burning-man-tech-elite-eric-schmidt That is profoundly disgusting.
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 22:49
|
|
|
burning man is loving awful and if it wasn't so associated with drug use i wouldn't be surprised if clinton went during election season to shore up her cred
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 22:51
|
|
|
100 degrees Calcium posted:That is profoundly disgusting. *gunfire intensifies in the distance*
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 22:52
|
|
|
thats the problem with socialists, too many fuckin words
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 22:54
|
|
|
AceRimmer posted:https://www.theguardian.com/business/2016/may/02/further-future-festival-burning-man-tech-elite-eric-schmidt burning man is already for the 1%
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 22:55
|
|
|
Al! posted:thats the problem with socialists, too many fuckin words sustainable reelection strategy!
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 22:56
|
|
|
Tatum Girlparts posted:why do you feel it was part of some kind of conspiracy vs just a problem in the system or whatever, especially if your area still went Sanders? It wasn't "some kind of conspiracy", it was actual directives from DNC leadership to push the election towards the favored candidate. This isn't a matter of speculation, it's a matter of historical record. Where is this even coming from, Tatum? We argued at the time whether or not this was morally correct, but even before the DNC hacks most of us at least had the decency to agree that it was occurring. We KNOW it was occurring now. This isn't a matter for debate. FWIW I (still) don't think it impacted the results of the election besides maybe the margins Hillary won by but it's pretty willfully ignorant to deny that some shady business going on. (USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 22:56
|
|
|
Venom Snake posted:One of my biggest pet peeve's is morons saying that it's lying to tell these people that we can and will give them good high earning jobs. Like politics should be all about the inevitable rather than moving in a desired direction That's why the hate is so strong. Hate of the familiar is moat intense.
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 22:57
|
|
|
Zikan posted:burning man is loving awful and if it wasn't so associated with drug use i wouldn't be surprised if clinton went during election season to shore up her cred my friend who voted for Jill Stine love burning man, i rather stay home drink beer, play video games and watch old wrestling ppv's and not be in middle of a loving desert with shity hippie art. i rather go to the dells and i hate the dells.
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 22:59
|
|
|
I don't think it's possible to claim that the Democratic primary was unbiased when there were super delegates pledging votes before the first primary was held, and the media would show bar graphs showing one candidate with a huge lead over the other because of pledged super delegates. I don't think that means it was rigged, but it's undeniable that there were a lot of thumbs on the scale. (USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 22:59
|
|
|
Al! posted:thats the problem with socialists, too many fuckin words 
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 23:02
|
|
|
now thats a platform i can get behind
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 23:02
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 23:02
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 23:04
|
|
|
Guy Goodbody posted:I saw people in D&D talking about how thousands of people are gonna lose their jobs when self-driving trucks become a thing. My thought is, why not just go ahead and ban self-driving trucks? So you want progressives to try to ban progress? (USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST) (USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 23:03
|
|
|
is there a point to burning man or does it exist now to fulfill its own hype
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 23:03
|
|
|
logikv9 posted:If you have ever stepped inside a bank before, you're going to be put against the wall well poo poo I cashed in some federal savings bonds last month, that's me marked for death I guess
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 23:04
|
|
|
Fulchrum posted:So you want progressives to try to ban progress? logikv9 posted:is there a point to burning man or does it exist now to fulfill its own hype
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 23:05
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 23:06
|
|
|
logikv9 posted:is there a point to burning man or does it exist now to fulfill its own hype Smelly hippie sex.
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 23:06
|
|
|
AceRimmer posted:The same point as Woodstock, casual sex under a thick veneer of bullshit see also every convention ever
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 23:07
|
|
|
democrats 2020: smashy smashy
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 23:08
|
|
|
Guy Goodbody posted:I saw people in D&D talking about how thousands of people are gonna lose their jobs when self-driving trucks become a thing. My thought is, why not just go ahead and ban self-driving trucks? That's luddite thinking. The better way is to say, hey now instead of having to sit on your rear end for 12 hours a day in your truck. You can sit on your rear end for 12 hours a day from the comfort of your home because we are going to implement a GMI and UHC with all the savings automation will give us.
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 23:08
|
|
|
Powercrazy posted:That's luddite thinking. The better way is to say, hey now instead of having to sit on your rear end for 12 hours a day in your truck. You can sit on your rear end for 12 hours a day from the comfort of your home because we are going to implement a GMI and UHC with all the savings automation will give us. because people generally want to feel like productive members of society and sitting on your rear end all day without a job is, and I speak from personal experience, really loving awful
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 23:10
|
|
|
hello i wish to learn more about smashy-smashy. do you have some sort of newsletter
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 23:11
|
|
|
Fulchrum posted:So you want progressives to try to ban progress? We could, but that still leaves the underlying problem that capitalism demands everyone be working all the time (assuming they're not a plutocrat of course) but also gives an edge to companies that lower worker pay and adopt technologies that reduce their workforce. Basically, we could ban self-driving cars, but we should really just cut to the chase and ban capitalism.
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 23:11
|
|
|
Well What Now posted:because people generally want to feel like productive members of society and sitting on your rear end all day without a job is, and I speak from personal experience, really loving awful I mean you don't have to sit on your rear end. That's the best part. If you want to get a job and enjoy some supplementary income, you can! The important part is that you don't HAVE to.
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 23:11
|
|
|
paranoid randroid posted:hello i wish to learn more about smashy-smashy. do you have some sort of newsletter It's just some Gallagher videos.
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 23:12
|
|
|
"Ha, all these dumb libertarians think they're going to be the next Rockefeller when their crazy ideas are implemented!" *starts picking out a street samurai wardrobe for the cyberpunk future, is murdered by an angry mob for $10 worth of Top Ramen*
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 23:13
|
|
|
freckle posted:It's just some Gallagher videos. Typical leftists with awful local organization!
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 23:13
|
|
|
paranoid randroid posted:hello i wish to learn more about smashy-smashy. do you have some sort of newsletter 
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 23:12
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 11, 2024 20:32 |
|
|
paranoid randroid posted:hello i wish to learn more about smashy-smashy. do you have some sort of newsletter we were going to print one, but amanda got a bit overzealous and smashy-smashy'd the printing press
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 23:12
|
|
