|
Enderzero posted:Oh my god man, I was referring to the part where he says he wants to see Negan rape someone I may have misread that. I was reading it as sarcasm because he knew it wouldn't happen, period. I've got no desire to see someone get raped. Hell, I'm glad they cut down the Maggie-Governor rape and skipped the Michonne rape entirely, big time. ED: Just in case there's any lingering confusion: I think rape is bad. I think Negan is also bad. I think Negan has earned a death sentence he's so bad. I think wasteland societies can redefine the law anyway they want. There. Literally all I did was compare the situation to real world laws, which I had absolutely no part in writing, to explain why some people (including the character himself) have a hosed up morality. Never wavered on any of these points. Blazing Ownager fucked around with this message at 23:07 on Dec 7, 2016 |
# ? Dec 7, 2016 23:04 |
|
|
# ? May 23, 2024 17:48 |
|
A True Jar Jar Fan posted:In the comics we soon learn that Negan is a secret gayman and all he does is feed these women cake, I read ahead and I'm ok with him now. Yea, but in the next chapter it's revealed he's a Mormon secret gayman, so those ladies still gotta be his slaves in the after-life.
|
# ? Dec 7, 2016 23:04 |
|
Blazing Ownager posted:
Enderzero posted:This isn't a loving court and we aren't jurors. Using simple principles of reason we can see that Negan is a rapist. But until we see Negan's pale rear end bouncing and the woman under him screams for him to stop and he doesn't he's just not a rapist. He's just a very very influential man. I don't however expect to see anything resembling that, ever, because AMC would never show anything like that. As to the Olivia comment; her emotional breakdown to Negan's mere presence is just so delicious. I really really want them to push that to the absolute edge; and then for them to jump completely off the deep end and really cement Negan's rape side with her specially. If their gonna make him a rapist then by god he needs to really rape someone suuuuper hard.
|
# ? Dec 7, 2016 23:10 |
|
Sjs00 posted:You really shouldn't insult people like that because technically he's correct. Negan hasn't yet accomplished, on screen, what by TWD and AMC's standards qualifies as rape. I think they standard set is twofold Cool thanks for the creepy post guy whose posts have stood out to me as being awful in the past, please quote me more and reply equally terribly
|
# ? Dec 7, 2016 23:12 |
|
So now we've got 3. How ignorant are you people? If I tell a girl at a party that she'll either gently caress me or i'll kill her best friend, just because a few call my bluff and say no doesn't mean the ones that say yes aren't being raped. What the gently caress is wrong with you people
|
# ? Dec 7, 2016 23:13 |
|
Also you guys need to relax on the whole "THIS IS RAPE" There's Rape, and there's sexual assault and you guys are confusing the poo poo out of those 2 terms.
|
# ? Dec 7, 2016 23:14 |
|
I thought Sjs's Olivia comment was just a way of saying he thinks she's hot, and that was ok, I like her too. But then it got weird.jfood posted:Yea, but in the next chapter it's revealed he's a Mormon secret gayman, so those ladies still gotta be his slaves in the after-life. drat, Kirkmam is GOOD. A True Jar Jar Fan fucked around with this message at 23:19 on Dec 7, 2016 |
# ? Dec 7, 2016 23:14 |
|
Sjs00 posted:I guess I vener really hated Lori too much because of loving Andrea Yeah you are loving terrible
|
# ? Dec 7, 2016 23:15 |
|
Dalael posted:Also you guys need to relax on the whole "THIS IS RAPE" Sexual assault is grabbing someone by the pussy in our future president's terms. Rape is either forceful sex, or sex by coercion. Sex by coercion is not "sexual assault" by any rational or legal definition.
|
# ? Dec 7, 2016 23:16 |
|
Sjs00 posted:As to the Olivia comment; her emotional breakdown to Negan's mere presence is just so delicious. I really really want them to push that to the absolute edge; and then for them to jump completely off the deep end and really cement Negan's rape side with her specially.
|
# ? Dec 7, 2016 23:18 |
|
Sjs00 posted:I guess I vener really hated Lori too much because of loving Andrea Kill yourself in real life lmao
|
# ? Dec 7, 2016 23:20 |
|
yeah I eat rear end posted:Sexual assault is grabbing someone by the pussy in our future president's terms. Rape is either forceful sex, or sex by coercion. Sex by coercion is not "sexual assault" by any rational or legal definition.
|
# ? Dec 7, 2016 23:20 |
|
yeah I eat rear end posted:So now we've got 3. How ignorant are you people? If I tell a girl at a party that she'll either gently caress me or i'll kill her best friend That is rape. Absolutely. If you tell her that if she fucks you, you'll give her ten thousand dollars that's prostitution & solicitation. If you tell her that if she fucks you, you can give her a place to crash rent free, that's either prostitution/solicitation or coercion. Perhaps if you tell her that if she fucks you, you can pay for her friends cancer treatments that she will die without (a closer example). That's "ten billion shades of wrong and hosed up" but still not defined rape. The law is hosed up but rape laws are tricky specifically because of this. Again in the wasteland you can shoot someone for any reason you like, and judge them however you like. I'm just saying how it works outside of the show, lovely as some of it may be. PS: In all of the above you can be a terrible piece of poo poo, unless I suppose you have a enthusiastically willing hooker and are seriously offering $10,000. Then you're just terrible with money. Blazing Ownager fucked around with this message at 23:25 on Dec 7, 2016 |
# ? Dec 7, 2016 23:22 |
|
Parity warning posted:Cool thanks for the creepy post guy whose posts have stood out to me as being awful in the past, please quote me more and reply equally terribly Well sure since it seems to matter to you so much! yeah I eat rear end posted:So now we've got 3. How ignorant are you people? If I tell a girl at a party that she'll either gently caress me or i'll kill her best friend, just because a few call my bluff and say no doesn't mean the ones that say yes aren't being raped. What the gently caress is wrong with you people Dude have you ever been to a party? That's literally all we do. Death threats and rape. ..Seriously guys; Negan is a good character and exists incredibly in that gray-area of good vs. evil that it makes strangers on the internet argue heatedly about it. Has Rick ever raped anyone? No; but has he killed women and children? Absolutely. Negan doesn't do what most rapes begin and end with; poverty, physical abuse, depression. His wives are certainly in fear of him; but not for themselves, for their husbands and families. They know that as long as they continue to make the choices that they've made, they will live in safety and comfort. AMC could really keep this whole dynamic ambiguous or they could knock it out of the park i.e. screwing the (totally cute) heavy chick with glasses; or hell, do what I only wished they would after a certain line in S701 and that's Rape the gently caress out of fan-favorite crossbow boy Its getting dark here and this freak comes out at night
|
# ? Dec 7, 2016 23:23 |
|
Blazing Ownager posted:No, no I did not. I brought up a legal POV to look at it through, which seemed to determine he dodged that particular law (even afoul of many others) - what he was doing IS wrong by that standard, just not as severe. By a real world/legal standpoint. It's true, you have said he's a piece of poo poo. That doesn't detract from your attempts to derail this conversation by bringing up legal theories when we're discussing a post apocalyptic story. It's like trying to say the heroes are bad people for stealing and trespassing; technically true but ultimately irrelevant and it distracts from the real issue which is way too many people don't know what rape is and want to defend a rapist for some godforsaken reason.
|
# ? Dec 7, 2016 23:23 |
|
BO also wrote off Steven Avery and Brendan Dassey's innocence entirely in the first episode of Making a Murderer entirely because of one allusion to animal abuse, ssssssooooo
|
# ? Dec 7, 2016 23:24 |
|
That's not what Negan is offering though. He is saying you have a place to crash rent free, or you become his slave who will be killed if you try to run away. People have said in the show that working for points is worse than death. People in that system beg for death because it would be better. It's coercion, and therefore rape by any non-autist definition.
|
# ? Dec 7, 2016 23:24 |
|
Sjs00 posted:Well sure since it seems to matter to you so much! The more I read your posts, the more I think that the only thing stopping you from raping someone is the fact that there's fear of punishment.
|
# ? Dec 7, 2016 23:26 |
|
Enderzero posted:It's true, you have said he's a piece of poo poo. That doesn't detract from your attempts to derail this conversation by bringing up legal theories when we're discussing a post apocalyptic story. It's like trying to say the heroes are bad people for stealing and trespassing; technically true but ultimately irrelevant and it distracts from the real issue which is way too many people don't know what rape is and want to defend a rapist for some godforsaken reason. To be fair, real world law came up a lot debating murdering / jailing people last season. It just didn't get this much emotional response because you can talk about murdering somebody in the worst way possible, gently caress, flay their skin and then smash their head to a paste in front of loved ones - nobody bats an eye. If that same kind of conversation appears when the R word gets broken out, you get the Ghostbusters mass hysteria quote. ED: I honestly think there was potential for some discussion about laws needing reform in there, but it's impossible to have. There's tons of people out there this generation that freak out and have to flee in tears if they are 'triggered' by even SAYING the word rape.. and a lot of these people were, in fact, never raped. It's a conversation that just can't be had on the internet, I guess, which is kind of too bad because this emotional mob reaction is hurting, not helping, reform. Blazing Ownager fucked around with this message at 23:31 on Dec 7, 2016 |
# ? Dec 7, 2016 23:27 |
|
yeah I eat rear end posted:That's not what Negan is offering though. He is saying you have a place to crash rent free, or you become his slave who will be killed if you try to run away. People have said in the show that working for points is worse than death. People in that system beg for death because it would be better. It's coercion, and therefore rape by any non-autist definition. I'm gonna half-heartedly say that this right here is incorrect. You will be hunted down and killed if you a. Steal all the drugs and run or b. owe a lot; and then you will owe a lot more. If you for instance, ghosted the gently caress out on Negan in a car you had secretly stashed/ scavenged and left something of equal or greater value where the Saviors could find it (such as a nice chainsaw or functioning woodchipper) along with a note that said you would never be returning to the compound again I'm sure they would leave you be so long as you were 'square' . crazy cloud posted:Kill yourself in real life lmao https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=viaTT859Yk0
|
# ? Dec 7, 2016 23:29 |
|
Blazing Ownager posted:That is rape. Absolutely. Rape laws may be tricky but the definition of rape is not. If you shoot someone not in self defense, you are a murderer. You might not be convicted but that's because the legal system is preoccupied with not jailing innocent people while not having perfect information; not being convicted has nothing to do with whether you are a murderer or not. You are or you aren't in a platonic sense - the legal system exists as it does because we don't have perfect information about the world.
|
# ? Dec 7, 2016 23:30 |
|
Dalael posted:The more I read your posts, the more I think that the only thing stopping you from raping someone is the fact that there's fear of punishment. Oh absolutely, when the dead start to walk hide your rear end in a top hat goon This has been very entertaining folks
|
# ? Dec 7, 2016 23:32 |
|
Blazing Ownager posted:To be fair, real world law came up a lot debating murdering / jailing people last season. That would be fine if anyone had brought up the law before you. No one did, so it's out of bounds for this conversation. Yeah, college students may be a little overwrought sometimes near the fringes of accepted thought. If they are wrong, we should be able to explicate why, and that will drive us towards a more complete understanding of what rape is. This is not the place for this conversation and you brought it up in the worst way possible. You can see why people are reacting the way they are, yes? It's not some sort of automatic hysteria around this topic, it's that one piece of poo poo was trying to defend a loving comic character against being called a rapist. Enderzero fucked around with this message at 23:37 on Dec 7, 2016 |
# ? Dec 7, 2016 23:34 |
|
Enderzero posted:Rape laws may be tricky but the definition of rape is not. If you shoot someone not in self defense, you are a murderer. You might not be convicted but that's because the legal system is preoccupied with not jailing innocent people while not having perfect information; not being convicted has nothing to do with whether you are a murderer or not. You are or you aren't in a platonic sense - the legal system exists as it does because we don't have perfect information about the world. To me there's definitely a difference between failing to convict someone for violating rape laws, and being unable to bring rape charges because they did not violate rape laws. It's a murky, muddy subject with a lot of complexities and isn't as black & white as people wish it was. Markorjoshua posted:So much effort posting to defend rape Defending rational discussion isn't defending rape. Neither is discussing the law on it. Hell, I've suggested several times the law should change IRL so.. Blazing Ownager fucked around with this message at 23:38 on Dec 7, 2016 |
# ? Dec 7, 2016 23:35 |
|
So much effort posting to defend rape
|
# ? Dec 7, 2016 23:34 |
|
This really feels like the time someone should make a great 'tasteful rape' joke...
|
# ? Dec 7, 2016 23:36 |
|
Blazing Ownager posted:To me there's definitely a difference between failing to convict someone for violating rape laws, and being unable to bring rape charges because they did not violate rape laws. It's a murky, muddy subject with a lot of complexities and isn't as black & white as people wish it was. Dalael posted:Dude, just stop. While I understand what you're trying to explain, you will never come out on top of this conversation. It won't happen. You're just going to keep bringing up your points, and people will keep calling you a rape apologist. Here is not where you can argue the finer points of the law regarding rape.
|
# ? Dec 7, 2016 23:38 |
|
Blazing Ownager posted:To me there's definitely a difference between failing to convict someone for violating rape laws, and being unable to bring rape charges because they did not violate rape laws. It's a murky, muddy subject with a lot of complexities and isn't as black & white as people wish it was. I hear these statements all the time and they usually serve to keep the waters muddy to protect a rapist because they know him, or it's a celebrity, or they just have misogynist attitudes towards women that they won't admit to. It's not complex: if both parties consent throughout the entire act, it's not rape. Otherwise it is.
|
# ? Dec 7, 2016 23:40 |
|
I think the #1 problem with this whole generation and their general approach to topics is if they don't like the topic, instead of discussing it, they do one of four things: 1) Stick their fingers in their ears and ignore everything 2) Immediately attack the source of the things you don't like until it goes away 3) All of the above 4) Retreat to a place they can cry When there's 3+ pages of rape talk, simply discussing the real world laws - with no agenda to use them to justify anyone, and in fact suggesting they need a revamp - is not being a rape apologist. But because people only read one or two hot button words and see red, they act as above.
|
# ? Dec 7, 2016 23:41 |
|
Sjs00 posted:I'm gonna half-heartedly say that this right here is incorrect. You will be hunted down and killed if you a. Steal all the drugs and run or b. owe a lot; and then you will owe a lot more. If you for instance, ghosted the gently caress out on Negan in a car you had secretly stashed/ scavenged and left something of equal or greater value where the Saviors could find it (such as a nice chainsaw or functioning woodchipper) along with a note that said you would never be returning to the compound again I'm sure they would leave you be so long as you were 'square' . What makes you think that at all? When has someone left the Saviors free and clear in the show? Why would there even be a point system with negative consequences if you don't earn enough points if you weren't his property? If you left a woodchipper for Negan and he could find you again, you'd be dragged back so you could find him 2 woodchippers. There is no evidence in the show that you can buy out of Negan's system, he'll milk you until you are dry and then kill you.
|
# ? Dec 7, 2016 23:43 |
|
Blazing Ownager posted:I think the #1 problem with this whole generation and their general approach to topics is if they don't like the topic, instead of discussing it, they do one of four things: you are literally so dumb you don't know how to do an 'all of the above' joke. I have yet to take much issue with your beliefs on the law; I've been focused on pointing out the inappropriate way you brought it into an unrelated discussion. But it's easier to just claim everyone else has the problem, not you, isn't it.
|
# ? Dec 7, 2016 23:44 |
|
Blazing Ownager posted:I think the #1 problem with this whole generation and their general approach to topics is if they don't like the topic, instead of discussing it, they do one of four things: But do you honestly that Somethingawful.com is the right place to discuss this stuff? Have you ever seen a discussion on this site, not devolve into complete and utter poo poo?
|
# ? Dec 7, 2016 23:44 |
|
yeah I eat rear end posted:What makes you think that at all? When has someone left the Saviors free and clear in the show? Why would there even be a point system with negative consequences if you don't earn enough points if you weren't his property? If you left a woodchipper for Negan and he could find you again, you'd be dragged back so you could find him 2 woodchippers. There is no evidence in the show that you can buy out of Negan's system, he'll milk you until you are dry and then kill you. Haha; did you even watch the Tara episode
|
# ? Dec 7, 2016 23:45 |
|
Enderzero posted:I hear these statements all the time and they usually serve to keep the waters muddy to protect a rapist because they know him, or it's a celebrity, or they just have misogynist attitudes towards women that they won't admit to. It's not complex: if both parties consent throughout the entire act, it's not rape. Otherwise it is. It's not as simple as that for a ton of reasons. I mean, it is. If one of the parties does not consent, and it continues, that is rape. But what about situations where the consent was given for untoward reasons? That's what we're discussing here, because how to you define it? The help lines for women trapped in bad (but not necessarily legally abusive) relationships cover this as anything from "If you don't do it with me, I'm breaking up with you" to stuff like "If you don't do it I'll slander you and take the kids." That divide is absolutely massive. Then there's a whole lot of situations where both parties aren't on the same page: One thinks everything is 100% fine while the other feels like they were cornered, and neither honestly do not realize due to miscommunication. I mean party B is saying "Yes, do it" and Party A doesn't necessarily get why B is saying that, etc. Why I say it's super muddy and murky to define this stuff in advance. The very, very basic and most simple type of rape - "I said stop, and you aren't stopping" is black and white as hell. Either way, I'm not going to keep arguing it because most people read "Rape" they do not even stop to consider anything other than rage. Calm discussion about a flawed legal system is not tolerated. Blazing Ownager fucked around with this message at 23:48 on Dec 7, 2016 |
# ? Dec 7, 2016 23:44 |
|
Blazing Ownager posted:I think the #1 problem with this whole generation and their general approach to topics is if they don't like the topic, instead of discussing it, they do one of four things: Maybe the context of a creepy, abusive warlord with a harem of wives coerced into staying in said harem under threat/coercion isn't a really good one to try and discuss real world rape laws in. Or, you know, that trying to defend said creepy, abusive warlord under the context of "technically he didn't violate x law!" isn't a really good defense, and kind of makes you sound a bit creepy as well. Negan isn't a good character. He's a raging, abusive rear end in a top hat warlord. Trying to defend his actions on technicality of laws that no longer even exist in the show really isn't that flattering. Nor is trying to deflect blame to this idea that somehow the argument turning badly for the borderline to outright rape apologists is due to those gosh dern millennials being pansies that can't handle a little discussion on the finer points of rape related law.
|
# ? Dec 7, 2016 23:46 |
|
Welp.. I tried to stop this train for derailing.
|
# ? Dec 7, 2016 23:47 |
|
Sjs00 posted:Haha; did you even watch the Tara episode Unfortunately yes. And you are conveniently ignoring the "if he can find you again" part of my post. The moment Negan finds the lesbo beach hotel, he would at the very least kill them all. Rick will probably execute his masterful comic book revenge on Negan before then, but in the real world he would find them eventually. I mean they weren't exactly hiding with the bells and whatnot.
|
# ? Dec 7, 2016 23:48 |
|
Dalael posted:
You're probably right. But that really extends to the ENTIRETY of the internet, not just SA: People only like echo chambers on sensitive subjects, wherever you are. This will be my last reply on the subject. PS: I can't clarify enough that rape is bad, and Negan is bad. Whatever you take away from this, don't think I was defending him, I never was.
|
# ? Dec 7, 2016 23:50 |
|
Blazing Ownager posted:You're probably right. But that really extends to the ENTIRETY of the internet, not just SA: People only like echo chambers on sensitive subjects, wherever you are. This will be my last reply on the subject. You weren't, you were just saying his blatant rape by anyone's definition wasn't rape because under our legal system he might not get convicted for it. Thanks for going to bat for the comic book villain.
|
# ? Dec 7, 2016 23:52 |
|
|
# ? May 23, 2024 17:48 |
|
Blazing Ownager posted:When there's 3+ pages of rape talk, simply discussing the real world laws - with no agenda to use them to justify anyone, and in fact suggesting they need a revamp - is not being a rape apologist. But because people only read one or two hot button words and see red, they act as above. I'm looking this thread over again and there's no way that anybody who has been following it should be having this problem. poo poo, didn't you even at one point reprimand Eyochigan where you pointed out that Sherry became Negan's wife on the grounds that Dwight wouldn't be clubbed to death? Law be damned, that is rape. This thread has become loving surreal.
|
# ? Dec 7, 2016 23:53 |