|
listen guys, we gotta javascript here so should we just roll our own poo poo or what?
|
# ? Dec 13, 2016 16:34 |
|
|
# ? May 26, 2024 04:03 |
|
deploy the YospoScript
|
# ? Dec 13, 2016 16:35 |
|
HoboMan posted:listen guys, we gotta javascript here so what should we just roll our own poo poo or what? just hire some miserable son of a bitch to javascript for you, and when you cant bear to look at his face anymore fire him and replace him with the next millenial js programmer in line its the only way, don't touch the poop, etc.
|
# ? Dec 13, 2016 16:36 |
|
HoboMan posted:listen guys, we gotta javascript here so should we just roll our own poo poo or what? use react
|
# ? Dec 13, 2016 16:37 |
|
I second the suggestion to just do git command line. My experience with git gui is that they all do something strange at some point, and when you're doing merges/rebases I want to be up to my elbows in the muck otherwise if things go sideways it takes a lot longer to figure out in gui and you end up googling for command line fixes anyway.HoboMan posted:anyone heard of Aurelia? it's been pitched as our new js framework I would make a case that using something that doesn't have a long, proven track record of support and maintenance should be avoided. You could say something like "maybe in 3-5 years, Aurelia will be mature enough to be used in mission critical systems." Then just use react.
|
# ? Dec 13, 2016 16:37 |
|
Symbolic Butt posted:deploy the YospoScript
|
# ? Dec 13, 2016 16:38 |
|
VOTE YES ON 69 posted:just hire lol
|
# ? Dec 13, 2016 16:38 |
|
i would just use react, but all we really need is client-side databinding which doesn't look like react does very well?
|
# ? Dec 13, 2016 16:41 |
|
there's a web browser for classic Amiga that supports HTML4 and CSS2 with HTML5 support in planning stages it requires AGA or a video card and 32MB of RAM though so it doesn't work on my system
|
# ? Dec 13, 2016 16:41 |
|
Luigi Thirty posted:there's a web browser for classic Amiga that supports HTML4 and CSS2 with HTML5 support in planning stages
|
# ? Dec 13, 2016 16:46 |
|
how did you manage to get an even more obnoxious av
|
# ? Dec 13, 2016 16:48 |
|
hackbunny posted:how did you manage to get an even more obnoxious av hey now, my last av was good
|
# ? Dec 13, 2016 17:02 |
|
HoboMan posted:i would just use react, but all we really need is client-side databinding which doesn't look like react does very well? not to sound like a broken record but, maybe try knockout? it's the sweet spot imo when you aren't building a full on single page app but you need something better organized than jquery spaghetti. or just go with whatever because picking a js framework is no hill to die on.
|
# ? Dec 13, 2016 17:11 |
|
i learned some python, enough to automate all the boring stuff at my stupid job. i've done some projects in it for fun, learning something new with every one. i wouldn't call myself competent, but I can google what I don't know. what do I do next so that someone will actually pay me money for being a terrible programmer.
|
# ? Dec 13, 2016 17:14 |
|
jony neuemonic posted:not to sound like a broken record but, maybe try knockout? it's the sweet spot imo when you aren't building a full on single page app but you need something better organized than jquery spaghetti. no, not whatever. select whatever from one of the mature frameworks with good tooling. do not roll your own do not use some 2-month old fad project
|
# ? Dec 13, 2016 17:15 |
|
ultravoices posted:what do I do next so that someone will actually pay me money for being a terrible programmer. have you tried: apply for a programming job?
|
# ? Dec 13, 2016 17:15 |
|
Wheany posted:have you tried: no. will they know i'm a terrible programmer?
|
# ? Dec 13, 2016 17:17 |
|
Wheany posted:no, not whatever. yep i misread and thought his team had already decided on it. hoboman die on the hill.
|
# ? Dec 13, 2016 17:18 |
|
ultravoices posted:no. will they know i'm a terrible programmer? probably
|
# ? Dec 13, 2016 17:18 |
|
HoboMan posted:probably will i still get a job?
|
# ? Dec 13, 2016 17:18 |
|
Bloody posted:I wonder what the compiler spits out for that multiply now that I remember the details of the cpu. I bet it's not good i have nerd sniped myself hard enough that now that im in front of IAR i am finding this out! the original problem: code:
interestingly, when i switch to a multiply by a non-constant, it calls a hardware multiplier that the default-selected msp430 apparently has (and i didnt realize it had when i did the first example): code:
of course, this is all for 16-bit ints. in the 32-bit case, it still does rotations (and a whole lotta them) for the constant multiply and it uses the multiplier with its multiply-accumulate a whole bunch for the non-constant multiply
|
# ? Dec 13, 2016 17:22 |
|
ultravoices posted:will i still get a job? probably
|
# ? Dec 13, 2016 17:33 |
|
ultravoices posted:will i still get a job? probably not to get my first job i applied to three places a day for a solid month and did about a dozen interviews so... if i had done an internship somewhere it would have probably helped e: oh sorry i thought you said *the* job not *a* job. you probably will get one HoboMan fucked around with this message at 17:44 on Dec 13, 2016 |
# ? Dec 13, 2016 17:34 |
|
ultravoices posted:will i still get a job? sure
|
# ? Dec 13, 2016 17:36 |
|
Why would I want git support in my editor? Someone mentioned that a page or so ago, I think, and I'm genuinely curious what the benefits are. I usually just keep a terminal open in another workspace and use git cli there and I've never felt constrained by that.
|
# ? Dec 13, 2016 17:40 |
|
Wheany posted:sure applies for: junior junior junior terrible programmer
|
# ? Dec 13, 2016 17:40 |
|
Nehacoo posted:Why would I want git support in my editor? Someone mentioned that a page or so ago, I think, and I'm genuinely curious what the benefits are. I usually just keep a terminal open in another workspace and use git cli there and I've never felt constrained by that. almost like different people have different workflows that fit them best
|
# ? Dec 13, 2016 17:44 |
|
Nehacoo posted:Why would I want git support in my editor? Someone mentioned that a page or so ago, I think, and I'm genuinely curious what the benefits are. I usually just keep a terminal open in another workspace and use git cli there and I've never felt constrained by that. they usually have some kind of highlighting for new/changed/deleted lines and modified files which is pretty useful even if you're doing all your git stuff in a terminal.
|
# ? Dec 13, 2016 17:45 |
|
Nehacoo posted:Why would I want git support in my editor? Someone mentioned that a page or so ago, I think, and I'm genuinely curious what the benefits are. I usually just keep a terminal open in another workspace and use git cli there and I've never felt constrained by that. rightclick file -> commit
|
# ? Dec 13, 2016 17:46 |
|
Nehacoo posted:Why would I want git support in my editor? Someone mentioned that a page or so ago, I think, and I'm genuinely curious what the benefits are. I usually just keep a terminal open in another workspace and use git cli there and I've never felt constrained by that. use checkboxes to select files to commit, have a better text editor for the commit message, get a better graphical diff, do extra stuff like clean up or analyze code.
|
# ? Dec 13, 2016 17:46 |
|
ultravoices posted:i wouldn't call myself competent, but I can google what I don't know. This is literally the only thing you need to learn to be a programmer. Nehacoo posted:Why would I want git support in my editor? Someone mentioned that a page or so ago, I think, and I'm genuinely curious what the benefits are. I usually just keep a terminal open in another workspace and use git cli there and I've never felt constrained by that. In VS you get little captions at the top of functions saying "Last updated by Dumb rear end in a top hat 5 days ago with a commit note of 'Farts' and work item 'Needs more farts'". Branch, commit, merge, diff, never leave your IDE again! Chalks fucked around with this message at 17:53 on Dec 13, 2016 |
# ? Dec 13, 2016 17:47 |
|
Chalks posted:This is literally the only thing you need to learn to be a programmer. however in interviews theyll treat you like a criminal convict if you need to
|
# ? Dec 13, 2016 17:53 |
|
Chalks posted:This is literally the only thing you need to learn to be a programmer.
|
# ? Dec 13, 2016 17:54 |
|
HoboMan posted:probably not Yeah, as an entry-level programmer, you need to find just the right job offer that is looking for entry-level/junior devs. That being said, depending on the company/your market/your skills even if they don't say "looking for entry-level terrible programmer" if you have the skills they're looking for they might take you anyway. Just get comfortable with whiteboard exercises, i.e. don't worry about bombing out because you will as a entry-level but it won't matter if they really are willing to hire entry-level guys and train them up.
|
# ? Dec 13, 2016 17:56 |
|
anthonypants posted:if you want a job as a programmer there are a few other things you can google, like "fizz buzz [language]" i wonder how long it would take to figure out fizzbuzz in malbolge
|
# ? Dec 13, 2016 17:56 |
|
LeftistMuslimObama posted:however in interviews theyll treat you like a criminal convict if you need to No that's... I don't... If you're interviewed by competent managers/devs that should not happen at all. If you're not interview by competent managers/devs that think googling for answers is evil then my hot take is don't work there.
|
# ? Dec 13, 2016 17:58 |
|
Finster Dexter posted:If you're interviewed by competent managers/devs that should not happen at all. that's a pretty big if
|
# ? Dec 13, 2016 18:05 |
|
Finster Dexter posted:No that's... I don't... Yeah, in our interviews we intentionally set problems that require the solution to act unusually in certain conditions. They're free to use google to help them with the answer, but they'd better read and fulfil the specification. It's a much better test of someone's ability to actually carry out a real world task rather than their ability to pointlessly memorise algorithms.
|
# ? Dec 13, 2016 18:05 |
|
anthonypants posted:if you want a job as a programmer there are a few other things you can google, like "fizz buzz [language]" i can write a loop and know what a modulus operator is, i'm all set to get those dollars.
|
# ? Dec 13, 2016 18:08 |
|
|
# ? May 26, 2024 04:03 |
|
ultravoices posted:i can write a loop and know what a modulus operator is, i'm all set to get those dollars. if you move to cali and can bullshit a bunch of javascript buzzwords you could immediately be getting a deece six figgies even but then you would be living near sv and coding in js and personally even a deece six point five is not really tempting enough
|
# ? Dec 13, 2016 18:14 |