|
They must not be using QuickSync on the 6700k that is streaming like poo poo right?
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2016 22:33
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 13, 2024 23:04 |
|
|
So on that 6700K stream, are they just doing Software encoding at 1080P? Interesting but a good proof that More cores help gamers/streamers more than they might think depending on the codec used.
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2016 22:34
|
|
|
Most people streaming on a single PC use NVENC anyways, even though it's lower quality
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2016 22:35
|
|
|
lmfao that choppy rear end video is me trying to stream any modern game at higher than 720pRabid Snake posted:I hope AMD finally pushes Intel to make 6 or 8 cores the new enthusiast "consumer" standard for the $200-300 price range. So far it looks promising roadhead posted:They must not be using QuickSync on the 6700k that is streaming like poo poo right? you get steadier frame rates but lower ones if you use software encoding
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2016 22:35
|
|
|
Now that 95W is a single chip out of this gang. Do they have their own 140W sample to offer for those that want all the cores/power!? VEGA!
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2016 22:36
|
|
|
Here comes the price? edit: lolno
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2016 22:36
|
|
|
Price? Nah the price isn't happening today. edit: Instead have Ryzen and Vega together doing 4k stuff or something. But with Battlefront.
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2016 22:36
|
|
|
Ah, a hint of Vega this way comes
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2016 22:37
|
|
|
FaustianQ posted:I mean, overall presentation has been improved, but jesus this is so empty, and not a hint of Vega Dr. Su thanks you for setting up her "oh, and one more thing"
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2016 22:37
|
|
|
4K Vega Battlefront test? Why not BF1 to keep things consistent? lol *Keep Clapping as it loads on a spinny rust drive"...
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2016 22:38
|
|
|
i'm blueeeeee blue ballin
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2016 22:38
|
|
|
EdEddnEddy posted:4K Vega Battlefront test? 'cause Vega isn't a Titan X Pascal and can't pull that off.
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2016 22:38
|
|
|
Renee is so fired.
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2016 22:39
|
|
|
Okay so Q1 confirmed launch, which means February, March. VEGA, VEGA, VEGA.
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2016 22:40
|
|
|
teagone posted:Renee is so fired. 
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2016 22:40
|
|
|
Lol space battle even.. Welp. Oooo Rogue One DLC though.. Neato. also Renee has to be from Accounting or something.. Jeeze.
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2016 22:40
|
|
|
20 second countdown is ultracringe.
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2016 22:40
|
|
|
Ah. Yeah, nothing there with the Vega demo, just "it works", since we can't be sure of the settings or how heavy that unreleased DLC is
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2016 22:41
|
|
|
Price? Nah. Unless they want Keighly to announce the price.
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2016 22:41
|
|
|
NewFatMike posted:20 second countdown is ultracringe. It appears to not be an Offline test and more a sort of "Surprise new DLC" tease as well. But she should have had that thing counting down before they even got to her. So yea.
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2016 22:42
|
|
|
HalloKitty posted:Ah. Yeah, nothing there with the Vega demo, just "it works" no zen price blue balled 
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2016 22:42
|
|
|
HalloKitty posted:Ah. Yeah, nothing there with the Vega demo, just "it works" Last time AMD gave a demo of "it works" release was 3 months later. So I'm guessing a March, April release for Vega?
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2016 22:43
|
|
|
I would've been much more impressed if they had compared some numbers, showed benchmarks etc. Oh well, at least the chip looks like it can handle current gen games which is more than my last AMD CPU (FX-8150) could do.
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2016 22:43
|
|
|
Anime Schoolgirl posted:admittedly it's a map where amd cards poo poo the bed in but lol Yeah, that was some hardcore blueballing. Seems like they're not quite at the finishing line, and they really don't have the specific SKUs nailed down at this point, including boost clocks and pricing.
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2016 22:44
|
|
|
That looked pretty good all things considered. Especially if it's 5-600$ vs the equivalent -E series 1100$ pricetag.HalloKitty posted:Yeah, that was some hardcore blueballing. Or they just want Intel to jump the gun on any price drops/sudden new SKUs so they can adjust pre-launch.
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2016 22:44
|
|
|
What they should have said is this is the 2017 $1000 Dream PC for VR... But Instead it is the "Dream PC" for AMD execs everywhere. Still. 6900K performance mixed with 1080/TitanX performance for hopefully $1000 less than both those combined in a complete system... Might be a pretty good deal. However, we won't know today now will we? 
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2016 22:44
|
|
|
Gwaihir posted:That looked pretty good all things considered. Especially if it's 5-600$ vs the equivalent -E series 1100$ pricetag. Oh it did look good, and at a considerably lower TDP. But we really don't know the pricing, and we've only seen benchmarks that they've chosen to show so far.
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2016 22:46
|
|
|
So basically, AMD didn't blow it, but we'll see if they nailed it later. It just comes down to pricing and release date.
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2016 22:49
|
|
|
SwissArmyDruid posted:Blender and Handbrake tests seem relatively-free of shenanigans, even if anyone sane would be offloading to GPU instead. The Blender test is pretty convenient for AMD since its renderer doesn't have an Embree backend. If you did the same test with RenderMan, V-Ray or UE4 Lightmass I think you'd get a very different result 
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2016 23:03
|
|
|
Right, back at a real computer and not trying to listen to the stream and shitpost at traffic lights at the same time. I sense AMD missed a real technical marketing trick here. Instead of Zen + Vega @ 4K on Ultra at capped framerates, they should have done that @ 5K instead, just for the extra ooh, ahh. Also Renee is the new Tom. Assuming Zen delivers on all its promises I would favorably prefer AMD over an Intel chip, if only because it would most certainly have better price-to-perf. I'm not saying how much I'd shell out for one, no sense in giving away that kind of info to any AMD or Intel marketers lurking, but I would make the investment for a top-flight chip. (The VM machine has been too long in the planning.) repiv posted:The Blender test is pretty convenient for AMD since its renderer doesn't have an Embree backend. If you did the same test with RenderMan, V-Ray or UE4 Lightmass I think you'd get a very different result I did say _relatively_. My comment about GPU offload stands.
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2016 23:15
|
|
|
Let's see: broadwell territory? Score. Not like skylake is much better and at the discount, it'll be selling fast. Don't gently caress this up AMD/GloFo
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2016 23:16
|
|
|
Ya jinxed it, Glofo is gonna poo poo the bed now.
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2016 23:17
|
|
|
I earnestly believe AMD needs to match their quadcore SKU up against Skylake/Kabylake i3s to have a chance, as there is no way Bristol Ridge can fill those shoes.
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2016 23:17
|
|
|
i'm the am4 platfrom
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2016 23:24
|
|
|
i'm the cpus with pins instead of land grids in tyool 2016
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2016 23:37
|
|
|
Boiled Water posted:i'm the cpus with pins instead of land grids in tyool 2016
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2016 00:02
|
|
|
Anyways, I think that there is one thing that we *can* concretely take away from today's marketing mess: Mobile parts based on Zen look to be very competitive.Gwaihir posted:Or they just want Intel to jump the gun on any price drops/sudden new SKUs so they can adjust pre-launch. That's a weak trick, and Chipzilla moves for no man. Like, we often think that Nvidia gets to demand whatever prices they want because they have a stranglehold on the market? But I don't think you quite appreciate Intel's position. We don't call them Chipzilla for nothing. repiv posted:i'm the am4 platfrom I see what you did there. Boiled Water posted:i'm the cpus with pins instead of land grids in tyool 2016 They don't. Anime Schoolgirl posted:i'm the pins that are so thin they're as durable as landing pins Semiconductor machinist here. More so. LGA pins are spring-loaded, and by definition, hollow at some point. Never mind how the ease of which it is to demolish an LGA socket is offset only by the total cost of replacement. SwissArmyDruid fucked around with this message at 03:19 on Dec 14, 2016 |
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2016 00:16
|
|
|
SwissArmyDruid posted:Artificial intelligence is genuinely stupid, I always say This was 100% true three years ago and is 100% false now.
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2016 03:27
|
|
|
repiv posted:The Blender test is pretty convenient for AMD since its renderer doesn't have an Embree backend. If you did the same test with RenderMan, V-Ray or UE4 Lightmass I think you'd get a very different result
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2016 03:32
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 13, 2024 23:04 |
|
|
Also, "Ryzen" as a name still reminds me of this guy: But hearing the word "Horizon" in the same sentence over and over is starting to rub off on me. =T Pryor on Fire posted:This was 100% true three years ago and is 100% false now. I bet your day job is to write clickbait news headlines. =(
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2016 03:44
|
|