|
I recently designed a logo for someone and discovered that I kinda enjoyed the process so I made a bunch of futuristic hexagon covered bullshit that you might find on a carbon fiber margarita machine or a cyberpunk bionic arm. It's strangely satisfying. Edit: Made a bij fucked around with this message at 19:46 on Dec 7, 2016 |
# ? Dec 2, 2016 14:11 |
|
|
# ? May 14, 2024 22:50 |
|
Procreate (probably the best iPad drawing app) just got a pretty major update. List of new things includes: PSD import(!), built in live streaming, keyboard shortcuts, and some nice layer management stuff.
|
# ? Dec 5, 2016 15:49 |
|
Crap posted:i don't know how you reached this or what it has to do with what i said, but i was being sincere blog?
|
# ? Dec 8, 2016 08:09 |
|
x x
|
# ? Dec 8, 2016 21:39 |
|
I was double sick so I'm only just now starting on christmas cards here's hoping i can finish this in time!
|
# ? Dec 12, 2016 21:22 |
|
|
# ? Dec 12, 2016 22:43 |
|
Festive!
|
# ? Dec 15, 2016 22:10 |
|
|
# ? Dec 16, 2016 13:13 |
|
Av, I'm not sure if its the awful app, but I can never seem to view your images.
|
# ? Dec 16, 2016 17:43 |
|
Monolith. posted:Av, I'm not sure if its the awful app, but I can never seem to view your images.
|
# ? Dec 17, 2016 14:29 |
|
Wrong. Avshalom is a gift to this and all threads
|
# ? Dec 17, 2016 15:53 |
|
Szmitten posted:Please don't encourage him. avs is a beautiful talented woman and should always be encouraged
|
# ? Dec 17, 2016 16:02 |
|
Done! now just gotta get it printed and send it off to my friend! (the back is so lazy but I have no energy left and I'm on the verge of sick again from working myself so hard)
|
# ? Dec 19, 2016 12:31 |
|
Lol
|
# ? Dec 19, 2016 17:00 |
|
do you like it or hate it or what??? One word vagueposts are frustrating! Diabetes Forecast fucked around with this message at 19:46 on Dec 19, 2016 |
# ? Dec 19, 2016 19:42 |
|
Diabetes Forecast posted:do you like it or hate it or what??? Clearly needs more robot labia. (Card looks great, even the low effort tree.)
|
# ? Dec 19, 2016 19:52 |
|
The background is much less detailed than the foreground and looks strange to me. Otherwise looks great!
|
# ? Dec 19, 2016 22:48 |
|
Yeah, I was major rushing through it all. Majority of the work was yesterday, with like 6 hours on it before I went to work, and then from 11p to 7am last night to finish it. I could definitely have done better. :/ Still I'm glad you like it, even with the faults. Maybe next year's card to John I won't get caught waiting to the last minute, haha. Diabetes Forecast fucked around with this message at 23:19 on Dec 19, 2016 |
# ? Dec 19, 2016 23:08 |
|
Either the people in the background are very tiny or the robot is very large.
|
# ? Dec 20, 2016 02:02 |
|
I think the problem is more that the road and grass don't look far enough away compared to the foreground. They're TECHNICALLY correct on my perspective grid, but I hosed up the sense of depth entirely. I could PROBABLY shave off some of the walkway and it'd look better, but... card's are already printed and the important one was sent off to Malta already. I'll have to do better next time I guess.
|
# ? Dec 20, 2016 02:13 |
|
Isn't the perspective grid showing that you made them as tall standing as she is sitting down
|
# ? Dec 20, 2016 04:19 |
|
...gently caress
|
# ? Dec 20, 2016 06:14 |
|
here have something kind of similar but not really at all i found a brush I like better than the one I was using before, still can't color though
|
# ? Dec 21, 2016 05:58 |
This is nifty. It's a digital drawing tablet from 1983. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0JXi1WSSfHw
|
|
# ? Dec 21, 2016 08:53 |
|
ugly flimsy looking joint was bugging me to death, figured out the starts of a good looking elbow setup. before: after: I'll add in a elbow pad in tomorrow that will tie it all together.
|
# ? Dec 26, 2016 10:28 |
|
I'm the subtly placed robotitties lurking in the background
|
# ? Dec 26, 2016 14:13 |
|
They're really not subtle.
|
# ? Dec 26, 2016 18:34 |
|
Is it wrong that I just leave my reference images on while I'm working??? (Though... I've had to deviate from the arm's joint so much that it's almost worthless to keep them up now...)
Diabetes Forecast fucked around with this message at 20:34 on Dec 26, 2016 |
# ? Dec 26, 2016 20:32 |
|
yes, it's illegal. please turn yourself in to the nearest police station.
|
# ? Dec 26, 2016 20:53 |
|
YOU'LL NEVER TAKE ME ALIVE, COPPER!
|
# ? Dec 26, 2016 21:21 |
|
Diabetes Forecast posted:Is it wrong that I just leave my reference images on while I'm working??? (Though... I've had to deviate from the arm's joint so much that it's almost worthless to keep them up now...) I really doubt people care about robot tits and labias. You did make a nice looking christmas card.
|
# ? Dec 26, 2016 21:38 |
|
Diabetes Forecast posted:YOU'LL NEVER TAKE ME ALIVE, COPPER! drat, outfoxed again by the robosex bandit!
|
# ? Dec 26, 2016 21:45 |
|
Monolith. posted:I really doubt people care about robot tits and labias. You did make a nice looking christmas card. I do I care
|
# ? Dec 26, 2016 23:31 |
|
Troposphere posted:I do Do you think the tits are big enough or should they be bigger then? Wait aren't you an rear end person? I forget.
|
# ? Dec 27, 2016 05:38 |
|
Make what you want, but the quality of feedback you're likely to get is inversely proportional to the probability that the image is intended as wank material. Have an onion being sliced.
|
# ? Dec 27, 2016 09:37 |
I remember when Robosexuals hung out in CYOAs instead of the art thread. Those were good days; a lot of good CYOAs back then. And they were on GBS, unharassed. This would have been well before the Applewhite fiasco of course. The reference drawing in the background is considered weird since you were showing the bust in the first face, and the face and bust in the second. Also, my gut feeling is that mechanism won't work too well without something to keep debris from getting stuck in the joint.
|
|
# ? Dec 27, 2016 12:05 |
|
It's coincidental placement of the camera, honest! Not literally everything is wank material just because there's a tid to be seen. I actually consider Melissa Roux/MRX to be a 'normal' character. She's intended as a singer/martial artist but I gotta model everything anyway else I won't be able to have a full clothes set and modular body/limb replacement sets. That other mono-eye robot I designed for a friend, though? That's way over on the lewd side and I'd never say otherwise. And yeah I'm currently working out what would be the best way to build a plate to fit over that joint. I've got an idea I'm testing at the moment, but failing that I might just go the Ingram approach of covering it with a cloth in the backside. Diabetes Forecast fucked around with this message at 20:18 on Dec 27, 2016 |
# ? Dec 27, 2016 20:13 |
|
Diabetes Forecast posted:Wait aren't you an rear end person? I forget. only the weak-hearted think it's either or
|
# ? Dec 27, 2016 22:41 |
|
Crap posted:only the weak-hearted think it's either or It's always worth asking! I mean I could make you your very own robo waifu!
|
# ? Dec 27, 2016 23:25 |
|
|
# ? May 14, 2024 22:50 |
|
Well, robots can't get pregnant don't tell me otherwise so this can't possibly go as wrong as the last attempt
|
# ? Dec 28, 2016 05:42 |