|
bloodychill posted:It could work. And the internet weirdo tears would be so plentiful and delicious. quite an experience, to live in fear
|
# ? Dec 20, 2016 13:32 |
|
|
# ? May 28, 2024 09:35 |
|
blade runner is my second favorite movie and any remake or sequel would probably be bad but they wouldn't change how good blade runner is. also yeah make a snatcher movie
|
# ? Dec 20, 2016 13:35 |
|
What's your favorite?
|
# ? Dec 20, 2016 13:36 |
|
the good the bad and the ugly
|
# ? Dec 20, 2016 13:37 |
|
Blade Runner is my third favourite movie of all time. Ghostbusters is fourth.
|
# ? Dec 20, 2016 13:39 |
Sakurazuka posted:Bladerunner remake where Deckard is played by a woman That sounds great.
|
|
# ? Dec 20, 2016 13:40 |
|
oddium posted:the good the bad and the ugly I like Once Upon A Time in the West better but that's a solid list
|
# ? Dec 20, 2016 13:41 |
|
oddium posted:the good the bad and the ugly Solid pick.
|
# ? Dec 20, 2016 13:42 |
|
oddium posted:blade runner is my second favorite movie and any remake or sequel would probably be bad but they wouldn't change how good blade runner is. also yeah make a snatcher movie oddium posted:the good the bad and the ugly You have great taste. And yeah, I know a sequel won't actually change how good Bladerunner is on its own. I just don't look forward to nerds talking about how the sequel determines the "canon" ending of Bladerunner.
|
# ? Dec 20, 2016 13:56 |
|
oddium posted:blade runner is my second favorite movie and any remake or sequel would probably be bad but they wouldn't change how good blade runner is. also yeah make a snatcher movie After being profoundly disappointed in Prometheus I honestly can't bring myself to really care or get upset at a Blade Runner sequel which yeah is probably going to ruin a lot of the mystique of the original. I've already been down that road when it comes to Ridley Scott Sci-Fi sequels/prequels. Also, happy Shantae day!
|
# ? Dec 20, 2016 13:59 |
|
I don't think about favorite movies often but I'd have to put Alien and Road Warrior in the list and they are very much opposites on the sequel quality scale. Aliens was great but other than some iconic scenes, the sequels were all garbage. Meanwhile everything after Road Warrior was great and I might be convinced Fury Road was better.
bloodychill fucked around with this message at 14:06 on Dec 20, 2016 |
# ? Dec 20, 2016 14:02 |
|
Fury Road is the best live-action film made this century
|
# ? Dec 20, 2016 14:04 |
|
I've come to terms with Alien 3 and don't hate it nearly as much as I did as a child, but that franchise has always truly been only a two film set in my mind.
|
# ? Dec 20, 2016 14:05 |
|
oddium posted:the good the bad and the ugly
|
# ? Dec 20, 2016 14:05 |
|
I watched Blade Runner for the first time earlier this year and honestly most of it went right over my head
|
# ? Dec 20, 2016 14:06 |
|
Alien 3 would be a cult SF classic if it didn't have the Alien name and retroactively ruin the ending of Aliens. The direction and soundtrack are top notch.
|
# ? Dec 20, 2016 14:06 |
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9XpXUAUe-yESakurazuka posted:Alien 3 would be a cult SF classic if it didn't have the Alien name and retroactively ruin the ending of Aliens. The direction and soundtrack are top notch. Having never seen any of the alien series, was alien 3 the one where it was like "btw those characters in the previous film died off screen" or was that something else
|
# ? Dec 20, 2016 14:08 |
|
Not exactly off screen but yes it killed all the characters that survived Aliens (not that there many mind you) apart from Ripley and made all the effort she went to pointless. Alien 3 was an amazing production mess and started shooting without even a finished script, it's actually amazing that it wasn't an utter disaster in every respect.
|
# ? Dec 20, 2016 14:10 |
|
Sakurazuka posted:Alien 3 would be a cult SF classic if it didn't have the Alien name and retroactively ruin the ending of Aliens. The direction and soundtrack are top notch. That's probably true. It's when you watch them in sequence that Alien 3 really suffers.
|
# ? Dec 20, 2016 14:12 |
|
Also the entire premise as to why Alien 3 happens at all is a fairly big plot hole that is poorly explained/handwaved, if you can say it is at all.
|
# ? Dec 20, 2016 14:13 |
|
Doesn't the girl die during hypersleep because of Alien infection?
|
# ? Dec 20, 2016 14:14 |
|
Healbot posted:Doesn't the girl die during hypersleep because of Alien infection? Explicitly no. I guess Alien 3 is a pretty good example of a sequel that retcons the poo poo out of a previous movie and I don't care at all. Maybe I can take that attitude into BR'49.
|
# ? Dec 20, 2016 14:18 |
|
Sakurazuka posted:Alien 3 would be a cult SF classic if it didn't have the Alien name and retroactively ruin the ending of Aliens. The direction and soundtrack are top notch. Fincher's one of the best directors around, yeah.
|
# ? Dec 20, 2016 14:18 |
|
Healbot posted:Doesn't the girl die during hypersleep because of Alien infection? From what I remember she dies during the crash landing caused by some facehuggers being on the ship somehow.
|
# ? Dec 20, 2016 14:19 |
|
Sakurazuka posted:From what I remember she dies during the crash landing caused by some facehuggers being on the ship somehow. I don't remember if the whole ship crashes. The cryosleep section is ejected. It's not out of the question that an alien actually hatched out of Hicks before the crash and ejected the pod, or damaged the ship and caused the pod to eject.
|
# ? Dec 20, 2016 14:34 |
|
The facehuggers loving about causes a fire that gets the cryo section ejected as a life raft yeah, but I'm almost certain the opening sequence shows one emerge from an egg that's impossible to be there. However it's been a while and I could be remembering wrong. E: yup it shows an empty egg for a second https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MhT4JbWscwI
|
# ? Dec 20, 2016 14:38 |
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CFwQBGL6pIc
|
# ? Dec 20, 2016 14:46 |
|
Snak posted:Explicitly no. Is there an indication that Blade Runner 2049 is going to retcon things from Blade Runner? Or is this a "just in case" thing?
|
# ? Dec 20, 2016 14:51 |
|
Harrow posted:Is there an indication that Blade Runner 2049 is going to retcon things from Blade Runner? Or is this a "just in case" thing? The original ending is lighter, which would be appealing to movie execs, but its also not the one most people are familiar with so its kind of a toss up. Tbh I kinda hope Drive 2049 bombs at release but then becomes a cult hit years later when the director's cut comes out.
|
# ? Dec 20, 2016 15:03 |
|
FirstAidKite posted:Having never seen any of the alien series, was alien 3 the one where it was like "btw those characters in the previous film died off screen" or was that something else
|
# ? Dec 20, 2016 15:04 |
|
Alfalfa The Roach posted:I watched Blade Runner for the first time earlier this year and honestly most of it went right over my head It's not very complicated. What about it confused you? Harrison Ford is a blade runner, a guy who hunts down rogue androids called replicants who violate their programmed directives. He's pulled in for a job to hunt four very dangerous replicants that are miners and military droids (iirc). As he does so he begins to fall in love with a woman, who turns out to be a replicant herself. He eventually kills them all except Rutger Hauer, their leader, who plays a violent game of cat-and-mouse with him in a derelict apartment building. Given the opportunity to kill Ford, Hauer saves his life in a demonstration of his mercy and humanity, then dies of natural causes (bc the replicants all have programmed obsolescence dates). Ford experiences a profound change of heart and goes on the run with the replicant he fell for, whose date is unknown, and who may die at any moment. Thematically, it's about transhumanist principles and mortality.
|
# ? Dec 20, 2016 15:10 |
|
Harrow posted:Is there an indication that Blade Runner 2049 is going to retcon things from Blade Runner? Or is this a "just in case" thing? I feel like Harrison Ford's character living for decades after the end of the first film is potentially a pretty big issue. They're either going to establish that he's not a replicant, or he's a special replicant. Either way I feel like there's gonna be a lot of explaining where none was needed.
|
# ? Dec 20, 2016 15:13 |
|
wizard on a water slide posted:It's not very complicated. What about it confused you? Actually it's about ethics in police procedure.
|
# ? Dec 20, 2016 15:14 |
|
wizard on a water slide posted:It's not very complicated. What about it confused you? there's way more to the movie than just the dry plot beats
|
# ? Dec 20, 2016 15:14 |
|
Don't watch the special editions first time though, Alien doesn't add much apart from a famous deleted scene that contradicts stuff set up in later films and Aliens is just too long though it adds a few interesting scenes.
|
# ? Dec 20, 2016 15:15 |
|
Sakurazuka posted:The facehuggers loving about causes a fire that gets the cryo section ejected as a life raft yeah, but I'm almost certain the opening sequence shows one emerge from an egg that's impossible to be there. However it's been a while and I could be remembering wrong. Yeah, but why is it impossible for the egg to be there? One stowaway carrying an egg is all it takes. But yeah, logistically it is kind of tricky. Like I said, it's a retcon I don't have any problem with, because it's a very solid "well what if this happened" way to continue the story, and showing the egg is good storytelling shorthand to start the movie.
|
# ? Dec 20, 2016 15:19 |
|
Sakurazuka posted:Don't watch the special editions first time though, Alien doesn't add much apart from a famous deleted scene that contradicts stuff set up in later films and Aliens is just too long though it adds a few interesting scenes.
|
# ? Dec 20, 2016 15:22 |
|
Like I get the basic plot of Blade Runner but I had a harder time with the abstract symbolism (like the unicorn for instance)
|
# ? Dec 20, 2016 15:23 |
|
Yeah, it's a real shame the Aliens extended cut went with the Lord of the Rings philosophy of "put literally every deleted scene back in the movie". Some of the added scenes are really good, and some are terrible and pointless. It would be nice if there was a good extended cut... Edit: ^ it's not really that deep. Bladerunner, is, in my opinion, a very visceral and emotional movie, not an overly intellectual one. Which version of Bladerunner did you watch? Edit: I guess "not that deep" is the wrong phase. There is emotional depth there, but its not some complicated thing you have to figure out. My advice, if you want to "get it" better, is watch it more times. Snak fucked around with this message at 15:29 on Dec 20, 2016 |
# ? Dec 20, 2016 15:24 |
|
|
# ? May 28, 2024 09:35 |
|
I can't even remember, I wanna say the original but it's hard to tell
|
# ? Dec 20, 2016 15:28 |