|
3 DONG HORSE posted:Hi dudes, it's been a while I mean you drafted one last year and even though I don't believe in him he deserves more of a look than he's gotten. I guess Denver's hoping for OL and a RB at some point? Maybe a TE. Sanders and Thomas are still signed for a while correct?
|
# ? Dec 26, 2016 07:44 |
|
|
# ? May 11, 2024 11:06 |
|
Grittybeard posted:I mean you drafted one last year and even though I don't believe in him he deserves more of a look than he's gotten. I guess Denver's hoping for OL and a RB at some point? Maybe a TE. Oh that's exactly why a QB won't be drafted. Lynch was a trade up and has only played two games with fairly short notice each time, so I think he gets a good chance to compete next year DT and Sanders are both signed and we have lots of young, not-bad receivers as depth. It's definitely not a priority unless there's a steal. I think we go with an early TE, defensive depth (keep a good thing going), and OL followed by...maybe late round WR or RB? I imagine they avoid a higher RB pick since CJ is under contract and Booker looks decent. Who knows, RBs are a dime a dozen but maybe Elway wastes another pick on one because reasons. I guess it's about time to start reading up on college players e- I'm using rotoworld so not sure how accurate it is but here's the most important Broncos FAs in 2016: Shaq Barrett - LB (Exclusive Rights) Bennie Fowler - WR Brandon McManus - K (ER) Jordan Norwood - WR Max Paradis - C (RFA) DeMarcus Ware - LB Ware, Barrett, and Paradis are the only ones who would cost actual money, with the first costing the most. Side note, it's loving sad to look at the list to see how much money is being wasted on our ghost TEs. Ugh. After perusing the existing contracts, I think this is a likely Broncos priority: TE > OL >> WR~defensive depth >>> RB 3 DONG HORSE fucked around with this message at 08:08 on Dec 26, 2016 |
# ? Dec 26, 2016 07:53 |
|
Depending on how things shake up next week I think the Titans can have the Rams' pick be as high as 3 and their own pick be as high as 12. I'm in favor of both of those happening.
|
# ? Dec 26, 2016 08:29 |
|
3 DONG HORSE posted:Oh that's exactly why a QB won't be drafted. Lynch was a trade up and has only played two games with fairly short notice each time, so I think he gets a good chance to compete next year Sounds like your team is entering the OJ Howard sweepstakes https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f1vnP9FFigY https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wXuD5W66J7A
|
# ? Dec 26, 2016 14:17 |
|
Dr. Capco posted:Depending on how things shake up next week I think the Titans can have the Rams' pick be as high as 3 and their own pick be as high as 12. I'm in favor of both of those happening. But why, there's no QB replacement for our dead Mariota
|
# ? Dec 26, 2016 15:18 |
|
So it looks like the Eagles pick from the Vikings can be as high as 8 or as low as 18. Regardless of position, who should be the BPA in that low teens range? Positions of need IMO are CB/WR/OL
|
# ? Dec 26, 2016 15:54 |
|
Guys I like Mitch Trubisky now, definitely looks like a top 50 prospect
|
# ? Dec 26, 2016 16:46 |
|
What's the general feeling about this draft? I'm hearing no big time qbs? Is it weak or strong, or d heavy /o heavy or anything like that?
|
# ? Dec 26, 2016 18:38 |
|
I think it's broadly defense-heavy, there are only a couple of guys right now who look like first round OTs and WR isn't much better. There are a bunch of running backs though, it's both good at the top and deep. Of course it won't work out like that because teams will talk themselves into guys, but still it looks like a good year to need D. Grittybeard fucked around with this message at 18:53 on Dec 26, 2016 |
# ? Dec 26, 2016 18:50 |
|
Grittybeard posted:I think it's broadly defense-heavy, there are only a couple of guys right now who look like first round OTs and WR isn't much better. There are a bunch of running backs though, it's both good at the top and deep.
|
# ? Dec 26, 2016 19:02 |
|
This sounds ideal.
|
# ? Dec 26, 2016 19:12 |
|
Grittybeard posted:Of course it won't work out like that because teams will talk themselves into guys, but still it looks like a good year to need D. ...would you say... secondary D?
|
# ? Dec 26, 2016 19:29 |
|
Probably Magic posted:...would you say... secondary D? Pending the combine, yeah it looks like there are a bunch of top 50 corners this year, Tennessee should be able to get someone (or someones) who are promising.
|
# ? Dec 26, 2016 19:38 |
|
Last year was supposed to be a weak QB draft and Goff/ Wentz still went 1 and 2. I want the QB hype train to start up again.
|
# ? Dec 26, 2016 19:52 |
|
Dr. Capco posted:Last year was supposed to be a weak QB draft and Goff/ Wentz still went 1 and 2. I want the QB hype train to start up again. I have a feeling Kizer will shoot up to No. 1 after the Combine even though I'm not totally sold on him at this point.
|
# ? Dec 26, 2016 21:19 |
|
Benne posted:I have a feeling Kizer will shoot up to No. 1 after the Combine even though I'm not totally sold on him at this point. This is a given. Remember how Jared Goff was a pro-ready prospect according to talking heads? It's in the NFL and the media's best interest for a QB to go #1
|
# ? Dec 26, 2016 22:27 |
|
Grittybeard posted:Pending the combine, yeah it looks like there are a bunch of top 50 corners this year, Tennessee should be able to get someone (or someones) who are promising. lol they're gonna draft Teez Tabor and I am gonna shoot my self
|
# ? Dec 26, 2016 22:41 |
|
NickRoweFillea posted:lol they're gonna draft Teez Tabor and I am gonna shoot my self He's pretty good tho? At least he's always giving the seminoles fits
|
# ? Dec 27, 2016 00:35 |
|
NickRoweFillea posted:lol they're gonna draft Teez Tabor and I am gonna shoot my self Please don't complain about drafting a corner tia
|
# ? Dec 27, 2016 00:36 |
|
DEHUMANIZE YOURSELF AND FACE TO MITCH TRUBISKY
|
# ? Dec 27, 2016 00:58 |
|
Dr. Capco posted:Last year was supposed to be a weak QB draft and Goff/ Wentz still went 1 and 2. I want the QB hype train to start up again. uh, not it wasn't. thrilla in vanilla posted:This is a given. Remember how Jared Goff was a pro-ready prospect according to talking heads? It's in the NFL and the media's best interest for a QB to go #1 jesus you guys are loving stupid.
|
# ? Dec 27, 2016 03:24 |
|
FizFashizzle posted:DEHUMANIZE YOURSELF AND FACE TO MITCH TRUBISKY
|
# ? Dec 27, 2016 03:28 |
|
warcrimes posted:uh, not it wasn't. Last year was a weak QB class. Unless you mean something else?
|
# ? Dec 27, 2016 04:33 |
|
Basically just ignore anything you hear about QB prospects:
|
# ? Dec 27, 2016 07:39 |
|
Kalli posted:Basically just ignore anything you hear about QB prospects: What is the problem with this analasis? the theory is tiny hands tiny dick he is trying to set his daughar up on a date this one time I was on a trip to band camp and the teacher and her assistant was trying to group us on the bus before we showed up to save time right, so she was measuring our hands and as a trombone player I had smalle hands and had to set in the back while those loving trumpet players with all there brash style and dressing abilities not to mention there muscial skill all got to set in the front, I got not proof but I think they got jacked off from the ta while I was looking out the window with tears in my eyes feeeling like the rosa parks or sexual opression Winkie01 fucked around with this message at 09:23 on Dec 27, 2016 |
# ? Dec 27, 2016 09:19 |
|
I'm sure you can find plenty of talking heads who considered Goff to be "pro-ready," but at the time that description was relative to the other quarterbacks in the draft since Cal is noted for not using a "pro-style offense." Of course that wasn't exactly correct either but it wasn't as stupid as you believe.
|
# ? Dec 27, 2016 11:16 |
|
Winkie01 posted:What is the problem with this analasis? the theory is tiny hands tiny dick he is trying to set his daughar up on a date lol
|
# ? Dec 27, 2016 12:37 |
|
Winkie01 posted:What is the problem with this analasis? the theory is tiny hands tiny dick he is trying to set his daughar up on a date Holy poo poo hahahaha
|
# ? Dec 27, 2016 14:58 |
|
This is one of the funniest goddamn things I have ever read
|
# ? Dec 27, 2016 18:44 |
|
oh wow
|
# ? Dec 27, 2016 22:37 |
|
Winkie01 posted:What is the problem with this analasis? the theory is tiny hands tiny dick he is trying to set his daughar up on a date help
|
# ? Dec 28, 2016 00:38 |
|
Winkie01 posted:What is the problem with this analasis? the theory is tiny hands tiny dick he is trying to set his daughar up on a date god drat
|
# ? Dec 28, 2016 02:28 |
|
That quote has had me laughing my rear end off all day. It's like the old Phenazepam or Ambien quotes.
|
# ? Dec 28, 2016 05:39 |
|
Winkie01 posted:What is the problem with this analasis? the theory is tiny hands tiny dick he is trying to set his daughar up on a date
|
# ? Dec 28, 2016 05:46 |
|
thrilla in vanilla posted:This is a given. Remember how Jared Goff was a pro-ready prospect according to talking heads? It's in the NFL and the media's best interest for a QB to go #1 Rams are not a pro team.
|
# ? Dec 28, 2016 20:48 |
|
big money big clit posted:Henry is 13th in the YPC list. Guys around him: Jaquizz Rodgers at 15; Matt Jones at 9. Bills Powell way up at 1; Mark Ingram at 3. This is from last page but 4.5 ypc is well above league average. Yah it's a smaller sample size with only ~100 carries but that is a lot better than "not bad". What will be most important is to see if he can maintain that YPC with a higher workload. His YPC is essentially identical to Murray's, but he has 1/3 the carries. Pretty sure any team would want a guy putting up 1200+ yards on 270 carries over the year. Would be interesting to see Henry's run distribution mapped out like in the Ground Control thread. I know he has been used a decent amount at the goal line.
|
# ? Dec 28, 2016 21:35 |
|
|
# ? Dec 29, 2016 03:49 |
|
lol
|
# ? Dec 29, 2016 03:52 |
|
to be fair all of Kansas State's designed QB run plays look like they're the slowest thing in the world until suddenly they're 10 yards down field and you have no idea how they did it
|
# ? Dec 29, 2016 07:17 |
|
|
# ? May 11, 2024 11:06 |
|
slow and steady wins the race
|
# ? Dec 29, 2016 09:08 |