|
If you mistook a horrifying CGI ghoul/puppet for a real person (the face in motion, not just a still photograph or from behind or whatever) that is a sign there is something profoundly wrong with your brain as it has failed one of its most fundamental tasks. e: Like, do you have trouble differentiating store mannequins from real people? Do you find Bethesda games to be100% photorealistic?
|
#
?
Dec 29, 2016 08:59
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 16, 2024 21:43 |
|
|
Oh, Mike.
|
|
#
?
Dec 29, 2016 09:06
|
|
|
Good to have some new spank bank material, thank you.
|
|
#
?
Dec 29, 2016 09:07
|
|
|
Did he have that chinstrap purely for that acting role he had, or was that a legit look he was going for at the time? Cause god-drat, that's the type of guy on the other side of the camera that took the pic of women all "No, don't come any closeI'MDEADNOW."
|
|
#
?
Dec 29, 2016 09:11
|
|
|
Guy Goodbody posted:If you stayed as an animal for more than two hours you were stuck and could never turn back. In the first book one of them got stuck as a red-tailed hawk But it meant he never had to go back to his abusive home so he was fine with it. He just lived in the woods and ate baby rabbits So that explains current Mike.
|
|
#
?
Dec 29, 2016 09:26
|
|
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=odj6NHsWe00
|
|
#
?
Dec 29, 2016 12:23
|
|
|
Impressive they compiled how wrong both extremes are.
|
|
#
?
Dec 29, 2016 12:33
|
|
|
PRO CLICK AS gently caress!!! I CLAPPED BECAUSE I KNOW STAR WARS!!!!
|
|
#
?
Dec 29, 2016 12:51
|
|
|
oohhboy posted:Impressive they compiled how wrong both extremes are. A lot of people don't get that RLM are mostly making fun of reaction videos and clickbait site hype, which absolutely is that bad if you haven't been to those corners of the internet recently. "Why are those guys being so mean... THEY MUST THEMSELVES BE BUTT HURT!" (furiously posts to Twitter)
|
|
#
?
Dec 29, 2016 15:23
|
|
ME
|
oohhboy posted:A bit hard to find someone that evil outside of the Republican party. JB50 posted:Any Clinton would do. lol sometimes the forums are like the comments section of any news article ever.
|
|
#
?
Dec 29, 2016 15:50
|
|
|
That's a good and funny video and I even liked the movie RLM are good and I know this is the internet but I think it's good to try and not get butthurt whenever you disagree with someone
|
|
#
?
Dec 29, 2016 16:11
|
|
|
Gammatron 64 posted:That's a good and funny video and I even liked the movie No you see, the real social media points go to the person who is totally ignorant of the issue, who won't even bother to read about the issue, who comes in and acts like they're above the people in the discussion because they refuse to engage the debate at all and thus the people involved in the debate are (insert stereotypes about target group). That way when they cry into their sink and punch the mirror at night they know it's all been worth it.
|
|
#
?
Dec 29, 2016 18:14
|
|
|
I will slay anyone who doesn't like films I like with my light sabre.
|
|
#
?
Dec 29, 2016 19:07
|
|
|
I get red in the face and my heart starts racing and then steam comes out of my ears and then i scream and cry and cry and cry if other people don't like the movie that i liked
|
|
#
?
Dec 29, 2016 19:29
|
|
|
Coming out of the theatre most of the chatter was all "wow how did they do the makeup to make Carrie fisher look so young" "they guy playing tarkin was really good" "did they get a younger actress and put make up on her??" "I understand how they did her face but how did they make her body look young??!" "Isn't the guy who played that old guy dead? Did they just find someone else who looked like him??" Apparently CGI is a totally unknown concept to a lot of the movie going public. I get my grandma in the 90's not understanding how they trained a pig to look like it's talking, but not understanding that poo poo in 2016?
|
|
#
?
Dec 29, 2016 19:42
|
|
|
God help the human race
|
|
#
?
Dec 29, 2016 20:17
|
|
|
Baronjutter posted:Coming out of the theatre most of the chatter was all "wow how did they do the makeup to make Carrie fisher look so young" "they guy playing tarkin was really good" "did they get a younger actress and put make up on her??" "I understand how they did her face but how did they make her body look young??!" "Isn't the guy who played that old guy dead? Did they just find someone else who looked like him??" People think of CGI as like, Jar Jar Binks. Or Transformers. A completely fake thing inserted into an otherwise real scene. They don't think about it as something used to change an existing thing. I don't think most people realize that there was a ton of CGI in Breaking Bad, for example.
|
|
#
?
Dec 29, 2016 20:18
|
|
|
thats hosed up
|
|
#
?
Dec 29, 2016 20:55
|
|
|
most people are loving stupid.
|
|
#
?
Dec 29, 2016 21:05
|
|
|
Baronjutter posted:Coming out of the theatre most of the chatter was all "wow how did they do the makeup to make Carrie fisher look so young" "they guy playing tarkin was really good" "did they get a younger actress and put make up on her??" "I understand how they did her face but how did they make her body look young??!" "Isn't the guy who played that old guy dead? Did they just find someone else who looked like him??" I am very surprised by that. The Tarkin CGI was very obvious, and I'm not sure why they didn't work around it. I legit thought he wasn't going to turn around in the first scene, and then we'd maybe see voice or hologram communication, but instead they really went for it. I guess whoever they focus tested it with was convinced enough for them to go with it. And if it worked for most people, I guess it was the right decision after all. Still stood out to me though.
|
|
#
?
Dec 29, 2016 22:12
|
|
|
I just watched GB2016. It was meh. Not terrible, not good. The RLM guys were mostly right.
|
|
#
?
Dec 30, 2016 01:14
|
|
|
Are you people just upset Tarkin wasnt played by a sexy indian child?
|
|
#
?
Dec 30, 2016 02:18
|
|
|
Nutsngum posted:Are you people just upset Tarkin wasnt played by a sexy indian child? I don't get it
|
|
#
?
Dec 30, 2016 02:51
|
|
|
Baronjutter posted:Coming out of the theatre most of the chatter was all "wow how did they do the makeup to make Carrie fisher look so young" "they guy playing tarkin was really good" "did they get a younger actress and put make up on her??" "I understand how they did her face but how did they make her body look young??!" "Isn't the guy who played that old guy dead? Did they just find someone else who looked like him??" Most people I know leave on that horrible setting on TVs that smoothes the framerate so everything looks like a soap opera. People are loving blind.
|
|
#
?
Dec 30, 2016 04:21
|
|
|
Nutsngum posted:Are you people just upset Tarkin wasnt played by a sexy indian child? I wasn't before, but now that you mention it... 
|
|
#
?
Dec 30, 2016 04:49
|
|
|
KakerMix posted:I don't get it Jungle Book was full of realistic CG animals and sometimes kid? I'm reaching here but it's the only connection I can make.
|
|
#
?
Dec 30, 2016 05:11
|
|
|
Mu Zeta posted:Most people I know leave on that horrible setting on TVs that smoothes the framerate so everything looks like a soap opera. People are loving blind. if you didn't turn that off all your family's tvs when visiting for the holidays you should be written out of the will.
|
|
#
?
Dec 30, 2016 06:07
|
|
|
dreezy posted:if you didn't turn off all your family's tvs when visiting for the holidays you should be written out of the will.
|
|
#
?
Dec 30, 2016 06:20
|
|
|
Well I finally saw Rogue One. I thought it was entertaining and well-done but it has some plot holes I'm trying not to think about. Went with a friend who isn't a Star Wars fan and he was really confused by the beginning. It made sense to me, but I'm familiar with the universe and its bullshit. CGI Tarkin and Leia didn't look bad though. Vader seemed more 'off' and he wasn't CGI.
|
|
#
?
Dec 30, 2016 16:41
|
|
|
Vader felt super fan-filmy. I know they were trying to make everything look like the crappy New Hope era costumes, but the crappy costumes mixed with an actor who wasn't quite shaped and didn't quite move like Vader and putting it all in a ridiculous lava castle that looked like a rejected lord of the rings set didn't help.
|
|
#
?
Dec 31, 2016 00:56
|
|
|
star wars is poo poo and now i know how people who hate comic book movies feel now
|
|
#
?
Dec 31, 2016 02:02
|
|
|
FuturePastNow posted:Well I finally saw Rogue One. I thought it was entertaining and well-done but it has some plot holes I'm trying not to think about. Went with a friend who isn't a Star Wars fan and he was really confused by the beginning. It made sense to me, but I'm familiar with the universe and its bullshit. Tarkin didn't look bad, he just didn't look real. Like, if this had been a completely CGI movie, I would have thought "wow, that's amazing, they've really come a long way with animating people." Putting him next to real live people made me think "holy christ, that was a bad idea."
|
|
#
?
Dec 31, 2016 02:48
|
|
|
Loden Taylor posted:Tarkin didn't look bad, he just didn't look real. Like, if this had been a completely CGI movie, I would have thought "wow, that's amazing, they've really come a long way with animating people." Putting him next to real live people made me think "holy christ, that was a bad idea." I agree, every scene I saw with him completely distracted me and was bad.
|
|
#
?
Dec 31, 2016 02:53
|
|
|
I proudly admit to not minding Tarkin at all. The battalion of CGI and visual effects artists employed by Disney(tm) don't come to where you assholes work and slap the dicks out of your mouths. Let's see you resurrect the dead with 100% fidelity.
|
|
#
?
Dec 31, 2016 04:00
|
|
|
It just wasn't necessary. They could have given more lines to Vader or just Krennic and made all the Tarkin stuff a hologram like Snoke.
|
|
#
?
Dec 31, 2016 04:03
|
|
|
Mu Zeta posted:It just wasn't necessary. They could have given more lines to Vader or just Krennic and made all the Tarkin stuff a hologram like Snoke. This. I really expected Tarkin to just speak through a reflection in the glass like when we first see him. I can't believe they went as far as they did. If you can't pull off the CGI with 100% certainty, then don't loving do it. We're still not quite there yet. Maybe another 5 years of CGI?
|
|
#
?
Dec 31, 2016 04:21
|
|
|
They could have also used an actor who even slightly resembled Peter Cushing and used makeup and facial prosthetics to finish the job. Practical effects didn't stop being a thing. The audience understands this film is being made almost 40 years after the original trilogy, they're not going to leave the theater because Grand Moff Tarkin looks slightly different than he did in the other movie. They didn't do CGI Mon Mothma, and that was fine. Why Tarkin?
|
|
#
?
Dec 31, 2016 04:45
|
|
|
Loden Taylor posted:They could have also used an actor who even slightly resembled Peter Cushing and used makeup and facial prosthetics to finish the job. Practical effects didn't stop being a thing. My bet is that it's the CGI studio that wanted to win an oscar for best effects if they could pull it off.
|
|
#
?
Dec 31, 2016 04:54
|
|
|
Also Mon Mothma was just some lady, Tarkin was played by a legend of the silver screen. Recasting the role would open the filmmakers up to just as much criticism. They should have written around the problem.
|
|
#
?
Dec 31, 2016 05:11
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 16, 2024 21:43 |
|
|
Tacky-rear end Rococco posted:Also Mon Mothma was just some lady, Tarkin was played by a legend of the silver screen. Recasting the role would open the filmmakers up to just as much criticism. They should have written around the problem. I agree. There was no reason to make Tarkin CGI
|
|
#
?
Dec 31, 2016 05:17
|
|